Ultra-Peripheral Collisions in STAR: Current Results and Future Prospects - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Ultra-Peripheral Collisions in STAR: Current Results and Future Prospects

Description:

Ultra-Peripheral Collisions in STAR: Current Results and Future Prospects Spencer Klein, LBNL (for the STAR Collaboration) What are ultra-peripheral collisions? – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:151
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 45
Provided by: Preferr778
Learn more at: https://www.star.bnl.gov
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Ultra-Peripheral Collisions in STAR: Current Results and Future Prospects


1
Ultra-Peripheral Collisions in STAR Current
Results and Future Prospects
Spencer Klein, LBNL (for the STAR Collaboration)
  • What are ultra-peripheral collisions?
  • Impact Parameter tagging and multiple
    interactions
  • STAR r0 Results at 130 GeV/nucleon
  • Preliminary r0 and ee- Results from 200 GeV
  • UPC Future Prospects
  • Conclusions

2
Coherent Interactions
  • b gt 2RA
  • no hadronic interactions
  • ltbgt 20-60 fermi at RHIC
  • Ions are sources of fields
  • photons
  • Z2
  • Pomerons or mesons (mostly f0)
  • A 2 (bulk) A 4/3 (surface)
  • Fields couple coherently to ions
  • Photon/Pomeron wavelength l h/pgt RA
  • amplitudes add with same phase
  • P? lt h/RA, 30 MeV/c for heavy ions
  • P lt gh/RA 3 GeV/c at RHIC
  • Strong couplings --gt large cross sections

3
Unique Features of Ultra-peripheral collisions
  • Very strong electromagnetic fields
  • g --gt ee- and g --gt qq
  • Multiple production
  • Coherent Decays
  • Unique Geometry
  • 2-source interferometer
  • Nuclear Environment
  • Particle Production with capture
  • Large s for e-

4
Specific Channels
  • Vector meson production
  • gA -- gt r0, w, f, J/y, A
  • Production cross sections --gt s(VN)
  • Vector meson spectroscopy (r, w, f,)
  • Wave function collapse
  • Multiple Vector Meson Production Decay
  • Electromagnetic particle production
  • gg -- gt leptons,mesons
  • Strong Field (nonperturbative?) QED
  • Za 0.6
  • meson spectroscopy Ggg
  • Ggg charge content of scalar/tensor mesons
  • Ggg is small for glueballs

ee-, qq,...
gs
Za 0.6 is Ng gt 1?
5
Exclusive r0 Production
  • One nucleus emits a photon
  • Weizsacker-Williams flux
  • The photon fluctuates to a qq pair
  • The pair scatters elastically from the other
    nucleus
  • qq pair emerges as a vector meson
  • s(r) 590 mb 8 of sAuAu(had.) at 200
    GeV/nucleon
  • 120 Hz production rate at RHIC design luminosity
  • RHIC r, w, f, r rates all gt 5 Hz
  • J/y , Y, f, w, copiously produced, U a
    challenge
  • The LHC is a vector meson factory
  • s(r) 5.2 b 65 of sPbPb (had.)
  • 230 kHz r0 production rate with calcium

6
Elastic Scattering with Soft Pomerons
  • Glauber Calculation
  • parameterized HERA data
  • Pomeron meson exchange
  • all nucleons are the same
  • s A2 (weak scatter limit)
  • All nucleons participate
  • J/y
  • s A 4/3 (strong scatter limit)
  • Surface nucleons participate
  • Interior cancels (interferes) out
  • s A 5/3 (r0)
  • depends on s(Vp)
  • sensitive to shadowing?

Y 1/2 ln(2k/MV)
7
Shadowing Hard Pomerons
  • If pomerons are 2-gluon ladders
  • P shadowing (gluon
    shadowing)2
  • Valid for cc or bb
  • ds/dy s depend on gluon distributions
  • reduces mid-rapidity ds/dy
  • Suppression grows with energy
  • s reduced 50 at the LHC
  • colored glass condensates may have even bigger
    effect
  • high density phase of gluonic matter

RHIC - Au
No shadowing
HERA param.
ds/dy
Leading Twist Calculation Frankfurt, Strikman
Zhalov, 2001
Shadowed
Y 1/2 ln(2k/MV)
8
Multiple Interactions
  • Za 0.6
  • Ng gt1 quite likely
  • Multiple Interactions
  • Photon emission is independent
  • S. N. Gupta (1950)
  • (Mostly) different interactions factorize

