Title: The Enterprise Risk Management Process in Higher Education
1The Enterprise Risk Management Processin Higher
Education
- Presented By
- David B. Crawford, CIA, CPA, CCSA
- Justina Crawford, MA, BME
- JDEnterprises crawfordjd_at_earthlink.net
2Topics
- What is Risk Management That is Enterprise Risk
Management (ERM) - Why Implement ERM in Higher Education
- Components of ERM Process
- How to Implement ERM
- Who Should be the Permanent ERM Owner
3What is Risk Management?
- A process that defines how the institution
- Identifies risks to the achievement of goals
objectives - Measures the significance of each identified risk
- Determines the most appropriate business response
to each risk - Evaluates and reports on how well the chosen
responses are carried out
4Characteristics of the Risk Management Process
- Requires an allocation of resources (people,
funds, time) - Is defined by policies and procedures
- Is an integral part of both the strategic and
day-to-day operations of the institution - Is designed to provide reasonable
(cost-effective) assurance that the institution
can successfully accomplish its mission
5What is Enterprise Risk Management (ERM)
- It is an institution-wide or holistic approach to
the risk management process. - In the USA, the recognized institution-wide risk
management model is the COSO Enterprise Risk
Management Framework.
6COSO ERM Characteristics
- A continuous, proactive and systematic process
- to understand, manage, and communicate risk
- from an institution-wide perspective.
7COSO ERM Components
8ERM is Management 101
9Why Implement ERM The Big Picture
- IT IS SIMPLY GOOD BUSINESS, and
10Why Implement ERM Specific Drivers
- US Sentencing Guidelines for Organizations
(Compliance) - Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002
- (Financial Reporting)
- Transparency and Accountability (Operations and
Strategic) - Quick response to new initiatives such as the
Governors Fraud Initiative
11Benefits of ERM (1 of 2)
- Reduce the incidence of serious negative
surprises - Quickly identify emerging risks and problem areas
before they escalate and cause serious harm - Respond to expectations of regulators,
stakeholders, and others. - Make risk and controls understandable
- Provide a simple, uniform methodology that is
applicable in all environments
12Benefits of ERM (2 of 2)
- Need to enhance accountability and communication
- Need to continuously eliminate unnecessary
controls and add needed controls. - Need to reduce response time for emerging risks
- Need to focus efforts on important issues and
concerns.
13Impact on Higher Education Institutions
University of MichiganChief Urologist charged
with Conflict of Interest100,000 penalty1
year probation
Thomas Jefferson UniversityMedicare
over-billing12 mil
University of MinnesotaMisuse federal grants32
mil
University of South Florida Improper Research
Costing4.1 mil
Johns Hopkins Effort reporting 2.6 mil
Stanford UniversityInflated research overhead
costs1.2 mil
Yale UniversityMedical credit balances5.6
mil
University of ChicagoResearch fraud and
abuse650,000
Duke UniversitySexual harassment 0.5 mil
Northwestern University Effort Reporting
fraud5.5 mil
University of WashingtonBilling fraud whistle
blower35 mil
Columbia University Hazardous waste
violations 800,000 penalty sought
University of TexasComponent Institution Medical
Billing 20 mil
Duke University Medicare fraud Millions sought
14ERM It will change your organizational culture
15What Changes?
- Ownership of risk and controls
- Questioning before acting
- Two-way communication
- Bad as well as good news
- Rapid response to changes
- Rapid response to failures in risk management
16Components of an ERM Process
- Standard risk management methodology
- Common risk language
- Standard tools and techniques
- Standard outputs
- Common assurance strategies
17The Assurance Continuum
The UT developed risk management methodology
18The Assurance ContinuumERM Principles
- Risk management is the responsibility of every
employee. - Assurance regarding the management of risks is
provided by employees, first line supervisors,
middle and upper managers, and internal auditors. - Risk management and risk assurance activities are
based upon risk self-assessments performed at
every level of the organization.
