EASTERN ENERGY LIMITED JHARKHAND STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD Replacement, Optimization. Repowering

1
EASTERN ENERGY LIMITEDJHARKHAND STATE
ELECTRICITY BOARDReplacement, Optimization.
Repowering Modernization of Existing Old
Russian Units at Patratu Thermal Power Station at
Patratu, Jharkhand State
EEL

• TOTAL ENERGY FOR THE FUTURE

2
EASTERN ENERGY LIMITED A FULL SERVICE ENERGY
COMPANY WHICH SPECIALIZES IN ELECTRIC POWER
GENERATION REPLACEMENT, OPTIMIZATION, REPOWERING
REFURBISHMENT MODERNIZATION OPERATION
MAINTENANCEENERGY CONSERVATION
3
EASTERN ENERGY LIMITED'S PROFESSIONAL STAFF
PROVIDES EXPERIENCE AND EXPERTISE IN DEVELOPMENT,
DESIGN, APPLICATION, IMPLEMENTATION,MANAGEMENT,
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THERMAL POWER
STATIONS, ENERGY SYSTEMS AND ENERGY RELATED
TECHNOLOGIES
4
QUALIFICATIONS OF ENGINEERING STAFF

• CERTIFIED COGENERATION PROFESSIONAL
• PROFESSIONAL ENERGY MANAGER
• PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
• 75 YEARS EXPERIENCE IN COGENERATION AND ENERGY
  FIELD
• 100 YEARS SENIOR MANAGEMENT EXPERIENCE IN THE
  ENGINEERING FIELD
• 50 YEARS EXPERIENCE IN REPLACEMTN. OPTIMIZATION,
  REPOWERING, REFURBISHMENT MODERNIZATION (RM)
  OF THERMAL POWER STATIONS (TPS)
• RECOGNIZED EXPERTS IN REFRIGERATION, STEAM,
  COGENERATION , RETROFIT REPOWERING AND ENERGY
  CONSERVATION AREAS

5
Experience Background of EELs Engineering
team Specializingin Replacement, Refurbishment
Optimization, Repowering, Modernization
Management ofThermal Power Stations
6

• EXPERTISE OF EELs TEAM MEMBERS
• Power Station Construction
• Power Station Optimization
• Power Station Operation Maintenance
• Power Station Management
• Condition Assessment
• Life Extension Assessment
• Rehabilitation Assessment
• Steam Gas Turbine technology
• All types of Boiler systems
• Fuel Handling Systems
• Controls
• Emissions Control

7

• One of the key elements for EELs success in RM
  is that EEL is NOT TIED TO ONLY ONE type of
  Technology. EEL will chose the best technology
  available based on economics, efficiency,
  practicality and value engineering.
• Many companies have an interest to only sell
  their equipment. An example A Boiler
  manufacturers want to sell their boilers
  Turbine manufacturers want to sell their turbines
  etc.
• EEL will provide the BEST SELECTION for the
  existing conditions.
• On this basis, EEL will conduct TOTAL RM
  PROGRAM for Jharkhand State Electricity Board
  (JSEB) by Replacement of existing old Russian
  Boilers and Optimizing, Repowering Modernizing
  Patratu Thermal Power Station (PTPS). EEL and
  Alliance partners Ford, Bacon Davis (FBD),
  Alstom Power and General Electric (GE) with JSEB
  will perfom Feasibility Study, Specifications
  and Detailed project Report. EEL has already
  completed the two Pre-Feasibility Studies and is
  in progress of initiating the Feasibility Study
  and DPR immediately upon entering Joint
  Development Agreement (JDA) with JSEB.

8
PETER J. BILLIAPROJECT DIRECTOR30 YEARS
EXPERIENCE IN THE AREAS OF

• DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF CORPORATE
  ENERGY POLICY
• MANAGEMENT OF DIVISIONAL MECHANICAL AND
  ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS.
• DESIGN AND INSTALLATION OF COGENERATION
  FACILITIES .
• NEW AND RETROFIT REFRIGERATION OPTIMIZATION .
• R M OF THERMAL POWER STATIONS

• CFC REFRIGERANT REPLACEMENT .
• BOILER OPTIMIZATION
• INDUSTRIAL ENERGY RECOVERY FOR BOILERS,
  REFRIGERATION, COMPRESSORS, OVEN ,HVAC, PROCESS
  
• EXPERIENCE -DAIRY,BAKERY,LEATHER, CANDY ,FOOD
  AND POWER INDUSTRIES.
• GENERATION OF STEAM AND ELECTRICITY FROM BIO-MASS
  AND WASTE MATERIAL ( RDF ).

