A Political Strategy to Defeat the Democratic Party by Targeting Their Base

1
A Political Strategy to Defeat the Democratic
Party by Targeting Their Base Exposing the
Democratic Partys Departure from the Land of
the Living and the Lawful By Al Lemmo Dearborn,
Michigan March, 2015
2
Outline of the Presentation Basic Approach,
Problems to Overcome and Objectives The United
States Constitution and the Democrats
Agenda Dr. Martin Luther Kings Philosophy,
Principles and Vision of The Beloved
Community Government and Religion - The Ten
Commandments and the Democrats Agenda The
Democrats Party of Divisions and Wars focus on
the War on the Prenatal Child The Nations
Philosophical Premise of Intrinsicism and the
Cult of Abortionism The Democrats Agenda and
the Mental Abortion The Democrats Destructive
Principles and Messages Questions for Democrat
Voters and Conclusion
3
Basic Approach Destroy the positive image the
Democrats have created for themselves with the
American people Demonstrate that the Democrats
overall agenda is harmful to our people and our
country Target the Party as a whole rather than
waste resources on numerous individual races a
party platform based approach Appeal to the
basic intelligence and goodness of the American
people to reject the Democrats agenda of
division, destruction, death and moral
degradation Appeal to the positive principles of
life, liberty, justice, rule of law, personal
virtue, etc.
4

• Problem Some Myths That Need Busting
• Not all of these will be addressed in this
  presentation
• Republicans are the party of Big Business and Big
  Money
• Republicans are anti-woman, anti-immigrant,
  anti-science, anti-union, anti-worker and
  anti-social and economic justice
• Republicans are the party of the status quo
• Limited government is just a preference rather
  than the law
• Democrats fight for the Little Guy
• Democrats fight for justice
• The Constitution empowers the government to solve
  all our problems and provide us with whatever
  goods and services we need or want

5
Problem Some Public Education That Needs to be
Accomplished There are real and important
differences between the Republican and
Democratic Parties Many important votes in
Congress and state legislatures fall along party
lines with relatively few rebels from each camp
voting scorecards from advocacy/issue
organizations clearly show this The real power
in legislatures is exercised in the committees,
all of which are controlled by the majority
party A vote for any candidate is a vote to
empower the agenda of that candidates party
since the candidates seat counts toward the
majority in the chamber and could change control
of the committees In spite of media derision,
the battles over spending are deadly serious and
not shenanigans
6
Problem Republicans/Conservatives Keep Fighting
on our Opponents Terms and Turf Every attempt
to address particular problems or fix particular
programs that lacks Constitutional authority is
conceding the legitimacy of the Democrats
unlawful approach to government. Approaching
every so-called issue on the Democrats terms
only makes Republicans look miserly, uncaring,
cold-hearted, etc. We cannot out-Democrat the
Democrats! The leadership of the so-called
Democratic Party consists of thieves, homicidal
psychotics, liars and ideologically driven
corrupters of our nations economic, social,
political and educational systems, as well as of
the very moral character of our people. The
characteristics of the so-called Democratic
Party fit the description of an organized crime
syndicate craving political power rather than
riches. The Democrats are obsessed with
CONTROL or, as Orwell put it, POWER. Republicans
need to TAKE THE GLOVES OFF!!!
7
Objectives Demonstrate that The Democratic
Partys agenda is entirely inconsistent with Dr.
Martin Luther King Jr.s Dream and Vision of The
Beloved Community. Their agenda abandons the
principles of nonviolence, inclusiveness,
justice and love of neighbor. The Democrats
agenda is abusive towards opponents, undermining
goodwill and making reconciliation
difficult The Democrats agenda does violence to
the rule of law, especially trampling
Constitutional protections against government
overreach The Democrats agenda undermines the
values, hopes and moral integrity of the
American people The Democrats agenda enables
ongoing direct physical violence to the most
innocent and helpless members of the human
community The Democrats agenda and messages are
deadly to African-Americans and other components
of the Partys base
8
Importance of the Constitution The Supreme Law
of the Land (Article VI) If you have ever worked
for the government at any level, have ever been
in the military or are a naturalized citizen, you
have taken an oath in some form to support the
Constitution of the United States as required in
Article VI. This oath does not
expire. Abiding by the provisions of the
Constitution is essential to having rule of law
9
2012 Republican Platform - GOP 2012 Republican
Platform (PDF) Balanced Budget Constitutional
Amendment requiring super-majority for a tax
increase Annual Audit of Federal Reserve Bills
cite constitutional authority Separate but equal
branches honoring delegated authority Defend
against activist judiciary Sanctity of
Life Traditional Marriage Repeal Obamacare Free
market economy Support small business and
entrepreneurship Reduced regulation Significant
tax reform, including repeal Death Tax and
Alternative Minimum Tax Adherence to the
Constitution with emphasis on 1st, 2nd, 4th, 5th,
9th and 10th Amendments American Sovereignty in
US Courts Energy Independence Immigration build
the fence, NO Amnesty, English as national
language, e-verify Source http//www.platformre
publicancaucus.com/platform.html
10
From the 2012 Republican Platform Taxes, by
their very nature, reduce a citizens freedom.
Their proper role in a free society should be to
fund services that are essential and authorized
by the Constitution, such as national security,
and the care of those who cannot care for
themselves. We reject the use of taxation to
redistribute income, fund unnecessary or
ineffective programs, or foster the crony
capitalism that corrupts both politicians and
corporations. Many of the issues that divide
us the most boil down to matters of
responsibility and authority.
11
Limited Government Republicans habitually say
they believe in limited government The phrase
sounds like a mere preference to the average
citizen who may want expanded government services
and has been conditioned to believe this is a
legitimate expectation for people to have of
their government A proposed better phrase that
unmistakably gets to the point is lawful
government
12
The Founders on Government George
Washington Government is not reason it is not
eloquent it is force. Like fire, it is a
dangerous servant and a fearful master. John
Adams Power always thinks... that it is doing
God's service when it is violating all his
laws. Remember, democracy never lasts long. It
soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There
never was a democracy yet that did not commit
suicide. Thomas Jefferson A democracy is
nothing more than mob rule, where fifty-one
percent of the people may take away the rights of
the other forty-nine. I predict future
happiness for Americans if they can prevent the
government from wasting the labors of the people
under the pretense of taking care of
them. That government is best which governs
the least, because its people discipline
themselves. The care of human life and
happiness, and not their destruction, is the
first and only object of good government.