19Common Risk Language Examples
- Business risk
- Impact
- Probability/likelihood
- Monitoring plan
- On-going assurance
- Periodic assurance
- Goals and objectives
- Level 1 Controls
- Level 2 Controls
- Level 3 Controls
- Level 4 Controls
- Process
- Mitigation strategy
- Assurance Continuum
- Certification
- Self-assessment workshop
- Control footprint
- Risk Footprint
20Standard Tools and Techniques
- Texas Instruments Brainstorming
- Excel Workbook powered by Visual Basic Macros
- The Levels of Control in COSO, a UT creation that
defines the monitoring responsibilities of each
employee in the risk management process - Three Tier Risk Assessment
21Assurance Continuum Levels of Control in COSO
Collaborative Assurance (Governance and
Management Control Processes)
Periodic Assurance
I----------I
I----------I
(Governance Control Processes)
I------------ On-going Assurance
------------I (Management Control Processes)
Level 1 Controls (Execution )
Level 3 Controls (Oversight)
Level 2 Controls (Supervisory)
Level 4 Controls (Internal Audit)
Level 4 Controls ( Internal Audit)
Pre-operations design review of on-going assurance
During execution of event or transaction
Immediately after execution of event or
transaction
Soon after execution of event or transaction
Post-operations audit of execution of on-going
assurance
22Standard Outputs
- Risk Footprints
- Control Footprints
- Monitoring Plans
23 TYPES OF RISK ASSESSMENTS
- Institution-wide perspective
- Activity-wide perspective
- Process detail perspective
24INSTITUTION-WIDE RISK ASSESSMENT
- Performed by executive management
- Defines the major activities the institution
performs to achieve goals and objectives - Identifies the essential processes used in each
major activity - Ranks each process as to impact on achievement of
goals and objectives and the probability that the
process will fail to contribute to that
achievement - Provides a road map for allocation of assurance
resources in the institution (on-going and
periodic)
25 INSTITUTION-WIDE RISK ASSESSMENT
26ACTIVITY-WIDE RISK ASSESSMENT
- Performed by the activity area management team
- Uses the processes for the activity from the
Institution-wide Risk Assessment - Identifies the major risk areas in each process
- Ranks the major risk areas as to their impact on
the achievement of goals and objectives if they
occur and the probability that they will occur - Provides a road map for assurance strategies at
the activity level and ensures coverage of
institution-wide critical risks
27ACTIVITY-WIDE RISK ASSESSMENT
28PROCESS RISK ASSESSMENT
- Performed by those employees (managers and staff)
working in the process - Uses the major risk areas from the Activity-wide
risk assessment - Identifies the specific risks that can occur in
each major risk area in the process - Ranks the specific risk for impact on achievement
of goals and objectives if they occur and the
probability of their occurrence - Provides road map for on-going, daily management
of risks and for periodic assurance activities
29 PROCESS RISK ASSESSMENT
30Risk Footprint Usage
- Management uses the footprint to allocate
resources to managing risks that can affect the
achievement of goals and objectives - Internal Audit uses the footprint to provide
governance and executive management with
appropriate level of assurance on all identified
risks
31Control Footprint
32 Control Footprint Usage
- Identify over- and under-controlled risks
- Identify marginal or unneeded controls
- Identify critical controls
33Monitoring Plan
34Monitoring Plan Usage
- Ensure continuous and appropriate management of
most critical risks - Links risk, planned control steps, and evidence
of execution of control steps - Provides a roadmap for audit of the application
of planned controls
35 Assurance Strategies
- External Assurance Providers
- Use where available
- Internal Audit
- Traditional Test-of-Transaction Audits on Red
Risks - Analytical procedures on Yellow risks
- Certifications by Management
- On all Green and Gray risks
36 External Assurance Providers
- Compliance officer, CEO, and governance
function obtain assurance from other assurance
providers. - Accreditation teams (SACS)
- Regulators
- External auditors
- Federal auditors
37Certifications By Management
- Criteria is the monitoring plan
- Responsible party for the risk performs
self-assessment of application of the monitoring
plan - Responsible party signs a statement regarding the
proper implementation of the monitoring plan - Internal audit selects statistical sample of
certifications and validates
38Deciding Which Assurance Strategy To Use
- Based on
- significance of the risk
- prior experience with risk and its
management - availability of cost effective assurance
strategies - confidence level needed
39How to Implement ERM?
- Find a champion
- Designate the catalyst or driver of the
initiative - Develop an Action Plan to Implement Enterprise
Risk Management - Select a simple, universally usable set of tools
- Involve everyone
- Train, Train, Train, Train, Train, Train
- Do the little things right every day
40Potential Implementation Drivers
- Compliance Function
- Infrastructure for risk management is already in
place - Minimizes start-up time
- Capitalizes on experience and knowledge
- Internal Audit Function
- Uses ERM model to build Annual Audit Plan
- Uses ERM model for individual audit engagements
- Capitalizes on experience and knowledge
41Permanent ERM Owner?
- Budget function
- Accountability and Management Improvement
function - Compliance function
- New risk management function
42Resources
Effective Compliance Systems A Practical Guide
for Educational Institutions Crawford,et al
www.theiia.org
www.COSO.org
www.csa-pdk.com
Email crawfordjd_at_earthlink.net