CD4 and Viral Load Diagnostics for the Developing World - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 35
About This Presentation
Title:

CD4 and Viral Load Diagnostics for the Developing World

Description:

Coulter Cytosphere. In the pipeline. LabNow ... CD4 counts by flow cytometry and Coulter Cytosphere assay ... AngieVernon (Beckman Coulter, PointCare) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:329
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 36
Provided by: joshua105
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: CD4 and Viral Load Diagnostics for the Developing World


1
CD4 and Viral Load Diagnostics for the Developing
World
  • Elizabeth M. Dax, and the staff of the NRL,
    Australia

2
Talk will cover-
  • Introduction the need for Cost-Effective
    approaches
  • Methods available
  • Viral Load - Disadvantages and advantages
  • CD4 - Disadvantages and advantages
  • Approaches that will assist
  • What can be done e.g. TAQAS

3
Introduction
  • Estimated 40 million living with HIV
  • Most do not have obvious risk factors
  • International programmes now offer antiretroviral
    therapy e.g.
  • GFATM
  • PepFAR
  • World and AD Banks
  • Most do not have access to adequate laboratory
    services but necessary to know who to treat!

4
In a population where there are no risks other
than heterosexual transmission if.
  • Estimated prevalence x
  • Have to test (100-x) times the estimated number
    of infected to identify all infected in that
    population
  • Thus, to find those who could be treated may be
    an extensive exercise
  • Cost of screening must be included in estimates
  • 10 of those infected will require treatment and
    monitoring

5
Lower Cost Approaches to Viral Load
  • Centralised systems
  • DBS (samples shipped to central testing
    laboratory)
  • centralised testing laboratories
  • Immunoassays
  • ExaVir RT EIA
  • Quantitative p24 Ag
  • Rapid test with limits
  • More C-E Conventional techniques
  • Real time PCR

6
Cavidi ExaVir? Load - an ultrasensitive RT assay
A low-cost, low-tech HIV viral load assay
7
ExaVir Load RT assays
  • Measures RT activity ? equiv. RNA copies/ml
  • Medium throughput (30 tests/run 1 scientist
    ?30-90/wk)
  • Affordable
  • Less prone to contamination than RT-PCR
  • Technically simple, largely manual
  • Equipment required is minimal and robust
  • Detection range 400 to 1,000,000 copies/ml
  • Requires 1ml plasma (but less works OK)
  • Detects all HIV-1 subtypes, HIV-2 and SIV
  • CE Marked and ISO certified

8
Results - Sensitivity
  • All specimens gave valid results
  • Detectable RT activity was present in 91 of
    samples with HIV RNA gt1,000 copies/mL
  • Detectable RT activity was present in 99 of
    samples with HIV RNA gt10,000 copies/mL
  • All but one cultured isolate gave a positive
    result

9
Sensitivity Viral Loads
10
ExaVir Load ver 2 vs ver 3

11
Review of Newer CD4 Technologies
  • Suzanne Crowe
  • Burnet Institute for Medical Research and Public
    Health
  • Melbourne

12
Current CD4 monitoring tests and technologies
include
  • Flow based assays
  • Becton Dickinson FACSCount
  • Guava EasyCD4
  • Partec CyFlow
  • Beckman Coulter PointCARE
  • Manual immune bead-based assays
  • Dynal Dynabeads
  • Coulter Cytosphere
  • In the pipeline
  • LabNow microchip technology
  • SemiBio slide test (microscopy)

13
Comparison of FACSCount with Guava EasyCD4 in
Chennai
100
1200
N 110 R 0.98
1000
0
800
CD4 by FLOW CYTOMETRY
DIFFERENCE
600
-100
400
Bias 26 for EasyCD4
200
0
-200
1200
1000
800
600
400
200
0
1000
800
600
400
200
0
1200
CD4 by EASYCD4
MEAN
Balakrishnan et al, 2005
14
CD4 counts by flow cytometry and Coulter
Cytosphere assay
300
n 122
200
100
Difference
0
-100
-200
-300
1200
1000
800
600
400
200
0
Mean
Balakrishnan et al JAIDS 2004 36 1006-1010
15
Should low-cost CD4 assays be introduced?
16
  • Depends on
  • Number of samples per day
  • Low throughput, manual may be most cost effective
  • High throughput, flow method most practical
  • Sophistication of lab
  • methods require varying degree of technical skill
  • Availability of technical support
  • A key issue for flow cytometers
  • Remote area, opt for
  • manual or
  • ship samples or
  • ensure local engineers trained
  • Cost