9
JONATHAN P. SIMPSONTURBINE SPECIALIST

• Mr.Simpson has over 36 years of experience in
  engineering, with particular expertise in the
  design and operation of turbine generators and
  their auxiliaries.Mr. Simpson provides expert
  consulting to projects on steam turbines,
  combustion turbines, generators, and auxiliaries.
  Mr. Simpson has been involved in all phases of
  the design, engineering, application,
  installation, repair, and maintenance of central
  station, cogeneration, and industrial turbine
  generators. Responsibilities have included
  conceptual design, equipment selection,
  preparation of specifications, proposal
  evaluations, system design, client and vendor
  liaison, performance testing review,
  refurbishment, vendor design review, and failure
  analysis.

10
PETER F. BARTHEL OM / CONDITION ASSESSMENT
SPECIALIST

• Mr. Barthel has 40 years of experience in the
  engineering industry. Currently, he is Project
  Engineer for an on going 4 boiler life extension
  project in Brazil. His recent experience has
  been Project Engineering Manager for the storage
  tank related portion of a grassroots
  petrochemical plant, Project Engineer for an
  18-unit emission reduction program for the Puerto
  Rico Electric Power Authority, a two unit life
  extension program, and a four boiler low NOX
  burner replacement at a New Hampshire paper mill.
  He was a member of an assessment team assigned
  to two Canadian utilities to assess the current
  operation, maintenance, and capital expenditure
  plans for 18 coal fired units, Lead Engineer for
  a 2 unit life extension program and for a 2 unit
  NOx abatement program.

11
RICHARD DUNN LIFE EXTENSION / CONDITION
ASSESSMENT SPECIALIST

• Mr. Dunn has 40 years experience in the power
  industry, 23 years with a utility in plant
  operation, engineering and project management and
  17 years in consulting engineering. He has led
  major fossil engineering projects involving both
  new facilities and rehabilitation. He has also
  managed a wide range of plant availability and
  performance improvement projects for coal, oil
  and gas-fired facilities. He has engineered plant
  on-line performance monitoring systems and an
  innovative circulating water spray cooling
  system. He also has conducted life extension and
  rehabilitation assessments for a wide range of
  plants and has been a lecturer on plant
  rehabilitation for three United Nations seminars
  for developing countries.

12
ROSS W. MACDONALDSENIOR ENGINEER

• Mr. MacDonald has over 26 years of domestic and
  foreign power plant construction and maintenance
  engineering experience. the majority of his
  assignments have been to assist clients with
  rehabilitation, overhaul, and retrofit work on
  gas turbine generators and steam turbine
  generators both in the U.S. and in foreign
  countries. The work performed on these units
  consisted of Steam turbine purchase for a
  co-generation plant ,Steam turbine and gas
  turbine rehabilitation contract management,
  Steam turbine and gas turbine startups, Fossil
  steam, nuclear steam, and gas turbine overhaul
  supervision, Combined cycle power plant testing
  and due diligence Performance evaluations and
  test witnessing, Feasibility studies and plant
  assessments ,Life extension studies, One of his
  current assignments is to predict the costs of
  extending the life of 12 steam turbine generators
  and associated equipment for Trans Alta Utilities
  in Alberta, Canada.

13
VINCENT M. LONERGAN FUEL HANDLING SPECIALIST

• Mr. Lonergan has more than 27 years of experience
  in the engineering industry.He has been
  responsible for systems engineering, project work
  and as Materials Handling Equipment Specialist on
  many projects. This work included the
  engineering and development of system layouts,
  preparation of specifications, analysis of bids
  with recommendations to purchase, and interfacing
  with suppliers and contractors, including general
  approval of the contractors' design and
  engineering. He has been involved with coal,
  coal mining wastes, limestone, peat, refuse
  derived fuel, biomass, sludge, and ash handling
  systems for many projects in the last 14 years.
• He has been responsible for the independent
  technical assessment of materials handling
  systems and equipment for a number of
  cogeneration projects.
• In addition, he has worked on various fluidized
  bed boiler and fossil-fueled power plants.

14
WILLIAM A. SMITHPOWER / ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS
SPECIALIST

• Mr. Smith has more than 19 years of experience in
  the engineering industry. Currently, Mr. Smith
  is assigned to a project developing engineering
  assessments and plant demarcation reports for the
  divestiture of generating assets of a major
  utility. Additionally, Mr. Smith is assigned as
  the Lead Instrumentation Control Engineer for
  engineering services in the development and
  resolution of issues associated with the Republic
  of Koreas Korean Next Generation Reactor (KNGR)
  plant design. While on his current assignment,
  Mr. Smith has performed short term tasks,
  including independent review of design
  assessments at an 850 MW pressurized water
  reactor plant, technical audit of IC products
  for an Advanced Boiling Water Reactor Plant and
  as a team member providing control system
  trouble-shooting activities on the Munitions
  Management Device at the Dugway Proving Grounds.
  

