Applications of Light Polarization in Vision - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Applications of Light Polarization in Vision

Description:

Applications of Light Polarization in Vision – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:1565
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 58
Provided by: csC76
Learn more at: http://www.cs.cmu.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Applications of Light Polarization in Vision


1
  • Applications of Light Polarization in Vision
  • Lecture 18

Thanks to Yoav Schechner et al, Nayar et al,
Larry Wolff, Ikeuchi et al
2
Separating Reflected and Transmitted Scenes
Reconstructing Shape of Transparent Objects
Removing Specularities
Removing Haze and Underwater Scattering Effects
3
Separation of Diffuse and Specular Reflections
Diffuse surfaces No (or minimal)
Polarization All light depolarized due to
many random scattering events
inside object. Specular Surfaces Strong
Polarization (even though partially
polarized) Smooth/Rough Surfaces The degree of
polarization decreases with roughness.
4
Active Illumination
  • Completely remove specular reflections using
    polarized light
  • when the filters are 90 degrees apart.
  • Commonly used in industrial settings.

5
Passive Illumination
  • Most illumination from sources (sun, sky, lamps)
    is unpolarized.
  • Merely using a polarizer will not remove specular
    reflections completely.

6
I_min is not equal to I_d (diffuse component)
7
Polarization Measurements
8
Determining the Polarization Cosine Curve
Using Vector Notation
Three measurements suffice to determine the
cosine curve.
9
Degree of Polarization
  • Varies between 0 and 1.
  • If zero, then there is no polarization ? Only
    diffuse component present.
  • If one, only specular component present.
  • If degree of polarization does not change as
    polarizer is rotated,
  • then there is no guarantee that specular
    component is completely removed
  • (I_sc may still be present).

10
Fresnel Ratio
  • I_sc and I_sv depend on refractive
  • index and angle of incidence.
  • I_sc and I_sv are related to fresnel
  • coefficients

is fresnel coefficient perpendicular to plane of
incidence
is fresnel coefficient parallel to plane of
incidence
11
Fresnel Ratio
Metals
Dielectrics
Brewster angle
  • Hard to separate diffuse and specular parts for
    metals.
  • Easier for dielectrics (good for non-normal
    incidences).

12
Dichromatic Model for Removing Specularities
Completely
  • Specularities are only reduced in intensity using
    polarization.
  • They are removed completely only for the Brewster
    angle of incidence.
  • Nayar et al. use additional color constraints in
    dichromatic model
  • to remove reflections completely.
  • Assume a local patch where the highlight and
  • its surrounding area have the same
    diffuse component.

13
Semi-Reflections
  • Both Reflected and Transmitted light are
    polarized.
  • But they are polarized differently.
  • They depend on the orientation of the transparent
    layer.
  • Reflections are removed completely only at
  • Brewster Angle of Incidence.

14
Transparent Layers
camera
15
(No Transcript)
16
Yoav Schechner, Joseph Shamir, Nahum Kiryati 99
17
Yoav Schechner, Joseph Shamir, Nahum Kiryati 99
18
Yoav Schechner, Joseph Shamir, Nahum Kiryati 99
Experiment
19
Yoav Schechner, Joseph Shamir, Nahum Kiryati 99
Optical coding
20
Yoav Schechner, Joseph Shamir, Nahum Kiryati 99
Optical coding
21
Yoav Schechner, Joseph Shamir, Nahum Kiryati 99
Digital decoding
2 Linear equations
22
(No Transcript)
23
Imaging through Haze
Instant Dehazing Yoav Schechner, Srinivasa
Narasimhan, Shree Nayar
24
Imaging through Haze
Instant Dehazing Yoav Schechner, Srinivasa
Narasimhan, Shree Nayar
25
(No Transcript)
26
Polarization and Haze
Instant Dehazing Yoav Schechner, Srinivasa
Narasimhan, Shree Nayar
27
still, there is a dominant polarization
28
Experiment
Best polarized image
Instant Dehazing Yoav Schechner, Srinivasa
Narasimhan, Shree Nayar
29
Experiment
Worst polarized image
Instant Dehazing Yoav Schechner, Srinivasa
Narasimhan, Shree Nayar
30
Model
I
A
31
Model
camera
2 input images
I
A
transmission
airlight
_
polarization degree
32
Dehazing Experiment
Instant Dehazing Yoav Schechner, Srinivasa
Narasimhan, Shree Nayar
33
Dehazing Experiment
Instant Dehazing Yoav Schechner, Srinivasa
Narasimhan, Shree Nayar
34
Range map
depth
35
Dehazing Experiment
Best polarized image
Instant Dehazing Yoav Schechner, Srinivasa
Narasimhan, Shree Nayar
36
Dehazing Experiment
Instant Dehazing Yoav Schechner, Srinivasa
Narasimhan, Shree Nayar
37
Range map
Instant Dehazing Yoav Schechner, Srinivasa
Narasimhan, Shree Nayar
38
signal
S
39
Hypothesis, 4 Decades Old
40
Hypothesis, 4 Decades Old
Lythgoe Hemmings, 1967 (Nature)
Many invertebrates are able to distinguish the
plane of polarized light. Does this enable them
to see further underwater? when the
polarizing screen was oriented to exclude the
maximum spacelight fishes stood out in greater
contrast against their background. simple
polarizing screen will be less versatile than the
system found in Octopus, where there is the
intra-ocular ability to distinguish light
polarized in one plane from that polarized in
another.
41
Polarization of Veiling Light
Y. Schechner N. Karpel, polarization-based
recovery
42
Image Components
24
scattering
Veiling light Spacelight Path radiance
Backscatter
Schechner, Karpel, underwater vision
43
Signal Polarization
Y. Schechner N. Karpel, polarization-based
recovery
44
Polarization Photography
25
45
Past Polarization-Based Methods

Raw images
Polarization-difference imaging
Degree of polarization
46
Model
2 input images
47
2 input images
48
Aqua-polaricam
Y. Schechner N. Karpel, underwater imaging
49
Experiments
50
Experiment
Eilat, 26m underwater
Best polarization image
Y. Schechner N. Karpel, underwater imaging
51
Naive White Balancing
26m underwater
Y. Schechner N. Karpel, underwater imaging
52
26m underwater
Y. Schechner N. Karpel, underwater imaging
53
Range Map
Attenuation
Image components
backscatter
Y. Schechner N. Karpel, underwater imaging
54
Shape Reconstruction of Transparent Objects
Miyazaki et al
  • Incident light is completely unpolarized.
  • Index of refraction is given.
  • Exploit relation between degree of polarization
    and
  • angle of incidence (Surface normal).

55
Relationship between DOP and Angle of Incidence
Two-way ambiguity in recovered angle of incidence
Manually disambiguate, use multiple views or use
prior knowledge (convex, concave, etc).
56
Recovered Shape
57
NEXT WEEK
  • Volumetric Scattering and its Applications to
  • Computer Vision and Computer Graphics
  • Lectures 18, 19, 20
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com