International Coalition of Library Consortia

1 / 29
About This Presentation
Title:

International Coalition of Library Consortia

Description:

NetLibrary is a division of OCLC Online Computer Library Center ... Marge Gammon. Division Vice President, Library & Publisher Services ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:31
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 30
Provided by: mgam6

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: International Coalition of Library Consortia


1
International Coalition of Library
Consortia Poznan, Poland September 30,
2005 Marge Gammon Division Vice President,
Library Publisher Services NetLibrary, A
Division of OCLC Online Computer Library Center,
Inc.
2
Traveling at the Speed of e
International Coalition of Library
Consortia Poznan, Poland September 30,
2005 Marge Gammon Division Vice President,
Library Publisher Services NetLibrary, A
Division of OCLC Online Computer Library Center,
Inc.
3
eDatabases
eAudiobooks
eMusic
eJournals
ePeriodicals, Newspapers
eVideo
eSpecial Collections
eBooks
4
eDatabases
eAudiobooks
eMusic
eJournals
eNewspapers
eVideo
eSpecial Collections
eBooks
5
Media are Converging. . .
  • . . . Text, images, audio, and content and are
    increasingly interactive in the consumer world. .
    . Which will drive the next wave of development
    for eBooks.
  • Source Outsell, Inc., Trend Alert Books are
    Back Big Time in the Enterprise, Volume 8,
  • June 10, 2005.

6
Were a long way from where the journey started.
. .
7
Charting a Course
  • Growth in NetLibrary Catalog and Libraries Served
  • (In Thousands)
  • 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
  • eBook
  • Titles 24.5 40.0 48.9 63.6 81.5 100.0
  • Libraries 2.0 3.0 6.8 7.2 8.6 14.0

Now Also 5500 eJournals, 1000 eAudiobooks,
23,500 titles from non-U.S. publishers, foreign
language materials, 2.1 million articles,
databases
8
Points of Departure. . .Preferred Publisher Route
e Stands for More Options and Flexibility
Comfort with Known Models Per Title Economics
9
Points of Departure. . . Preferred Library Route
e Should Provide More accesses Purchase Options
Comfort with Known Models Per Title Economics
10
The Case for Shared Collections
  • Create awareness
  • Reach more libraries via a trusted source
  • Provide high value to libraries
  • Facilitate new product adoption usage
  • Supplement print purchases
  • Actual exposure vs. potential exposure
  • Managed via one book/one user model
  • Result in additive sales of titles that otherwise
  • might not be purchased

11
The Case Against Shared Collections
  • Significant departure from traditional sales
    approaches
  • Potential for print cannibalization
  • Authors are as sensitive or more so than
  • publishers
  • Growing adoption leads to corporate scrutiny
  • within publishing houses
  • Risk-takers must respond to management

Economically not sustainable Lost
Revenues Content devaluation
12
The data suggests. . .
  • Decreasing participation in shared collections as
  • adoption grows
  • Typical Shared Purchase 42 Libraries
  • One Book/One User Model moderates exposure
  • Average 8 minutes in a book

13
The data further suggests. . .
  • 5-8 institutions in a typical consortial shared
    purchase would likely have purchased copies of
    the same title in print.
  • Source OCLC NetLibrary Research comparing
    WorldCat print holdings to eBook purchase
    activity among consortia librariers

14
The Current Model. . .
  • Consortia of 42 members
  • Approximately 500,000 ftes
  • Purchases 10,000 eBook titles
  • For 500,000 (50 per title average)
  • Cost per fte 1.00
  • Cost per institution 11,905
  • Cost per book per institution 1.19

15
Current vs. Print Behavior
  • Shared e Print
  • Institutions 42 42
  • Number w/Access to Titles 42
    5
  • Estimated FTEs
    500,000 60,000
  • Copies Purchased 1 5
  • Total Rev (50/title) 500,000
    2,500,000
  • Cost Per Inst/Title 1.19
    50.00
  • Cost Per FTE 1.00
    5.00-41.67
  • Publisher/Author Revenues
  • Per Title per Institution
  • Based On 1.19
    50.00

