Title: Inpatient Medicine: Year in Review
1Inpatient Medicine Year in Review
- Karen Hauer, MD
- UCSF
- August, 2006
2Methods
- Literature review March 2005 - 2006
- 11 major journals
- Am J Med Circulation
- Annals Internal Med Critical Care Medicine
- ACP Journal Club JAMA
- Archives Internal Med Lancet
- BMJ New Engl J Medicine
- CMAJ
3Selection criteria
- Relevance for inpatient medicine
- Potential to change, inform, or confirm practice
- Diverse topics, study types
4Topics
- Acute coronary syndromes
- Insulin in the ICU
- Clostridium difficile
- Contrast nephropathy
- PE
- Diagnosing catheter-related infection
- Medication discrepancies
5Case
- A 75 year old man with diabetes, hypertension,
hyperlipidemia, dyspepsia on PPI, and COPD is
admitted with chest pain, fever, and cough. Vital
signs are pulse 95, BP 145/90, resp 22, 02 sat
97 on room air. On exam JVP is 9 cm, chest
clear, cardiac RRR with S4, no edema. BNP is 250.
ECG shows NSR with 2 mm ST elevation in V4-6. CXR
shows LLL infiltrate.
6Question 1
- You administer aspirin 325 mg. Do you give
Clopidogrel? - Yes, before percutaneous coronary intervention
(PCI). - Yes, after PCI
- Yes, if tPA is given
- No, aspirin is enough
7Effect of Clopidogrel Pretreatment before PCI
- Negative consequences of platelet activation
- Coronary artery thrombosis - plaque rupture
- Thrombotic complications of percutaneous coronary
intervention (PCI) - What is the optimal timing of clopidogrel
treatment in patients with ST elevation MI
(STEMI)? - Initiated at time of PCI or
- pretreatment
8Effect of Clopidogrel Pretreatment before PCIthe
PCI Clarity StudySabatine, N Engl J Med
20052941224
- 1863 patients with recent STEMI
- Randomized trial
- All patients received fibrinolytic, aspirin
- Clopidogrel 300 mg load, then 75/day or placebo
- Initiated with fibrinolysis, then PCI at 2-8 days
- Any patient getting stent received clopidogrel
after - Outcome
- Primary composite of CV death, MI, or stroke
from PCI to 30 days - Secondary MI or stroke before PCI
9Clopidogrel Pretreatment before PCI improved
outcomes
10Effect of Clopidogrel Pretreatment before PCIthe
PCI Clarity Study
- Clopidogrel pretreatment benefit
- Regardless of patient characteristics
- For urgent/elective PCI regardless of timing
- No difference in bleeding
- 2.0 vs. 1.9
- No increase in bleeding with clopidogrel
pretreatment plus GpIIb/IIIa inhibitor - Benefit of clopidogrel across a range of
pretreatment durations
11Implications of Clopidogrel Pretreatment before
PCI
- For every 100 patients undergoing PCI
- Prevent 2 MIs before PCI
- Prevent 2 CV deaths, MI or stroke after PCI to 30
days - Addition of clopidogrel to ASA in 45,852 patients
with acute MI - 93 STEMI or BBB
- 9 reduction in death, MI, or stroke at discharge
- COMMIT. Lancet 20053661607
12Question 1
- You administer aspirin 325 mg. Do you give
Clopidogrel? - Yes, before percutaneous coronary intervention
(PCI).
13Topics
- Acute coronary syndromes
- Insulin in the ICU
- Clostridium difficile
- Contrast nephropathy
- Pulmonary embolism
- Diagnosing catheter-related infection
- Medication discrepancies
14Case
- Your patient undergoes successful PCI with stent
placement. You also diagnosed pneumonia based on
the presentation and initial CXR and started
Levofloxacin. His oxygen requirements increase
over the first 2 hospital days to the point that
he is intubated and admitted to the ICU.
15Question 2
- Do you initiate intensive insulin therapy in the
ICU? - A. No, only in surgical ICU patients.
- B. Yes.
- C. Yes, if he is likely to be in the ICU for gt 3
days. - D. Yes, if glucose at ICU admission is gt 300
mg/dl.
16Intensive Insulin Therapy in the ICU Van den
Berghe, N Engl J Med 20013451359
- Benefits of strict glucose control in surgical
ICU - In-hospital mortality 11 vs. 7, (p .01)
- Greatest benefit with ICU stay gt 3-5 days
- Reduced morbidity
- Septicemia 8 vs. 4 (p .003)
- Organ failure
- Does intensive insulin therapy improve prognosis
in the medical ICU?
