Mixing science and intuition: the process of synthesising data from a longitudinal mixed methods study of volunteering - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Mixing science and intuition: the process of synthesising data from a longitudinal mixed methods study of volunteering

Description:

Mixing science and intuition: the process of synthesising data from a longitudinal mixed methods study of volunteering Rose Lindsey and Liz Metcalfe, University of ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:206
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: Justin392
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Mixing science and intuition: the process of synthesising data from a longitudinal mixed methods study of volunteering


1
Mixing science and intuition the process of
synthesising data from a longitudinal mixed
methods study of volunteering
  • Rose Lindsey and Liz Metcalfe, University of
    Southampton
  • Third Sector Research Centre
  • ESRC grant no. ES/K003550/1

2
Presentation aim
  • To explore the challenges encountered when
    combining longitudinal qualitative and
    quantitative secondary data to study volunteering
    across time
  • Key challenge What do we mean when we talk about
    synthesising, integration, combining, mixing,
    interweaving, blending, merging? (Bryman, 2008)
  • Do we think our methods of combining have
    actually worked?

3
Presentation outline
  • Part 1 Designing the project
  • Introduction to Continuity and Change project
  • Discussion of the methodological challenges faced
    within the mixed-method research design
  • Bringing different data sources and findings into
    dialogue
  • Part 2 Challenges in practice
  • Exploring the analytical challenges faced when
    putting the design into practice
  • Working across methodological paradigms
  • Understanding the effect of, and working across,
    time
  • Design versus practice

4
Part 1 The Continuity and Change Project
  • Aim To explore individual attitudes and
    behaviours towards volunteering, and individual
    views on the role and responsibility of the state
    towards provision for social need, across a
    period of thirty years.
  • Design Concurrent use of longitudinal
    mixed-methods to analyse secondary data
  • Time-frame 1981-2012, encompassing different
    periods of economic adversity and prosperity
  • Project website http//longitudinalvolunteering.w
    ordpress.com

5
Choice of secondary data sets
  • Qualitative data
  • Quantitative data
  • The Mass Observation Project
  • Aim to capture experiences, thoughts and
    opinions of individuals
  • A national panel of volunteers writing in
    response to themed questions or directives
    (1981 to present day)
  • Longitudinal data following the same people
    through thirty years of their life-course
  • British Household Panel Survey/Understanding
    Society
  • Aim to understand individuals and households
    social and economic change
  • A national panel of the British population and
    volunteers (1991 to 2012)
  • Longitudinal data
  • British Social Attitudes Survey
  • Aim to track peoples changing social, political
    and moral attitudes
  • A national survey of the British population (1983
    to 2012)
  • Cross-sectional data

6
Why did we use mixed-methods?Enhancing strengths
and offsetting weaknesses
Our research design aimed to potentially offset
the respective weaknesses of these two analytical
methodologies by taking advantage of their joint
strengths to provide a completeness, and
comprehensive picture (Bryman, 2008, p.91)
Study strengths Study weaknesses
Qualitative Provides depth and nuance relating to the complex reasons why people behave in a certain way, or hold particular viewpoints Offers potential insights into how and why perspectives change or continue over time Enables insights into the connection between the life-course and routes into volunteering Not representative of the population Too much data
Quantitative Representative of volunteers within the population Can formally test how volunteering behaviour and attitudes change over time Offers potential insights into contextual re external events affect on change or continuity over time Insight into motivations and barriers are limited Limitations re understanding how individual time and the life-course affect volunteering
7
Multi-layered picture of volunteering behaviour
In-depth analysis of individual volunteers
Contextual social, economic and political events
over time
Behaviour and attitude analysis for volunteers
within the population
Sample size decreases
Focus on individuals increases
  • In-depth analysis of individual volunteers

Contextual social, economic and political events
over time
8
Bringing secondary data sources, analyses and
findings into dialogue
  • We aimed for three types of mixed-method
    dialogue
  • across the lifetime of the project, described by
    Tashakkori and Teddlie (2008, p.104) as a
    continuous feedback loop, to enable an
    iterative research process
  • some direct comparisons between qualitative and
    quantitative analyses where there was a fit
    between the data
  • combining substantive findings so that the sum of
    our joint knowledge claims would be greater than
    our individual findings

