Infrastructures for eScience / eScholarship - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 10
About This Presentation
Title:

Infrastructures for eScience / eScholarship

Description:

Infrastructures for eScience / eScholarship German Initiatives in a European Context Prof. Dr. Stefan Gradmann Humboldt-Universit t zu Berlin / Berlin School of ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:75
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 11
Provided by: muf73
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Infrastructures for eScience / eScholarship


1
  • Infrastructures for eScience / eScholarship
  • German Initiatives in a European Context
  • Prof. Dr. Stefan Gradmann
  • Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin / Berlin School
    of Library and Information Science (B-SLIS)
  • President of the German Association for
    Information Science and Information Practice
    (DGI)
  • stefan.gradmann_at_ibi.hu-berlin.de

2
Overview
  • German Players in a confusing environment
  • Data ? Information ? Knowledge Selected eScience
    Initiatives
  • Infrastructure for data and computing D-Grid
  • eScholarship/eScience Virtual Research
    Environments
  • Digital Library, (moderately) successfull Max
    Planck Digital Library
  • Digital Library, not (yet) successfull German
    Digital Library
  • From 'Information' to 'Knowledge' Theseus and
    Semantic Technology
  • Context what can be done on national level?
  • A concluding word on DGI

3
Players on the German Scenea Confusing
Environment
  • Infrastructure funding BMBF (Ministry of
    Education and Research)
  • Research and Digital Libraries funding Deutsche
    Forgschungsgemeinschaft (DFG)
  • Academia 16 federal states
  • Extra-academic research Max Planck Gesellschaft
    (MPG), Helmholtz, Fraunhofer (applied science)
  • Concertation Deutsche Initiative für
    Netzwerkinformationen (DINI)
  • Digital Library research HU B-SLIS (my
    institute)
  • ...

4
Infrastructure D-Grid
  • Data and computing infrastructure
  • Funded by BMBF (2004-2010)
  • The promise of grid architectures
  • enable direct network based access to computers,
    storage, scientific instruments and experiments,
    sensors, applications, data, and middleware
    services.
  • almost infinite computing and storage capacity
  • cost reduction through a utility model.
  • Community projects in high-energy physics,
    astrophysics, alternative energy, medicine and
    life sciences, climate sciences, engineering
    sciences, and scientific libraries.
  • Integration project (DGI) for generic grid
    middleware resources such as authentication /
    authorisation facilities

5
D-Grid Big Picture
  • European and global context
  • Enabling Grids for E-Science (EGEE,
    http//public.eu-egee.org/)
  • Semantic Grid Community (http//www.semanticgrid.o
    rg/)

6
DFG Collaboratories
  • Virtual research environments for
  • Network based collaborative working modes
  • New collaborative scenarios
  • New approaches for dealing with scientific data
    and information
  • Using new components or new aggregations of known
    interoperable components of data and information
    related infrastructure such as
  • Wikis, blogs, tagging,
  • Project Management,
  • Virtual organisations
  • Primary data repositories
  • Authentication structures
  • Enabling a better co-operation of of research
    networks and information institutions and more
    specifically libraries.

7
Digital Libraries
  • German Digital Library (DDB)
  • not (yet) successful
  • Badly needed as aggregating instance for
    Europeana
  • For the time being all we have in hand is a
    position paper prepared by the federal
    government, the federal states and the
    municipalities
  • Beta version planned for 2010 / 2011
  • Funding situation remains unclear
  • Diffuse customer and stakeholder profile
  • Max Planck Digital Library (MPDL)
  • (moderately) successful
  • Strong technical partnership with eSciDoc (FIZ
    Karlsruhe)
  • Relatively well focussed and coherent decision
    structures within MPG
  • Clear customer and stakeholder profile (Max
    Planck Institutes)
  • ? http//www.mpdl.mpg.de/

8
Theseus Semantic Technology
  • Semantic contextualisation from 'Information' to
    'Knowledge'
  • Has a conflictual pre-history I almost dare not
    to mention Quaero!
  • Driven by computer science, applied science and
    industry with key players such as Fraunhofer,
    SAP, Siemens, DFKI
  • ... an innovative, groundbreaking knowledge
    infrastructure allowing entirely new forms of
    knowledge access, knowledge management and
    web-based services, applications and business
    models. (Wahlster, DFKI)
  • Scenarios
  • ALEXANDRIA Knowledge discovery and organisation
    services for end users
  • CONTENTUS Multimedia in cultural heritage
    institutions
  • MEDICO - Syntax and vocabularies for medical
    image retrieval
  • ORDO automated content categorisation and
    organisation
  • TEXO Design, offering, combination, delivery,
    accounting of semantics based web services
  • PROCESSUS IT enabled business knowledge
    administration
  • http//www.theseus-programm.de/en-US/home/default.
    aspx

9
Key question what can / should be done on
national level?
  • As far as Germany is concerned very little!
  • Research infrastructure in a WWW based context is
    transnational by nature
  • Fragmentation of the German landscape makes
    effective national strategies even less likely
  • We can make the best use of German resources in
    directly contributing to European infrastructure
    endeavours
  • The primary context thus is defined in
  • European Research Agenda (ERA) http//ec.europa.eu
    /research/era/index_en.html
  • European Strategy Forum on Research
    Infrastructures (ESFRI) http//cordis.europa.eu/es
    fri/
  • Thus we substantially contribute (and sometimes
    take the lead) in
  • DRIVER (http//www.driver-repository.eu/)
  • Europeana (http//www.europeana.eu)

10
A concluding word on DGI
  • DGI had a very strong position with much
    political backing in the 'Information Society'
    approach pushed by BMBF in the 90ies (Global-Info
    and related initiatives) - in a pre-WWW
    perspective
  • We lost a substantial part of this position with
    the information paradigm shift to the WWW and
    as a consequence the decline of Global-Info and
    even more with the weakening of BMBF and the
    partial erosion of professional identity
  • But we keep a large member base including key
    players such as for instance FIZ Karlsruhe major
    academic and industrial members!
  • ? We try to strategically reposition DGI in the
    new paradigm of information and knowledge
    organisation and management
  • eInfrastructure is well covered by other parties
  • Digital Library research is well covered by
    others
  • Semantic contextualisation for knowledge creation
    is the way to go
  • Thanks for your attention questions?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com