Title: Reviewing Literature
1Reviewing Literature
- This workshop will
-
- Explain what completing a review of literature
involves - Offer tips on how to manage the reviewing process
- Show you basic strategies for taking a critical
approach to literature at degree-level.
- Louise Livesey
- Academic Skills Adviser
2The Plan
- Why review literature? Whats the point?
- How to begin tips for the first steps of
reviewing - Managing your reviewing
- Working critically with the literature.
-
31.Why review literature? Whats the point?
What has made you book on todays session?
TALKING POINT
4Activity 1 Why are you asked to review
literature?
1.Why review literature? Whats the point?
- Work as a pair or small group, and agree on a
list of all the reasons why someone would be
asked to review literature in their field of
study/future profession.
- To check your research has not been done before
so you do not waste your time. - For ideas on how to approach your research, what
methods are appropriate to obtain the type of
information you want (NOT the answers you want!) - Justifies the reason for your research to show
there is a gap in the field. - To ensure you have a full understanding of the
subject.
5Reviewing the literature gives you and your
marker
1.Why review literature? Whats the point?
- A landscape of knowledge and key issues (Bell,
2005) - It locates your topic within a much larger
field of information (Blaxter et al., 2006) - It is a small piece in a complicated jigsaw
puzzle it does not stand alone. (Ridley, 2008
5).
62.How to begin tips for the first steps of
reviewing
72.How to begin tips for the first steps of
reviewing
82.How to begin tips for the first steps of
reviewing
- Be efficient longer pieces of work review more
literature before selecting. Keep track of your
searches.
The proposed topic of your research plagiarism trends in higher education The proposed topic of your research plagiarism trends in higher education The proposed topic of your research plagiarism trends in higher education The proposed topic of your research plagiarism trends in higher education
Core search terms searching criteria plagiarism HE higher education university academic misconduct academic malpractice. Journals only / 2000 onwards / HE only / quantitative studies only Core search terms searching criteria plagiarism HE higher education university academic misconduct academic malpractice. Journals only / 2000 onwards / HE only / quantitative studies only Core search terms searching criteria plagiarism HE higher education university academic misconduct academic malpractice. Journals only / 2000 onwards / HE only / quantitative studies only Core search terms searching criteria plagiarism HE higher education university academic misconduct academic malpractice. Journals only / 2000 onwards / HE only / quantitative studies only
Searched Terms or combinations of terms searched for Results of search (e.g. articles or books located) Date of search
ERIC plagiarism HE 21 - Larkham Manns (2002) Ercegovac Richardson (2004) 23/09/14
Summon plagiarism HE OR university 11 - 23/09/14
Google Scholar trendsplagiarism 7 - 24/09/14
Adapted from Ridley (2008 43)
9Reviewing is about more than just reading
3.Managing your reviewing
10Preliminary reading and analysis
3.Managing your reviewing
- Once you have found potentially useful papers
11Focused in-depth reading
3.Managing your reviewing
124.Working criticallywith the literature
- The difference between exploratory and focused
(Ridley, 2008). - Take notes / map the text / annotate TRANSFORM
it (Cottrell, 2005).
134.Working criticallywith the literature
- Try different readings of different groups of
texts.
144.Working criticallywith the literature
- Abstract gt conclusions gt introduction gt
findings/results - Applying similar
- steps to all/most
- literature you find
What is the purpose of the study? What is the scope of the study? What is the focus of the study? What are the units of analysis? What is the sampling strategy? What types of data were collected? How were the data managed? What analytical approach was used? How is validity addressed in the study? When did the study occur? How is the study justified? How are ethical issues handled? How are logistics handled? (Hart, 1998 49)
154.Working criticallywith the literature
- What do we think a critiquing tool is?
TALKING POINT
(Cottrell, 2005)
Activity 2 Using a critiquing tool
What is the blank examples strengths and
weaknesses?
164.Working criticallywith the literature
- Create your own critiquing tool
175. Summary of the literature review process
18References
- Bell, J. (2005) Doing Your Research Project. 4th
ed. Maidenhead Open University Press -
- Blaxter, L., Hughes, C. Tight, M. (2006) How to
Research. 3rd ed. Buckingham Open University
Press. -
- Cottrell, S. (2005) Critical Thinking Skills.
Basingstoke Palgrave Macmillan. -
- Hart, C. (1998) Doing a Literature Review
Releasing the Social Science Research
Imagination. London SAGE Publications Ltd. -
- Ridley, D. (2008) The Literature Review a
Step-by-Step Guide for Students. London SAGE
Publications Ltd. -
- Student Services. (2014) Why do I have to have a
literature review? Brisbane St. Lucia University
of Queensland. online Available at - http//www.uq.edu.au/student-services/phdwriting/p
hfaq23.html Accessed 16.10.2014 -
- Thomas, G. (2013) How to do your Research
Project. 2nd ed. London SAGE Publications Ltd.
19Academic Skills Advice
- What do we do? Support undergraduate students
with their academic skills by running clinics and
workshops, having bookable appointment slots, and
enabling students to access Instant Advice. - When can you come for help? Everyday both face to
face and on-line - How do you get in touch? Email
academic-skills_at_brad.ac.uk or website
www.brad.ac.uk/academic-skills - Where are we? Chesham Building B0.23
- Who are we? Michael and Helen specialise in Maths
Support Lucy and Russell advise students on
study skills and I (Louise) deliver the
workshops
20Any questions?