17
Where are we up to?
  • In-country analyses continuing.
  • Rigorous independent evaluation is absolutely
    essential
  • Some technologies /assays recently licensed in
    USA (PLG, PointCARE)
  • However all are still emerging technologies
  • QA participation essential establishing this
    should be part of the deal
  • Countries should not purchase technologies that
    have not been adequately validated

18
Monitoring Infections Maximises-
  • Good management
  • Treatment efficaciousness
  • Avoiding drug resistance
  • Management of toxicities

Capacity Building necessary
19
Other Approaches
  • Laboratory systems rather than more laboratories

20
Laboratory Systems
NRL(s)
Refer Samples
Central (Reference) Labs
Intermediate Labs
Peripheral Labs
QA
Health Care Settings
21
TAQAS
  • TreatAsia Quality Assessment Scheme for HIV-1
    Genotypic Resistance Testing

22
TREATAsia Network and TAQAS
  • Evaluation, surveillance and monitoring of HIV
    drug resistance in Asian region.
  • Quality Assessment Scheme (TAQAS).
  • Detection of drug resistance mutations.
  • Interpretation and reporting of genotypic data.
  • Identification of technical factors affecting
    optimal performance.
  • Standardizes outcomes HIV genotypic resistance
    testing.
  • Meaningful and confident comparison of results.

23
TAQAS Laboratories
Current Laboratories
Future Laboratories
24
Aligning of Nucleotide Sequences
Positions associated with drug resistance
Key
Wildtype
Mixture
Mutant
Differences in nucleotide sequence are made
obvious to laboratories to enable self-education.
25
Detection of drug resistance mutations
Most laboratories detected gt85 of the drug
resistance mutations (DRM) in Panel 1. Detection
of DRM was sustained in Panel 2.
26
TAQAS Outcomes .to date
  • High quality genotyping results achieved in a
    group of Asian laboratories.
  • Some differences identified between laboratories
    in the outcomes of
  • sequencing
  • sequence editing
  • detection of drug resistance mutations.
  • The scheme will be expanded and the variation in
    outcomes of HIV genotyping between laboratories
    addressed.

27
New Approaches
  • Laboratory systems rather than more laboratories
  • Transport systems

28
New Approaches
  • Laboratory systems rather than more laboratories
  • Transport systems
  • Better tests for use in resource-limited
    settings

29
New Approaches
  • Laboratory systems rather than more laboratories
  • Transport systems
  • Better tests for use in resource-limited
    settings
  • Training

30
New Approaches
  • Referral systems rather than more laboratories
  • Transport systems
  • Better tests for use in resource-limited
    settings
  • Training
  • Improved laboratory development mechanisms
    including QA

31
New Approaches
  • Laboratory systems rather than more laboratories
  • Transport systems
  • Better tests for use in resource-limited
    settings
  • Training
  • Improved laboratory development mechanisms
    including QA
  • Insist on donors supporting systems and
    infrastructure - not individuals

32
  • Laboratories are once again are seen as important
  • Screening
  • Monitoring

33
Summary
  • There is urgent need for Cost-Effective
    approaches
  • Newer methods are available for Viral Load and
    CD4 but each has its own advantages and
    disadvantages
  • There are some approaches that must be considered

34
(No Transcript)
35
Acknowledgements
  • The Forum CD4 working group members, especially
  • Veronica Miller
  • Ben Cheng
  • Susan Fiscus
  • Alan Landay
  • Bill Rodriguez
  • Clinical Research lab at the Burnet Institute,
    especially
  • Vicki Greengrass, Lisa Morris
  • Others who contributed new slides or information
    for this presentation
  • Roland Gohde (Partec)
  • Dr Balakrishnan (YRG Care Chennai)
  • Frank Xu (Semi-Bio)
  • John Wotherspoon (Becton Dickinson)
  • Jeff Harvey, Tina Baumgartner, Leonard Buchner,
    (Guava),
  • AngieVernon (Beckman Coulter, PointCare),
  • Viv Granger and Dave Barnett (NEQAS), Amanda
    Lindholm (Streck),
  • Shelley Hossenlopp and Larry Fox (LabNow)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com