13
A Sad Reflection on Government But what is
government itself, but the greatest of all
reflections on human nature? If men were angels,
no government would be necessary. If angels were
to govern men, neither external nor internal
controls on government would be necessary. In
framing a government which is to be administered
by men over men, the great difficulty lies in
this you must first enable the government to
control the governed and in the next place
oblige it to control itself. A dependence on the
people is, no doubt, the primary control on the
government but experience has taught mankind the
necessity of auxiliary precautions. James
Madison Federalist No. 51
14
Purposes of the Constitution as Stated in the
Preamble To form a more perfect Union To provide
for the common defense To establish Justice To
promote the general Welfare To insure domestic
Tranquility To secure the Blessings of Liberty to
ourselves and our Posterity The Supreme
Courts judicial dictate in Roe v. Wade, which
the Democrats embrace Divided us like nothing
else Established injustice of the worst sort
the deprivation of life against the most
innocent and helpless among us, on a massive
scale Ensured domestic upheaval for the last 40
plus years Prevented any defense for the most
helpless among us Promoted general moral
degradation Secured the curses of physical,
mental/emotional, spiritual and social
problems for many women and men Destroyed
tens of millions of our posterity The American
people continue to chafe under the morally and
socially unacceptable consequences of this brazen
act of judicial tyranny which is incompatible
with everything this nation has ever stood for.
This controversy is not going away, at least not
until the so-called Democrats are largely removed
from positions of power.
15
Some Key Provisions of the U.S.
Constitution Article I (legislative branch)
Section 1. All legislative powers vested in
Congress No such powers to make laws are vested
in the executive or judicial branches Article I
Section 8. Enumerated powers of Congress The
enumerated powers are very specific - only those
thought to be necessary for the central
government to exercise all else left to the
states Much of what the federal government does
today is not lawful under the Constitutions
list of enumerated powers, including healthcare,
education, welfare, transportation, energy,
agriculture and much more General Welfare not
carte blanche per the Tenth Amendment Commerce
clause among the several States
interstate commerce only Necessary and proper
clause redundant and unnecessary Article III
(judicial branch) Section 1. The judicial Power
not defined Only the jurisdiction of the
judiciary is defined in Section 2 Congress
empowered to regulate the Supreme Court Sec. 2
clause 2 Therefore, Court stripping is a
legitimate power of Congress Tenth Amendment
Reserved powers negates broad interpretation of
general Welfare The powers not delegated to
the United States by the Constitution, nor
prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to
the States respectively, or to the people.
16
Enumerated Powers Under the Constitution It is
to be remembered that the general government is
not to be charged with the whole power of making
and administering laws. Its jurisdiction is
limited to certain enumerated objects, which
concern all the members of the republic, but
which are not to be attained by the separate
provisions of any. The subordinate governments,
which can extend their care to all those other
subjects which can be separately provided for,
will retain their due authority and activity.
James Madison Federalist No.
14 Clearly, Madison did not anticipate the
usurpations that would result in the general
government encroaching upon many of the powers of
the subordinate governments (of the states).
17
Three Clauses the Supreme Court Perverts to Get
Around the Enumerated Powers (part 1 of 3) By
Publius Huldah The interstate (sic) Commerce
clause (Art. I, 8, cl. 3) Websters 1828
Dictionary says commerce is the buying and
selling of goods. In Federalist No. 22 (4th
para) and Federalist No. 42 (9th 10th paras),
Hamilton and Madison explain the primary purpose
of the clause To prohibit the States from
imposing taxes tolls on merchandize as it is
transported through the States for purposes of
buying and selling.
Source https//publiushuldah.files.wordpress.com/
2014/09/chart-on-three-clauses- the-supreme-court-
perverts-1.pdf
18
Three Clauses the Supreme Court Perverts to Get
Around the Enumerated Powers (part 2 of 3) By
Publius Huldah The general Welfare clause
(Preamble Art. I, 8, cl. 1) Websters 1828
Dictionary defines welfare as 2. Exemption
from any unusual evil or calamity the enjoyment
of peace and prosperity, or the ordinary
blessings of society and civil government
applied to states. It has nothing to do with
handouts, public relief, or the feds doing
whatever they think is a good idea. In Federalist
No. 41 (last 4 paras), Madison points out that
Art. I, 8, employs general terms which are
immediately followed by the enumeration of
particular powers which explain and qualify,
by a recital of particulars, the general
phrase. It is error to focus on general
expressions and disregard the specifications
which ascertain and limit their import thus, to
argue that the general expression provides an
unlimited power is an absurdity. So yes! The
powers of Congress over the Country at Large
really are limited primarily to those few listed
at Art. I, 8, clauses 3-16. Our Framers
understood that general Welfare, i.e., the
enjoyment of peace and prosperity, and the
enjoyment of the ordinary blessings of society
and civil government, was possible only with a
federal government of strictly limited powers.
Let that sink in.
19
Three Clauses the Supreme Court Perverts to Get
Around the Enumerated Powers (part 3 of 3) By
Publius Huldah The necessary and proper
clause (Art. I, 8, last clause) This clause
delegates to Congress power to pass all laws
necessary and proper to execute its declared
powers (Federalist No. 29, 4th para) the
constitutional operation of the intended
government would be precisely the same if this
clause were entirely obliterated as if it were
repeated in every article a power to do
something must be a power to pass all laws
necessary and proper for the execution of that
power, and thus the clause is perfectly
harmless, a tautology or redundancy
(Federalist No. 33, 2nd 3rd paras). Madison
writes to the same effect in (Federalist No. 44,
under his discussion of the SIXTH class of
powers). So the clause permits the execution of
powers already delegated and enumerated in the
Constitution. No additional substantive powers
are granted by the clause. Learn the enumerated
powers delegated to Congress to the President.
