ExOR: Opportunistic Multi-Hop Routing For Wireless Networks - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

ExOR: Opportunistic Multi-Hop Routing For Wireless Networks

Description:

This paper contributes the first complete design and implementation of a link ... Gradual falloff of probability with distance (80%, 40%, 20 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:226
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: csBing
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: ExOR: Opportunistic Multi-Hop Routing For Wireless Networks


1
ExOR Opportunistic Multi-Hop Routing For
Wireless Networks
  • Sanjit Biswas Robert Morris

2
Contributions
  • This paper contributes the first complete design
    and implementation of a link/network-layer
    diversity routing technique that uses standard
    radio hardware.
  • It demonstrates a substantial throughput
    improvement over traditional routing.

3
Why ExOR promises high throughput? (1)
4
Why ExOR promises high throughput? (2)
N5
N1
N3
N7
N6
N2
N4
N8
S
D
Traditional Path
  • Gradual falloff of probability with distance
    (80, 40, 20..)
  • Lucky longer path can reduce transmission count
  • Shorter path ensures some forward progress
  • ExOR works better with local interference than
    global

5
Four Design Challenges
  • The nodes must agree on which subset of them
    received each packet
  • A metric to measure the probable cost of moving
    packet from any node to destination
  • Choosing most useful participants
  • Avoid simultaneous transmission to minimize
    collisions

6
Node State
  • Packet buffer
  • Forwarding timer
  • Transmission tracker
  • Used to adjust forwarding tracker.
  • Batch map
  • Highest priority node that received the pkt

7
Working
N7
N8
F
F
F
N1
N2
N5
S
F
N4
D
Batch
N3
N6
F
1st round
2nd round
3rd round
8
Cost Metric similar to ETX
  • ETX Expected Transmission Count
  • ExOR uses forward delivery probability
  • Knowledge of inter-node loss rate

9
Evaluation Setup
  • 38 Roofnet nodes participated using 802.11b
  • One hop at a time for fair comparison in
    traditional routing.

10
Evaluation 1A
  • Bars higher than 1000 indicates that nodes had
    to transmit the packet more than once.

11
Evaluation 1B
  • ExOR exhibits better throughput

12
Evaluation - 2
13
Summary
  • Pros
  • ExOR achieves 2x to 4x throughput improvement for
    more distant pairs
  • ExOR implemented on Roofnet and evaluated in
    detail
  • Exploits radio properties, instead of hiding them
  • Does not require changes in the MAC layer
  • Cons
  • Not scalable to large network as traditional
    routing
  • Overhead in packet header (batch info)
  • Batches affect the TCP performance
  • What if not enough packets to make the batch?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com