15
RICHARD M. GRIEVE CONDITION ASSESSMENT SPECIALIST

• Mr. Grieve has 24 years of experience in utility
  and industrial power projects, European heat and
  power cogeneration plant investment retrofit. Mr.
  Grieve's assignments have included Project
  Engineer and Lead Engineer on many projects. In
  his present position he is responsible for
  engineering, design, and trouble-shooting for
  operating coal, oil, and gas fired utility and
  industrial plants. Currently assigned as Project
  Engineer for the rehabilitation of power and
  central heating plants in Lithuania. Also
  assigned as Project Engineer for selective
  Non-Catalytic Reduction NOX emission control
  projects, Lead Engineer for Panther Creek Power
  Station facility bank reviews, Lead Mechanical
  Engineer for Canal Electric Unit 2 Gas
  Conversion, Lead Mechanical Engineer for
  Consolidated Edison Orimulsion Study, Lead
  Mechanical Engineer for Eastern study, and Lead
  Mechanical Engineer for the City of Detroit's
  Mistersky Station Units 5 and 6 gas conversion
  and life extension projects.

16
ROGER H. SIROISBOILER SPECIALIST

• Mr. Sirois has over 26 years of experience in
  power and steam boiler engineering and
  management. The majority of this experience has
  been in technical and management positions of
  increasing responsibility with major boiler
  manufacturers. He has successfully worked in a
  team leadership and equipment specialist role on
  projects related to boiler modifications, boiler
  mathematical modeling, fuel switching, and NOX
  and CO emission reduction.
• Mr. Sirois is experienced with the design,
  start-up and troubleshooting of steam boilers
  applied to numerous processes in the utility,
  industrial and municipal sectors. He has
  advanced knowledge in this technology having
  applied and integrated numerous mechanical
  engineering principles and industry practices to
  complete consulting assignments, in the U.S. and
  overseas, on a broad spectrum of topics and
  develop boiler performance modeling computer
  programs. He has applied ASME Code criteria to
  boiler modification projects requiring pressure
  part alteration. The successfully completed
  projects required preparing specifications and
  bid evaluations, and staying abreast of equipment
  and system developments.

17
ENERGY EASTERN LIMITED OFFERS ITS CUSTOMERS
AN EXCITING ARRAY OF INNOVATIVE ENERGY SYSTEMS
AND SERVICES
18
ENERGY SERVICES

• ENERGY AUDITS AND STUDIES
• COGENERATION
• -SIMPLE OR COMBINED CYCLE , DIESEL
• -RANKINE CYCLE (STEAM )
• -REFUSE DERIVED FUEL
• PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING AND
• ENERGY CONSERVATION
• -FOOD INDUSTRY
• -DAIRY INDUSTRY
• -LEATHER INDUSTRY
• -CHEMICAL INDUSTRY
• -POWER INDUSTRY

• AREAS OF SPECIALIZATION
• -COGENERATION FACILITIES
• -BOILER STEAM SYSTEM S
• - AMMONIA REFRIGERATION
• -REFRIGERATION OPTIMIZATION
• -ENERGY RECOVERY
• -ENERGY CONSERVATION
• - OPERATION, MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT
• -ALTERNATIVE BOILER FUEL SYSTEMS
• -RE-POWERING REFURBISHMENT OF POWER PLANTS

19
EASTERN ENERGY LIMITEDINCORPORATES THE TOTAL
ENERGY CONCEPT WHICH OPTIMIZE ENERGY
UTILIZATION THIS CONCEPT IS APPLIED TO ALL OF
OUR ENERGY APPLICATIONS
20
TOTAL ENERGY CONCEPT

• THE TOTAL ENERGY CONCEPT IS A VERY POWERFUL AND
  SIMPLE CONCEPT TO UNDERSTAND
• UTILIZE ENERGY IN A HIGHLY EFFICIENT MANNER AND
  RECOVER ALL OF THE WASTE ENERGY IN A PRACTICAL
  AND ECONOMIC SCHEME.
• AN EXCELLENT EXAMPLE WHICH DEMONSTRATES THE
  CONCEPT AND ITS POTENTIAL IS THE ELECTRIC
  GENERATING INDUSTRY

