Title: Econ Geog
1Econ Geog
- Economic Geography study of flow of goods and
services across space - Look at ways in which people provide for
themselves across the globe - Geographic patterns of inequality at different
scales - Globalization is a MAJOR thread throughout econ
geog.free trade, intnl trade, international econ
alliances, etc.
2Industrial Revolution
- Industry manufacturing goods in a factory
- Industrial Revolution
- GB late 1700s diffused to W. Eur and U.S.
- Technology and mechanization led to unprecedented
increase in production - Iron and textiles 1st to industrialize
3Where is Industry Distributed?
- For 200 yrs industry was limited to
- N. Europe GB, France, Russia, Germany
- E. Asia Japan
- N. America U.S.
- These countries dominated ind production/innovatio
n until mid 20th C
4Where is Industry Distributed
- In recent yrs shift in geography of
industrialization - Major corporations have moved factories to LDCs
(cheap labor) - Older industrial countries have shifted to
service based economies research and
development, marketing, tourism, sales,
telecommunications, etc.) - Service jobs are safer, more pay, less pollution,
and overall higher satisfaction
5Where is Industry Distributed?
- BUT service jobs require more education/training
than factory work - i.e. difficult transition factory lose jobs as
factories outsource, must go back to school or
switch careers in mid life - Mill towns/factory towns ghost towns or
reinvent themselves with new econ niche
6Where is Industry Distributed?
- Deindustrialization when industrial factories
leave an area and take that regions econ base
with them - Ex Rust Belt Great Lakes region was home to
all auto manufacturing but GM and other companies
have relocated debilitating for the economy of
the region and the workers there - Backwash Effect when one regions econ gain is
anothers loss
7The Rust Belt
8Where are industries distributed and why there?
- All industries seek to maximize profits by
minimizing production costs - Critical question Where is the most profitable
place to locate a factory?? - Alfred Weber Least Cost Theory firms look at
the following to decide where to locate..
9Least Cost Theory
- 1.) Transportation Costs must move raw
materials (inputs) to plant and finished product
to market - Market Orientation Firms if finished product
weighs more or is perishable, then locate the
plant closer to the market than the raw
materials.4 types of market orientation
10Least Cost Theory Market Oriented Firms
- A.) Bulk Gaining Industry product gains volume
or weight during production (TV, refrigerator,
soft drinks) - B.) Single Market Manufacturer product sold
mainly in one location - C. Perishibility fresh fruits, milk, bread,
newspaper must be near market - D.Ubiquitious Industry industry distr is in
direct proportion to the distr of the population
(i.e. near large metro areas with people labor
and market) i.e. hospitals, big business
11Least Cost Theory Material/Resource Orientation
- Material/Resource Orientation raw materials
(inputs) weigh more (or are perishable) than the
finished product so locate plant closer to raw
materials than to market. These are called Bulk
Reducing Industries final product weighs less
than the inputs - (i.e. paper mills, steel, copper most mining,
tomato cannery, etc.)
12Least Cost Theory Other transportation variables
- Footloose firms industries w/ products that are
lightweight and valuable and can locate anywhere
(i.e. diamond of computer chips) - Spatially fixed cost cost of product does not
change no matter where factory is located - Spatially Variable cost price of product varies
depending on where factory is located and where
product is produced
13Least Cost Theory - Transportation
- Longer distance is cheaper per mile
- Ships best for longest distances
- Air most expensive but fastest
- Break of Bulk Points cost of transport for some
inputs is cheaper than another type of transport
so you use multiple methods of transport. BBP
transfer point (usually a seaport or airport)
14Least Cost Theory - AGGLOMERATION
- Agglomeration when many companies of the same
industry cluster together in a small area to draw
from the same set of collective resources (i.e.
computer companies in Silicon Valley, motion
picture industry in LA, fashion in Paris)
15Least Cost Theory - AGGLOMERATION
- Multiplier Effect as more firms from same
industry locate in an area, more resources become
available and cements that regions specialty
even more (ex CA became known for high tech
firms, it attracted more computer experts, which
attracted more high tech firms, etc.)
16Least Cost Theory - AGGLOMERATION
- Ancillary Activities agglomeration results in
ancillary activities i.e. the supporting cast.
Economic activities that surround/support the
primary industry of the region. These can
include a range of activities shipping, food
services, etc.
