Poli 103A California Politics Crime and Punishment II: Race and Crime - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

Poli 103A California Politics Crime and Punishment II: Race and Crime

Description:

Poli 103A California Politics Crime and Punishment II: Race and Crime – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:298
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: Thad53
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Poli 103A California Politics Crime and Punishment II: Race and Crime


1
Poli 103A California PoliticsCrime and
Punishment IIRace and Crime
2
Crime and Punishment II Race and Crime
  • Trends Changing Budgets and Lives
  • Breaking Down the Impact of Race
  • Arrests
  • Releases
  • Sentences
  • Policing Practices

3
Trends Changing Budgets and Lives
  • Today there are 161,785 people in the California
    prison system.
  • Per inmate cost average 30,929.

4
Trends Changing Budgets and Lives
  • Californias Youth and Adult Corrections budget
    has grown from 3.32 of general fund spending in
    1976-1977 to a proposed 7.54 in 2004-2005.
    Fasting growing area.
  • Higher Education has dropped from 17.96 to
    11.43 over this period.

5
Trends Changing Budgets and Lives
Puzzle for discussion Why has the prison
population grown while crime rates have gone down?
6
Trends Changing Budgets and Lives
  • The criminal justice control rate (includes
    prison, jail, CYA, parole, and probation) differs
    by ethnicity
  • 5.4 for whites aged 20-29 in 1990
  • 33.2 for blacks
  • 9.4 for Latinos
  • 3.5 for others (including API)

7
Trends Changing Budgets and Lives
  • There are competing explanations for the
    differences in incarceration and control rates by
    ethnicity
  • Discrimination in the system accounts for harsher
    treatment of minorities.
  • Behavioral differences, whether they stem from
    individual choice or environmental forces,
    account for outcomes, system is unbiased.

8
Breaking Down the Impact of Race
  • To adjudicate between these competing
    explanations, Frank Gilliam, Jr. breaks down the
    steps of the justice system, looking at
  • Arrest rates (police officers)
  • Releases without charges (prosecutors)
  • Conviction rates and sentence lengths (judges and
    juries)

9
Breaking Down the Impact of Race Arrest Rates
  • It is hard to separate offense rates from arrest
    rates.
  • Blacks are arrested at rates 4-5 times larger
    than their proportion of the population.
    (Gilliam, pp. 312-313)
  • Historical evidence shows that the black/white
    gap has always existed, but is growing.

10
Breaking Down the Impact of Race Arrest Rates
  • Explanations of this gap include
  • 1. Socioeconomic status blacks and Latinos have
    more poverty, less employment. This is
    consistent with high rates of narcotics arrests.

11
Breaking Down the Impact of Race Release Rates
  • 2. The gap (and year-to-year changes) may also
    result from different police tactics. Police may
    be over-arresting blacks and Latinos.
  • If so, some portion of their high arrest rates
    may indicate discrimination on the part of law
    enforcement authorities rather than a behavioral
    difference.

12
Breaking Down the Impact of Race Release Rates
  • Gilliam finds evidence that minorities are in
    fact over-arrested by looking at how often they
    are released with no trial
  • In 1992, blacks accounted for about 30 of all
    arrests but 60 of all releases.
  • Contrary to what you may have seen on TV, black
    suspects are no more likely than whites to be
    released due to witness reluctance. Its usually
    lack of evidence.

13
Breaking Down the Impact of Race Sentencing
  • A survey of those in prison in 1978 by RAND found
    that minority status alone accounted for one to
    seven additional months, in prison, even holding
    constant
  • Prior records
  • Likelihood that the crime was violent
  • Probation and parole records

14
Breaking Down the Impact of Race Sentencing
  • Californias 1977 Determinate Sentencing Act was
    designed to remove the role of prejudice
  • Instead of case-by-case decisions on sentencing,
    the law set ranges for crimes
  • At the same time that it got fairer on crime, the
    Act got tougher on crime by shifting from
    rehabilitation to punishment

15
Breaking Down the Impact of Race Sentencing
  • Gilliams analysis of 1992 data appears to show
    that the Act worked he found no direct effect of
    race on the length of sentences.
  • He found indirect effects of factors associated
    with race such as type of attorney, type of plea,
    and prior records.

16
Policing Practices
  • America is distinctive in the lack of a federal
    role in policing. Californias police and
    sheriffs are all local.
  • Californias major cities are distinctive in the
    small size of their police forces, taking a
    strike force rather than foot soldier
    approach.
  • Cities vary in the of minority officers.

17
Policing PracticesStrike Force vs. Foot Soldiers
18
Policing Practices Minority Officers
19
Discussion Questions
  • What are some of the causes that Sandra Bass
    identifies for the higher rates of police
    neglect, harassment, and brutality of minority
    groups?
  • Should cost/benefit analyses apply to criminal
    justice policies? If not, what criterion should
    we use maximum crime prevention, fairness, etc.
    to judge them?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com