The Growing Economic Divide - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 34
About This Presentation
Title:

The Growing Economic Divide

Description:

Marguerite Marges, for her paper 'The Neglect of Child Neglect' ... including racism, sexism, heterosexism (homophobia), classism, and ageism? ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:81
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 35
Provided by: felice
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Growing Economic Divide


1
The Growing Economic Divide
  • An Interactive Presentation/Discussion on Growing
    Economic Inequality, Class, and Child Welfare

2
Thanks
  • Many of the charts were developed by United for a
    Fair Economy, www.faireconomy.org
  • Marguerite Marges, for her paper The Neglect of
    Child Neglect
  • Dee Wilson, for his some slides from Substance
    Abuse and Chronic Neglect and Substance Abuse
    and Reunification A Child Welfare Dilemma
  • Paul Gorski, EdChange

3
  • Facilitator Bio
  • Felice Yeskel is the Director of Class Action, a
    national, non-profit organization that inspires
    action to end classism by raising awareness,
    facilitating cross-class dialogue, supporting
    cross-class alliances, and working with others to
    promote economic justice. Felice is a Founder and
    was the Co-Director of United for a Fair Economy
    for over six years. She comes from a
    working-class Jewish family from New York Citys
    lower east side.
  • She is on the faculty of the Social Justice
    Education Program, at UMass, Amherst where she
    founded and directed The Stonewall Center A LBGT
    Resource Center for over 20 years. She also
    co-directed DiversityWorks, Inc. an organization
    of social justice educators training and
    consulting on issues of diversity and
    multiculturalism. Felice has led hundreds of
    workshops and given talks across the country
    about economic inequality and about healing
    divisions among people of different class
    backgrounds, races, genders, and sexual
    orientations. Felice received her doctorate in
    Organizational Development in 1991.
  • She is recently edited a special issue of the
    journal Equity and Excellence in Education on
    Class and Education it came out in March of
    2008. Felice is the co-author of Economic
    Apartheid in America, published by The New Press
    in the fall of 2000 a second edition came out in
    the Fall of 2005. Felice has also written
    chapters in the following books, Teaching for
    Diversity and Social Justice, The Narrow Bridge
    Jewish Perspectives on Multiculturalism, Money
    Talks So Can We, and Coming Out of the Class
    Closet. Articles by Felice have appeared in The
    Diversity Factor, The Womens Review of Books,
    Sojourner, "The Holistic Education Review
    Journal of Women Religion, Sh'ma A Journal
    of Jewish Responsibility, and Bridges A
    Journal for Jewish Feminists and Our Friends.
    Felice has frequently appeared as a guest on
    radio shows across the country discussing issues
    of class, economic justice and social change.
  • fyeskel_at_classism.org

4
The Context of Our Work
  • Social and economic inequalities have risen
    steeply over the past 30 years.
  • Children and their families have been
    particularly disadvantaged by this creeping
    impoverishment, which is associated with negative
    effects on parenting capacity and developmental
    outcomes for children.
  • The social capital of communities, which consists
    of the cultural resources and inter-personal
    relationships between members, is also eroded by
    inequality and social exclusion.
  • Children's welfare and family functioning are
    crucially dependent upon the social support
    available within local communities.
  • Helping to build economic and social capital in
    poor communities may be a more effective way of
    promoting children's welfare than formal child
    protection and family support services.
  • Whats child welfare?

5
Individual Problem or Systemic Problem?
  • Delving into case files is an effective way to
    examine the issues that caseworkers confront
    every day. But focusing on individual cases also
    obscures systemic issues that profoundly affect
    child welfare decision-making.
  • Does the child welfare system sometimes
  • Separate children from caring parents instead
    of providing services that would address the
    family's problems?
  • Concentrate more on finding fault with parents
    than on meeting children's needs, relying on
    questionable therapies rather than concrete
    solutions?
  • Why are so many of the families working-class or
    poor?
  • Social factors and political decisions often
    determine which families get caught in child
    protective services and what happens to them once
    they become involved.