21
ENERGY LOSSES FOR ELECTRIC GENERATING STATIONS
PRIMARY ENERGY
STACK LOSSES
TRANSMISSION LOSSES
1 KW
CENTRAL POWER PLANT
ENERGY USED
10, 675 BTU
RANKINE CYCLE (STEAM) GENERATION OF ELECTRICITY
BTU INPUT 10.675 BTU KW OUTPUT 1 KW
3415 BTU OVERALL EFFICIENCY OUTPUT
3415 32
INPUT 10,675 BTU 32 IS THE
U.S.A. NATIONAL AVERAGE OVERALL AREAS OF ENERGY
LOSS BOILER LOSSES
15 TRANSMISSION LOSSES
5 TURBINE CONDENSER LOSSES 48
TOTAL ENERGY LOSSES 68
22
RANKINE CYCLE
STACK LOSSES 15
DEAERATOR
BOILER
BFP
FUEL 100 INPUT
TRENSMISSION LOSSES 5
ELECTRICITY 32
COOLING TOWER
CONDENSING STEAM TURBINE GENERATOR
CONDENSER
CONDENSER LOSSES 48
23
POWER POLICY

• As per Power Policy mentioned under 4.5
  Renovation, Modernization and Management of
  Existing Power Plants
• 4.5.1 An important area which has not
  received sufficient attention is the upkeep of
  existing plants. Some of the power stations in
  INDIA have outlived their original life span. In
  the absence of surplus generation capacities, due
  attention has not been paid to scheduled
  maintenance, renovation and modernization of the
  existing plants. This has resulted in unplanned
  outages and frequent breakdowns. As a result,
  availability factor and the Plant Load Factor of
  a number of plants are below satisfactory level.
  It is proposed to increase the operating
  efficiency of the existing plants through
  introduction of professional management and
  renovation and modernization programs. The
  process of renovation and modernization involves
  substantial investment. The State proposes to
  throw open the renovation and modernization of
  the existing plants to private sector (joint
  sector) participation which can help in bringing
  in more efficient management practices leading to
  greater availability of power.

24

• 4.5.2 In this, the first task is to identify
  critical components in the plants that require
  immediate replacement and renovation. Such
  renovation/extension programs can extend the life
  by another 20-30 years at a fraction of the cost
  of a new plant. By improving the efficiency and
  utilization of the plant, the Plant Load Factor
  can be increased to 75. Nearly 5000 million
  additional units can be generated by this method
  alone in the State. Government will encourage the
  renovation and modernization of all plants of
  State Electricity Board. For this purpose help of
  private sector will be taken on case-to-case and
  merit basis.
• 4.5.3 Private Sector will be allowed to
  operate/manage the plants wherever necessary.
  Such participation by the private sector may
  follow the following routes
• a) Lease, Rehabilitate, Operate and Transfer
  (LROT)
• b) Joint Asset Management with State Electricity
  Boards
• c) Sale of existing plants to private sector or
  to any joint sector venture.

25
Patratu Thermal Power Station(Based on the Data
submitted by JSEB to High Court Jharkhand)

• Installed Capacity - 10 UNITS 840 MW
  (1964)
• (4 x 50 MW 2 x 100 MW 4 x 110 MW)
• Derated Capacity 770 MW
• (4 x 40 MW 2 x 90 MW 2 x 105 MW 2 x 110
  MW)
• Generation Availability 150 200 MW (2006)
• Unit no. 2, 6, 9 and 10 (Available for
  Generation)
• Unit no. 2 40 MW
• Unit no. 6 Boiler 6(ii) 35/40MW - 70 MW
• Capital Overhauling of Turbine Generator set has
  not been done since 1992
• Boiler 6(i)
• Out of Service since 2006 ESP Path of Boiler
  6(i) is being connected with ESP Path B of
  Boiler 6(ii) MECON Consulting work to be
  completed by 2006
• Consulting Fees_____________________
• Unit no. 9 50-60 MW
• This unit has run for about 54,000 Hours after
  its last Capital Maintenance.
• Capital Overhauling Maintenance OVER DUE.
  COST__________________
• Unit no. 10 80-90 MW
• AVAILABILITY OF UNITS 4040110110 300 MW
  Capacity
• OPTIMUM GENERATION 300 PRESENT

26
Patratu Thermal Power Station (Based on
the Data submitted by JSEB to High Court
Jharkhand) Capital Overhauling of Turbine
Generator set has not been done since
1992Boiler 6(i) Out of Service since 2006 ESP
Path of Boiler 6(i) is being connected with ESP
Path B of Boiler 6(ii) MECON Consulting work to
be completed by 2006 Consulting
Fees_____________________Unit no. 9 50-60
MWThis unit has run for about 54,000 Hours after
its last Capital Maintenance.Capital
Overhauling Maintenance OVER DUE.
COST__________________Unit no. 10 80-90
MWAVAILABILITY OF UNITS 4040110110 300 MW
CapacityOPTIMUM GENERATION 300 MW
27

• In support of Power Policy,
• EEL proposes a program on
• Retrofitting, Replacement, Optimization,
  Renovation, Modernization
• (Electroplating) of Power Plant(s)
• of
• Jharkhand State Electricity Board