With our Votes Nullification of
unconstitutional acts, lets enforce the
Constitution we already have. Dont let others
change or replace it! PH Source
https//publiushuldah.files.wordpress.com/2014/09/
chart-on-three-clauses-the-supreme-court-perverts-
1.pdf
20
Some Historically Mistaken Ideas About the New
Constitution The powers delegated by the
proposed Constitution to the federal government
are few and defined. Those which are to remain in
the State governments are numerous
and indefinite. The former will be exercised
principally on external objects, as war, peace,
negotiation, and foreign commerce with which
last the power of taxation will, for the most
part, be connected. The powers reserved to the
several States will extend to all the objects
which, in the ordinary course of affairs, concern
the lives, liberties, and properties of the
people, and the internal order, improvement, and
prosperity of the State. The operations of the
federal government will be most extensive and
important in times of war and danger those of
the State governments, in times of peace and
security. As the former periods will probably
bear a small proportion to the latter, the State
governments will here enjoy another advantage
over the federal government. The more adequate,
indeed, the federal powers may be rendered to the
national defense, the less frequent will be those
scenes of danger which might favor their
ascendancy over the governments of the particular
States. If the new Constitution be examined with
accuracy and candor, it will be found that the
change which it proposes consists much less in
the addition of NEW POWERS to the Union, than in
the invigoration of its ORIGINAL POWERS. The
regulation of commerce, it is true, is a new
power but that seems to be an addition which few
oppose, and from which no apprehensions are
entertained. James Madison Federalist
No. 45
21
Judicial Review Established by the Supreme
Court case of Marbury v. Madison in 1803. The
Court's decision was opposed by then President
Thomas Jefferson, who lamented that this doctrine
made the Constitution "a mere thing of wax in the
hands of the judiciary, which they may twist and
shape into any form they please." Jefferson
couldnt have guessed how right he would be
proven with the Supreme Courts decision in Roe
v. Wade.
22
Judicial Power Whoever attentively considers the
different departments of power must perceive,
that, in a government in which they are separated
from each other, the judiciary, from the nature
of its functions, will always be the least
dangerous to the political rights of the
Constitution because it will be least in a
capacity to annoy or injure them. The Executive
not only dispenses the honors, but holds the
sword of the community. The legislature not only
commands the purse, but prescribes the rules by
which the duties and rights of every citizen are
to be regulated. The judiciary, on the contrary,
has no influence over either the sword or the
purse no direction either of the strength or of
the wealth of the society and can take no active
resolution whatever. It may truly be said to have
neither FORCE nor WILL, but merely judgment and
must ultimately depend upon the aid of the
executive arm (emphasis mine) even for the
efficacy of its judgments. The courts must
declare the sense of the law and if they should
be disposed to exercise WILL instead of JUDGMENT,
the consequence would equally be the substitution
of their pleasure to that of the legislative
body. Alexander Hamilton Federalist
No. 78 The exercise of will by the courts has
become routine and much desired by the Democrats
to enact their agenda directly, free from the
messy legislative process. They long ago
accomplished their objective of Rule of Whim or
substitution of their pleasure to that of the
legislative body.
23
Administrative Law Largely under Democrat rule,
Congress has habitually directed Executive branch
agencies to write rules which carry the force
of law, then execute the rules and adjudicate any
disputes which may arise in their application.
Aside from violating the principle of
non-delegation, which was recognized by the
ancient Greeks, this practice combines all three
branches of government in the same hands and
leaves citizens with little or no
recourse. The accumulation of all powers,
legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the
same hands, whether of one, a few, or many,
and whether hereditary, self-appointed, or
elective, may justly be pronounced the very
definition of tyranny. James
Madison Federalist No. 47 Does it trouble
the Democrats that We the People are experiencing
the creeping loss of our liberties due to the
expansion of regulation by administrative law?
24
Some of Dr. Kings Concepts and
Principles TRIPLE EVILS  The Triple Evils of
POVERTY, RACISM and MILITARISM are forms of
violence that exist in a vicious cycle. They are
interrelated, all-inclusive, and stand as
barriers to our living in the Beloved Community.
When we work to remedy one evil, we affect all
evils. To work against the Triple Evils, you must
develop a nonviolent frame of mind as described
in the Six Principles of Nonviolence and use
the Kingian model for social action outlined in
the Six Steps for Nonviolent Social
Change. Source The Martin Luther King Jr.
Center for Nonviolent Social Change http//www.the
kingcenter.org/king-philosophy
25
This presentation will demonstrate that the
Democratic Partys agenda - Promotes moral and
spiritual poverty - Is closely related to
racism - Pursues numerous policies that can be
considered wars and have predictably
destructive effects
26
Some Aspects of Dr. Kings Beloved Community a
realistic, achievable goal that could be attained
by a critical mass of people committed to and
trained in the philosophy and methods of
nonviolence. a global vision, in which all
people can share in the wealth of the earth. In
the Beloved Community, poverty, hunger and
homelessness will not be tolerated because
international standards of human decency will not
allow it. Racism and all forms of discrimination,
bigotry and prejudice will be replaced by an
all-inclusive spirit of sisterhood and
brotherhood. In the Beloved Community,
international disputes will be resolved by
peaceful conflict-resolution and reconciliation
of adversaries, instead of military power. Love
and trust will triumph over fear and hatred.
Peace with justice will prevail over war and
military conflict. all conflicts in The
Beloved Community should end with reconciliation
of adversaries cooperating together in a spirit
of friendship and goodwill. Source The Martin
Luther King Jr. Center for Nonviolent Social
Change http//www.thekingcenter.org/king-philoso
phy
27
SIX PRINCIPLES OF NONVIOLENCE (part 1 of
2) PRINCIPLE ONE Nonviolence is a way of life
for courageous people. It is active nonviolent
resistance to evil.  It is aggressive
spiritually, mentally and emotionally.