17Intensive Insulin Therapy in the Medical ICU Van
den Berghe, N Engl J Med 2006354449
- Prospective, randomized, unblinded trial
- Intensive insulin with goal glucose 80-110
- Conventional treatment insulin drip with goal
glucose 180-200 - Primary outcome in-hospital mortality
- Secondary outcomes ICU mortality, organ failure,
bacteremia or prolonged antibiotics
18Intensive insulin therapy and in-hospital
mortality
p 0.009
p 0.33
19Intensive insulin therapy and hypoglycemia
- Average glucose 150s with conventional Rx vs.
100s with intensive insulin - More hypoglycemia with intensive insulin, but no
adverse clinical events - Risk factors ICU gt 3 days, liver failure,
dialysis - Hypoglycemia was independent risk for death
20Intensive insulin therapy in the MICU
implications
- Mortality benefit for patients in ICU gt 3 days
similar to benefit in surgical ICU - But. . .
- Cant predict length of ICU stay
- Higher mortality with insulin ICU lt 3 days
- A reasonable approach
- Aim for glucose lt150 on ICU days 1-3
- Consider goal of 80-110 after day 3
21Question 2
- Do you initiate intensive insulin therapy in the
ICU? - C. Yes, if he is likely to be in the ICU for gt 3
days.
22Topics
- Acute coronary syndromes
- Insulin in the ICU
- Clostridium difficile
- Contrast nephropathy
- Pulmonary embolism
- Diagnosing catheter-related infection
- Medication discrepancies
23Case Question 3
- On hospital day 3, your patient has 4 loose
stools and subsequent stool testing reveals C.
difficile colitis. What risk factors might
explain his developing C. difficile infection? - Levofloxacin use
- PPI use
- Colonization with C. dif in the spore form
- Your washing your hands with an alcohol-based
hand sanitizer
24The new Clostridium difficile what does it mean?
- C diff colonization
- 3 healthy adults
- 20-40 hospitalized patients
- Metabolically inactive spore form until gut flora
perturbed - C diff virulence factors toxins A and B
- 2 genes down-regulate toxin production
- Binary toxin mediates potency of toxins A and B
25Outbreaks of C diff in health care facilitiesLoo
VG. N Engl J Med 20053532442.
- Prospective and case control studies of C diff
outbreaks at 12 Quebec hospitals - C diff 2 of all admissions
- 7 in patients gt 90 years
- Mortality with C diff
- 25 30-day mortality
- Attributable mortality 7
- 14 in patients gt 90 years
26Case control study risk factors for C diff
- Not associated with C diff
- Other antibiotics
- Acid blockers, enteral feeding
27Severe diarrhea associated with virulent strain
- Two genetic mutations increased virulence
- Binary toxin gene
- Partial deletion of suppressor gene
- Severe diarrhea
- 22/132 patients (17) with mutations vs. 0/25
without - All isolates susceptible to metronidazole,
vancomycin
28ImplicationsC diff may be evolving into a more
severe disease
- 4X higher rate of C diff than in past years
- Prevention and control
- Barrier precautions
- Patient isolation
- Cleaning environment with sporicidal agents
- Handwashing - soap and water in addition to
alcohol-based sanitizers - Antibiotic restraint
29Gastric acid suppression and the risk of
community-acquired C diff Dial. JAMA.
20052942989
- Case control study - United Kingdom population
database - Not hospitalized in past year
- Factors associated with community-acquired C diff
(adjusted risk) - PPI 2.9
- H2 blocker 2.0
- Only 37 had antibiotics in prior 90 dys
30Case Question 3
- On hospital day 3, your patient has 4 loose
stools and subsequent stool testing reveals C.
difficile colitis. What risk factors might
explain his developing C. difficile infection? - Levofloxacin use
- PPI use
- Colonization with C. dif in the spore form
- Your washing your hands with an alcohol-based
hand sanitizer
31Topics
- Acute coronary syndromes
- Insulin in the ICU
- Clostridium difficile
- Contrast nephropathy
- Pulmonary embolism
- Diagnosing catheter-related infection
- Medication discrepancies
32Case Question 4
- In the ICU, your patient develops worsening
hypoxia with stable infiltrates on chest x-ray.
