Analytic v Synthetic Phonics - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

Analytic v Synthetic Phonics

Description:

Teach grapheme/phoneme correspondences systematically. Teach blending and segmentation ... 44 phonemes and graphemes taught in a few months. Emphasis on how ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:1419
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: sussex9
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Analytic v Synthetic Phonics


1
Analytic v Synthetic Phonics
2
  • Phonics not new
  • Specialist language training for dyslexic pupils

Hickey
Gillingham Stillman
3
Reading debate ITA launched in 1961
4
Teaching of reading
  • Past schemes and initiatives
  • ITA
  • Look and Say
  • SRA
  • Real books
  • NLS

5
Searchlights model NLS 1998
  • Phonic knowledge
  • Grammatical knowledge
  • Word recognition/
  • graphic knowledge
  • Contextual knowledge

6
NLS model 1998
  • Does not best reflect how a beginner reader
    progresses to be a skilled reader
  • Emergent readers need to learn how to decode
    through blending

7
  • 5 Ways to read words (Ehri)
  • Decoding
  • Chunking
  • Sight words
  • Analogy (pound/found)
  • Predicting words from context

8
Access meaning from written symbols
  • meet me tomorrow at the swimming pool.
  • i will be there at 5. we can go for a swim
  • and have supper in the restaurant.

9
Independent Review of the Teaching of Early
Reading (Rose March 2006)
  • Findings
  • Phonic work essential for the development of
    reading also writing and spelling
  • Teach grapheme/phoneme correspondences
    systematically
  • Teach blending and segmentation

10
Fidelity to the programme Rose
  • Rose advises not to pick and mix
  • Multi-sensory learning
  • Regular sessions systematic - sequential
  • Ongoing assessment
  • Recognises decodable books and real books (work
    of Solity and Vousden Warwick University 2006)
  • Letter/sound correspondence taught quickly in
    first year
  • Parental involvement

11
Primary Framework for Literacy 2006
  • Simple view of reading replaces Searchlights
    model
  • Ultimate goal of learning to read comprehension
  • Word recognition and comprehension
  • fluent reading
  • Different teaching methods for word recognition
    skills and comprehension of written and spoken
    language

12
(No Transcript)
13
Teaching the Brain to Read - Duncan Milne
14
(No Transcript)
15
  • SYNTHETIC
  • Before reading
  • Emphasis on how words are built up
  • Small groups of letters
  • Sounds blended (synthesised)
  • Consonant blends not taught
  • Consonant digraphs taught

16
  • ANALYTIC
  • Whole word level sight vocabulary
  • Alliteration introduced to initial sounds
  • first car, cat
  • 1). 26 initial sounds
  • 2). Middle sounds
  • 3). Final sounds
  • 4). Initial consonant blends bl, cr and final
    consonant blends
  • 5). Vowel and consonant digraphs ch,sh, ee, oo

17
Comparison
  • Analytic phonics
  • Whole word and sounds
  • Onset and rime
  • Fewer demands on memory
  • Less processing cr/ash
  • Sight vocabulary often taught first
  • Can take up to 3 years
  • Synthetic phonics
  • 44 phonemes and graphemes taught in a few months
  • Emphasis on how words built up
  • More processing c/r/a/sh
  • Usually taught before reading

18
Professor Rhona Johnston Analytic phonics good
but synthetic phonics is better.
19
Clackmannanshire3rd study
Synthetic phonics programme produced improvement
in Reading
Spelling Phonemic
awareness
1 month
1 month
1 month
1 month
1 month
1 month
1 month
20
Balanced literacy
  • Techniques for reading
  • Predicting a words pronunciation based on what
    is meaningful (lower circuit)
  • Decoding letter and sounds (upper circuit)
  • Analysis of letter/sound relationship from visual
    analogy (upper and lower circuit in unison)
  • Combination of the three strategies in reading
    intervention Milne 2005
  • Multi-sensory techniques enhance connections
    between the auditory and visual modules

21
One size fits all??
  • Double Deficit WolfBowers
  • Hypothesis that some pupils with phonological
    weaknesses may also have additional problems in
    speed of processing
  • Problems mapping phonemes to words
  • Phonic programme with emphasis on sounds may not
    suit all pupils

22
Additional reading and information
  • Lindamood
  • Tallal
  • Duncan Milne
  • Shaywitz
  • Goswami
  • Wolf Bowers
  • Ruth Miskin
  • Debbie Hepplewhite
  • Solity
  • Reid Lyon
  • Johnson Watson
  • Dombey
  • McGuiness
  • Ehri

23
Its mammoth before elk except after bird
24
Phonographix Units of Sound Jolly
Phonics
Hickey
Fast Forward
The materials are important, but the teacher
matters more. (Bramley)
Nessy
Thrass
PAT
TRTS
Alpha to Omega Rave-O Lindamood
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com