Diabetes Mellitus, Metabolism Journal Club - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Diabetes Mellitus, Metabolism Journal Club

Description:

... The primary objective of the Justification for the Use of Statins in Prevention: an Intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin (JUPITER) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:301
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 42
Provided by: rei1150
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Diabetes Mellitus, Metabolism Journal Club


1
Diabetes Mellitus, MetabolismJournal Club
Rosuvastatin to Prevent Vascular Events in Men
and Women with Elevated C-Reactive Protein, The
primary objective of the Justification for the
Use of Statins in Prevention an Intervention
Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin (JUPITER) NEJM Nov
20, 2008 vol. 359 no. 21 Low-Dose Aspirin for
Primary Prevention of Atherosclerotic Events in
Patients With Type 2 Diabetes, A Randomized
Controlled Trial The Japanese Primary Prevention
of Atherosclerosis With Aspirin for Diabetes
(JPAD) trial JAMA, November 12, 2008 Vol 300, No.
18
  • November 27, 2008
  • Rei Suganaga, MD
  • Diabetes and Endocrine Department,
  • Kameda Medical Center

2
Rosuvastatin to Prevent Vascular Events in Men
and Womenwith Elevated C-Reactive Protein
  • The primary objective of the Justification for
    the Use of
  • Statins in Prevention an Intervention Trial
    Evaluating
  • Rosuvastatin (JUPITER)
  • NEJM Nov 20, 2008 vol. 359 no. 21

3
Background
  • ?????????????????
  • MI?stroke?death from CV cause ????statin?????????
  • ??????MI?Stroke??????LDL??????????
  • ???CRP????future vascular events??????????
  • LDL?????????????????
  • ???statin????CRP?????????????
  • ???LDL?????CRP?????
  • ????statin???????????????????
  • JUPITER??
  • rosuvastatin20mg/day????CV events ?????????

4
Methods
  • A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled,
  • multicenter trial conducted at 1315 sites in
    26 countries
  • intention-to-treat basis
  • Inclusion Criteria
  • did not have a Hx of cardiovascular disease
  • LDL?130 mg/dl and high-sensitivity CRP? 2.0 mg/l
  • a willingness to participate for the duration of
    the trial
  • TG ? 500 mg/dl

5
Methods
  • Exclusion criteria
  • previous or current use of lipid-lowering
    therapy,
  • current use of postmenopausal HRT
  • hepatic dysfunction , CK ?, Cr gt2,0mg/dl
  • sBPgt190 or dBP gt100
  • cancer within 5 years before
  • uncontrolled hypothyroidism
  • a recent Hx of alcohol or drug abuse or another
    medical

6
Methods
  • Trial Protocol
  • randomly assigned in a 11 ratio to receive
    either
  • Rosuvastatin 20 mg daily,
  • Placebo
  • Follow-up visits occur at 13weeks and then
  • 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54,60 months
    after randomize

7
End points
  • Primary outcome
  • occurrence of a first major cardiovascular event,
  • defined as nonfatal MI, nonfatal stroke,
  • hospitalization for unstable angina,
  • an arterial revascularization procedure,
  • or confirmed death from cardiovascular
    causes.
  • Secondary end points
  • the components of the primary end point
  • considered individually and death from any
    cause.

8
Results
  • Baseline Characteristics
  • Feb 4, 2003 Dec 15, 2006
  • 89,800 enrollment
  • ?72,088 ineligible (80.2) (LDLgt130(52.2), CRP
    lt2.0(36.1))
  • ?17,802 assigned
  • Rosuvastatin 8,901
  • Placebo 8,901

9
(No Transcript)
10
(No Transcript)
11
Results
  • Effect of Rosuvastatin
  • Compliance 75

-37
-50
4
-17
12
Results
  • End points
  • median follow-up 1.9 years (max 5.0 years)
  • first major CV event 142 Rosuvastatin vs 251
    placebo

13
(No Transcript)
14
NNT
NNT
95 31 ??25
(2years) (4years) (5years)

15
Results
  • Subgroup analyses

16
(No Transcript)
17
Results
  • Adverse events

18
(No Transcript)
19
Conclusions
  • ?Among apparently healthy men women
  • who didnt have HL but have elevated level of
    CRP,
  • Rosuvastatin significantly reduced the incidence
    of major CV events, and death from any cause.
  • Consistent effects were observed in all
    sub-groups
  • no significant increase about adverse events

20
Limitations
  • Not include people with low level of CRP
  • Short follow-up time
  • ?longer-term therapy should be considered.