17Least Cost Theory - AGGLOMERATION
- Agglomeration leads to regionalization unique
specialization from region to region - Deglomeration opposite of agglomeration when
a firm leaves an agglomerated region to start up
in a new place
18Least Cost Theory AgglomerationRegional
Specialization Silicon valley
19Least Cost Theory LABOR
- Labor intensive industry one where the cost of
labor is a high percentage of production (ex
textiles) - Outsourcing move production abroad for cheap
labor. Youre willing to pay more for
transportation b/c of cheap labor. Outsourcing
usually goes to semi-periphery cheap labor,
decent infrastructure, no environmental regs
20Least Cost Theory LABOR
- Textiles has followed cheap labor originally in
NE b/c of cheap immigrant labor, late 1800s/early
1900s moved to SE to avoid unions, post WW II
moved overseas to LDCs in Asia (50s in Hong Kong
and Japan, 70s in China and Korea, today in
Indonesia, Bangladesh
21Least Cost Theory Other things a firm may
consider
- Land
- Factories today usually rural or suburban
- Need large tracts of land (1 story more
efficient) - Amenities climate, cost of living, re
opportunities (i.e. Sun Belt) - Communities engage in bidding wars zoning, tax
breaks, environmental conditions, etc. to offer
most attractive package (i.e. Dell in NC)
22Least Cost Theory Other things a firm may
consider.
- Capital
- Money available to expand or open new factories
- May go to area where banks are willing to make
high risk loans (i.e. Silicon Valley)
23Factory Work
- Fordism mass production and assembly lines
(each worker assigned one specific task to
perform repeatedly). Started by Ford in early
20th C
24Factory Work
- Post-Fordism more flexible work in teams and
often master a wide array of tasks
25Webers factors to consider site and situation
factors
- Site Factors land, labor, capital
- Situation Factors transportation costs i.e.
relative location to inputs/raw materials and to
market
26Summary of Location Principles
- Access to materials for production
- Adequate supply of cheap labor
- Proximity to shipping and market
- Decrease production costs (cheap land, cheap
labor, and favorable govnt policies) - Natural factors, climate
- Firms history and personal inclinations
27Industrial Problems
- Over production global capacity to produce
manufactured goods has increased more rapidly
than demand - Consumption leveled off since 1970s b/c
- No population increase
- Wages have not risen as fast as prices
- Market Saturation everyone already has one (TV,
cars, microwaves, etc.) - Higher quality goods last longer
28Industrial Problems in MDCs
- Must protect markets from new competitors
- Trading Blocs industrial competition in MDCs is
betwn blocs, not countries - NAFTA, EU, ASEAN
- Cooperation within bloc, competition betwn
- Seek complementary trade within bloc
29Industrial Problems in MDCs
- Transnational Corporations locate aspects of
production in various countries. i.e. take
advantage or regional diff in wages, tax laws,
labor laws, natural resources, etc. - Ex Nike HQ in Oregon, but factories span the
globe
30Industrial Problems in MDCs
- Most transnational corp are conglomerate
corporations firms that consist of many smaller
firms that serve different functions (ex GM
many smaller firms that operate all over the
world, and produce a wide variety of goods and
services
31Industrial Problems in LDCs
- Distance from markets far from wealthy
consumers in MDCs - Poor infrastructure (roads, technology,
communication, etc.) - Cheap labor best drawing card for industry.
Intnl division of labor low paid, low skilled
work done in LDCs, high skilled work in MDCs
32Industrial Problems in LDCs
- Export Processing Zones zones officially
designated for manufacturing have accessible
facilities, lax environmental regs, and tax
exemptions, cheap labor. Ex Maquiladoras along
US/MX border. Pros jobs for MX, cheap labor
for US. Cons often plagues w/ high crime,
govnt corruption, pollution
33Industry today..
- Outsourcing
- Export processing zones - maquiladoras
- Tourism
- All of these exploit LDCs/periphery.
Neocolonialism econ and political controls are
exercised by developed states over the economies
and societies of independent countries in the
developing world
34DEVELOPMENT
- Development process of improving material
conditions of people w/ diffusion of knowledge
and technology continuous process of trying to
improve health, living conditions, and prosperity - Wallersteins World Systems Model
- N/S Divide (see handout)
35Development Varies Across Space
- Dev can be broken into econ, social, or
demographic factors - Human Development Index (HDI) created by UN to
look at all 3 - Life exp, educ (literacy rate and amnt of ed),
income (GDP) - Highest possible 1.0 (100)
- Norway highest - .944
- U.S. never first, but always high
- Lowest - sub Sahara Africa (Sierra Leone .275)
36Economic Factors of Development
- GNP and GDP (omits investments abroad)
- Per capita (divide by population)
- Annual per capita GDP more than 20,000 in MDCs
and _at_ 1,000 in LDCs this gap is widening
37Economic Factors of Development
- Types of jobs.
