RTI%20Teams:%20Improving%20Problem-Solving%20Through%20Effective%20Case%20Management%20%20Jim%20Wright%20www.interventioncentral.org - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

RTI%20Teams:%20Improving%20Problem-Solving%20Through%20Effective%20Case%20Management%20%20Jim%20Wright%20www.interventioncentral.org

Description:

Title: PowerPoint Presentation Author: Mimi Mark Last modified by: Jim Created Date: 1/15/2006 6:20:54 PM Document presentation format: On-screen Show (4:3) – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:230
Avg rating:3.0/5.0

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: RTI%20Teams:%20Improving%20Problem-Solving%20Through%20Effective%20Case%20Management%20%20Jim%20Wright%20www.interventioncentral.org


1
RTI Teams Improving Problem-Solving Through
Effective Case Management Jim
Wrightwww.interventioncentral.org
2
(No Transcript)
3
Case Manager Role
  • Meets with the referring teacher(s) briefly prior
    to the initial RTI Team meeting to review the
    teacher referral form, clarify teacher concerns,
    decide what additional data should be collected
    on the student.
  • Touches base briefly with the referring
    teacher(s) after the RTI Team meeting to check
    that the intervention plan is running smoothly.

4
Case Manager Tips
  • If you discover, when you meet with a referring
    teacher prior to the RTI Team meeting, that his
    or her concern is vaguely worded, help the
    teacher to clarify the concern with the question
    What does teacher concern look like in the
    classroom?
  • After the RTI Team meeting, consider sending
    periodic emails to the referring teacher(s)
    asking them how the intervention is going and
    inviting them to inform you if they require
    assistance.

5
Case Manager Pre-Meeting
  • Prior to an initial RTI Problem-Solving Team
    meeting, it is recommended that a case manager
    from the RTI Team schedule a brief (15-20 minute)
    pre-meeting with the referring teacher. The
    purpose of this pre-meeting is for the case
    manager to share with the teacher the purpose of
    the upcoming full RTI Team meeting, to clarify
    student referral concerns, and to decide what
    data should be collected and brought to the RTI
    Team meeting.

6
Case Manager Pre-Meeting Steps
  • Here is a recommended agenda for the case
    manager-teacher pre-meeting
  • Explain the purpose of the upcoming RTI
    Problem-Solving Team meeting The case manager
    explains that the RTI Team meeting goals are to
    (a) fully understand the nature of the students
    academic and/or behavioral problems (b) develop
    an evidence-based intervention plan for the
    student and (c) set a goal for student
    improvement and select means to monitor the
    students response to the intervention plan.

7
Case Manager Pre-Meeting Steps
  1. Define the student referral concern(s) in clear,
    specific terms.. The case manager reviews with
    the teacher the most important student referral
    concern(s), helping the teacher to define those
    concern(s) in clear, specific, observable terms.
    The teacher is also prompted to prioritize his or
    her top 1-2 student concerns.

8
Case Manager Pre-Meeting Steps
  1. Decide what data should be brought to the RTI
    Team meeting. The case manager and teacher decide
    what student data should be collected and brought
    to the RTI Team meeting to provide insight into
    the nature of the students presenting
    concern(s).

9
Case Manager Pre-Meeting Steps
10
RTI Problem-Solving Teams Promoting Student
InvolvementJim Wrightwww.interventioncentral.org

11
(No Transcript)
12
(No Transcript)
13
(No Transcript)
14
RTI Promoting Student Involvent
  • Schools should strongly consider having middle
    and high school students attend and take part in
    their own RTI Problem-Solving Team meetings for
    two reasons. First, as students mature, their
    teachers expect that they will take
    responsibility in advocating for their own
    learning needs. Second, students are more likely
    to fully commit to RTI intervention plans if they
    attend the RTI Team meeting and have a voice in
    the creation of those plans.

15
RTI Promoting Student Involvement
  • Before the RTI Team Meeting. The student should
    be adequately prepared to attend the RTI Team
    meeting by first engaging in a pre-meeting with
    a school staff member whom the student knows and
    trusts (e.g., school counselor, teacher,
    administrator). By connecting the student with a
    trusted mentor figure who can help that student
    to navigate the RTI process, the school improves
    the odds that the disengaged or unmotivated
    student will feel an increased sense of
    connection and commitment to their own school
    performance (Bridgeland, DiIulio, Morison,
    2006).

16
RTI Promoting Student Involvement
  • A student RTI pre-meeting can be quite brief,
    lasting perhaps 15-20 minutes. Here is a simple
    agenda for the meeting
  • Share information about the student problem(s).
  • Describe the purpose and steps of the RTI
    Problem-Solving Team meeting.
  • Stress the students importance in the
    intervention plan.
  • Have the student describe his or her learning
    needs.
  • Invite the student to attend the RTI Team
    meeting.

