Radiofrequncy Ablation in Chronic Pain Management - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 21
About This Presentation
Title:

Radiofrequncy Ablation in Chronic Pain Management

Description:

Radiofrequncy Ablation in Chronic Pain Management Joel Chang MD CASE 67 y/o M Lumbago, facet arthropathy, lumbar spondylolithesis, post-laminectomy Attempted Tx: TENS ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:409
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: mcVanderb
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Radiofrequncy Ablation in Chronic Pain Management


1
Radiofrequncy Ablation in Chronic Pain Management
  • Joel Chang MD

2
CASE
  • 67 y/o M
  • Lumbago, facet arthropathy, lumbar
    spondylolithesis, post-laminectomy
  • Attempted Tx TENS, PT/ aqua, lidoderm,
    oxycontin, epidural
  • 2 Lumbar MBBs of L3-S1 with about 1 hour relief
    each time
  • Presented for pulsed radiofrequency ablation of
    L3-S1 of right MBs

3
Overview
  • RFA is indicated for pain with constant and
    limited distribution
  • Interrupts nociceptive pathways in the treatment
    of chronic pain
  • Useful for nociceptive pain and some neuropathic
    pain
  • Diagnosis confirmed with diagnostic blocks first
  • Tendency for recurrence 1-2 years but can be
    repeated

4
Non-indications
  • Centralized pain
  • Pathology in the spinal cord
  • Serious Psychopathology

5
Diagnosis
  • Diagnostic blocks are usually done before RFA
  • Done only if blocks are expected to provide
    information (ex herniated disc)
  • Diagnostic block utility include trigeminal
    neuralgia, and lumbar and cervical facet joint
    pain

6
Diagnostic Injections
  • Studies showed that single diagnostic lumbar z
    joint blocks are false positive 38 of the time.
    Blocks are usually repeated as a result
  • The International Association for the Study of
    Pain specifies that diagnosis requires
    radiographically guided blocks provide complete
    relief and are validated by a appropriate control
    test that exclude false-positive responses

7
RFA Sites
  • Medial Branch of Posterior Ramus innervates the
    facet joints
  • Dorsal Root Ganglion (herniated discs or regional
    pain syndromes)
  • Intradiscal RF
  • Sympathetic chain
  • Splanchnic nerve
  • Gasserian ganglion for trigeminal neuralgia

8
RF Machine
  • Includes temperature display, impedance monitor,
    stimulator, and lesion generator.
  • Impedance Monitor Useful for detecting entry
    into various mediums ( a large increase for
    example might suggest movement from fluid to
    tissue)
  • Electrical Stimulation Sensory stimulation
    confirms proximity to the target. Motor
    stimulation confirms a safe distance to motor
    fibers in case a heat lesion is made
  • Lesioning Module continuous vs pulsed RF

9
RF Machine (cont)
  • When the electrode is placed on the patients
    body, a circuit is complete
  • An electric field is established around the
    electrode tip. This field oscillates with
    alternating RF current causing movement of ions
    in the tissue
  • This causes friction in tissue surrounding the
    catheter tip which produces heat (not the
    catheter itself)
  • Monitoring the catheter tip temp therefore
    adequately measures tissue temp.

10
RF Machine (cont)
  • RF current is low energy, high frequency
    (100,000-500,000 hz)
  • RF lesions do not selectively destroy only
    nociceptive afferents
  • Temperature determines the size of the lesion
  • Cells become damaged at temps 42 to 45 degrees
    celsius. With temps of 60-100 degrees celsius
    there is near instantaneous induction of protein
    coagulation, leading to cell death
  • Electrical stimulation at 50 hz should produce
    sensory stimulation at less than 1 V if electrode
    is placed correctly.
  • Stimulation at 2 hz should evoke contraction of
    ipsilateral paraspinal muscles below 2.5 V but
    without limb contracture.