6
Above the Water Line
The Individual
History Legacy Social Policies Discrimination
7
What happened in Child Welfare
  • The profile of child welfare families and of
    children entering the foster care system changed
    dramatically in the 1980s Neglect, substance
    abuse, high rates of infant placements and
    placements of pre-school children, long length of
    stay in out-of-home care, reduced rates of
    reunification, and high rates of re-entry into
    care resulted in large increases in states
    foster care population.
  • This constellation of factors was the child
    welfare context which led to the passage of the
    1997 Adoption and Safe Families Act (AFSA), the
    most important new child welfare law since 1980.
  • AFSA set strict timelines for public child
    welfare agencies to work with birth parents who
    have had children removed from their custody
    Once a child has been in out-of-home care 15 out
    of 22 months and cannot safely be returned to
    parents, the child welfare agency is required to
    file for termination of parent rights, absent
    compelling reasons to do otherwise.
  • AFSA also clearly states that child safety is the
    pre-eminent child welfare goal, so that decision
    makers will have an explicit guideline if faced
    with a choice between child safety and supporting
    and strengthening families
  • AFSA also established fiscal incentives for
    public child welfare systems to increase
    adoptions and, nationally adoptions have
    increased from about 20,000 children per year to
    more than 50,000 children per year.

8
Poverty/Wealth-Classism means we all lose
  • Long term poverty is associated with neighborhood
    concentrations of poverty, family structure,
    educational outcomes, parents work histories and
    change in labor market conditions
  • However, even when these conditions are
    controlled for there is a 2-1 difference in
    lifetime earnings between children growing up in
    middle class families vs. poor families.
  • (Corcoran Chaudry, 1997)
  • According to federal statistics, black children
    in the child welfare system are placed in foster
    care at twice the rate for white children. A
    national study of child protective services by
    the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
    reported that "minority children, and in
    particular African American children, are more
    likely to be in foster care placement than
    receive in-home services, even when they have the
    same problems and characteristics as white
    children"
  • The costs of classism to children with class
    privilege may be the under-reporting of child
    welfare cases

9
(No Transcript)
10
(No Transcript)
11
(No Transcript)
12
(No Transcript)
13
(No Transcript)
14
(No Transcript)
15
(No Transcript)
16
(No Transcript)
17
(No Transcript)
18
(No Transcript)
19
(No Transcript)
20
(No Transcript)
21
(No Transcript)
22
(No Transcript)
23
(No Transcript)
24
(No Transcript)
25
(No Transcript)
26
(No Transcript)
27
(No Transcript)
28
(No Transcript)
29
(No Transcript)
30
(No Transcript)
31
(No Transcript)
32
  • 1. The Base Shift Equality ? Equity
  • a. Is every child/family treated the same, and
    have the opportunity to receive the best possible
    care and treatment, regardless of race,
    ethnicity, socioeconomic status, gender,
    religion, first language, sexual orientation,
    (dis)ability, or any other dimension of
    difference?
  • b. As long as the answer to these questions
    remains no, am I, and is the system, willing to
    be transformed?
  • 2. Cultural Competence ? Equity and Social
    Justice
  • a. Is the focus on feeling good and celebrating
    difference or on institutional change?
  • b. Am I willing to push myself and the system out
    of our comfort zone to honestly and continually
    assess and address inequities including racism,
    sexism, heterosexism (homophobia), classism, and
    ageism?
  • 3. Difference as the Problem ? Inequity as the
    Problem
  • a. Do I, or does my institution, tend to
    problematize difference and its complexities,
    such as language diversity, instead of
    problematizing the history and present of
    inequities that have led us to a point of
    remaining unprepared to effectively and
    efficiently navigate these differences?
  • b. Am I, or is the institution, willing to tackle
    inequitieseven those that assign privilege to me
    and the majority of those in power in the system?
  • 4. Expectation Client Will Adapt ? Responsibility
    Ours to Be Transformed
  • a. Do I, or does the institution, believe that it
    is the responsibility of the patient or client to
    adapt to the mainstream culture?
  • b. Am I, or is the institution, willing to change
    to the same extent that people outside the
    mainstream culture are forced to change just to
    navigate our services?
  • Thanks to Paul Gorski, EdChange

33
(No Transcript)
34
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com