4511_Lec4_30Jan08 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 9
About This Presentation
Title:

4511_Lec4_30Jan08

Description:

... cm's of Pb); no electric charge; EM radiation like X-rays, but more energetic. ... EM: Strong, but short range ( ~10-14 m) No effect on atomic physics. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:33
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 10
Provided by: ronpo
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: 4511_Lec4_30Jan08


1
Nuclear Instability and Radioactive Decay
  • ?-radiation strongly ionizing (absorbed by a few
    cm of air) positively charged (deflection in E/B
    fields) spectroscopy and e/m ? He ions.
  • Natural radioactivity discovered by Becquerel
    (1896). Came to be recognized as nuclear
    disinte- gration. Many unstable nuclides
    identified (Curies, et al.). Three types of
    radiation described.
  • ?-radiation longer range (penetrates Pb foil)
    negatively charged e/m ? electrons.

Continuous Spectrum
Monoenergetic
  • ?-radiation still longer range (penetrates cms
    of Pb) no electric charge EM radiation like
    X-rays, but more energetic.

2
  • An unstable nucleus decays because there is an
    arrangement of its component parts that is
    energetically favored over the original.
  • We learn a great deal about the strong
    interaction from the patterns of stability.
  • Small nuclei (A ? 40) are stable with N ? Z, but
    larger nuclei demand more neutrons (N ? 1.7Z).
  • Protons have attractive nuclear forces and
    repulsive Coulomb forces neutrons have just the
    nuclear force and act as extra glue.
  • Why dont small nuclei demand more neutrons too?

3
  • Qualitative explanation
  • Larger nuclei have greater charge density.
  • Destabilizing effect of being surrounded by
    protons needs to be compensated by the presence
    of extra neutrons.
  • Look more closely at the stability data.
    Preference for configurations with paired nuclei
    is clear
  • Strong Pairing hypothesis, also suggested by
    nuclear spins.
  • Understanding of nuclear sizes (incompressibility)
    , the neutron hunger of large nuclei, evidence
    for strong pairing must be incorporated into
    nuclear models.
  • First, peek at some properties of the nuclear
    force.

4
Properties of the Strong Nuclear Force
  • Info from scattering, other experiments (?N, nN,
    deuterons, etc.)
  • Different from other forces, esp. EM
  • Strong, but short range (lt10-14 m)
  • No effect on atomic physics. B/A does not depend
    on size ? p/n interact only with nearest
    neighbors.
  • Suggests (Yukawa) carrier is a particle with
    nonzero mass, not like photon.
  • Attractive on nuclear scale, repulsive core.
  • Nuclei dont collapse, maintain const. density.
  • Qualitative potential helps with intuitive
    understanding, but limited quantitative
    application.
  • Charge independence
  • n and p exhibit identical nuclear interactions
    after the effects of electric charge are
    eliminated.
  • Reveals basic symmetry of strong interaction
    isospin and sets the stage for deeper
    symmetries and the quark model.

5
  • Next task
  • Use qualitative and quantitative observations
    about properties of nuclei and the nuclear force
    to construct phenomenological models of nuclear
    structure.
  • Most basic features
  • Nuclei are spherical.
  • Nuclear radii satisfy R?A1/3 ? constant density

Liquid Drop Model
  • Nucleus behaves like a non-rotating
    incompressible liquid drop, with nuclei instead
    of molecules.
  • Individual quantum properties of nucleons are
    irrelevant.
  • Short-range attraction holds nucleons together,
    extremely-short-range repulsive force prevents
    collapse.
  • Stable central core of nucleons for which the
    nuclear force is saturated (?A).
  • Surface layer of nucleons not as tightly bound
    for which the nuclear force is not saturated
    (?A2/3).
  • Together these result in a net attraction toward
    the center ? surface tension.

6
Payoff Semi-Empirical Mass Formula
  • Simple liquid drop picture does not yet have
    electromagnetic effect of the proton charges.
  • Details depend on specific charge distribution,
    but in general
  • With the nuclear-force effects and this Coulomb
    repulsion, we can make a first stab at a formula
    for the nuclear binding energy

Semi-empirical ? determine the coefficients by
fitting B.E. data
7
(A good start, but still not good enough.)
Fermi-Gas Model
  • Treat nucleus as a gas of free ps and ns
    confined in a spherically symmetric potential
    well.
  • Width nuclear diameter
  • Depth whatever gives the observed B.E.
  • ps and ns are spin-1/2 and must obey
    Fermi-Dirac statistics and the Pauli exclusion
    principle.
  • ? Two identical nucleons (? and ?) per state

Ignore for now potentials for n and p must be
different because of charge.
In the ground state, levels fill from the bottom
to the Fermi level. To exchange a proton for a
neutron takes energy.
8
Start at NZ
Total energy increment for N Z ? to some N gt Z
with A constant approaches
Simplified treatment of energy levels ? no
difference between increasing Z and increasing N.
Reality symmetry broken by proton charge.
9
  • Potential well has energy spacing that is
    inversely proportional to size
  • Combining this with the previous result, we get a
    new term for the B.E. reflecting the price of
    p/n asymmetry.

One more effect to incorporate strong pairing.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com