NSF Status Review of DUSEL Deep Underground Science and Engineering Laboratory January 28-30, 2000 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

NSF Status Review of DUSEL Deep Underground Science and Engineering Laboratory January 28-30, 2000

Description:

Deep Underground Science & Engineering Laboratory Dr. Ed Seidel Assistant Director Mathematical and Physical Sciences National Science Foundation – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:133
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: DavidL428
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: NSF Status Review of DUSEL Deep Underground Science and Engineering Laboratory January 28-30, 2000


1
Deep Underground Science Engineering
Laboratory Dr. Ed Seidel Assistant
Director Mathematical and Physical
Sciences National Science Foundation October 1,
2010
2
Outline
  • DUSEL Scientific Promise and Project Status
  • International opportunities
  • Timelines and key decision points

Camland Project, Japan
3
Deep Underground Science and Engineering
Laboratory (DUSEL)
  • DUSEL is being envisioned as a unique, dedicated
    international underground education research
    facility that would support potentially
    transformational experiments in multiple
    disciplines
  • The U.S. particle, nuclear, and astrophysics
    communities have selected DUSEL as central to
    their national programs
  • The engineering, geology and biology communities
    are proactively engaged, and participate in all
    aspects of DUSEL planning
  • Development focused on the former Homestake Gold
    Mine (Lead, SD), the deepest mine in North
    America

Davis Cavern Sep 21, 2009
4
(No Transcript)
5
Cosmic Questions for DUSEL
  • Of what is the Universe made?
  • What is Dark Matter?
  • What are neutrinos telling us?
  • Are protons unstable?
  • Where did the antimatter go?
  • How did the Universe evolve?

Dark Matter searches
Long Base Line Neutrino Experiment Proton Life
time
Double Beta Decay Experiments
Homestake Home to the Davis Detector (Nobel
Prize, Physics, 2002)
Raymond Davis, Jr.
6
Worldwide Underground Research
(Excludes large cavities)
7
Proposed Science in DUSEL
  • Four main pillars of emerging national physics
    program
  • Long Baseline ? experiment
  • Proton Decay
  • ßß decay
  • Dark Matter
  • Other programs (list growing as possibilities
    become known)
  • New capabilities in nuclear and neutrino
    astrophysics
  • Research in geology, chemistry, biology,
    atmospheric sciences!

60 m
55 m
8
NSF/DOE Collaboration
  • NSF/DOE agreed to establish DUSEL Physics Joint
    Oversight Group (JOG) immediately after release
    of P5 report (May 2008).
  • Will jointly coordinate oversee DUSEL
    experimental physics program.
  • JOG meeting bi- monthly.
  • Both agencies closely collaborating in defining
    and realizing the DUSEL physics program.
  • Agencies have agreed on DUSEL stewardship roles
    core research program

Program Element Steward Co-sponsor
DUSEL facility NSF
Dark matter NSF DOE OHEP
Neutrino-less double-beta decay DOE ONP NSF, DOE OHEP
Long baseline neutrinos DOE OHEP NSF
Proton decay DOE OHEP NSF
Other disciplines (Bio, Geo, Eng) NSF
Interagency MOU planned for end of FY 2010.
9
International Opportunities
  • Open Global Laboratory
  • NSF would steward DUSEL for the world community
  • Experiments and collaborations welcome
  • International partners assume only incremental
    costs
  • Infrastructure investment already made
  • Network of similar labs around the world?
  • Coordinated, distributed global program
  • Cooperative stewardship model
  • For multi-component scope (not, e.g., ITER)
  • Well defined steward co-sponsor roles
  • Well defined extent of risk
  • Extend JOG concept as appropriate

10
Summary
  • DUSEL Scientific Promise and Project Status
  • Potentially transformational over a decade in
    planning
  • Solid technical trajectory towards Preliminary
    Design Review in early 2011
  • Timelines and key decision points
  • Establish baseline late 2011
  • Final Design Review mid-2013?
  • Construction start 2014?
  • International Opportunities
  • Partners in facility definition Partners in
    discovery
  • Broad scientific scope

11
Back-up
12
Community Planning Activities Reports
  • Community Activities, Advisory Committee Reports
  • Bahcall Report (2001)
  • Nuclear Science Advisory Committee (NSAC)
    Long-Range Plan (2002)
  • International Workshop on Neutrinos and
    Subterranean Science (NESS, 2002)
  • High Energy Physics Advisory Committee (HEPAP)
    Long-Range Plan (2003)
  • EarthLab (2003)
  • DOE 20-yr. Facility Plan (2003)
  • The Neutrino Matrix (Four APS Divisions, 2004)
  • Quantum Universe The Revolution in 21st Century
    Particle Physics (2004)
  • Deep Science (2006)
  • The Frontiers of Nuclear Science  A Long Range
    Plan (2007), Nuclear Science Advisory Committee
    (NSAC).
  • Particle Physics Project Prioritization Panel
    (P5) A Strategic Plan for the Next Ten Years
    (2008)
  • National Research Council, National Science and
    Technology Council Reports
  • Connecting Quarks to the Cosmos (2003)
  • Neutrinos and Beyond (2003)
  • Physics of the Universe A Strategic Plan for
    Federal Research at the Intersection of Physics
    and Astronomy (2004)
  • Revealing the Hidden Nature of Space and Time
    (EPP2010, 2006)
  • NSF/DOE commissioned a new NRC study to be
    completed early 2011.

13
Project Status
  • Facility Design
  • Design team at UC Berkeley and SD School of Mines
    has been completed and is making good progress on
    the preliminary design.
  • Experiments Design
  • Multiple collaborations have been formed (S4
    awards) composed of University and National lab
    teams to design a set of world class experiments
    for DUSEL lab.
  • Sanford Lab
  • Significant progress in dewatering
  • 4850 Level infrastructure restoration underway
  • Safety Culture
  • Project team and Sanford Lab. developing a
    safety culture to allow for a world class safe
    Laboratory.
  • Preliminary Design expected end of CY 2010

14
Far Detector Water Cerenkov (WC)
  • Large detectors 100 K-ton
  • Plan for at least 2 detector Equivalent
  • conventional technology 50,000K PM /
    Detector.
  • Gadolinium? N-detection
  • Signal to Background
  • Energy Resolution
  • Large Cavity LCAB agrees the rock at Sanford
    Lab is good.
  • Cost and time for excavation

Kamiokande Det.
DUSEL Cavity Design
15
Far Detector LAr
  • Large TPC
  • Containment Vessel Design
  • Safety Issues
  • Cold Electronics Readout
  • Superior Signal to Noise
  • Cost competitive

Liquid Argon time projection chambers
(modern day bubble chambers)
Passing charged particle ionizes the Argon.
Ionization electrons drifted to the detector
edge
Ionization electrons drift through readout
electrodes so charge is induced/collected on
electrodes
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com