  PRINCIPLE TWO Nonviolence seeks to win
friendship and understanding. The end result of
nonviolence is redemption and reconciliation.  Th
e purpose of nonviolence is the creation of the
Beloved Community.   PRINCIPLE THREE
Nonviolence seeks to defeat injustice not people.
Nonviolence recognizes that evildoers are also
victims and are not evil people.   The nonviolent
resister seeks to defeat evil not people.
28
SIX PRINCIPLES OF NONVIOLENCE (part 2 of
2) PRINCIPLE FOUR Nonviolence holds that
suffering can educate and transform.
Nonviolence accepts suffering without
retaliation.  Unearned suffering is redemptive
and has tremendous educational and transforming
possibilities.     PRINCIPLE FIVE Nonviolence
chooses love instead of hate. Nonviolence
resists violence of the spirit as well as the
body.             Nonviolent love is spontaneous,
unmotivated, unselfish and creative.
  PRINCIPLE SIX Nonviolence believes that the
universe is on the side of justice. The
nonviolent resister has deep faith that justice
will eventually win.  Nonviolence believes that
God is a God of justice.    
29
SIX STEPS OF NONVIOLENT SOCIAL CHANGE
1. INFORMATION GATHERING To understand and
articulate an issue, problem or injustice facing
a person, community, or institution you must do
research. You must investigate and gather all
vital information from all sides of the argument
or issue so as to increase your understanding of
the problem. You must become an expert on your
opponent's position.  2. EDUCATION It is
essential to inform others, including your
opposition, about your issue. This minimizes
misunderstandings and gains you support and
sympathy.  3. PERSONAL COMMITMENT Daily check
and affirm your faith in the philosophy and
methods of nonviolence. Eliminate hidden motives
and prepare yourself to accept suffering, if
necessary, in your work for justice. 4.
DISCUSSION/NEGOTIATION Using grace, humor and
intelligence, confront the other party with a
list of injustices and a plan for addressing and
resolving these injustices. Look for what is
positive in every action and statement the
opposition makes. Do not seek to humiliate the
opponent but to call forth the good in the
opponent. 
30
SIX STEPS OF NONVIOLENT SOCIAL CHANGE
5. DIRECT ACTION These are actions taken when
the opponent is unwilling to enter into, or
remain in, discussion/negotiation. These actions
impose a "creative tension" into the conflict,
supplying moral pressure on your opponent to work
with you in resolving the injustice.  6.
RECONCILIATION Nonviolence seeks friendship and
understanding with the opponent. Nonviolence does
not seek to defeat the opponent. Nonviolence is
directed against evil systems, forces, oppressive
policies, unjust acts, but not against persons.
Through reasoned compromise, both sides resolve
the injustice with a plan of action. Each act of
reconciliation is one step closer to the 'Beloved
Community.'  Source The Martin Luther King Jr.
Center for Nonviolent Social Change http//www.th
ekingcenter.org/king-philosophy
31
Kings SIX PRINCIPLES OF NONVIOLENCE as seen
from the Constitutionalists perspective (part 1
of 2) PRINCIPLE ONE Nonviolence is a way of life
for courageous people. It is active nonviolent
resistance to evil.  It is aggressive
spiritually, mentally and emotionally.
  Constitutionalists have never resorted to
physical violence in opposing the destruction of
their protections against federal government
overreach. PRINCIPLE TWO Nonviolence seeks to
win friendship and understanding. The end result
of nonviolence is redemption and
reconciliation.  The purpose of nonviolence is
the creation of the Beloved Community.
  Constitutionalists seek an end to abuses of
their Constitutional protections and the
spiritual redemption of their fellow citizens who
are committing theft by ballot box. These are
steps toward the creation of the Beloved
Community. PRINCIPLE THREE Nonviolence seeks to
defeat injustice not people. Nonviolence
recognizes that evildoers are also victims and
are not evil people. The nonviolent resister
seeks to defeat evil not people. Constitutionalist
s seek to defeat the evil of unlawful government
and the spiritual healing of their fellow
citizens who destroy Constitutional protections.
32
Kings SIX PRINCIPLES OF NONVIOLENCE as seen
from the Constitutionalists perspective (part 2
of 2) PRINCIPLE FOUR Nonviolence holds that
suffering can educate and transform. Nonviolence
accepts suffering without retaliation.  Unearned
suffering is redemptive and has tremendous
educational and transforming possibilities.  
  Constitutionalists have never sought
reparations or other vengeful actions against
those who have unlawfully violated Constitutional
protections. PRINCIPLE FIVE Nonviolence chooses
love instead of hate. Nonviolence resists
violence of the spirit as well as the
body.   Nonviolent love is spontaneous,
unmotivated, unselfish and creative.
  Constitutionalists have always resisted
violence against the rule of law by creative
persuasion, legislation and judicial actions and
the amendment process, in spite of persistent
abuses. PRINCIPLE SIX Nonviolence believes that
the universe is on the side of justice. The
nonviolent resister has deep faith that justice
will eventually win.  Nonviolence believes that
God is a God of justice.     Constitutionalists
believe in our Constitution, which recognizes
Jesus as Lord (signed in the Year of our Lord
1787), to provide justice if all would abide by
it.
33
The Tenth Amendment and the Beloved
Community Many Americans recognize that the
Tenth Amendment, the last article of the Bill of
Rights, was intended to protect all of us from
exactly the kind of federal overreach that has
resulted in the bloated monstrosity that is
todays federal government. The habitual
violations of the Tenth Amendment by the
Democrats and their accomplices in the judiciary,
the media and among some Republicans (RINOs
Republicans In Name Only) are the root cause of
much of the ill feeling among Americans. The
power to remove this ill feeling rests with those
who have kept the Democrats in power with their
votes and its removal would be a major step
toward achieving Dr. Kings Beloved Community.
