Title: Codes. The need for regulation and codes of behavior emerge
1Ethical Issues in Research
2McGill University Study
- During the period 1957-60 Ewan Cameron at McGill
U. in Montreal administered psychedelic drugs to
52 unsuspecting patients in order to carry out
brainwashing experiments for the CIA. These
experiments were disclosed publicly for the first
time in 1977 in the New York Times. But it was
not until 1988 that the survivors received
settlement.
3Tuskegee Study
- "Beginning in the 1930s, 399 men signed up with
the U.S. Public Health Service for free medical
care. The service was conducting a study on the
effects of syphilis on the human body. The men
were never told they had syphilis. They were told
they had "bad blood" and were denied access to
treatment, even for years after penicillin came
into use in 1947. By the time the study was
exposed in 1972, 28 men had died of syphilis, 100
others were dead of related complications, at
least 40 wives had been infected and 19 children
had contracted the disease at birth."
4Codes
- The need for regulation and codes of behavior
emerged from revelations of the research
atrocities committed by the Nazis. - The Nuremberg Code of 1947 for biomedical
research was the first to focus on the importance
of informed consent. - The Helsinki Declaration of 1964 provided
guidance in such areas as the use of animals for
research purposes. - Perhaps the earliest code in the social sciences
was the 1953 code relating to research, teaching,
and professional practices developed from over
1000 case studies submitted by members of the
Amer. Psych. Association (APA) through a research
study launched in 1948.
5- The Amer. Sociol. Assn. (ASA) adopted a formal
code of ethics in 1969. - American Psychological Association (1982)
- The Ethical Principles in the Conduct of Human
Research with Human Participants - The National Research Act (1974)
- Passed by Congress for the purpose of protecting
human subjects participating in experiments.
6However, the responsibility for ethical research
ultimately lies with the individual researcher.
7Letter of Introduction
- Perhaps Signed By
- Boss
- CEO
- Professor
- Letter Should Specify
- Precise rationale for research
- How exactly it will involve participants
- How results will help participants
8Other Ethical Factors
- Never Any Pressuring of Participants
- Safety of Participants Essential
- Every researcher must receive precise,
appropriate credit. - One Should Use Ones Research in Some Way
- One Should Try to Make Results Known to
Participants - One Should be Conscious of Possible Bad Uses of
Research
9- Failure to do a Literature Review May be Seen as
Unethical
10- One Should Not Cheat
- One Should Not Plagiarize
11Research Proposal
- Consideration of ethical issues is an important
part of many research proposals.
12Elements of Informed Consent
- Tell participants who is conducting study
- Why was subject singled out for
participation? e.g. random sample e.g.
recently given birth to 1st child etc. - What is the time commitment? e.g. 45 minutes to
complete the survey
13- Any benefits to be expected? Realistically,
there are often few direct benefits. - Any potential risks, and how have these been
managed? Some people may experience negative
emotions when discussing parental alcoholism.
If you would like to discuss these with someone,
please feel free to call the study director at
the number below.
14Informed Consent
- Explain the Study and Offer to Answer
Questions It is possible that telling all might
compromise the integrity of the research.
However, at the end debriefing is essential. - Participation is always voluntary.
- Provide Participants with Copy of Informed
Consent Form (if relevant).
15Informed Consent
- Payment Participant must know of any
compensation - Confidentiality (Anonymity, on the other hand,
means that no one, including the researcher,
will know the subjects identity) - Debriefing
16INFORMED CONSENT
- Special Populations and CoercionDifficult for
Some to Give True Voluntary Informed
Consent They might lack necessary
competency --children --mentally retarded
17INFORMED CONSENT
- Others May be Indirectly Coerced Students P
rison Inmates Employees Military
Personnel The Homeless Welfare Recipients
18INFORMED CONSENT
- Factors Such As Higher grades Early
Parole Promotions Fear from
refusing Expectations of other benefitsMay
Play a Part
19Sometimes Consent is not Possible
- Fake an assault in the street to gauge reaction
of bystanders -- who will intervene, who will do
nothing. - Element of surprise is essential
- Problem
- witnessing such an attack may be very disturbing
to some. - Those who do not intervene may be upset and
suffer feelings of low worth. - Those who do intervene may be injured.
- Debriefing is mandatory.
20Institutional Review Board (IRB)
- Sample Questions for Ethics ReviewInvestigator
Who is the primary investigator, and who is
supervising the study?
21Research Participants
- What are general characteristics of the research
participants (e.g. age, sex etc.)? - Any special characteristics of research
participants (e.g. children, alcoholics, mentally
retarded etc.)? - Any other institutions/individuals cooperating or
cosponsoring the study? - What is general state of health (mental and
physical) of the research participants? - How will subjects be selected for, or excluded
from, participation in this study?
22Procedure
- What will the subjects be asked to do, or what
behaviors will be observed by the researchers? - Will deception be used? If yes, why is it
necessary? - What is nature of the deception, and when will
the debriefing take place?
23Material
- If electrical or mechanical equipment will be
used, how has it been checked for safety? - What standardized tests, if any, will be used?
What info. will be provided to the subjects
about their scores on these tests?
24Confidentiality
- What procedure will you use to ensure the
confidentiality of the data?
25Anonymity
- Sometimes its impossible to have anonymity
- face to face interviews
- direct observation of behavior
- Important that you tell participants that their
participation will not be anonymous. - However, confidentiality may be safeguarded.
26Risks
- Any immediate risks to the subjects, including
possibly causing them embarrassment,
inconvenience, or discomfort? - Are there any long-range risks to the subjects?
- If there are risks, what is the necessity for
them, and how will subjects be compensated for
facing such risks?
27Psychological Harm
- Interviewing of women whove been raped.
- Obviously consent must be obtained.
- Theyre free to withdraw at any time.
- Perhaps have psychological counseling available
in case of distress.
28Bias-Free Writing
- No implication that it is normal or
right To belong to a specific ethnic
group Have a particular sexual
preference Engage in a particular life-style
29Language is Particularly Important
- As far as possible use gender-neutral
words e.g. PARENTING rather than MOTHERING - Careful about assuming that certain professions
are gender-related e.g. The physician . . .
he The scientist . . . he
30Avoid Sexual Stereotyping
- e.g. A bright and beautiful female professor
31Careful with too many gender-biased pronouns
- e.g. A consultant may not always be able to see
HIS clients. - Other possibilities
- use the plural form Consultants . . . their
clients - Delete the adjective . . . to see clients
- Vary female and male adjectives, i.e. sometimes
write her clients, sometimes his clients.
32Avoid language that reinforces stereotypes
- e.g. African-American students, NOT
SURPRISINGLY, won the athletic events. - The Irish contingent, as we might expect,
drank very heavily at the party.
33Dont make unsupported assumptions about
various age groups.e.g. that the elderly are
less intellectually able.