Qualitative data
Substantive findings
Quantitative data
Project beginning
Project end
9
Study design challenges-sample fit
  • The Mass Observation Project
  • British Household Panel Survey/Understanding
    Society
  • Sample restricted to available volunteering data
    (every other year between 1996 to 2011)
  • N2067
  • The Mass Observation Project (MOP)
  • 15 directives (sets of questions) were selected
  • N38
  • 2 samples were taken to provide a range of ages
    and occupations
  • Sample 1, n20 were writers from 1981 to 2012
  • Sample 2, n18 were younger and wrote for shorter
    periods of time

British Social Attitudes Survey
  • Questions of volunteering only asked a limited
    number of times
  • Number of people each year mean (sd) 3393 (711.7)

10
How the three datasets complement each other,
temporally and thematically
11
Part 2 Challenges in practice
  • Three main challenges were present throughout the
    project
  • Working across methodological paradigms
  • Understanding the effect of, and working across
    time
  • Putting the design into practice

12
Working and communicating across methodological
paradigms
  • Working across methodologies we encountered some
    challenges
  • Differences in terminology
  • Forming definitions
  • Timings/speed of analysis
  • Methodological standpoints differences in the
    types of questions that are being addressed
  • Conceptions of time

13
How time fits together
  • The way that these multiple perceptions of time
    interact and intersect (or not) was at the heart
    of the mixed methods effort for our research
    project.
  • the flow of personal biographical, narrative,
    retrospective, life-course, individual time
  • chronological time, moving from one year to the
    next
  • contextual public/collective time related to
    chronological time

Hi, Im Sarah
Children
Retirement
Marriage
1981 1984 1987 1990 1993 1996
1999 2002 2005 2008 2011
2013
Recession
Recession
Double-dip recession
14
Multi-layered picture of volunteering behaviour
Biographical time
In-depth volunteer analysis
Behaviour and attitude analysis for volunteers
within the population
Sample size decreases
Focus on individuals increases
Chronological time
Contextual time
Changes in social, political and moral attitudes
over time
15
Design versus practice
  • Longitudinal mixed-methods are more complicated
    than a single methodological approach
  • Over-estimation of mixed methods It has not been
    possible to answer all of the designed research
    questions with the data chosen, the fit of the
    samples and the timing of the analysis
  • Did we achieve our mixed method dialogue?
  • Paradigm, background, and terminology differences
    make maintaining a mixed-method dialogue
    difficult
  • How time fits together in practice time does not
    relate directly between different methodologies
  • Has the project benefited from using
    mixed-methods?

16
References
  • Bryman, C. (2008) Why do Researchers
    Integrate/Mesh/Blend/Mix/Merge/Fuse Quantitative
    and Qualitative research?, in M.M. Bergman (ed.)
    Advances in Mixed-Methods Research, London
    Sage. pp 87-100.
  • Tashakkori, A. and Teddlie, C. B. (2008) Quality
    of Inferences in Mixed Methods Research Calling
    for an Integrative Framework in in M.M. Bergman
    (ed.) Advances in Mixed-Methods Research,
    London Sage. pp.101-119

17
Thank you for listening, any questions?
  • Contact details
  • R.Lindsey_at_soton.ac.uk
  • E.Metcalfe_at_soton.ac.uk
  • Project website
  • http//longitudinalvolunteering.wordpress.co
    m/

18
Back-up slides
19
The challenges of analysing secondary data over
time
  • Quantitative
  • Variations in data collection process were
    difficult to uncover
  • The questions that were asked limits the data
    available
  • Data collected is set within the present time,
    only part of the life-course is recorded
  • Qualitative
  • Inconsistent descriptions of the life-course at
    different time-points
  • Lack of awareness of the what is happening within
    the present time
  • Accuracy of retrospective writings

20
Study design challenges
  • The mixed-method design framed the study, and
    influenced how well the data sources fitted
    together. Compromises around the following
    choices needed to be made
  • Choice of secondary data sources
  • Choice of timing of analyses
  • Choice of samples and how these substantively fit
    together
  • Choice of samples and how these fit together
    across time (thematic and temporal bunching)

21
Concurrent mixed method design
Our research design aimed to potentially offset
the respective weaknesses of these two analytical
methodologies by taking advantage of their joint
strengths to provide a completeness, and
comprehensive picture (Bryman, 2008, p.91)
22
Cross-sectional or Longitudinal?Synchronic or
Diachronic?
  • The length of chronological time being researched
    affects our perceptions and understandings of
    behaviour and attitudes
  • Longitudinal/diachronic following a person
    through time
  • Cross-sectional/synchronic A certain point in
    time

Hi, Im Sarah
Volunteered
Do not volunteer
Increasing age
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com