Strategic Case Options Evaluation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 11
About This Presentation
Title:

Strategic Case Options Evaluation

Description:

Strategic Case - Options Evaluation. Stephen Frith. Ben Hutchison. Voting Session 1 ... deliver phased functionality from December 2005 to ensure programme credibility ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:102
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 12
Provided by: stephe250
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Strategic Case Options Evaluation


1
Strategic Case - Options Evaluation
  • Stephen Frith
  • ----
  • Ben Hutchison

2
Voting Session 1
  • Investment Objectives
  • at Single Record project level
  • across all phases

Informing Healthcare
Single Record
3
Single Record Objectives (1/2)
  • The Single Record project should
  • make the Single Record available for use across
    NHS Wales (i.e. one shared solution)
  • ensure compatibility of solution with NHS England
  • ensure compatibility with the rest of the UK
  • deliver phased functionality from December 2005
    to ensure programme credibility and enable early
    benefits to be realised
  • provide the infrastructure required for staff to
    access the Single Record at the point of care
    delivery

4
Single Record Objectives (2/2)
  • The Single Record project should
  • deliver a solution that will control and audit
    access to patient identifiable and clinical
    information
  • deliver a solution that will enable authorised
    staff to identify the correct information for the
    correct patient
  • support the re-design of working practices to
    deliver the full benefits of the Single Record
  • ensure that all services are proactively managed,
    achieving full integration of any multi-supplier
    solutions
  • deliver best value for money for the life of the
    investment

5
Voting Session 2
  • Key questions for the Strategic Outline Case
    across the Single Record
  • (for all Wales - for all phases)

Informing Healthcare
Single Record
6
Question 1 - Phased Implementation?
  • Option A Decide what we want for the next 3
    years, deliver it, in parallel take a view on
    how to enhance it further over time
  • Option B Decide what we want for the next 7-10
    years, commit to it up-front with supplier(s),
    then deliver it in stages
  • Option C As for B, but deliver it all at once

7
Question 2 - Integrate Primary Care Systems
  • Option A Keep existing systems and interface to
    the Single Record
  • Option B Replace all existing systems with
    corporate systems
  • Option C Keep good existing systems and replace
    bad existing systems

8
Question 3 - Integrate Secondary Care Systems
  • Option A Keep existing systems and interface to
    the Single Record
  • Option B Replace all existing systems with
    corporate systems
  • Option C Keep good existing systems and replace
    bad existing systems

9
Question 4 - Service Management options
(helpdesk, change control, supplier management,
contract management, standards)
  • Option A Totally central service management and
    support
  • Option B Central and local split
  • Option C Local service management under central
    guidance
  • Option D Totally local service management

10
Question 5 - Contract options
  • Option A Single prime contractor
  • Option B Let multiple best of breed contracts
    (which might include elements of C) and manage
    within NHS Wales
  • Option C Join English National Programme for IT
    for everything

11
Question 6 - Pace of implementation
  • Option A Centrally defined (i.e. force sites to
    implement to agreed time-scales)
  • Option B Locally defined (i.e. may never join but
    summary never complete)
  • Option C Corporately defined (i.e. in agreement
    but then enforced)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com