Risk Assessment and Decision Analysis - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 28
About This Presentation
Title:

Risk Assessment and Decision Analysis

Description:

Risk evaluation offers a starting point in the balance between acceptable risk ... A la hora de tomar decisiones sobre una zona contaminada puede existir un n mero ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:118
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 29
Provided by: pedrogar
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Risk Assessment and Decision Analysis


1
Risk Assessment and Decision Analysis

Gestión Ambiental Tema 11
2
Risk Evaluation
  • Risk Probability of a specific undesired
    consequence.
  • Each activity produces a risk. Total risk in life
    is 1.
  • Risk evaluation offers a starting point in the
    balance between acceptable risk increase vs cost
    of controlling the risk.
  • When several kinds or magnitudes of injury or
    loss may occur, risk can be defined as
  • Risk (Probability of an undesired consequence)
    x (size of the loss)

3
(No Transcript)
4
Risk Assessment Methodology
  • Hazard Assessment
  • Dose-Response Assessment
  • Exposure Assessment
  • Risk Characterization

5
Acute Toxicity
  • Short term exposure from a single incident or
    event.
  • Effect is described by means of the compound dose
    (mg/kg) needed to kill an organism. To take into
    account the different condition of the members of
    the community is used the LD50
  • LD50 Dose that produce the death of the 50
    of the population

6
Acute Toxicity
7
Chronic toxicity
  • Long-term exposure to a toxic compound
  • Risk versus dose (mg/kg d)
  • For non-carcinogenic chemicals the existence of a
    dosage threshold is assumed, below which there is
    no increase in adverse effects above natural
    background rates.
  • A security factor for human is introduced.

8
Exposure factors
9
Dose-response assessment relationship for a
non-carcinogenic chemicals
  • There is a threshold value
  • Lower dose with observable adverse effect level
    (LOAELs)
  • Non observable adverse effect level (NOAELs)
  • Reference Dose (RfD) Acceptable daily intake

10
Dose-response assessment relationship for a
non-carcinogenic chemicals
  • RfD NOAEL/ Security factor (10)
  • Dose (mg/kg d) is compared versus RfD
  • Hazard quotient (HQ) Dose/RfD
  • Acceptable risk for a non carcinogen HQ lt 1
  • Where several chemicals are present at the same
    time, the HZ are summed to yield a Hazard index
    (HI)
  • Hazard Index (HI) S (HQ)i

11
Reference Dose
12
Reference Dose
13
Sources of uncertainty in risk assessment
14
Potency factor (Carcinogens)
  • Chronic Daily Intake (CDI) is the average daily
    dose of a chemical over the lifetime of an
    individual
  • CDI (mg/kg d) Daily Dose (mg/d)/Weight (kg)
  • Potency Factor based on the dose-response curve
  • PF Incremental cancer risk for a chronic daily
    intake of 1 mg/kg d
  • Incremental Risk, based on a lineal response
  • Incremental lifetime cancer risk CDI x PF

15
Potency factor (Carcinogens)
16
Acceptable risk ?
  • EPA considers acceptable a risk of 10-6
  • Values higher than 10-3 are considered important
    and need an attention
  • Risk between 10-4 and 10-6 can be accepted,
    although require a specific study

17
Bioconcentration
  • Accumulation of pollutants

18
Risk Management
  • Risk management Process to define the acceptable
    risk in a specific situation and decide on the
    best course of action to reduce, control or
    eliminate the risk
  • There are four options to manage a risk
  • Reduce or eliminate the source (removal of
    contaminated soil, reduction of gas emissions)
  • Modify exposure (to avoid spread of by means of
    barriers)
  • Reduce or eliminate human exposure (prohibit
    access, evacuate the population)
  • Treat or compensate the effects (Less favorable
    option)

19
Exposure Mechanisms
20
Contaminated Sites
  • There is a great experience in environmental risk
    assessment related with contaminated sites.
  • It is necessary to reach an equilibrium between
    environment and health protection and the need of
    economical and technological resources.
  • Risk assessment can lead to that the solution can
    be no treat the site (when the risk is acceptable)

21
  • Steps in the risk assessment and risk management
    for a contaminated site

22
Decision Analysis
  • A la hora de tomar decisiones sobre una zona
    contaminada puede existir un número importante de
    opciones diferentes (desde no hacer nada a
    diferentes respuestas tecnológicas o
    institucionales)
  • A veces la identificación de los factores que
    afectan una decisión puede ser complicada
  • El análisis de decisiones es una herramienta útil
    para la toma de decisiones y para estructurar e
    identificar información relevante para decidir

23
Influence Diagrams
  • Is a way of visualizing the important connections
    among different elements of a problem.
  • In its simple form the diagram consist of a
    series of ovals representing the key variables
    that influence a decision
  • Influence of factors
  • over final grade in
  • Environmental Management

24
Interaction among the factors
25
Simbols
26
Global Warming (example)
27
Decision trees
  • Herramienta gráfica útil para el análisis de
    decisiones.
  • Muestra las ramificaciones o decisiones
    alternativas e incertidumbres (Forma de árbol)
  • Se construye a partir de 2 tipos de nodos
  • Decisión (?). Debe elegirse una rama
  • Posibilidad (o). Existen diferentes posibilidades
    que cubren todo el espectro

28
Example
  • Your company wants to buy and develop a site to
    build a new assembly plant for its production.
    Two available properties would serve equally
    well. The main difference is cost
  • Site A costing 1,000,000 . Site A is known to be
    uncontaminated
  • Site B costing 600,000 . Site B may require
    cleanup
  • A consulting firm has done a preliminary
    assessment and developed a mathematical model to
    predict the likelihood of environmental risk and
    potential cleanup cost, with the following
    results
  • 80 chance the property is clean
  • 15 chance the land is partially contaminated
    (Cleanup effort costing 500,000 )
  • 5 chance the land is highly contaminated
    (Cleanup effort costing 2,500,000 )
  • Draw a decision tree for this problem based on
    the information given

29
(No Transcript)
30
Example. Part 2
  • Suppose that the consulting firm offers you the
    option of a more detailed site investigation with
    a cost of 100,000 . This procedure will yield
  • 85 chance of knowing conclusively whether the
    site is safe or in need of either partial or
    major cleanup
  • 15 chancethat the deeper investigation will be
    no more conclusively than the preliminary study
  • Draw a decision tree for this problem based on
    the information given

31
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com