9
Nuclear Excitation
  • Nuclear excitation tags small b
  • Multiple photon exchange
  • Mutual excitation
  • Au decay via neutron emission
  • simple, unbiased trigger
  • Multiple Interactions probable
  • P(r0, b2R) 1 at RHIC
  • P(2EXC, b2R) 30
  • Non-factorizable diagrams are small for AA

10
Photonuclear Interaction Probabilities ds/dy
  • Excitation r0 changes b distribution
  • alters photon spectrum
  • low ltbgt --gt high ltkgt

r0 with gold _at_ RHIC
ds/dy
y
Exclusive - solid X10 for XnXn - dashed X100 for
1n1n - dotted
Baltz, Klein Nystrand (2002)
11
gg with nuclear breakup
dN/dy for f2(1270) gold at RHIC
  • Impact parameter tagging similar for gg
  • f2(1270) cross sections
  • Breakup non-negligible
  • Tagging is less dramatic than for photoproduction
  • s(XnXn), s(1n1n)/s(tot) smaller
  • rapdity distributions less different

XnXn breakup
Rapidity
no breakup
12
gg --gt mm- w / nuclear breakup
  • Smaller ltbgt
  • harder photon spectrum
  • harder Mmm spectrum
  • s(XnXn), s(1n1n)/s(tot) ratio smaller than
    f2(1270)
  • smaller avg. mass

gg --gt mm- gold at RHIC
XnXn nobreak
XnXn breakup
Mmm(GeV)
13
Polarized Photons
  • Electric fields parallel to b
  • photon linear polarization follows b
  • not spin
  • Use 1 reaction to determine the polarization, to
    study a 2nd reaction
  • Correlated Decay angles
  • Use r0 -- gt pp- as analyzer
  • pp- plane tends to parallel photon pol.
  • Study VM production angles, single spin
    asymmetries in gA, etc.

b,E
(transverse view)
14
Polarized Photons
  • Electric fields parallel to b
  • photon polarization follows b
  • Use 1 reaction to determine the polarization, to
    study a 2nd reaction
  • Correlated Decay angles
  • Use r0 -- gt pp- as analyzer
  • pp- decay plane often parallels photon pol.
  • reasonable analyzing power
  • Study VM production angles, single spin gA
    asymmetries, etc.

15
Interference
  • 2 indistinguishable possibilities
  • Interference!!
  • Similar to pp bremsstrahlung
  • no dipole moment, so
  • no dipole radiation
  • 2-source interferometer
  • separation b
  • r,w, f, J/y are JPC 1- -
  • Amplitudes have opposite signs
  • s A1 - A2eipb2
  • b is unknown
  • For pT ltlt 1/ltbgt
  • destructive interference

No Interference
Interference
y0
r0 --gt pp- pT (GeV/c)
16
Entangled Waveforms
  • VM are short lived
  • decay before traveling distance b
  • Decay points are separated in space-time
  • no interference
  • OR
  • the wave functions retain amplitudes for all
    possible decays, long after the decay occurs
  • Non-local wave function
  • non-factorizable Yp p- ? Yp Yp-
  • Example of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox

17
Interference and Nuclear Excitation
  • Smaller ltbgt --gt interference at higher ltpTgt

r0 prod at RHIC
J/Y prod at the LHC
Solid - no breakup criteria Dashed lines 1n1n and
XnXn breakup
18
Multiple meson production
  • P(r0) 1 at b2RA
  • w/ Poisson distribution
  • P(r0r0) (1)2/2 at b2RA
  • 106 r0r0 /year
  • Enhancement (ala HBT) for production from same
    ion (away from y0)
  • Vector meson superradiance
  • toward a vector meson laser
  • Dp lt h/RA
  • Like production coherence
  • Large fraction of pairs
  • Stimulated decays?

