Media Effects - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Media Effects

Description:

Media Effects The role of the mass media in American politics – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:190
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: wwatson
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Media Effects


1
Media Effects
  • The role of the mass media in American politics

2
What is mass media?
  • Print media (newspapers, magazines)
  • Broadcast media (television and radio)
  • Internet

3
Importance of mass media
  • Primary conduit of information about politics
  • But is the media passive?
  • Is the media biased or objective?
  • If biased, does it matter?

4
Traditional view of media effects
  • Expected effects
  • - information
  • - persuasion
  • Experimental design
  • Findings
  • - little retention of information
  • - little persuasion
  • Minimal Effects Hypothesis

5
More subtle effects
  • Agenda-setting
  • Priming
  • Framing

6
Agenda-setting
  • Importance of issue
  • Scope of issues/answers
  • Iyengar, Kinder and Peters study
  • Effect increased by
  • - lead story status
  • - vivid story, emotional engagement
  • - lack of political sophistication of viewer

7
Priming
  • Cognitive misers
  • Which aspect of an issue weighs most heavily in
    our attitude
  • Iyengar, Kinder and Peters Study

8
Not just the news . . .
  • Entertainment shows may also have effects
  • - agenda-setting
  • - priming
  • Even better than the news
  • - full hour on single issue
  • - consistency from week to week
  • Examples

9
Framing!
  • What is the frame of a story?
  • What is the cultural or ideological context in
    which we place an issue?

10
(No Transcript)
11
Manipulating the frames
  • Klan rally
  • - free speech
  • - social order
  • Bosnian conflict
  • - genocide
  • - centuries of ethnic conflict

12
Bottom lineMedia doesnt change what we think,
only how we think
13
Characteristics of the Media and Media Coverage
  • (and their implications)

14
A look ahead
  • Ideological bias
  • Corporate control of media
  • Personalization/Personality Politics
  • Dramatization
  • Fragmentation

15
Ideological bias?
  • Allegations of liberal bias journalists
  • Allegations of conservative bias media owners /
    advertisers
  • Does it matter?

16
Corporate control of media
  • Limits the number of real news outlets
  • Profit motive
  • - demand-driven news
  • - cost-cutting measures
  • - journalists sell souls for access
  • - rush to print

17
Demand-driven news
  • Saturation coverage of ultimately non-historical
    events
  • May crowd out other stories
  • May burn out the public, make us jaded
  • Examples O.J., Paris Hilton

18
Cost-cutting measures
  • Canned news stories (same stories in every
    paper)
  • Lack of in-depth research
  • Usual suspects interviewed, no diversity of
    viewpoints

19
Objectivity vs. Access
  • Willing to do puff pieces in order to get
    choice interviews
  • Embedded journalists

20
The rush to the presses
  • Use sources and tips without confirmation
  • Trying to predict the news
  • Implications
  • - may get things wrong, and people dont pay
    attention to retractions
  • - elections people behave strategically

21
Personalization / Personality Politics
  • Tendency to focus on issues through lens of
    individual victims
  • Tendency to focus on personality of candidates
  • Implications
  • May actually engage some viewers
  • Personality characteristics may be good cues to
    how politicians will actually behave
  • But . . . May gloss over important policy issues

22
Example of personalization CNN (October 17,
2000)
  • there might have been a defeat for Gore on the
    likeability factor. (Bob Novak)
  • Gores clear decision to be aggressive, to try
    to define very sharp differences might make him
    seem assertive and tough minded or rude and
    smug. (Jeff Greenfield)
  • In this forum, where he was answering questions
    and being that aggressive, it will be interesting
    to see whether or not it plays as if he was a
    little terrier running out and trying to answer
    this persons question versus standing back and
    saying You know, let me talk down to you.
    (Tamala Edwards)

23
Dramatization
  • News told through narrative structure and visuals
  • If it bleeds, it leads
  • May result in important pieces of information
    being cut because they dont fit with the
    narrative structure
  • Oversimplifies issues
  • Polarizes issues by playing up dramatic conflict

24
Fragmentation
  • News told in small bits (esp. w/ broadcast media)
  • Oversimplification
  • Dont see stories in context, developing dynamic,
    connection between various issues and events

25
In sum
  • Many aspects of news coverage result in poor
    quality information and skewed decisions about
    which stories to cover
  • May not persuade us to vote Republican rather
    than Democratic, but these biases do affect how
    we think about political issues

26
So . . .
  • If media is such an important component of
    political life and
  • Media is so terrible
  • What can we do about it?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com