28

• RE-POWERING
• MODERNIZATION
• OF THE
• PATRATU THERMAL POWER STATIONS
• (PTPS)
• IN
• JHARKHAND , INDIA

29
OBJECTIVE

• EVALUATE THE TECHNICAL AND ECONOMIC
  FEASIBILITY TO RETROFEIT, RENOVATE, REPLACE,
  REFURBISH AND MODERNIZE UNIT NO. 3,4 AND 5 OF OLD
  EXISTING RUSSIAN UNITS (PHASE 1) WITHOUT
  INTREPTING THE CURRENT ELECTRIC GENERATION, BASED
  ON IDENTIFYING ALTERNATIVE MODIFICATIONS TO THESE
  PLANTS.
• THE MODIFICATIONS WILL RESULT IN
• IMPROVED PLF
• IMPROVED THERMAL EFFICIENCY
• IMPROVED NET PLANT HEAT RATE
• IMPROVED UNIT RELIABILITY AVAILABILITY
• IMPROVED PLANT ECONOMICS
• REDUCED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
• INCREASE OUTPUT CAPACITY

30
Eastern Energy Limited s Methodology for
successful implementation of the RM Program for
the existing PTPS at Patratu in the State of
Jharkhand will be as follows

1. Pre-feasibility Study
2. Feasibility Study
3. Detail Project Report (DPR)
4. Specifications for Equipment and System
5. Preparation of the Tender Documents for
   International Competitive Bidding (ICB)-(if
   required)
6. Finalization of the Tender Documents
7. ICB - Evaluation Selection
8. Implementation and Supervision of RM
9. Completion Evaluation

31
PRE-FEASIBILITY

• A Pre-feasibility study will be conducted for
  Patratu Thermal Power Station (PTPS) for the RM
  on a mutually agreed to schedule. The
  Pre-Feasibility studies for all of JSEBs TPS
  will include the following
• Objective of Refurbishment / Modernization
• Executive summary
• Power plant background information
• Description of power plant major facility
  components
• Identification of existing electric generating
  line problems /evaluation / solutions
• Performance of refurbishment / modernization
• Benefits of refurbishment / modernization
• Cost implications (frequent outages, fuel etc.)
• The results of the pre-feasibility studies for
  JSEBs PTPS will determine the scope of work.

32
FEASIBILITY STUDY

• THE FEASIBILITY STUDIES FOR PATRATU THERMAL
  POWER STATION WILL BE CONDUCTED BY EASTERN ENERGY
  LIMITED

33

• DETAILS
• 1 DEVELOP PROJECT DESIGN BASIS DOCUMENT
  (TECHNICAL ECONOMIC)
• WILL CONTAIN BASIS OF THE STUDY, ASSUMPTIONS,
  DATA UTILIZED, OBJECTIVE
• ECONOMIC PARAMETERS.
• THIS WILL INSURE THAT JSEB EEL HAVE A
  DOCUMENTED UNDERSTANDING OF THE DATA AND
  ASSUMPTIONS UPON WHICH THE FEASIBILITY WILL BE
  PERFORMED.

34
THE FOLLOWING IS A PRELIMINARY SUMARY OF THE TWO
TECHNOLOGIES BEING CONSIDERED FOR THE PATRATU
THERMAL POWER STATION (PTPS) REPLACEMENTS

• Description CFB Boiler PC-Fired Boiler
  Comments    
• Fuel Size Size6-12 mm x O gt70lt70
  microns Crushing Cost Higher in PC-Fired
• Fuel Range Up to 75 Up
  to 60 PC-Fired has more limited range
• (ash moisture)
• Sulfur (1 - 6) Limestone
  injection FGD plant required CFB has less
  expensive SO2 removal
• Aux. Fuel (Oil/Gas) Up to 20-30 Up
  to 60 PC-Fired requires more oil/gas
• Aux. Power Consumption Slightly higher Lower
  Unless FGD is needed in which case, PC
  is higher
  
  
• SO2 lt200 ppm lt250 ppm
  with FGD CFB has lower SO2 emissions, less
  expensive
• NOx lt100 ppm lt 100
  with SCR CFB doesnt require SCR
  (or SNCR)
• Boiler Efficiency Same
  Same No
  difference
• OM Cost 5-10 lower
  5-10 higher CFB
  has less moving equipment
• Capital Cost 5-10 higher
  5-10 lower w/o FGDSCR
• 8-13 lower 8-13
  higher w/FGDSCR
• w/FGDSCR
• ONCE ALL OF THE PARAMETERS ARE KNOWN THE
  TECHNOLOGY WILL BE FINALIZED BETWEEN CFB BOILER
  AND PC-FIRED BOILER.