Production with gold at RHIC
P(b)
b (fermi)
19
Angular Correlations in r0r0
  • r0 polarization follows the photon
  • r0r0 should have parallel polarization
  • pp- planes should be highly correlated

b,E
(transverse view)
20
(No Transcript)
21
(No Transcript)
22
r0 Analysis
  • Exclusive Channels
  • r0 and nothing else
  • 2 charged particles
  • net charge 0
  • Coherent Coupling
  • SpT lt 2h/RA 100 MeV/c
  • back to back in transverse plane
  • Backgrounds
  • incoherent photonuclear interactions
  • grazing nuclear collisions
  • beam gas interactions
  • upstream interactions
  • out-of-time events

23
Triggering Strategies
  • Triggering is the hardest part of studying UPCs!!
  • Ultra-peripheral final states
  • 1-6 charged particles
  • low pT
  • rapidity gaps
  • small b events
  • tagged by nuclear breakup

24
Peripheral Trigger Data Collection
  • Level 0
  • hits in opposing CTB quadrants
  • Rate 20-40 /sec
  • Level 3 (online reconstruction)
  • vertex position, multiplicity
  • Rate 1-2 /sec
  • 2000 prototype
  • 9 hours of data -gt 30,000 events
  • 2001 early production
  • few weeks -gt 1.5M events

25
Exclusive r0
  • 2 tracks in interaction region
  • vertex in diamond
  • reject cosmic rays
  • non-coplanar qlt 3 rad
  • peak for pT lt 150 MeV/c
  • pp and p-p- give background shape
  • pp- pairs from higher multiplicity events have
    similar shape
  • scaled up by 2.1
  • high pT r0 ?
  • asymmetric Mpp peak

Signal region pTlt0.15 GeV
r0 PT
M(pp-)
26
Minimum Bias Dataset
  • Trigger on neutron signals in both ZDCs
  • 800,000 triggers
  • Event selection same as peripheral
  • pp and p-p- model background
  • single (1n) and multiple (Xn) neutron production
  • Coulomb excitation
  • Giant Dipole Resonance
  • Xn may include hadronic interactions?
  • Measure s(1n1n) s(XnXn)

Signal region pTlt0.15 GeV
r0 PT
ZDC Energy (arbitrary units)
27
Direct p p- production
  • The two processes interfere
  • 1800 phase shift at M(r0)
  • changes p p- lineshape
  • good data with gp (HERA fixed target)
  • pp- r 0 ratio should depend on s(pA)s(rA)
  • decrease as A rises?

28
r0 lineshape
ZEUS gp --gt (r0 pp- )p
STAR gAu --gt (r0 pp- )Au
ds/dMpp (mb/GeV)
ds/dMpp (mb/GeV)
Preliminary
Mpp
Mpp
Fit to r0 Breit-Wigner pp- Modified Soding
approach Interference is significant pp-
fraction is comparable to ZEUS
ee- and hadronic backgrounds
Many other fits are possible
29
dN/dy for r0(XnXn)
Soft Pomeron, no-shadowing, XnXn
  • r ds/dy are different with and without breakup
  • XnXn data matches simulation
  • Extrapolate to insensitive region

After detector simulation
30
Cross Section Comparison
Baltz, Klein Nystrand (1999/2002)
  • Normalized to 7.2 b hadronic cross section
  • Systematic uncertainties luminosity, overlapping
    events, vertex tracking simulations, single
    neutron selection, etc.
  • Exclusive r0 bootstrapped from XnXn
  • limited by statistics for XnXn in topology
    trigger
  • Frankfurt, Strikman Zhalov predict 50 higher
    cross sections
  • Good agreement
  • factorization works

31
The 2001 data
  • 200 GeV/nucleon
  • higher cross sections
  • much higher luminosity
  • Production triggers
  • Minimum Bias data
  • 10X statistics
  • Topology Data
  • 20X statistics
  • Higher STAR B field
  • 0.5 T (2001) vs. 0.25 T (2000)
  • lower acceptance for low pT particles
  • shorter interaction region
  • sz 25 cm
  • Physics
  • precision r0 lineshape, pT spectra and helicity
    distribution
  • s(ee-) and theory comparison
  • 4-prong events (r(1450/1700)?)