16
Changes are coming. . .
  • NetLibrarys Goals
  • Retain what is known and effective
  • Transition to a new place
  • Move toward what the market is asking for
  • Ground the transition process in fact
  • Provide stepping stones
  • Include innovation
  • Create stability in the decision-making
  • process

17
Changes are coming. . .
  • Be mindful of what will be needed 1-3 years from
    now
  • Balance the familiar and stable, with the new and
    uncertain. . . Take some risk!
  • Incorporate all constituents in solution
    development
  • Monitor and adjust

18
Merging along the Same Path. . .
  • Libraries
  • Increase value of unique collections
  • Continue shared collections
  • Create new products with
  • varied content formats
  • Create purchase options
  • Publishers
  • Grow unique collections
  • Redefine consortia roles pricing
  • Add revenue streams
  • Innovate and grow via new business
  • models products, and services

19
Just over the next hill. . .
  • NetLibrarys Proposal to Publishers
  • All unique collections new and future be
    provided with two simultaneous accesses for no
    additional charge
  • Shared collections will require the purchase of
    multiple accesses
  • Publishers opt in or opt out for a period of
    18 months
  • Engage and incent consortia to participate in
    other selling programs

20
Just over the next hill. . .
  • NetLibrarys Proposal to Publishers
  • All unique collections new and future be
    provided with two simultaneous accesses for no
    additional charge
  • Shared collections will require the purchase of
    multiple accesses
  • Publishers opt in or opt out for a minimum of
    18 months
  • Engage with and incent consortia to participate
    in other selling programs

D R A F T

21
Proposal for Shared Collections
  • The level of multiple accesses required is
    predicated on
  • number of libraries participating in any shared
    collection.
  • Now through July 1, 2006 thru
  • June 2006 June 30, 2009
  • Members Required Required
  • Participating Accesses Accesses
  • 2-15 2 2
  • 16-30 3 4
  • 31-50 4 6
  • 50 Special Quote Special
    Quote

22
Current vs. New Model
  • Current Shared Proposed
  • Institutions Participating 42
    42
  • Number w/Access to Titles 42
    42
  • Estimated FTEs
    500,000 500,000
  • Titles Purchased
    10,000 10,000
  • Copies Purchased 1 4
  • Accesses
    1 4
  • Total Cost (50/title) 500,000
    2,000,000
  • Cost Per Inst/Title 1.19
    4.76
  • Cost Per FTE/Title 1.00
    4.00
  • Publisher/Author Revenues
  • Per Title per Institution
  • Based On 1.19
    4.76

23
Implications
  • Sticker Shock
  • Value of shared collections remains high
  • Libraries will re-think selections
  • More focused, smaller shared collections
    targeting specific interests and needs
  • More options for consortia participation in the
    movement to electronic

24
Beyond Shared Collections. . .
  • New Products and Services
  • eBooks integrated with other content formats
  • Custom content creation (e.g., eLearning)
  • Disaggregated content options
  • Individual chapter, article purchase options
  • Short term, high use access business models
  • Increased functionality, e.g., linking between
    and among content types
  • More audio (launched 2/05), more journals and
    databases
  • Advancement into video and music
  • More foreign language (Spanish, French, Chinese,
    Japanese, German)

25
Beyond Shared Collections. . .
  • Promotion and Preview
  • Growing preselling program
  • Content preview options
  • Content summaries, abstracts, reviews

26
Beyond Shared Collections. . .
  • Purchase Options
  • Annual or permanent ownership of monographs
  • Annual access plans with substitution options
  • Simultaneous e and p purchasing for
    monographs
  • FTE pricing for products with combined formats
    and/or annual pricing based on library size and
    circulation characteristics

27
Beyond Shared Collections. . .
  • New Programs
  • Purchase incentives managed by consortia for
    unique collections
  • Specialized subject collections targeting
    specific library types for shared collections
  • Volume discounts on multiple copies for highly
    focused library requirements (e.g., medical)

Change is as inevitable as the opportunities. . .
28
Our travels continue. . .
  • We are still in the early stages of a
  • long transition period where a
  • hybrid model will reign.
  • Source ARL

29
Dziekuja
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)