You suspect pulmonary embolism (PE), and you want
to order a CT to evaluate. What is the best
strategy to prevent contrast nephropathy? - A. N-acetylcysteine
- B. Bicarbonate
- C. IV hydration, hope he doesnt develop CHF
- D. Hydrate, then lasix
33Contrast Nephropathy
- Major causes of renal failure in the hospital
- Prerenal, Medications
- Contrast
- Consequences of contrast nephropathy
- Prolonged hospitalization
- Need for hemodialysis
- Morbidity and mortality - especially with cardiac
disease - Oops, should have thought of this
- before the cardiac cath
34Risk factors for Contrast Nephropathy
- Patient
- Baseline renal insufficiency
- DM, CHF
- Anemia
- Hypertension, hypotension
- Age
35Contrast Nephropathy
- Definition
- Creatinine increase by 25 or gt 0.5 mg/dl within
48 hrs of contrast - Incidence
- 1.6-2.3 of all patients receiving contrast
- Pathophysiology
- Vasoconstriction -gt renal ischemia
- Direct toxicity
36Preventing Contrast Nephropathy Meta-analysis
of 59 trialsPannu, JAMA 20062952765
- Hydration
- NS superior to half NS
- 1 ml/kg X 6-12 hrs pre-procedure, 6-12 hrs post
- D5W with 3 amps NaHCO3 better than NS before
cardiac cath - 3 ml/kg X 1 hr pre-procedure, 6 hrs post
- Oral hydration works, but IV probably better
- Merten, JAMA. 20042912328
- Mueller, Arch Int Med. 2002162329
37Preventing Contrast Nephropathy What is the
Evidence?
- N-acetylcysteine
- Antioxidant
- Dose 600 mg BID X 2 days
- Early evidence of dramatic benefit
- 90 risk reduction vs. placebo
- (NEJM. 2000343180)
- Subsequent studies mostly favorable but less so
- Summary
- Well-tolerated
- May help
38Preventing Contrast Nephropathy Hemofiltration
- Marenzi. NEJM 20033491333
39Preventing Contrast Nephropathy Summary of the
Evidence
- Yes
- Identify high-risk patients
- Avoid unnecessary contrast
- Hydration
- No
- Hemodialysis
- Fenoldopam
- Dopamine
- Diuretics
- Maybe
- Hemofiltration
- Acetylcysteine
- Theophylline
40Summary Recommendations
- gt 2 risk factors for contrast nephropathy
- IV hydration before procedure
- Consider N-acetylcysteine
- Iso or low-osmolar contrast, minimize amount
- IV hydration after procedure
41Case Question 4
- What is the best strategy to prevent contrast
nephropathy? - Risk factors for contrast nephropathy? yes
- C. IV hydration
42Topics
- Acute coronary syndromes
- Insulin in the ICU
- Clostridium difficile
- Contrast nephropathy
- Pulmonary embolism
- Diagnosing catheter-related infection
- Medication discrepancies
43Case Question 4
- In the ICU, your patient develops worsening
hypoxia with stable infiltrates on chest x-ray.
You suspect pulmonary embolism (PE), but a chest
CT is negative for PE. What do you do next? - A. D-dimer
- B. LE doppler ultrasound
- C. Pulmonary angiography
- D. Conclude that PE is ruled out
44Diagnostic tests for PE in the hospital
- D-dimer unhelpful
- low specificity in hospitalized or post-op
patients, or with cancer - Ultrasound specificity gt sensitivity
- 40 with DVT may have asymptomatic PE
- Angiography gold standard, invasive
- CT sensitivity for central PE high
- What about subsegmental PEs?
- Sensitivity may be as low as 29 - significance?
45Clinical Validity of a Negative CT with suspected
PE a systematic reviewQuiroz. JAMA.
20052932012.
- Meta-analysis of 15 studies using CT to rule out
PE - 3500 patients, 7 nations
- Patient follow up 3-12 months
- After negative CT
- Negative likelihood ratio of clot 0.07
- Negative predictive value 99.1
- No benefit to additional studies prior to CT
46Clinical Validity of a Negative CT with suspected
PE? Yes!
- Negative predictive value of CT (99) compares
favorably to - V/Q scan 76-88
- Pulmonary angiography 98-100
- Visualization of peripheral pulmonary arteries
- improving with better CT techniques
- A negative chest CT rules out PE
- No further testing needed
47Case Question 4
- In the ICU, your patient develops worsening
hypoxia with stable infiltrates on chest x-ray.
You suspect pulmonary embolism (PE), but a chest
CT is negative for PE. What do you do next? - D. Conclude that PE is ruled out
48Topics
- Acute coronary syndromes
- Insulin in the ICU
- Clostridium difficile
- Contrast nephropathy
- Pulmonary embolism
- Diagnosing catheter-related infection
- Medication discrepancies
49Case
- Your patient spikes a temperature to 39 degrees.
On exam BP is 140/80, heart rate 100. He has no
localizing findings. He has a clean internal
jugular line site but you are still concerned
about central line infection. How do you make
this diagnosis?