34
Why Running Against the Entire Democrat Agenda
Matters Unless Constitutionalists can make the
case that the routine violations of our Tenth
Amendment protections are abusive of Americans,
our progressive friends will continue to view
their unlawful approaches to our problems as
legitimate charity and conforming to Christian
teaching. They will continue to believe that
they hold the high moral ground and are more holy
and righteous than those committed to following
the Constitution. Note the misplaced sense of
responsibility and responsibility transference in
the following email (next chart) from someone
claiming to be pro-life. See also
www.cul.detmich.com/lemmo_common_good/lemmo_common
_good.html
35
Email response to my fundraising letter for the
2012 elections from a Catholic friend of long
standing Dear Al -- As a pro-life advocate I
want to promote candidates for political office
who actively support life. To be pro-birth is
not enough. If a candidate wants to cut support
that enables young women to choose life for their
unborn children, how is this nurturing life? Is
that what Jesus would do? If a candidate wants
to cut programs that mentor young fathers-to-be
so they can recognize and meet their
responsibilities, how is this nurturing life? A
recent EWTN speaker pointed out that the abortion
rate for those in poverty is 300 higher than for
those above the poverty line. To slash the
budget for programs that offer counseling, food,
shelter, alternative education, job training, and
health care is often to slash the lifeline that
enables the most fragile in society to choose
life. Finally, would the same Jesus who told
us Love your enemies, do good to those who
hate you choose to expand our military force by
trillions of dollars in the next few yearsnot
even requested by the armed forceswhen our
nation has poured more money into defense than
the next 20 nations combined? Where is the
trillion dollars for peace academies, conflict
resolution programs, diplomacy training and a
host of life-affirming methods that would greatly
diminish the call for violent force? We need
courageous men and women to affirm life every
step of the way.
36
My email response to my friend Thank you for
your response.  What most people don't understand
when it comes to all these federal programs is
that our Constitution prohibits the government
from being involved in nearly all of them.  Yes,
they do good things for people, but failing to
abide by our supreme law, which was written to
restrict the power of government, is failure to
abide by a still higher law to love our neighbor
as ourselves.  Charity belongs at the state or
local level where it is closer to the people. 
This is what the Church's teaching on
subsidiarity requires.  And apart from government
action, charity should be our responsibility as
individuals, as church and as members of whatever
organizations we choose to associate with to deal
with particular issues.  Passing off our
responsibility to the federal government, which
has no legitimate powers to conduct social
programs, has corrupted our whole society in many
ways, building a culture of dependency that has
wrecked families, and distorting our government
functions.I'd love to sit down with you or
anyone else and show them exactly where in the
Constitution the restrictions I'm speaking of
exist.  I know you and many others have the best
of intentions, but empowering an evil agenda --
and I don't use the word evil lightly --  to
accomplish things that have no justification
under the law to begin with, is no way to
exercise responsible citizenship or Christian
charity.
37
Ideas on Government and Religion (1 of
3) Articles of Confederation And Whereas it
hath pleased the Great Governor of the World to
incline the hearts of the legislatures we
respectively represent in Congress, to approve
of, and to authorize us to ratify the said
Articles of Confederation and perpetual
Union. In Witness whereof we have hereunto
set our hands in Congress. Done at Philadelphia
in the State of Pennsylvania the ninth day of
July in the Year of our Lord One Thousand Seven
Hundred and Seventy-Eight, and in the Third Year
of the independence of America. Northwest
Ordinance of 1787 Art. 3. Religion, morality,
and knowledge, being necessary to good government
and the happiness of mankind, schools and the
means of education shall forever be encouraged.
(The Bible was the main textbook.) Done by
the United States, in Congress assembled, the
13th day of July, in the year of our Lord 1787,
and of their sovereignty and independence the
twelfth.
38
Ideas on Government and Religion (2 of 3) George
Washington It is impossible to rightly govern a
nation without God and the Bible. Let us with
caution indulge the supposition that morality can
be maintained without religion. Reason and
experience both forbid us to expect that national
morality can prevail in exclusion of religious
principle. Thomas Jefferson) We hold these
truths to be self-evident that all men are
created equal that they are endowed by their
Creator with certain unalienable rights that
among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of
happiness. - Declaration of
Independence It behooves every man who values
liberty of conscience for himself, to resist
invasions of it in the case of others or their
case may, by change of circumstances, become his
own. God who gave us life gave us liberty.
Can the liberties of a nation be secure when we
have removed a conviction that these liberties
are the gift of God? Indeed I tremble for my
country when I reflect that God is just, that His
justice cannot sleep forever.
39
Ideas on Government and Religion (3 of 3) John
Adams We have no government armed with power
capable of contending with human passions
unbridled by morality and religion. Avarice,
ambition, revenge or gallantry would break the
strongest cords of our Constitution as a whale
goes through a net. Our Constitution is designed
only for a moral and religious people. It is
wholly inadequate for any other. Alexander
Hamilton The sacred rights of mankind are not to
be rummaged for among old parchments or musty
records. They are written, as with a sunbeam,
in the whole volume of human nature, by the hand
of the divinity itself and can never be erased
or obscured by mortal power.
40
American Government and the Ten Commandments The
below statement, author unknown, states
important truths We have staked the whole
future of American civilization, not upon the
power of government, far from it. We have staked
the future of all of our political institutions
upon the capacity of mankind for self-government
upon the capacity of each and all of us to govern
ourselves, to control ourselves, to sustain
ourselves according to the Ten Commandments of
God.
41
The Democrat Agenda and The Ten Commandments (1
of 3) Idolatry and Killing By the idolatrous
self-worship of their own intellects as competent
to determine criteria for who is or isn't a
person under the law, the Democrats have
rationalized massive prenatal child-slaying.
This is simply the ancient practice of living
human sacrifice (abortion "rites") to additional
idols this nation now worships, especially
unrestricted sexual expression. The fatal
discrimination against the prenatal population
arises from the same idolatrous, self-worshiping
arrogance that is the source of racism. It's the
same ugly ideas, just different criteria for
choice. The Democrats are first cousins to
racists, believing that human rights are granted
or denied to the powerless by the powerful, based
on criteria of their choice, rather than being
intrinsic with each human life, which was the
premise of our nation before it was struck down
by Roe v. Wade. Another idol they worship is
equality of outcomes (rather than equality of
opportunity, equality under the law or equality
in the eyes of God) regardless of talent, effort,
accomplishment, drive or virtue.