21
(No Transcript)
22
Low-Dose Aspirin for Primary Preventionof
Atherosclerotic Events in Patients With Type 2
Diabetes
  • A Randomized Controlled Trial
  • The Japanese Primary Prevention of
    Atherosclerosis
  • With Aspirin for Diabetes (JPAD) trial
  • JAMA, November 12, 2008
    Vol 300, No. 18

23
Background
  • ??????????????????????
  • Framingham Heart Study Odds Ratios
  • -Coronary heart disease(??)1.51.8
    -Stroke1.41.7
  • aspirin????????????????????????
  • ??????????????????????????????
  • ?????????asprin???????????
  • ADArecommend use of aspirin for DM a
  • (a 40y.o.lt, Fx of coronary , HTN,
    smoke, HL, UAE)
  • ??????????????????????????????
  • /???????????????????
  • ??????????????????aspirin??????
  • ??????????

24
Methods
  • The Japanese Primary Prevention of
    Atherosclerosis With Aspirin for Diabetes (JPAD)
    trial
  • A prospective, randomized, open-label,
    controlled trial with blinded end-point
    assessment.
  • Patients were enrolled and followed up
  • at 163 institutions throughout Japan.

25
Methods
  • Inclusion Criteria
  • Dx of type 2 DM
  • Age 30 85
  • ability to provide informed consent.

26
Methods
  • Exclusion criteria
  • ECG changes(ST??,Qwave)
  • Hx of coronary heart disease(confirmed by
    angiography)
  • Hx of cerebrovascular disease
  • Hx of arteriosclerotic disease
  • Af Pregnancy
  • Use of antiplatelet or antithrombotic therapy
  • Hx of severe gastric or duodenal ulcer
  • Severe liver/renal dysfunction allergy to
    aspirin.

27
Methods
  • Trial Protocol
  • randomly assigned
  • 81 mg or 100 mg of aspirin once daily.
  • Non aspirin group
  • Follow-up visits
  • every 2 weeks for patients seen in a
    clinic setting
  • every 4 weeks for patients seen in a hospital
    setting
  • Non aspirin group were allowed to use
    antiplatelet/thrombotic therapy,
  • including aspirin, if needed and vice versa.

28
End points
  • Primary outcome
  • any atherosclerotic event
  • sudden death(coronary,cerebrovascular, and aortic
    causes)
  • nonfatal AMI AP newly developed exertional
    angina
  • nonfatal ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke TIA
  • nonfatal aortic and peripheral vascular disease
  • (ASO,dissection, mesenteric arterial
    thrombosis)
  • Secondary end points
  • each primary end point
  • Combinations of primary end points
  • death from any cause.

29
Adverse events
  • Adverse events
  • gastrointestinal (GI) events
  • any hemorrhagic events other than hemorrhagic
    stroke

30
Results
study population
screened Dec 2002- May 2005 follow-up until
Apr 2008 median follow-up 4.37years
31
(No Transcript)
32
(No Transcript)
33
Results
  • Baseline Characteristics
  • 2,567 screened ?2539 randomized
  • ?aspirin 1262 vs nonaspirin1262
  • ?193 lost to follow-up
  • median follow-up 4.37years
  • By the end of the study
  • aspirin group123(10) patients had stopped
    taking Med
  • nonaspirin group 6(0.5) aspirin,
  • 3(0.2) other
    antiplatelet

34
Results
  • ?total 154 events occurred
  • ?primary end point there is no significant
    difference
  • secondary - fatal coronary and
    cerebrovascular events

  • gt significantly (P.0037)

35
Results
  • Subgroup Analyses
  • 65 ? the events was significantly lower in
    aspirin group
  • (HR 0.68 , 32 relative reduction)
  • other subgroup show non-significant difference.

36
Results
  • Adverse events

37
(No Transcript)
38
Results
  • Adverse events
  • serious bleeding that required transfusion
  • asipirin 4 vs nonasipirin 0
  • But no increase in hemorrhagic strokes
  • in aspirin group

39
Limitations
  • Did not have advantages of a double-blind,
    randomized.
  • (prospective, randomized, open-label,
    controlled trial
  • with blinded end-point assessment)
  • 2. Event rate was low and the study was
    underpowered
  • ?larger trial is needed to determine the efficacy

40
Conclusions
  • ?JPAD trial is the first prospectively designed
    trial to evaluate the efficacy of low-dose
    aspirin for the primary prevention of
    atherosclerotic events in patients with type2 DM
  • Low-dose aspirin as primary prevention didnt
    reduce the risk of cardiovascular events.
  • -As for fatal coronary and cerebrovascular
    events,
  • low-dose aspirin reduced the events
    significantly(P.0037 HR0.10)
  • -65? 32 relative reduction in total
    atherosclerotic events
  • no increase in hemorrhagic strokes
  • but a small increase in serious GI hemorrhagic
    events

41
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com