Recent%20drag%20rate%20measurements - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Recent%20drag%20rate%20measurements

Description:

Title: Electron Cooling Commissioning Update Author: Beams Division Last modified by: Beams Division Created Date: 4/19/2005 9:06:55 PM Document presentation format – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:75
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 12
Provided by: Beam77
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Recent%20drag%20rate%20measurements


1
Recent drag rate measurements
  • Recycler Departmental Meeting
  • November 8th, 2006
  • L. Prost, S. Shemyakin

2
Data taken
  • Drag rate measurements with the electron beam on
    axis, 2 kV jumps
  • 100 mA 400 mA
  • Nominal file (806)
  • Magnetic field realigned recently
  • Modified file 806
  • SPB01I changed from 13.5 A to 14.5 A
  • From focusing optimization based on equilibrium
    changes of a cooled beam at 200 mA (1 mm offset)
  • Equilibrium to equilibrium
  • Check old SA calibration
  • Got unexpected data due to slow energy
    oscillations
  • Additional output
  • Energy vs y-position at R01
  • Jumps calibration

3
Drag rates ranged from 25 to 50 MeV/C per hour
All but 6/15/06 data were taken with R38 lt4gt
4
Comparison to current density profile Better
agreement ?
Unexplained discrepancy (?!?!) Otherwise, good
agreement between the two detectors
5
Data may not be straightforward to interpret
because of a wobbling energy
Pbars drift before the jump
6
Slow (6 minute period) energy oscillations are
observed
  • Comparison of the Pelletron voltage variation dU
    recorded with GVM and the electron energy
    variations dE calculated from BYR01S
  • Both signals are averaged over 30 sec
  • Calibration from a jump (last week presentation)
  • 0.31 mm/kV
  • Source of these oscillations is unknown
  • Voltage regulation loop ?
  • Temperature ?

This is a new observation
7
Taking advantage of the oscillations as an
independent measurement of the drag rate for
small deviations
  • The blue curve shows the evolution of the pbar
    momentum Pi predicted from BYR01 positions Yi as

where P0 - initial momentum offset ? 33 hr-1 -
drag rate coefficient D - coefficient
translating the dispersion in BYR01S into the
units of MeV/c per mm Y0 - beam position in
BYR01S corresponding to an equilibrium energy
8
Energy jumps calibration/uncertainties
380 V
100 mA, on axis
Intended jump (3.67 MeV/c)
Error on jump (1s) 0.23 MeV/c
GVMVLT gives 0.11 MeV/c for 1s
9
Summary/Conclusions/Questions
  • Fastest drag rates ever recorded
  • Max 50 MeV/c per hour for Ib 300 mA
  • Better magnetic field alignment
  • Better alignment with pbars
  • Smaller emittances ?
  • Better focusing ?
  • In particular for 300 mA case
  • Should not matter on axis
  • May be slightly better agreement with estimation
    of the dependence of the drag force with the
    current density on axis
  • But still abnormally low drag rate for high
    electron beam current (e.g. 400 mA)
  • Standard data analysis (shown here) may be too
    simple for this set because of the energy
    wobbling continuously (see following points)

10
Summary/Conclusions/Questions (cont)
  • Slow and relatively large energy oscillations
    were observed (with pbars and R01 position) for
    the whole duration of the measurements
  • New phenomenon/observation
  • Better (higher) drag force ?
  • Temperature variations ?
  • Relatively good agreement between the two
    measurements using a linear model for the drag
    force
  • Small oscillations
  • Possibility to use an applied sinusoid for
    automated measurement of the drag force
  • Continue to use R01 position as a spectrometer
  • Estimated errors for the jump 0.23 MeV/c (1s)
  • Based on GVMVLT data, the estimated error is
    half the one calculated with position data
  • But it is less sensitive

11
Not a real plan but
  • We want to continue (and accentuate) the
    investigation of the friction force and cooling
    rates
  • More measurements will be requested
  • Visitors from BNL will come to Fermilab in
    December for that purpose
  • Very important for their project which goes into
    review in the Spring
  • Goals
  • Improve cooling (FNAL)
  • Rates, lifetime,
  • Understand cooling (FNAL, BNL,) !!
  • Physics contribution of the Electron cooling
    project
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com