Economic%20Comparison - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Economic%20Comparison

Description:

Economic Comparison Fr Clinic II – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:118
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: Jess3199
Learn more at: https://users.rowan.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Economic%20Comparison


1
Economic Comparison
  • Fr Clinic II

2
Overview
  • Economics and Engineers
  • Time Value of Money
  • Different types of Economic Analyses
  • Comparing our filters two examples

3
Warning
  • The field of economic comparison is huge, Ive
    left a lot out.

4
Engineers and Economics
  • Engineers often must estimate the benefits and/or
    costs of their designs
  • Buildings, roads, landfills
  • New products
  • Communication systems
  • Refineries, oil platforms

5
Time Value of Money
  • What would you rather have, 100 now or 5 years
    from now? Why?
  • Assuming you dont need the 100 to meet some
    immediate need, what is your answer? Why?

6
Investments
  • You can take that 100 and invest it in bank
    accounts, bonds, or stocks and get a return on
    your investment
  • At a 10 annual return,
  • what will 100 be worth in five years?
  • 100 (1.1)(1.1)(1.1)(1.1)(1.1) 100 (1.1)5
    161
  • getting the 100 five years from now would be the
    same as getting what amount now?
  • 100 (1.1)-5 62

7
Different types of Economic Analyses
  • Present Worth
  • Transform costs and benefits into equivalent
    present value
  • Project with largest present worth is best
  • Annual Cash Flow
  • Transform costs and benefits into equivalent
    uniform annual amounts over project lifetime
  • Project with largest annual net benefit is best

8
Different types (Cont.)
  • Payback Period
  • How long will it take for an investment (say a
    new manufacturing process) to recover its cost?
  • Projects with short payback period are good, but
    direct comparison of projects requires an
    incremental process
  • Benefit/Cost Ratio
  • Determine ratio of benefits to costs, see if its
    gt than 1
  • High B/C ratios are good, but direct comparison
    of projects requires an incremental method
  • Rate of Return
  • Determine the rate of return provided by a
    project (similar to the interest rate for a bank
    account)
  • High rate of return is good, but direct
    comparison of projects requires an incremental
    process

9
What if all you have are costs?
  • If its difficult to assign monetary value to
    benefits, you may be left with only costs
  • Can still use present worth and annual net
    benefit methods
  • Just look for alternative with the smallest
    present or annual cost
  • This assumes alternatives provide similar benefits

10
Comparing Filters
  • Without time value of money
  • Costs are purchase of (a) entire unit and (b)
    replacement cartridges
  • Costs can be related to volume of water treated
  • With time value of money
  • Must estimate rate at which water will be
    treated, to estimate cartridge replacement times

11
Without time value, example 1
  • Filter 1
  • Initial cost 40, replacement filter 30, every
    100 Liters
  • Filter 2
  • Initial cost 60, replacement filter 20, every
    100 Liters
  • Filter 3
  • Initial cost 80, replacement filter 60, every
    500 Liters

12
Excel Calculations, example 1
Cumulative Expenditures
13
Figure, example 1
14
With time value, example 2
  • Same as first example, but take into account time
    value of money.
  • Need to determine when costs occur, then
    transform to equivalent present costs.
  • PC FC (1 i)-n
  • PC present cost
  • FC future cost
  • i annual interest rate
  • n number of years

15
Additional information, example 2
  • Lifetime and salvage cost of Filters
  • 10 year lifetime and 0 salvage cost
  • Interest rate? ? 8 (i 0.08 in equation)
  • When do you buy replacements?
  • Buy replacements at beginning of year needed
    (i.e., end of previous year)
  • How much water do people drink per day of filter
    use?
  • 2 L/day

16
Additional Information, example 2
  • Lets conduct three different comparisons, for
    three levels of use.
  • Low 12 people-days/year (24 L/yr)
  • e.g., three 2-people, 2-day outings
  • Moderate 48 people-days/year (96 L/yr)
  • e.g., twelve 2-people, 2-day outings
  • High 144 people-days/year (288 L/yr)
  • e.g., twenty-four 3-people, 2-day outings

17
Calculations, example 2
PC for filter 1, Low use scenario 40 30
(1.08)-4 30(1.08)-8 PC for Filter 1, Mod use
scenario 40 30(1.08-1) 30(1.08-2)
30(1.08-8) 30(1.08-9)
18
Present Worth Figure
19
Conclusion
  • Conduct an economic comparison of the filters
    using the methods outlined here!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com