42
The Democrat Agenda and The Ten Commandments (2
of 3 continued) Coveting Their emphasis on
class warfare between "haves" and "have nots"
promotes and rationalizes covetousness. Theirs
is the politics of envy. Stealing Their
confiscatory approach to taxation, without
constitutional authority for their spending
priorities, is simply theft. It routinely
violates the principle of equal protection of the
laws by far more heavily taxing some of us, and
punishes success. Dishonoring father and
mother They dishonor father and mother with
their support for euthanasia and doctor-assisted
suicide, pressuring the elderly to end their own
lives. Sexual and Relational Sin They condone
and encourage sexual and relational sin by their
support for mainstreaming and normalizing
homosexuality and marriage for SADS, Sexual
Affinity Disorder Sufferers (a compassionate and
accurate term, unlike the dishonest and
misleading "gays") as well as sexual relations of
every kind for minors and others outside of
marriage.
43
The Democrat Agenda and The Ten Commandments (3
of 3 continued) False Witness They bear false
witness against their neighbors with their wild
accusations of racism, hate and judgmentalism in
attempts to intimidate, silence or put on the
defensive any critics of their destructive ideas.
This is really psychological projection,
attributing to others what is true of themselves.
Misuse of the name of God They misuse the
name of God when they violate their oaths of
office to support the Constitution by pursuing
legislation for which there is no constitutional
authority and by supporting judicial dictates and
executive usurpations which subvert legislative
authority altogether. These pursuits are
violations of the laws of man as well as of the
laws of God.
44
Democrats The Party of Division Divide us by
class, sex, race, religion, generations, language
groups, financial interests Divide us into tax
payers and tax beneficiaries Divide income from
work Divide knowledge from schooling Divide
certification from achievement Divide advancement
from merit Divide benefits from fiscal
realities Divide morality from law Divide power
from accountability Divide legislation from
Constitutional authority Divide voting from
citizenship Divide individuals from
responsibility Divide responsibilities from
freedoms Divide punishment from crime Divide the
right to life from prenatal lives (so much for
the Little Guy) Divide children from parental
authority Divide fatherhood from family Divide
religion from moral development Divide sex from
love, commitment and marriage
45
Democrat Wars In Progress (a partial list) War on
the Rule of Law and the Constitution War on the
American Taxpayer War on Fiscal and Moral
Sanity War on American Industries War on
Recognition of Our Creator War on Religious
Freedom War on the Family War on the Prenatal
Child War on Women (the real one!) War on Black
America War on American Values War on Personal
Virtue, Self-Confidence and Moral Character War
on the Foundations of Western Civilization Much
could be said about each of these wars, but this
presentation will focus on the War on the
Prenatal Child
46
Democrats are waging war against American
traditions, standards and values Self-reliance
the last thing Democrats want the more
dependent you are on government, the more they
own you Personal Virtue the Constitution will
not work for the governance of any but a moral
and virtuous people Monogamous and Heterosexual
Marriage one of the foundations of any
morally, psychologically, physically and
spiritually healthy society The Nuclear Family
the most critical institution for the raising of
children which the political left has
historically sought to undermine and
replace Private Initiative any private
initiatives must be approved in advance by
government through a series of burdensome
permitting and regulatory hurdles Free Enterprise
ownership is not sought since that would bring
with it responsibility Democrats seek to
control private enterprises their economic
model is not socialism but fascism Rule of Law
to be replaced by the Rule of Whim characteristic
of the Democrats philosophy of childhood If I
want it I should have it. Sanctity of Human Life
This war has featured violence to life, truth,
values, language, law, government, medicine,
ethics and principles of human rights
47
Does the Democrats War on America Meet the
Definition of Treason in the U.S.
Constitution? Article III, Section 3. Treason
against the United States, shall consist only in
levying War against them, or in adhering to their
Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. -
U.S. Constitution The Democrats have been waging
all-out war against the very foundations of
American society for decades, including war
against our economic, social, political, legal,
ethical and educational systems and the very
moral character of our people. The present
(Obama) Democrat Administration has been
relentlessly tearing down the good name of the
United States while apologizing to and flattering
our adversaries.
48
The Democrats Agenda Promotes Genocide The
International Convention of the Prevention and
Punishment of the Crime of Genocide on December
9, 1948 set the United Nations definition of
genocide General Assembly Resolution 260A (III)
Article 2 In the present Convention, genocide
means any of the following acts committed with
intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a
national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as
such (a) Killing members of the group (b)
Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members
of the group (c) Deliberately inflicting on the
group conditions of life calculated to bring
about its physical destruction in whole or in
part (d) Imposing measures intended to prevent
births within the group (e) Forcibly
transferring children of the group to another
group Electing a Democrat to our presidency
allows the seeding of our entire diplomatic corps
with abortion zealots and empowers historys most
egregious campaign of cultural imperialism.
Democrats are committed to jamming abortion down
the throats of Third World nations and destroying
good will toward our country.
49
Just War Criteria Violated in the Democrats War
on the Prenatal Child
Just Cause to confront a real and present
danger to protect innocent life - Very seldom
the case with abortion
Competent Authority war must be declared by
those with responsibility for public order -
Decision typically left to the distraught,
ill-informed or underage individuals
Comparative Justice Are the values at stake
critical enough to override the presumption
against war (abortion)?