35

• 2 DEVELOP PHYSICAL PLANT SITE
  ASSESSMENT DOCUMENT
• THIS DOCUMENT WILL BE DEVELOPED FOR USE IN THE
  FIELD DURING THE PLANT WALK-DOWNS, TO INSURE THAT
  CRITICAL INFORMATION IS OBTAINED FOR ALL MAJOR
  EQUIPMENT AND SYSTEMS SUBJECT TO REFURBISHMENT
  AND MODERNIZATION.

36

• 3 DEVELOP PLANT PERSONNEL INTERVIEW FORM
• THIS FORM WILL BE DEVELOPED FOR USE IN OBTAINING
  INFORMATION FROM PLANT OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE
  PERSONNEL REGARDING
• ROUTINE OPERATIONAL PRACTICES
• OPERATIONAL, RELIABILITY, AND AVAILABILITY
  CHARACTERISTICS OF EXISTING MAJOR EQUIPMENT AND
  SYSTEMS
• REPAIR/MAINTENANCE/BREAKDOWN HISTORY OF MAJOR
  EQUIPMENT AND SYSTEMS

37

• 4 DEVELOP PROJECT ECONOMIC PRO-FORMA
• THIS PRO-FORMA WILL CONTAIN ALL THE REQUIRED
  ECONOMIC PARAMETERS TO ILLUSTRATE THAT THE
  IMPLEMENTATION IS ECONOMICALLY VIABLE AND
  FINANCEABLE. THIS PRO-FORMA WILL BE A GENERIC
  TEMPLATE TO BE REFINED DURING THE COURSE OF THE
  FEASIBILITY STUDY.

38

• 5 CONDUCT ON-SITE PLANT WALK-DOWNS AND PERSONNEL,
  INTERVIEWS
• THIS IS DONE TO PHYSICALLY INSPECT THE CONDITION
  OF THE MAJOR EQUIPMENT AND SYSTEMS, AND TO
  OBTAIN OPERATIONAL AND PROCEDURAL INFORMATION
  REGARDING THE FACILITY. THESE PLANT WALK DOWNS
  WILL BE CONDUCTED USING THE PLANT ASSESSMENT AND
  PERSONNEL INTERVIEW FORMS, WITH TECHNICAL
  PERSONNEL RESIDING IN INDIA.

39

• 6 IDENTIFY REASONABLY FEASIBLE ALTERNATIVE UNIT
  MODIFICATIONS FOR EACH UNIT
• DURING THIS PHASE OF THE FEASIBILITY STUDY THE
  APPLICATION OF THE STATE OF THE ART TECHNOLOGIES
  WILL BE EVALUATED CONSIDERED BY EXPERTS IN THE
  FIELD.

40

• 7 IDENTIFY THE IMPACT TO MAJOR EQUIPMENT AND
  SYSTEMS
• THIS PART OF THE FEASIBILITY STUDY IS VERY
  IMPORTANT BECAUSE THE MODIFICATION OF THE MAJOR
  SYSTEMS AND EQUIPMENT CAN SIGNIFICANTLY EFFECT
  THE OPERATION OF THE REMAINING PARTS OF THE
  ELECTRIC GENERATING LINE. THE END RESULT IS THAT
  THE TOTAL SYSTEM HAS TO BE IN BALANCE AND
  OPERATE IN A EFFICIENT AND ORDERLY MANNER

41

• 8 EVALUATE THE ALTERNATIVE MODIFICATIONS TO
  IDENTIFY A SINGLE PREFERRED APPROACH FOR EACH
  UNIT, BASED ON TECHNICAL AND ECONOMIC
  CONSIDERATIONS
• ALL OF THE ALTERNATIVES BEING CONSIDERED UP TO
  THIS POINT WILL BE REVIEWED, AND A PREFERRED
  APPROACH WILL BE IDENTIFIED FOR EACH OF THE
  PLANTS.

42

• 9 DEVELOP A CONCEPTUAL LAYOUT FOR EACH UNIT,
  BASED ON THE MODIFICATIONS IDENTIFIED
• 10 DEVELOP A CONCEPTUAL INSTALLED PRESENT-
  DAY CAPITAL COST ESTIMATE FOR EACH PREFERRED
  APPROACH FOR EACH UNIT
• 11 DEVELOP A CONCEPTUAL FIRST YEAR ANNUAL
  OPERATING COST ESTIMATION FOR EACH UNIT

43

• 12 GENERATE THE CONCEPTUAL
• 13 PRO-FORMA FOR EACH UNIT MODIFICATION SELECTED
• THIS CONCEPTUAL PRO-FORMA WILL BE BASED ON THE
  GENERIC PRO-FORMA TEMPLATE DESCRIBED IN SLIDE
  34. IT WILL INCLUDE THE CONCEPTUAL CAPITAL AND
  ANNUAL COST DEVELOPED FOR EACH OF THE TWO
  PREFERRED APPROACHES SELECTED FOR IMPLEMENTATION.
• 14 GENERATE A SUMMARY REPORT PRESENTING THE ABOVE
  ACTIVITIES