- Primary activities w/ land fishing, farming
- Secondary manufacturing, industry
- Tertiary service
- Quaternary research and development
generating/exchanging knowledge (teaching,
banking, law, accounting, etc.) - Quinary high tech scientific research
38Types of Jobs/Econ Activities
39Economic Factors of Development
- All countries have all types of econ activities.
The higher up you go, the more educ required and
the better pay. MDCs mostly in tertiary or
higher. LDCs mostly in primary. Semi-periphery
mostly in secondary. - Human Res and productivity increase in MDCs
(workers produce more w/ less effort).higher
educ, skilled, machinery and technology
40Economic Factors of Development
- Energy Consumption per capita correlates w/
technology and dev. - MDCs 10X more per capita than LDCs
- MDCs consume sign more energy than they produce
- MDCs use coal, natural gas, hydropower
- LDCs use firewood, dung, peat, and domestic fuels
to cook and keep warm - Wood 60 of fuel use in LDCs and 90 in poorest
countries
41Social Indicators of Development
- MDCs use money for schools, hospitals, that
provide better educ and healthier longer lives
this is cyclical b/c better educated and - healthier pop can be more productive and make
more money
42Social Indicators of Development
- Education MDCs have greater quantity and
quality of educ - Student teacher ratio (2X as many students to 1
teacher in LDC) - Literacy Rate (over 95 in MDCs, less than 35 in
LDCs) - Avg student attends school 10 yrs in MDC and a
few yrs in LDCs (varies)
43Social Indicators of Development
- Health
- MDCs better ratio of people to hospitals,
doctors, and nurses - MDC consume greater calorie consumption. In LDCs
many get less than daily recommended allowance - Different problemsMDCs problems w/ obesity,
elderly population, etc.
44Demographic Indicators of Development
- Life Expectancy avg if yrs a newborn can
expect to live (early 40s in LDCs, 70s in MDCs) - Infant Mortality die b/f 1st b-day (less than 1
in MDCs, 10 in LDCs) - CBR higher in LDCs but dropping
- Maternal Mortality Rate sign higher in LDCs
45Gender Issues in Development
- Gender inequality exists in every country
- Two composite measures to look at
46GDI Gender Related Development Index
- GDI looks at same measure as HDI but to
highlight disparity betwn men and women - Complete equality is 1.0
- Penalized for greater diff betwn men and women
- Highest GDIs in Europe and N. America lowest in
Sub Sahara Africa - Even in MDCs womens average income is less than
mens
47GDI
- In LDCs women less likely to attend school and
have lower literacy rates (99/100 women to men in
MDC high school 60/100 in LDC high schools) - (remember this affect on pop growth)
- Globally women outlive men, but outlive men much
longer in MDCs than in LDCs (mostly b/c of
maternal mortality rate)
48Gender Empowerment Measure (GEM)
- Measures econ and political power
- 4 factors.
- Income
- Professional jobs
- Managerial jobs
- Elected positions (no country has a natnl
Congress w/ majority womenhighest in Eur w/ _at_
30....U.S. has _at_ 15)
49- Every nation has a higher GDI and lower GEM i.e.
means women possess a greater share of a nations
resources than power over allocation of those
resources - Even in MDCs womens average income is less than
mensWHY?
50LDCs Obstacles to Development
- While LDCs have improved, gap betwn MDC and LDC
has increased. - WHY? Circular/cumulative causation process
where tendency for econ growth are
self-reinforcing.i.e. it takes money and
development to foster money and development - Solution? LDCs must dev at a faster rate, but
how? Two prominent options.
