Child Language Acquisition - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 15
About This Presentation
Title:

Child Language Acquisition

Description:

What do your examples reveal about the nature of children's language acquisition? ... s endings (genitive/ possessive endings): these signify ownership and again ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:1415
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: dancl5
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Child Language Acquisition


1
Child Language Acquisition
  • Give examples of how children learn to use the
    grammar of English. What do your examples reveal
    about the nature of childrens language
    acquisition?

2
How to start
  • Think about the key words in the question
  • Grammar
  • Examples
  • The nature of child language acquisition

3
Grammar
  • What is grammar?
  • Theres no point starting to talk about cooing
    and babbling theyre phonology not grammar.
  • Likewise, theres not much point going on about
    first words thats more to do with lexis and
    semantics.

4
Grammar
5
Syntax
  • At what stage do children start to put words
    together? The holophrastic stage only consists of
    one word utterances, so this is not relevant in
    terms of syntax (but it is perhaps worth
    mentioning that childrens first words tend to
    fall into the nouns/naming category Katherine
    Nelson 1973).
  • Its on the 2 word and telegraphic stages where
    most of your focus should fall.

6
Syntax
  • Two word stage look at the patterns that
    generally occur and the researchers whove noted
    these patterns. Look at Roger Browns research
    into semantic relations (agent action,
    possessor possession etc) and what these fairly
    regular patterns might tell us about the nature
    of CLA. Look too at the words that are missing
    and why this might be.

I walking
7
Syntax
I drink daddy beer
  • Telegraphic stage again, look at the patterns
    and provide examples that illustrate them. Which
    words are left in and which are omitted (clue
    think of words classes that dont have much
    meaning to small children like auxiliary verbs,
    determiners etc).
  • it was empty, so dont call Social Services.
    Please. Not again.

8
Syntax
Grandads happy cos we remembered his birthday
  • Post-telegraphic stage its probably worth
    mentioning how children move beyond the earlier
    stages into a more advanced type of utterance.
    What do children do as they get older? They link
    clauses together using conjunctions
    (co-ordinating conjunctions at first and then
    and then, followed later by subordinating
    conjunctions My tummys rumbling because Im
    hungry).

9
Syntax
Not want dat
  • Other areas of syntax - questions and negatives
    to create questions, we have to change word order
    how do children cope with this? Look at the 3
    part structure from the Powerpoint lecture. To
    create negation, a similar 3 stage process has to
    be followed. Look at the same handout or file on
    Moodle.

10
Grammar
  • Morphology
  • What kinds of inflections (suffixes/bound
    morphemes) do children start to apply and what do
    these tell us about the nature of CLA?
  • -ing endings progressive endings often come
    first because young children tend to tell us what
    they are doing as they do it. They provide a
    running commentary I running, daddy (gettit?).

11
Morphology
  • -ed endings past tense endings come later
    because according to Piaget a childs concept
    of time must become established before they start
    to use language to label it.
  • -s endings (genitive/ possessive endings) these
    signify ownership and again - linked to Piagets
    cognitive theory - children start to develop a
    sense of their own identity and belongings, as
    well as others, before they grasp this ending.

12
Morphology
  • -er and est endings these develop as the child
    understands seriation or relative sizes. Again,
    Piaget would argue that until a child has grasped
    relative sizes, such morphemes are pointless.

13
Wugs
  • Dont forget this classic experiment which looked
    at how children apply the plural rule to made up
    nouns.
  • The wugs test supports nativist theories of
    language Chomsky and Pinker.

14
Theory and what to do with it
15
Theory
  • Imitation theory cannot account for childrens
    acquisition of grammar.
  • Interaction can only go so far it can help some
    aspects of a childs development, but grammar is
    not one of the main ones.
  • Cognitive theory can help explain some aspects of
    grammatical development.
  • Nativist theory is best equipped to explain the
    acquisition of grammar and its rule-based systems.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com