Right Intention War can only be conducted to
satisfy the just cause - Just cause usually
absent
Last Resort All peaceful alternatives have
already been exhausted - Adoption usually
possible
Probability of Success The outcome cannot be
disproportionate or futile - Significant damage
to womens physical, mental and spiritual
health and to their social standing -
Damage to societys ethical values (sanctity of
human life)
Proportionality inflicted damage must be
proportionate to the good expected - Trades a
human life for values typically less than life -
Grotesquely disproportionate to the ends usually
sought
50
Laws of War and Other Principles Violated by
Analogy in the Democrats War on the Prenatal
Child Prohibiting of Poisonous
Weapons Prohibiting of Refusal of
Quarter Immunity for Non-Combatants Prohibiting
of Live Dismemberment (Mutilation) of Unarmed
Target Population International Standards for
Treatment of Prisoners including Prohibiting of
Experimentation Rationalization on the Basis of
Hard Cases Results in Overwhelming Collateral
Damage Literally Surgical First Strikes to
Preempt the Recognition and Protection of Law
Normally Accorded at Birth
51
The Democrats War on the Prenatal
Child Withholds or suspends every principle of
humane, compassionate, lawful and civilized
behavior No benefit of any doubt No presumption
of personhood Most excruciatingly painful methods
of execution used Execution permitted for any
reason or no reason The unwanted prenatal child
confronts us with an insoluble problem except by
resort to violence. Its very existence means
loss of control, a maddening prospect for those
obsessed with control. The prenatal child -
Cannot be negotiated with - Cannot be deterred -
Cannot be appeased - Cannot be threatened -
Cannot be embargoed - Cannot be held hostage -
Cannot be imprisoned - Cannot be stayed from
being born, its natural destiny, by any
non-violent means
52
Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice
everywhere. - The Rev. Dr. Martin Luther
King, Jr. Dr. King devoted his life to opposing
the choice to discriminate on the basis of race
Exactly one week after his January 15th
birthday, 7 days which should be designated
National Hypocrisy Week or National Schizophrenia
Week, we observe the January 22nd anniversary of
the Roe v. Wade decision, which freed us to
choose to discriminate fatally on the basis of
"wantedness", physical maturity, appearance, sex,
health, dependence, sentience, parentage, or any
other criterion, including race, if it is done
before birth Are these criteria any less
arbitrary or subjective than race? By what
logic shall we choose criteria for excluding
others from the protection of the human
community? Would any such exclusion be an act
of justice? What does the acceptance of such
criteria for destruction say about the content of
our character?
53
Intrinsicism The United States is founded on the
philosophical premise that our unalienable human
rights are intrinsic with our human lives. This
premise, which I choose to call Intrinsicism, a
single word and descriptive term, allows us to
appeal to our Creator over the head of any tyrant
or other would-be grantor or denier of our
fundamental human rights for their recognition
and protection. This premise has been called
our civic religion. It is a protective and
inclusive philosophy. All real Americans are
Intrinsicists.
54
Intrinsicism (continued) The inclusive
philosophy of Intrinsicism serves as a wall of
separation between freedom and oppression
between civilization and barbarianism. Once this
barrier has been breached, all criteria for
destruction then compete on an equal basis
because they are justified in principle. Abandoni
ng Intrinsicism can and often does result in
carnage. The U.S. has some 58,000,000
disappeared. For over 40 years, the Democratic
Party has stood in the way of extending any legal
protection at all to prenatal children such that
the horrific daily slaughter continues.
55
Rejection of Intrinsicism The Cult of
Abortionism Rejection of the philosophy of
Intrinsicism is the basis of a cult religion that
has been at the root of virtually every abuse
ever inflicted on human individuals or
populations. I call this cult "Abortionism" to
clearly associate it with the most egregious
violation of human rights in our country and most
of the world today. However, its principles
apply equally well to nearly every other human
rights abuse in world history. Its standard
practices are three abortions or terminations
See http//www.cul.detmich.com/essentials_of_ab
ortionism.html
56
The Three Abortions All three Abortions are
evils or sins Theological Abortion terminates
the authority of God to make the rules
activating principle human will fundamental
human rights are granted or denied to the
powerless by the powerful Abortionite creed My
will be done Mental Abortion dehumanize the
target individual(s) or population activating
principle infatuation with human intellect or
self-worship worship of the faculty of reason
to eliminate conscience - essential to overcoming
the moral obstacles to committing the most
egregious violations of other human beings that
all human societies prohibit the Mental
Abortion is authorized by the Theological
Abortion The criteria for choice in conducting
the Mental Abortion typically make perfect
sense to the practicing Abortionite Physical
Abortion terminates the lives, liberties or
property rights of the target population -
activating principle might makes right
anything can be justified against non-persons
57
A Principle of Conflict Resolution Attack the
problem. It is not you against me it is you and
me against the problem. The problem is the
problem. (Recall Kings principles of
non-violence, attacking evil and unjust systems,
not people.) The problem is sin. Our whole
culture is part of the problem. The sexual
devolution (to creatures with the moral code of
rodents) normalized sexual sin and its
consequences. The this-world and hereafter
adverse consequences of sin remain
unchanged. The problem starts with the
Theological Abortion. Many people now believe
they can make their own moral rules. Moral
relativism arises from the Theological
Abortion. Our political, ethical, moral, social
and overall cultural environments have been
seriously polluted. Major cleanup is necessary
but the Democratic agenda stands in the way,
dedicated to protecting this pollution as a
legitimate expression of freedom.
58
The Sects of Abortionism The sects and subsects
of this cult are characterized by their criteria
for choice in performing the Mental Abortion and
are named accordingly Racist, Sexist, Creedist,
Birthist, Classist, Utilitarianist,
Functionalist, etc. Basically, Racist
Abortionites and Birthist Abortionites, for
example, share the same ugly ideas with other
Abortionites. They believe it is up to them --
those who have power -- to grant or deny
fundamental human rights to other human beings
rather than that such rights are granted to all
human beings by God. They differ only in their
criteria for the choice of discriminating against
others even to the point of rationalizing their
destruction. Challenge those who protest this
comparison to explain how they think they are
different!
59
Secular Humanism or Abortionism? There is
nothing secular about secular humanism. Its
adherents are devoutly religious, idolatrously
and fervently worshiping the idol of their own
intellects. People think that secular is good
or neutral due to misunderstandings of the
purpose of the First Amendment, which are
promoted by Democrats. It is a prettified way of
saying atheistic, a world view that has an
abysmal record in human governance. Why cover
this up? Humanism sounds like something
friendly to humans, which it is not. Speaking of
Abortionite sects allows for easy comparison and
linkage of all historical abuses of human rights.