17
RTI Promoting Student Involvement
  • During the RTI Team Meeting. If the student
    agrees to attend the RTI Team meeting, he or she
    participates fully in the meeting. Teachers and
    other staff attending the meeting make an effort
    to keep the atmosphere positive and focused on
    finding solutions to the students presenting
    concern(s). As each intervention idea is
    discussed, the team checks in with the student to
    determine that the student (a) fully understands
    how to access or participate in the intervention
    element being proposed and (b) is willing to take
    part in that intervention element. If the student
    appears hesitant or resistant, the team should
    work with the student either to win the student
    over to the proposed intervention idea or to find
    an alternative intervention that will accomplish
    the same goal.
  • At the end of the RTI Team meeting, each of the
    intervention ideas that is dependent on student
    participation for success is copied into the
    School Success Intervention Plan.

18
RTI Promoting Student Involvement
  • After the RTI Team Meeting. If the school
    discovers that the student is not carrying out
    his or her responsibilities as spelled out by the
    intervention plan, it is recommended that the
    staff member assigned as the RTI contact meet
    with the student and parent. At that meeting, the
    adult contact checks with the student to make
    sure that
  • the intervention plan continues to be relevant
    and appropriate for addressing the students
    academic or behavioral needs
  • the student understands and call access all
    intervention elements outlined on the School
    Success Intervention Plan.
  • adults participating in the intervention plan
    (e.g., classroom teachers) are carrying out their
    parts of the plan.

19
RTI Writing Interventions Jim
Wrightwww.interventioncentral.org
20
  • "If all the grammarians in the world were placed
    end to end, it would be a good thing."
  • Oscar Wilde

21
Graham, S., Perin, D. (2007). Writing next
Effective strategies to improve writing of
adolescents in middle and high schools A report
to Carnegie Corporation of New York. Washington,
DC Alliance for Excellent Education. Retrieved
from http//www.all4ed.org/files/WritingNext.pdf
22
The Effect of Grammar Instruction as an
Independent Activity
  • Grammar instruction in the studies reviewed
    for the Writing Next report involved the
    explicit and systematic teaching of the parts of
    speech and structure of sentences. The
    meta-analysis found an effect for this type of
    instruction for students across the full range of
    ability, but surprisingly, this effect was
    negativeSuch findings raise serious questions
    about some educators enthusiasm for traditional
    grammar instruction as a focus of writing
    instruction for adolescents.Overall, the
    findings on grammar instruction suggest that,
    although teaching grammar is important,
    alternative procedures, such as sentence
    combining, are more effective than traditional
    approaches for improving the quality of students
    writing. p. 21

Source Graham, S., Perin, D. (2007). Writing
next Effective strategies to improve writing of
adolescents in middle and high schools A report
to Carnegie Corporation of New York. Washington,
DC Alliance for Excellent Education.
23
Origins of the Latin AlphabetEarly Greek Alphabet
Boustrophedon ox trail Script alternates
between left-to-right and right-to-left
Source http//www.translexis.demon.co.uk/new_page
_2.htm
24
  • "The difference between the right word and the
    almost right word is the difference between
    lightning and the lightning bug."
  • Mark Twain

25
  • "Your manuscript is both good and original. But
    the part that is good is not original, and the
    part that is original is not good."
  • Samuel Johnson

26
  • Domains of writing to be assessed (Robinson
    Howell, 2008)
  • Fluency/Text Generation Facility in getting text
    onto paper or typed into the computer. (NOTE
    This element can be significantly influenced by
    student motivation.)
  • Syntactic Maturity This skill includes the
  • Ability to discern when a word string meets
    criteria as a complete sentence
  • Ability to write compositions with a diverse
    range of sentence structures
  • Semantic Maturity Writers use of vocabulary of
    range and sophistication

Source Robinson, L. K., Howell, K. W. (2008).
Best practices in curriculum-based evaluation
written expression. In A. Thomas J. Grimes
(Eds.), Best practices in school psychology V
(pp. 439-452). Bethesda, MD National Association
of School Psychologists.
27
Domains of writing to be assessed (Robinson
Howell, 2008)
  • 5-Step Writing Process (Items in bold are
    iterative)
  • Planning. The student carries out necessary
    pre-writing planning activities, including
    content, format, and outline.
  • Drafting. The student writes or types the
    composition.
  • Revision. The student reviews the content of the
    composition-in-progress and makes changes as
    needed. After producing an initial written draft,
    the student considers revisions to content before
    turning in for a grade or evaluation.
  • Editing. The student looks over the composition
    and corrects any mechanical mistakes
    (capitalization, punctuation, etc.).
  • Publication The student submits the composition
    in finished form.

Source Robinson, L. K., Howell, K. W. (2008).
Best practices in curriculum-based evaluation
written expression. In A. Thomas J. Grimes
(Eds.), Best practices in school psychology V
(pp. 439-452). Bethesda, MD National Association
of School Psychologists.
28
Evaluating the Impact of Effect Size Coefficients
  • 0.20 Effect Size Small
  • 0.50 Effect Size Medium
  • 0.80 Effect Size Large

Source Cohen,J. (1988). Statistical power
analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nded.).
Hillsdale,NJErlbaum.
29
  • Elements of effective writing instruction for
    adolescents
  • Writing Process (Effect Size 0.82) Students
    are taught a process for planning, revising, and
    editing.
  • Summarizing (Effect Size 0.82) Students are
    taught methods to identify key points, main ideas
    from readings to write summaries of source texts.
  • Cooperative Learning Activities (Collaborative
    Writing) (Effect Size 0.75) Students are
    placed in pairs or groups with learning
    activities that focus on collaborative use of the
    writing process.
  • Goal-Setting (Effect Size 0.70) Students set
    specific product goals for their writing and
    then check their attainment of those
    self-generated goals.

