Exploiting%20observations%20of%20water%20vapour%20to%20investigate%20simulations%20of%20water%20vapour%20feedback%20processes%20Richard%20Allan,%20Tony%20Slingo%20Environmental%20Systems%20Science%20Centre,%20University%20of%20Reading%20%20%20Mark%20Ringer%20Hadley%20Centre,%20Met%20Office - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Exploiting%20observations%20of%20water%20vapour%20to%20investigate%20simulations%20of%20water%20vapour%20feedback%20processes%20Richard%20Allan,%20Tony%20Slingo%20Environmental%20Systems%20Science%20Centre,%20University%20of%20Reading%20%20%20Mark%20Ringer%20Hadley%20Centre,%20Met%20Office

Description:

Title: No Slide Title Author: Richard Philip Allan Last modified by: Richard Allan Created Date: 4/27/2001 1:31:33 PM Document presentation format – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:141
Avg rating:3.0/5.0

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Exploiting%20observations%20of%20water%20vapour%20to%20investigate%20simulations%20of%20water%20vapour%20feedback%20processes%20Richard%20Allan,%20Tony%20Slingo%20Environmental%20Systems%20Science%20Centre,%20University%20of%20Reading%20%20%20Mark%20Ringer%20Hadley%20Centre,%20Met%20Office


1
Exploiting observations of water vapour to
investigate simulations of water vapour feedback
processesRichard Allan, Tony SlingoEnvironmenta
l Systems Science Centre, University of
ReadingMark RingerHadley Centre, Met Office
2
INTRODUCTION
  • How does water (vapour/liquid/ice) respond to
    global warming?
  • Cruicial for Climate Sensitivity
  • Direct feedback water vapour
  • Fundamental test of models
  • Can we determine water vapour feedback from
    observations of present day climate?
  • Can we use reanalyses?
  • do results link into present day changes in
    cloudiness?

3
Previous studies
Observational determination of water vapour
feedback (e.g. Raval and Ramanathan 1989 Cess
1989 Soden et al. 2002 Forster Collins
2004) Theoretical/ Modelling studies (e.g.
Manabe and Wetherald 1967 Held and Soden 2000
Ingram 2002, Minschwaner and Dessler 2004)
4
Climate sensitivity
DTsl DQ, l-1/(bBB bWV bGbCld.), bWV-(dOLR/
dwv)(dwv/dTs) bG ?? bWV ??bCld
Theory, Measurement
Observations
5
dOLRc/dwvtheoretical calculations
6
OLR Sensitivity to Water Vapour
7
dwv/dTs
  • Theoretical basis (Clausius Clapeyron)
  • dwv/dTs 6 - 7.5K-1 (WentzSchabel 2000)
  • Can only measure dwv/dTs

8
Interannual variability of Column Water vapour
(Allan et al. 2003, QJRMS, p.3371)
SST
CWV
1980 1985
1990 1995
See also Soden (2000) J.Clim 13
9
CWV Sensitivity to SST
  • dCWV/dTs 3.5 kgm-2 K-1 for HadAM3 and
    Satellite Microwave Observations (SMMR, SSM/I)
    over tropical oceans
  • Corresponds to 9K-1 in agreement with Wentz
    Schabel (2000) who analysed observed trends
  • But what about moisture away from the marine
    Boundary Layer?

10
Can we use reanalyses?
Reanalyses are currently unsuitable for detection
of subtle trends associated with water vapour
feedbacks Allan et al. 2004, JGR, accepted
11
Observations of clear-sky OLR and the greenhouse
parameter
  • Clear-sky OLR sensitive to Ts and RH
  • dOLRc/dTs as proxy for water vapour feedback
  • e.g. Cess et al. (1990) agreement between
    climate model dOLRc/dTs

12
Observed and modelled changes in OLRc ENSO
  • Soden (2000) ERBS vs AMIP multi model ensemble
  • Tropics, AMIP I

2 0 -2
dOLRc (Wm-2)
1983 1985 1987 1989
13
Interannual monthly anomalies tropical
oceansHadAM3 vs ERBS, ScaRaB and CERESdga/dTs
4 x 10-3 K-1 Raval and Ramanathan (1989) get
3.4x10-3 K-1 spatially
ga1-(OLRc/sTs4)
1980 1985 1990 1995
(Allan et al. 2003, QJRMS, p.3371)
14
Does dOLRc/dTs indicate consistent water vapour
feedback?
  • Consider GFDL HadAM3 AMIP experiments
  • Interannual variability
  • dOLRc/dTs 2 Wm-2 K-1
  • BUT differing height dependent Temperature and
    water vapour response
  • (Allan, Ramaswamy, Slingo, JGR 2002)

15
Does dOLRc/dTs2 Wm-2 K-1 indicate consistent
water vapour feedback?
HadAM3
GFDL
HadAM3
GFDL
dTa(p)/dTs dq(p)/dTs
Allan et al. 2002, JGR, 107(D17), 4329.
16
Water vapour / T-lapse rate
  • Compensation between water vapour and temperature
    lapse rate feedback in models
  • e.g. Colman (2003)
  • Sensitivity to convective parametrizations?

17
Relative Humidity Feedback(include main
component of bWV into bBB ?)
DTsl DQ, l-1/(bBB bRH bCld.), bRH-(dOLR/dRH
)(dwv/dRH) bBB constant RH, G
Theory, Measurement
Observations
18
Evaluation of upper tropospheric humidity
feedback in HadAM3
  • 6.7 mm cloud cleared radiance sensitive to upper
    tropospheric Relative Humidity
  • Explicitly simulate 6.7 mm radiance in HadAM3
  • Modified satellite-like clear-sky diagnostics

19
Sensitivity of OLRc to UTH
20
Interannual monthly anomalies of 6.7 micron
radiance HadAM3 vs HIRS (tropical oceans)
(Allan et al. 2003, QJRMS, p.3371)
Small changes in T_6.7 (or RH) in model and obs
(dUTH/dTs 0 ?)
21
(additional forcings)
(Allan et al. 2003, QJRMS, p.3371)
22
Small changes in RH but apparently larger changes
in tropical cloudiness? (Wielicki et al, 2002)
23
Altitude and orbit corrections (40S-40N)
Clear LW
LW
SW
Following Wielicki et al.
(2002) Allan Slingo (2002)
24
- Even considering the latest corrections to the
ERBS WFOV data, models still appear to
underestimate the variation of tropical mean
cloudiness - This is despite the apparent
agreement between models and observations that
tropical mean Relative Humidity varies only
slightly on a decadal time-scale
25
Summary
  • reanalyses not yet suitable for analysis of
    climate sensitivity
  • Climate model captures
  • low-level water vapour changes
  • Sensitivity dCWV/dTs3.5 kgm-2 K-1
  • Decadal variation in clear-sky OLR
  • Sensitivity dOLRc/dTs2 Wm-2 K-1
  • Small decadal changes in free-tropospheric RH
  • Sensitivity dOLRc/dRH 0.5 to 1 Wm-2 -1
  • dRH/dTs 0 K-1
  • But satellite data suggests larger variation in
    radiation budget due to cloud compared to models
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com