44
ESTIMATED SCHEDULE

• It is anticipated that the Feasibility Study
  can be completed according to the following
  overall milestone schedule
•   Activity
  Completion Weeks after
  JDA
  Execution
• Develop Design Basis Document Format
• for Submittal to JSEB/EEL JV Company 3
•  Develop Plant Walk-Down Forms
• Personnel Interview Forms 3
• Obtain existing technical parameters of the
• Processes and equipment from GPCL/GEB 5
• Commence Plant Walk-Downs and Interviews 8
• Identify Potential Alternatives 14
• Evaluate Alternatives and Select
  1
• Preferred Option 17
• Provide Draft report of Effort to GPCL/GEB 22
• Obtain review comments from GPCL/GEB 25
  Issue revised final report for Feasibility
  Study 28  

45
DETAIL PROJECT REPORT (DPR)

• Detail Project Report will include but not
  limited to the following
• 1. Conceptual Design of Refurbishment and
  Modernization
• 1.1 Lay out
• 1.2 Mechanical Systems
• 1.3 Electrical Systems
• 1.4 Instrumentation Control
• 1.5 Civil Structural
• 1.6 Support Facilities
• 1.7 Construction Facilities
• 1.8 Environmental Aspects
• 2. Project Implementation Schedule
• 3. Organizational Set-up
• 4. Capital Cost Estimation and Financial
  Analysis
• 5. Drawings

46
Specifications for equipment and Systems

• Detailed specifications and standards will be
  developed to meet all the required local, State
  and JSEB codes and standards to insure that a
  safe, efficient, reliable, cost effective and
  dependable RM installation is achieved. The
  Specification schedule will be finalized once the
  Feasibility Study is completed.

47
Preparation of the Tender Documents for
International Competitive Bidding (ICB)(if
required)

• The tender documents will be prepared jointly
  with JSEB to insure that the most efficient, cost
  effective, reliable, dependable and expeditious
  RM installation is accomplished.
• Building on the data and information already
  developed and agreed upon, the tender documents
  will be developed. The tender documents will
  consist of instructions and information for
  bidders along with the actual EPC and OM
  agreements (if required) that will be completed
  and executed between the parties. . The schedule
  for preparation of the Tender Documents will be
  finalized once the Feasibility Study, DPR and
  Specifications for Equipment Systems are
  completed.

48
Finalization of the Tender Documents

• Subject only to final negotiations, the tender
  documents developed to this point are intended to
  be complete, final, and mutually consistent. This
  is a final in-house step prior to final bidding
  and negotiations with the service providers. The
  necessary documents in conjunction with the
  additional technical and legal support will also
  be prepared
• Among the most critical assumptions made in the
  financial proforma are the guarantees upon which
  the facility performance is based. Engineering,
  heat balance diagrams combined with the
  experienced estimates of the necessary margins,
  will indicate the levels at which the EPC
  contractors can be expected to bid the
  performance guarantees.

49
ICB - Evaluation SELECTION

• Armed with the detailed financial analysis,
  assumptions and anticipated performance data, the
  JSEB/EEL development team is equipped to
  intelligently finalize each of the agreements.
  Interfaces between the contracts are allocated
  per the responsibility matrix (developed by EEL)
  and terms are concluded only after comparison to
  the financial model. Deviations resulting during
  negotiations are examined for impact on the
  overall project and adjustments are made to all
  contracts affected by each deviation.
• EEL will prepare the necessary documents and
  conduct all negotiations with the development
  guidelines that will be set in place. All
  negotiations will be conducted in conjunction
  with the additional technical and legal support
  required.
• As the contracts are negotiated the financial
  proformas are updated and reviewed. This
  repetitive process yields a financial indication
  of the impact of current events throughout the
  development process. It also assures that a high
  degree of control is available.