32
Minimum Bias r0 at 200 GeV
  • 70 of minimum bias data processed so far
  • 1.7 million triggers
  • higher purity than 2000
  • Analysis same as for 2000 data

r0 PT
r0 PT
ZDC Energy (arbitrary units)
33
Minimum Bias r0 at 200 GeV
Rapidity
Mpp (GeV)
34
200 GeVExclusive r0
Signal region pTlt0.15 GeV
  • Almost same analysis as 130 GeV
  • smaller interaction diamond
  • 1.5 million triggers
  • improved trigger --gt higher efficiency
  • B0.5T increases trigger threshold
  • fewer low Mpp pairs
  • still under investigation
  • Same modified Mpp Soding fit

r0 PT
Preliminary
M(pp-)
35
gg --gt ee-
red - e e- pairs
p
  • Minimum bias trigger
  • 200 GeV
  • B0.25T
  • small fraction of data
  • Select electrons by dE/dx
  • in region plt 140 MeV/c
  • Select identified pairs
  • pT peaked at 1/ltbgt
  • Different from photoproduced pp

e
Preliminary
P (GeV/c)
Events
ee
pp
Pair Pt (GeVc)
36
STAR Near Future possibilities
  • VM interference measurements
  • 2-prong meson decays
  • r0 at higher pT
  • J/Y (needs more data)
  • wider r0 rapidity distribution (using FTPCs)
  • 4-prong meson spectroscopy
  • r0
  • r0r0

37
Future Possibilities RHIC LHC
  • Criteria
  • Interesting Physics
  • At least vaguely experimentally realizable
  • More multiple vector meson production
  • correlated decays?
  • Photoproduction of open charm/bottom/top
  • Pair production with capture
  • pp diffraction meson spectroscopy and hard
    diffraction

38
Photoproduction of Open Quarks
  • gA --gt ccX, bbX
  • sensitive to gluon structure function.
  • Higher order corrections problematic
  • Ratio s(gA)/s(gp) --gt shadowing
  • removes most QCD uncertainties
  • max 10 at RHIC, 20 at LHC
  • Experimentally feasible (?)
  • high rates
  • known isolation techniques
  • Physics backgrounds are gg--gt cc, gg --gt cc
  • gg cross section is small
  • gg background appears controllable by requiring a
    rapidity gap

QQ--gt open c,b
g
g
Production occurs in one ion
Klein, Nystrand Vogt, 2002
39
Electron Production w/ Capture
  • gg -- gt ee-
  • Electron is bound to nucleus
  • Probe of atomic physics
  • non-perturbative
  • s uncertain, 100-200 barns
  • Focused 78Au beam
  • RHIC Rate 10,000 particles/sec
  • beam 40-80 mW
  • easy to measure
  • LHC rate 1M particles/sec
  • beam 10-40 W
  • can quench superconducting magnets
  • limits LHC luminosity w/ Pb
  • Could extract as external beam

Za 0.6 is Ng gt 1?
Klein,2001
40
pp Diffraction
  • Mostly double-Pomeron interactions
  • at SPS significant Reggeon component
  • use Roman pots to measure momentum transfer from
    diffracted protons

p
Pomerons
p
Coupling nuclear form factor
41
Meson spectroscopy with pp
  • CERN WA91/102 discovered pt filter
  • meson type depends on momentum transfers
  • low dpt selects exotics (non qq)
  • at RHIC
  • much smaller Reggeon component
  • polarized beams
  • study spin structure of Pomeron meson
    production
  • very little theoretical guidance

42
Hard diffraction at RHIC
  • Study jets, W,Z production ala CDF
  • CDF, D0 find s(D)/s(ND) 0.01
  • good rates
  • polarized beams
  • spin structure of Pomeron
  • probe quark content (for W,Z)
  • compare pp vs. pp

43
Physics Recap
  • RHIC is a high luminosity gg and gA collider
  • The strong fields and 2-source geometry allow
    many unique studies
  • Coherent events have distinctive kinematics
  • Ultra-peripheral collisions allow for many
    studies
  • Measurement of s(VA)
  • Vector meson spectroscopy
  • A measurement of the r0 pT spectrum can test if
    particle decay triggers wave function collapse
  • multiple vector meson production
  • Tests of strong field QED
  • Studies of charge content of glueball candidates

44
Conclusions
  • STAR has observed three peripheral collisions
    processes
  • Au Au -- gt Au Au r0
  • Au Au -- gt Au Au r0
  • Au Au -- gt Au Au ee-
  • The cross sections for r0 production are in
    agreement with theoretical models
  • Interference between r0 and direct pp- is seen
  • Ultra-peripheral collisions is in its infancy
  • It works!!!
  • Were learning a lot about techniques
  • come back next year for many more results!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com