Source Graham, S., Perin, D. (2007). Writing
next Effective strategies to improve writing of
adolescents in middle and high schools A report
to Carnegie Corporation of New York. Washington,
DC Alliance for Excellent Education. Retrieved
from http//www.all4ed.org/files/WritingNext.pdf
30
  • Elements of effective writing instruction for
    adolescents
  • Writing Processors (Effect Size 0.55) Students
    have access to computers/word processors in the
    writing process.
  • Sentence Combining (Effect Size 0.50) Students
    take part in instructional activities that
    require the combination or embedding of simpler
    sentences (e.g., Noun-Verb-Object) to generate
    more advanced, complex sentences.
  • Prewriting (Effect Size 0.32) Students learn
    to select, develop, or organize ideas to
    incorporate into their writing by participating
    in structured pre-writing activities.
  • Inquiry Activities (Effect Size 0.32) Students
    become actively engaged researchers, collecting
    and analyzing information to guide the ideas and
    content for writing assignments.

Source Graham, S., Perin, D. (2007). Writing
next Effective strategies to improve writing of
adolescents in middle and high schools A report
to Carnegie Corporation of New York. Washington,
DC Alliance for Excellent Education. Retrieved
from http//www.all4ed.org/files/WritingNext.pdf
31
  • Elements of effective writing instruction for
    adolescents
  • Process Writing (Effect Size 0.32) Writing
    instruction is taught in a workshop format that
    stresses extended writing opportunities,
    writing for authentic audiences, personalized
    instruction, and cycles of writing (Graham
    Perin, 2007 p. 4).
  • Use of Writing Models (Effect Size 0.25)
    Students read and discuss models of good writing
    and use them as exemplars for their own writing.
  • Writing to Learn Content (Effect Size 0.23)
    The instructor incorporates writing activities as
    a means to have students learn content material.

Source Graham, S., Perin, D. (2007). Writing
next Effective strategies to improve writing of
adolescents in middle and high schools A report
to Carnegie Corporation of New York. Washington,
DC Alliance for Excellent Education. Retrieved
from http//www.all4ed.org/files/WritingNext.pdf
32
Sentence Combining
  • Students with poor writing skills often write
    sentences that lack syntactic maturity. Their
    sentences often follow a simple, stereotyped
    format. A promising approach to teach students
    use of diverse sentence structures is through
    sentence combining. In sentence combining,
    students are presented with kernel sentences and
    given explicit instruction in how to weld these
    kernel sentences into more diverse sentence types
    either
  • by using connecting words to combine multiple
    sentences into one or
  • by isolating key information from an otherwise
    superfluous sentence and embedding that important
    information into the base sentence.

Sources Saddler, B. (2005). Sentence combining
A sentence-level writing intervention. The
Reading Teacher, 58, 468-471. Strong, W. (1986).
Creative approaches to sentence combining.
Urbana, OL ERIC Clearinghouse on Reading and
Communication Skill National Council of
Teachers of English.
33
Formatting Sentence Combining Examples
34
(No Transcript)
35
(No Transcript)
36
(No Transcript)
37
Team Activity Use of Sentence Combining as a
Writing Strategy Across Content Areas
  • Discuss the sentence-combining strategy discussed
    in this workshop.
  • Brainstorm ways that schools can promote the use
    of this strategy across content areas to
    encourage students to write with greater
    syntactic maturity.

38
Miscellaneous Slides
39
RTI Advanced Group 15 January 2010
40
Networking Activity Sharing RTI Status
  • Appoint a spokesperson.
  • Consider your schools or districts current
    state of RTI implementation.
  • What is an area of relative strength that you
    would like to share with the group?
  • What is your most significant current challenge
    moving forward?
  • Has your school or district yet reached the RTI
    tipping point?

41
HELPS Reading Program www.helpsprogram.org
  • HELPS (Helping Early Literacy with Practice
    Strategies) is a free program that targets
    student reading fluency skills. HELPS was
    developed by Dr. John Begeny of North Carolina
    State University. The program is an
    evidence-based intervention package that includes
    the following effective treatment components
    adult modeling of fluent reading, repeated
    reading of passages by the student, phrase-drill
    error correction, verbal cueing and retell check
    to encourage student reading comprehension, and
    reward procedures to engage and encourage the
    student reader. HELPS can be used as an RTI
    intervention for reading fluency at Tiers 1
    through 3.

42
Team Planning Time
  • As a team, use the next segment of the workshop
    to work on any aspect(s) of your RTI plan.
    Consider
  • using your challenge(s) identified during the
    morning activity as a focal point for this
    planning activity.
  • networking with other teams to share ideas to
    address your planning question(s).
  • planning to roll out your next RTI element(s) by
    September 2010.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com