50
Implementation and Supervision of RM

• The project implementation and supervision phases
  of the RM process should be rather anticlimactic
  if the stage is set prior to its beginning. Still
  events may occur that result in added cost or
  time to complete the project. Additionally, the
  relationship with the community and agencies that
  form the external environment of the project will
  be established at this time. These relationships
  work best if kept on a positive basis. Management
  of public relations and news releases can set a
  positive tone for this and future projects under
  development. The key steps in this phase of the
  process are
• Active Implementation Plan
• Monitor Progress and Report
• Control Changes and Force Majuere Events
• Manage Political, Legal, and Media Aspects of
  Project

51
Completion Evaluation

• Several months before completion of construction,
  members of the JSEB/EEL construction team will
  commence planned pre-commissioning activities.
  Some of the activities are as follows
• Checking of equipment and systems for
  completeness and operability including safety and
  mechanical integrity.
• System cleaning and any necessary pre-treatment
• Leak testing
• Electrical system check-out, including safety
  checks
• Instrumentation check-out, including loop checks
• Checking of machinery and drives, making ready
  for operation. Other activities include arranging
  for vendor specialists to perform their
  activities at site in accordance with the RM
  program requirements
• Once the RM work is completed the entire
  generating line will be tested to determine if it
  performs as per the specified performance
  warranties. At this time an evaluation will be
  made to determine if all the performance
  requirements are met and if so the electric
  generating line will be officially declared ready
  for Power Generation.

52
APPLICATION OF THE TOTAL ENERGY CONCEPT
FORREFURBISHMENT MODERNIZATION

• This concept will be applied to all aspects of
  the RM. The main areas that this concept will be
  applied to but not limited to and how it will be
  applied will be as follows
• AREA HOW APPLIED
• Boilers Economizers, Air Pre-heater,
• 
  Combustion Controls, Blown-Down
  Energy Recovery, Automation,
  Metering of Fuel, etc.
• Steam turbine Refurbishment or Replacement (as
  required) with high efficiency type.
• Cooling System Optimize to obtain the best
  possible cooling to maximize the output
  of the steam turbine generator

53

• Controls Instrumentation. Install a
  control system (as required) to minimize the
  energy utilized by the electric generating
  facility.
• Recovery of the condenser waste heat which is
  normally dissipated to the atmosphere via a
  cooling tower. This is achieved by application of
  the state of the art technology in the form of
  HYDROPONIC FARMING and / or FISH FARMING. The
  application of these types of technologies can
  potentially raise the overall thermal efficiency
  of the power plant to above 75 .
• The above is a partial listing of the
  technologies that will possibly be utilized with
  the application of the TOTAL ENERGY CONCEPT with
  the RM, if all of the economic criteria are met.
  The recovery of the condenser heat load as
  stated above requires additional time and
  engineering and will be evaluated and if
  economically viable and practical will be
  implemented after the completion of the RM.

54
JSEBs ELECTRICAL ENERGY END USERS (CUSTOMERS)

• The TOTAL ENERGY CONCEPT can be applied to JSEBs
  electrical energy customers in the form of
  creating an ENERGY MANAGEMENT and CONSERVATION
  PROGRAM for JSEBs customers. The primary reason
  for this is that energy management and energy
  conservation is the most economic form of
  generating electrical energy. That is if
  electrical energy consumption is reduced by
  energy conservation, the energy that was
  conserved can be sold to another one of JSEBs
  customers. The average simple payback periods for
  typical energy conservation projects are usually
  less than two years. It is significantly less
  costly to increase your available electrical
  energy by implementing energy conservation
  projects which makes electrical energy available
  than it is to build additional electrical
  generating facilities. A rule of thumb which
  clearly illustrates the effectiveness of the
  TOTAL ENERGY CONCEPT is that the average energy
  conservation project cost about 200.00 to
  300.00/ KW to conserve the electrical energy and
  the cost to build additional electric generating
  capacity is about 800.00/KW.

55
FINANCE OPTIONS

• B.O.O. (BUILD, OWN, OPERATE )
• B.O.T. ( BUILD, OWN, TRANSFER)
• B.O.O.T. ( BUILD, OWN, OPERATE, TRANSFER )
• B.O.O.M. ( BUILD, OWN, OPERATE, MAINTAIN )
• B.O.O.M.T. ( BUILD, OWN, OPERATE, MAINTAIN,
  TRANSFER )

56
EEL can also follow the following routes as per
the Power Policy

• a) Lease, Rehabilitate, Operate and Transfer
  (LROT)
• b) Joint Asset Management with State Electricity
  Boards
• c) Sale of existing plants to private sector or
  to any joint sector venture

57
SOURCES OF FINANCING

• MULTI-LATERAL LENDING AGENCIES
• ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK
• EUROPEAN BANK FOR RECONSTRUCTION DEVELOPMENT
• INTER-AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK
• UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
• UNITED NATIONS INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION
• WORLD BANK
• INTERNATIONAL FINANCE CORPORATION

58
SOURCES OF FINANCING

• BI-LATERAL BANKING INSTITUTIONS
• U. S. EXIM BANK
• HERMES (Germany)
• COFACE (France)
• CANADIAN INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY
• EXPORT DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (EDC) OF CANADA

59
SOURCES OF FINANCING

• EQUITY PARTNERS
• STOCK EXCHANGES
• COMMERCIAL DEBT
• PRIVATE INVESTORS