50Question 5
- Remove the catheter, culture the tip
- Draw blood cultures peripheral and through the
catheter - Draw 2 peripheral blood cultures
- Any diagnostic approach is fine as long as I
dont need to replace the central line
51Catheter-related bloodstream infection
- High morbidity and mortality
- 12-27 mortality
- Prolong hospital stay by 1 week
- Clinical presentation - nonspecific
- Fever, /- hypotension
- No other source
- Line site usually clean
- Increased risk with catheter gt 7 days
52Diagnosing intravascular device-related
bloodstream infection
- Remove the catheter
- Qualitative or quantitative tip culture
- or. . . . Keep the catheter
- Blood cultures through the catheter
- Catheter and peripheral blood cultures
- Differential time to positivity gt 2 hours
- Paired quantitative cultures 3-5 X higher
concentration of organisms from catheter
53Meta-analysis Methods of diagnosing
intravascular device-related bloodstream
infectionSafdar. Ann Intern Med. 2005142451.
- Highest sensitivity
- Qualitative cultures catheter tip (90) or
through catheter (87) - Paired quantitative blood cultures (87)
- Differential time to positivity (85)
- Highest specificity
- Paired quantitative blood cultures (98)
- Quantitative blood culture through catheter (90)
54Summary diagnostic tests for catheter-related
bloodstream infection
- Best test Paired quantitative blood cultures
- Differential time to positivity also accurate and
more widely available - Only test when catheter infection suspected
- Positive predictive value of tests much higher
with high clinical suspicion - Avoids overuse of antibiotics
-
55Question 5
- B. Draw blood cultures peripheral and through the
catheter
56Topics
- Acute coronary syndromes
- Insulin in the ICU
- Clostridium difficile
- Contrast nephropathy
- Pulmonary embolism
- Diagnosing catheter-related infection
- Medication discrepancies
57Case
- Under your excellent care, your patient is ready
to return home from the hospital. His medications
on discharge are coumadin, atenolol, benazepril,
atorvastatin, and omeprazole. - As you handoff his care to his primary care
doctor, what are the risks of a medication
problem?
58Question 6
- None - you explained the regimen to him yourself
- He has close primary care followup so he should
be fine until his clinic appointment - You are fine because of your system to meet the
JHACO Patient Safety Goal to obtain and document
the patients medications on admission, and
discharge - The risk is real and a medication discrepancy
would increase his risk of readmission
59JHACO National Patient Safety Goal 8 medication
reconciliation
- Medication reconciliation
- process during a transition in care
- comparing what medications the patient has been
taking previously with the medications about to
be provided - Hospital admission and discharge important
transitions in care - Discharge medication list must be communicated to
the next provider of care (not just the patient)
60Post Hospital Medication DiscrepanciesColeman.
Arch Intern Med. 20051651842.
- What are the prevalence and contributing factors
associated with medication discrepancies - - prehospital -gt discharge -gt meds actually taken
after discharge - What are risk factors for medication
discrepancies? - Are medication discrepancies associated with
readmission?
61Post Hospital Medication Discrepancies study
population
- 375 Adults gt 65 years old
- Admitted with common conditions likely to require
discharge to skilled nursing facility - CHF, COPD, CAD, DM, stroke, PVD, arrhythmia
- Back conditions, hip fracture
- Discrepancies what was patient told vs. what
was planned
62Categorizing Medication Discrepancies
- Medication Discrepancy Tool (MDT)
- Meds assessed by NP 24-72 hours after discharge
to home - Discrepancies
- Systems-based doctor or system
- Patient-based intentional or non-intentional
- Did they try to take it correctly?
63Medication Discrepancies
- 14 of patients
- 38 of those had gt 1 discrepancy
- Average meds 9 with discrepancy vs. 7 without
(p lt .001) - Common offenders (50 of discrepancies)
- Anticoagulants
- Diuretics, ACE inhibitors
- Lipid-lowering agents
- PPIs
64Causes of Medication Discrepancies
- System (49)
- Bad instructions
- Conflicting instructions
- Duplication
- Patient (51)
- Nonintentional nonadherence (34)
-
- Intentional nonadherence
65Implications of Medication Discrepancies
- 30-day readmission rates higher with medication
discrepancies (14 vs. 6, p .04) - Transitions of care are a high risk time
- Medication reconciliation in the hospital wont
solve the problem - Multiple interventions needed
- Post discharge follow up reconciliation
- Systems improvements
- Patient education
66Question 6
- D. The risk is real and a medication discrepancy
would increase his risk of readmission
67Take Home Points
- Acute coronary syndromes clopidogrel plus ASA
before PCI improves outcomes - Insulin in the medical ICU tight glucose control
improves survival with ICU stay gt 3 days - Clostridium difficile increasingly virulent,
increasingly common in the hospital and community
68Take Home Points
- Contrast nephropathy IV hydration for high risk
patients - PE negative spiral CT rules out clinically
important PE - Diagnosing catheter-related infection diagnose
with paired catheter and peripheral quantitative
cultures, or differential time to positivity - Medication discrepancies common after hospital
discharge due to nonintentional non-adherence or
systems problems