Even someone who claims to be for the positive
good of choice cannot easily avoid the fact
that to be for such choice one has to have
committed a Mental Abortion on the target
population, a characteristic shared by other more
obvious abusers. Attention is focused on the
only thing at issue the nature of the
choice. Abortionism demonstrates that the
pro-life cause is based on the principles of
human rights rather than on religious
beliefs. Abortionism places abortion apologists
in a difficult defensive position.
60
Language Shaping the Battlespace Fighting on
ones preferred turf has been recognized as a
key advantage in battle for millennia The
battlefield and weapons in this struggle consist
of words and ideas Language shapes thinking
which shapes actions Actions shape thinking
which shapes language How many people even know
there is a correct, scientific term for a
pregnant woman, much less what it is?
61
Language Fighting on Our Preferred
Turf Refusing to Allow the Mental Abortion by
Communicating in Abortionspeak The powers that
be have seen to it that everyone knows and uses
the word fetus, which is the correct, scientific
term for what used to be called an unborn baby.
This is precisely because it is strange, sterile,
cold and dehumanizing. Likewise, the correct,
scientific term for a pregnant woman is strange,
sterile, cold and dehumanizing. But you will
never hear it used outside of scientific circles
because it is on no ones agenda to dehumanize
women in order to rationalize destroying them,
whereas it is on many peoples agendas to
dehumanize unborn babies in order to rationalize
destroying them. The correct, scientific term
for a pregnant woman is gravida. Its from the
same root as gravity, meaning heavy, as with
child. Challenge opponents as to why they do not
use this scientifically correct term while they
insist on using fetus.
62
More Problems with Language Overcoming
Abortionspeak, the Language of Denial, Confusion
and Dehumanization Repro-destructive rites (or
rituals so as not to be confused with the
homonym rights) Viable able to live in
particular environments. This legacy term from
the physicians perspective has been used as
though the ability to live is a function of
medical technology after birth. This usage has
suggested to many that the prenatal child is
somehow not alive or doesnt matter when it is
perfectly viable in the only environment in which
it is adapted to live at the early stages of the
human life cycle. Suggested alternatives are
intra-uterine viable and extra-uterine viable to
make clear that the child is perfectly viable
(i.e., able to live) at every stage of its
existence and in both environments. Viability at
a given stage of development depends on
environment, not technology. See also
http//www.cul.detmich.com/glossary.html
63
From the 2012 Democratic National
Platform Protecting A Woman's Right to Choose.
The Democratic Party strongly and unequivocally
supports Roe v. Wade and a woman's right to make
decisions regarding her pregnancy, including a
safe and legal abortion, regardless of ability to
pay. We oppose any and all efforts to weaken or
undermine that right. Abortion is an intensely
personal decision between a woman, her family,
her doctor, and her clergy there is no place for
politicians or government to get in the way. We
also recognize that health care and education
help reduce the number of unintended pregnancies
and thereby also reduce the need for abortions.
We strongly and unequivocally support a woman's
decision to have a child by providing affordable
health care and ensuring the availability of and
access to programs that help women during
pregnancy and after the birth of a child,
including caring adoption programs. Whats
missing from this document? The prenatal child
doesnt even bear mentioning. It has been wiped
out of mind by the Mental Abortion such that it
does not exist and carries no significance. The
Democratic National Platform is a document
written by and for psychopaths.
64
Partial-Birth Abortion Consider what kind of
mind it takes to hold a perfectly formed human
baby in ones hands, its legs kicking while its
head is still within its mother, and then
puncture its skull and suck its brains
out. Anyone who could do this has first
committed a complete Mental Abortion of the
prenatal child. Guess which political party
defended this atrocity?
65
Birthist Abortionite logic If youre
against abortion then dont have one. Lets
apply this logic to some other human
behaviors If youre against slavery then dont
enslave anyone and dont become enslaved
yourself. That will solve the problem,
right? If youre against rape then dont rape
anyone and dont get raped yourself. That will
solve the problem, right? If youre against
postnatal murder then dont murder anyone and
dont get murdered yourself. That will solve the
problem, right? What do these examples have in
common? In each case the primary victim has been
mentally aborted and carries no significance in
the mind of the person making the argument.
66
Birthist Abortionite logic Answering the
Bodily Autonomy Argument A woman has a right to
control her own body Our bodies are not
autonomous there are many restrictions on how
we use them The argument cant be limited to
pregnant women, requires support for abortion at
every stage of development and argues against any
restrictions on a womans activities during
pregnancy Abortion isnt simply withdrawing
support but active killing The unborn child is
not, in any scientific or medical sense, an
intruder or a parasite or a part of the mother.
It is where it is supposed to be in the natural
order and is biologically not the mother but a
separate and unique human individual If an
unborn baby exists at all it is because of the
actions of its parents who have thereby become
responsible for it regardless of whether its
creation was intentional See also http//www.pe
rsonhoodusa.com/blog/no-pro-life-fanatic-could-eve
r-possibly-dispute/
67
The Declaration of Apathy, Moral Cowardice and/or
Degradation, Intellectual Sloth, Self-Serving
Cynicism and Womens Moral Incompetence I Am
Pro-Choice Apathy I dont care if an unborn
baby lives or dies or what abortion does to its
mother. Moral Cowardice and/or Degradation I
have conducted a Mental Abortion sufficient to
absolve myself of any obligation to defend the
most innocent and helpless members of the human
family and substituted apathy for compassion. I
may also desire to engage in rodentism, the
adoption of the moral code of rodents (whereby
humans meet, briefly sniff each other out and
then have at it) and wish to be able to easily
clean up after any mistakes. Intellectual Sloth
I am passionately devoted to ignorance about
the biological facts of life before birth and/or
pathologically self-absorbed, regarding the
entire subject of abortion as a matter of women
controlling their own bodies and nothing
else. Self-Se