Affymetrix CytoScan HD array - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Affymetrix CytoScan HD array

Description:

Affymetrix CytoScan HD array CytoScan HD vs current array Current array (CGH based) patient + reference DNA required (two color) utilizes Cy dyes ozone sensitive ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:587
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: Trial46
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Affymetrix CytoScan HD array


1
Affymetrix CytoScan HD array
2
CytoScan HD vs current array
  • Current array (CGH based)
  • patient reference DNA required (two color)
  • utilizes Cy dyes ozone sensitive
  • copy number probes only (135 K)
  • CytoScan HD array (not CGH based)
  • patient DNA only (single color)
  • in silico reference based on gt300 normal
    individuals and cell lines
  • utilizes phycoerythrin not ozone sensitive
  • copy number probes (1.9 million) SNP (750 K)

3
Coverage
  • Average marker spacing
  • ISCA genes 384 bp
  • OMIM genes 659 bp
  • X chromosome OMIM genes 486 bp
  • RefSeq genes 880 bp
  • Intergenic backbone 1737 bp

4
Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs)
..ATGC
Allele A
..ATAC
Allele B
5
Copy number SNP arrays
  • SNPs limited to specific locations in genome
    SNP
  • only arrays biased due to positional
    restrictions
  • Non-polymorphic (copy number) probes fill gaps to
  • allow broad coverage

6
Improvements of CytoScan HD over Affy SNP 6.0
  • Improved software
  • Much less noise
  • Probes empirically chosen based on performance
  • 20 million probes screened
  • All reagents centrally manufactured and provided
    as kits
  • Streamlined procedure only one restriction
    digest, half the steps, less hands-on time

7
Other potential benefits of CytoScan
  • Affy filing for FDA clearance
  • CytoScan currently has best coverage on single
    array for both constitutional and neoplastic
    cases
  • Other large clinical labs switching to CytoScan
    (LabCorp, ARUP)

8
  • Copy number SNP arrays - detect copy number
    changes and allele frequencies
  • SNPs can detect uniparental isodisomy,
    consanguinity
  • more sensitive for detection of mosaicism
  • independent confirmation of copy number findings
    and better breakpoint determination

9
Copy number SNP array
Copy
Allele peaks
10
(No Transcript)
11
SNP arrays more sensitive for detection of
mosaicism
Non-mosaic deletion
Mosaic deletion
12
CNC detection vs. reporting
  • Cytoscan software allows differential flagging in
    known clinically signficant critical regions vs.
    backbone regions
  • Can potentially detect smaller CNCs but doesnt
    mean everything should be reported
  • Ex LabCorp size cut-offs for reporting in
    backbone regions
  • Postnatal gt500 Kb gain, gt200 Kb loss
  • Prenatal gt2 Mb gain, gt1 Mb loss

13
Uniparental disomy
  • Inheritance of two homologous chromosomes from
    one parent
  • isodisomy two copies of the same homolog
  • heterodisomy two different homologs
  • UPD mechanisms
  • meiotic non-disjunction with trisomy or monosomy
    rescue
  • post-zygotic mitotic recombination
  • Whole chromosome isodisomy vs. hetero/isodisomy

14
SNPs and consanguinity or UPD
Chromosome 2
15
Normal allele homozygosity
Whole chromosome isodisomy
16
UPD or normal ?
17
LabCorp studyPapenhausen et al. Am J Med Genet.
155A757-68, 2011
  • Homozygosity profiling by SNP array is screen for
    UPD
  • What LCSH size should be used as cut-off for
    recommending parental f/u for UPD?
  • Determined distribution of LCSH in patient
    population
  • Retrospectively analyzed eight confirmed UPD
    cases for LCSH

18
Distribution of LCSH in 120 consecutive patients
19
Eight known UPD cases
  • Two whole chromosome homozygosity
  • Six mixture of hetero/isodisomy
  • Single LCSH range 13.5 48.4 Mb
  • One case with two LCSH of 11 and 11.2 Mb
  • Set LCSH UPD cut-off at gt13.5 Mb (two LCSH with
    total of gt 15 Mb)
  • LCSH in more than one chromosome identity by
    descent

20
Prospectively analyzed 13,000 patients by SNP
array
  • 92 patients with UPD qualifying LCSH based on
    cut-offs
  • Parental f/u on 46 cases (mostly imprinted
    chromosomes)
  • Confirmed UPD in 29 cases
  • 14/30 whole chromosome isoUPD
  • 13/30 mixture of hetero/isoUPD
  • False-positive UPD 17 cases
  • Chromosome 3 and 11 pericentromeric region, 13q21

21
LabCorp Study other observations
  • False-positive cases had shorter average LCSH,
    greater freq near cen, no telomeric LCSH
  • No false-positive cases with qualifying telomeric
    LCSH
  • Sometimes see evidence of copy mosaicism in
    trisomy/monosomy rescue allele freq mosaicism in
    segmental UPD
  • Low likehood of false-negatives

22
LabCorp current cut-offs for UPD (combined
hetero/isodisomy or segmental UPD)
  • Single LCSH in one chromosome
  • gt20 Mb interstitial or gt10 Mb telomeric for
    non-imprinted chromosomes
  • gt15 Mb interstitial or gt8 Mb telomeric for known
    imprinted chromosomes

23
SNP detection of consanguinity
LCSH involving multiple chromosomes (regions of
identity by descent)
24
LabCorp cut-offs for consanguinityLCSH gt 10 Mb
Degree of Relationship Relationship Coefficient of Inbreeding Theoretical level of LCSH (based on total of 2850 Mb minus X and Y) Empiric Level of LCSH Theoretical Percent LCSH
1ST Degree Siblings/Parent-Child 1/4 712.5 Mb 550-950 Mb 25.0
2nd Degree Half Siblings/Uncle-Niece/Aunt-Nephew/Double First Cousins 1/8 356.25 Mb 250-635 Mb 12.5
3rd Degree First Cousins/Half Uncle-Niece/Half Aunt-Nephew 1/16 178.5 Mb 100-300 Mb 6.25
4th Degree First Cousins Once Removed/Double Second Cousins 1/32 89.0 Mb 30-75 Mb 3.12
5th Degree Second Cousins 1/64 44.5 Mb gt30 Mb 1.56
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com