11
RF tidbits
  • RFA near bone or scar tissue may have a very
    irregular ablation pattern from differences in
    impedance and conductivity leading to
    complications. Pulsed RFA is more ideal in these
    situations and less likely to lead to
    complications
  • Patients with pacemakers cardiology consultation
    is needed to convert the pacemaker to a fixed
    rate for the procedure
  • Patients with spinal cord stimulators
  • adjustments are also needed with the settings
    (monopolar needs to be changed to bipolar and
    off)

12
Technique
  • RF electrodes produce little lesion distal to
    their tip and coagulate transversely
  • Therefore if electrodes are placed
    perpendicularly to the nerve the may fail to
    coagulate the nerve or will coagulate the nerve
    minimally
  • The most reliable coagulation is done if the
    electrodes are placed parallel to the nerve.
  • Of note that some of the early studies were
    believed to be done under poor technique,
    producing poor outcomes
  • Needless to say, outcome results depend on user
    experience with RFA

13
Technique (cont)
  • The use of preliminary electrical stimulation of
    the medial branch nerve to verify electrode
    placement is debatable.
  • Some argue its an unnecessary use of time and
    that adjusting the electrode position to minimize
    the threshold for evoked activity does not
    improve outcome
  • Radiological confirmation of electrode placement
    is essential

14
Pulsed-RFA
  • RFA 80 degrees C for 90 seconds
  • Pulsed-RFA 42 degrees for 120 seconds
  • Current is applied in bursts of 20 ms with a
    silent time of 480ms
  • Lower temp in pulsed-RFA results in less tissue
    destruction
  • Unclear Mechanism of pulsed RFA
  • - modulates pain processing mechanisms
  • -selectively disrupts small nerve fibers
  • - Pulsed RFA associated with increased cFos

15
Pulsed- RFA
  • Studies show that PRF for lumbar facet joints
    tend do have a shorter benefit of pain relief (4
    months compared to 12 months for RF)
  • Standard RF also denervates the multifidus
    muscle which eliminates the muscular component of
    lumbar facet syndrome

16
Results
  • Success for Lumbar RFA ranges from 60-90
  • 21 had complete pain relief and 65 reported
    mild to mod pain relief
  • Other studies showed that 60 percent of patients
    enjoy at least 80 relief at 12 months and 80
    percent enjoy at least 60 percent relief.
  • 92 achieved good relief for Trigeminal Neuralgia
  • Reports show that there is some loss of effect
    over 1-2 years
  • Can be repeated

17
Cervical RFA
  • Symptoms that indicate a patient might benefit
    from cervical RFA include neck pain, headache,
    shoulder pain, scapula and upper arm pain
  • Cervical MBB have a false positive rate of 1 in 3
    (lower than Lumbar but still requires diagnostic
    blocks)
  • A high failure rate noted for C2-C3 Z joints 2/2
    nerves larger size and more variable course. This
    facet is innervated by the medial branch of the
    C3 dorsal ramus with a inconsistent contribution
    from the greater occipital nerve.
  • Cervical anatomical variability necessitates
    multiple RF lesions per target nerve
  • When pain reoccurs procedures can be repeated
  • Side effects are well tolerated and serious
    complications have not been reported

18
Other Applications
  • RFA MB of thoracic Z joint pain, but evidence not
    as reassuring
  • Also evidence for sacroiliac joint also not strong

19
Repeat RFAs
  • Study of effectiveness of repeat radiofrequency
    neurotomy for lumber facet pain (Schofferman,
    Kine, Spine Vol 29) showed that the frequency of
    success and durations of relief remained
    consistent after each subsequent radiofrequency
    ablation.
  • Mean duration of 10.5 months and successful more
    than 85 of the time
  • This 10.5 months however, is shorter than
    reported 1st time RFA relief

20
To Keep In Mind
  • RFA significantly improves the pain and quality
    of life in patients
  • However, it does not cure the (facet) pain.

21
References
  • Lord, S, Bogduk, N. Radiofrequency procedures in
    chronic pain. Best Practice and Research Clinical
    Anesthesiology Vol. 16, No. 4, 597- 617.
  • Mikeladze, Espinal, et al. Pulsed Radiofrequency
    application in treatment of chronic zygapopyseal
    joint pain. The Spine Journal 3 (2003) 360-362.
  • Niemisto, Kalso, et al. RF Denervation for Neck
    and Back Pain A Systemic Review Within the
    Framework of the Cochrane Collaboration Back
    Review Group. Spine Vol 28, Number 16, pp
    1877-1888.
  • Sluijter, M., Racz, G. Technical Aspects of
    Radiofrequency. Pain Practice, Vol 2, Number 3,
    195- 200.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com