51Self Sufficiency/Balanced Growth Approach China
and India
- Country should invest across all sectors of the
economy and all regions - Limit imports (tariffs)
- Internal businesses encouraged to produce for own
people not export
52Problems w/ Self-Sufficiency Model
- Protects inefficient businesses in own country
(protect from international competition, but has
little incentive to improve quality or lower
price) - HUGE govnt bureaucracy to manage econ leads to
abuse and corruption Govnt red tape
53Option Two International Trade Model
- Develop through international trade (look
outward). Look outward. Identify a unique econ
asset and export globally. Use funds and profit
to finance other development - Done in Arabian peninsula and E/SE Asia
54W.W. Rostow Dev Model
- Rostow advocated intnl trade approach with a 5
step model towards development. He created the
model in the 1950s and based it on the pathway
the U.S. and Eur followed - Stage 1 Traditional Society country dominated
by primary econ activities low prod, low tech,
low per capita income
55Rostow Intnl Trade
- Stage 2 Preconditions to Takeoff preconditions
to econ dev are commercialization of AG and
exploitation of raw materials - Stage 3 Takeoff foreign investment jump starts
econ. Rapid growth in a limited number of
sectors other sectors still dominated by tradntl
methods. Country uses profits to pour into
infrastructure (roads, canals, etc.)
56Rostow Intnl Trade
- Stage 4 Drive to Maturity Dev and modern tech
diffuse to wider variety of the econ. Workers
become more skilled and specialized - Stage 5 high levels of mass consumption and per
capita income. Shift from heavy industry to
services and producing consumer goods.
57Criticisms of Rostow
- Not all countries will pass through stages
consecutively - Model doesnt account for.
- Global politics
- Colonialism
- Physical geog
- War
- Culture
- Ethnic conflict
- All of these may affect progression and cause
different pathway
58Example of INtnl Trade Model
- 4 Asian Tigers/Dragons S. Korea, Singapore,
Taiwan, Hong Kong - all poor in natural resources
- Promoted dev by focusing on a handful of econ
goods (esp clothing and electronics). i.e. find
comparative advantage produce item for which
you have the greatest advantages in comparison to
other countries - Low labor allowed them to sell products cheaply
in MDCs
59Map Asia -
- India China initially self/sufficiency and
balanced growth model - 4 Asian Tigers International Trade Model
604 ASIAN TIGERS
- South Korea
- Taiwan
- Hong Kong
- Singapore
61Problems w/ Intnl Trade Model
- May hinder other LDCs from following this path.
- 1.) Uneven resource distr many country's niche
faced lower price on world market (ex Zambia and
copper world prices for copper have been
dropping) - 2.) Market stagnation market for consumer goods
slowing down in general
62Problems w/ Intnl Trade Model
- 3.) Increased dependence on MDCs takeoff
industries force LDCs to decrease production of
food, clothing, or other necessities for own
people - Conclusion.intntl trade model is widely accepted
alternative to self-sufficiency model
63Statistics
- World Bank since 1990 per capita GDP has
increased more than 4 annually in countries w/
intnl trade model and less than 1 in countries
w/ self-sufficiency model
64Statistics..
- 1960-1990..
- Indias GDP increased by 4/year on self
sufficiency model - Thailands by 8/year (intnl trade)
- Taiwans by 8/year (intnl trade)
- S. Koreas by 9 /year (intnl trade)
- Since 1990s India switched to intnl trade and GDP
has increased by 6/year
65WTO World Trade Organization
- Est in 1995 promotes intnl trade model. Works
to decrease barriers to intnl trade by. - Eliminating restriction on trade (no tariffs, no
quotas on imports, no subsidies on exports) - Enforcing trade agreements (rules on arguments
and accusations)
66WTO
- Liberal critics say WTO is anti-democratic and
promotes interests of large, wealthy,
transnational corp - Conservative critics says WTO compromises gov
of countries b/c it can order changes in
subsidies, taxes, etc. - ALWAYS protestors outside WTO mtgs
67WTO
68 for Development??
- 1.) Loans usually from World Bank or
International Monetary Fund (both controlled by
MDCs) - Together loan _at_ 50 billion/year
- Idea borrow to improve infrastructure to
attract businesses/investment - Many infrastructure projects fail dont work,
dont pay off, or businesses still do not come
69 for Development?
- (Loans)
- Debt is greater than annual income in 30
countries - Many LDCs cannot even pay interest on loans, much
less the principal - Result.many MDCs becoming more hesitant to
grant loans
70 for Development??
- 2.) Foreign Direct Investment Transnational
Corporations flow of money and investment from
one country to another through private
corporations (increasing trend in late 20th C) - BUT only ¼ of foreign investment went from MDC to
LDC (most goes from MDC to MDC) - Of all money from MDC to LDC, ½ of that goes to
Brazil, China, MX