Ecology and Exaptation All the Way in Language Evolution - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Ecology and Exaptation All the Way in Language Evolution

Description:

through his mental and anatomical predisposi-tion for language ... that determines the particular language varieties that shape his idiolect ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:86
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: sali99
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Ecology and Exaptation All the Way in Language Evolution


1
Ecology and Exaptation All the Way in Language
Evolution
  • Salikoko S. Mufwene
  • University of Chicago

2
Coming soon to a bookstore near you
3
Whats the ecology of language?
  • Its the speaker
  • through his mental and anatomical predisposi-tion
    for language
  • through his adaptive responses to his
    socio-economic environment
  • Its the socioeconomic environment that
    determines the particular language varieties that
    shape his idiolect
  • An interesting cascade of indirect ecological
    determinisms apply in colonial settings
    geographical ecology ? economic system ?
    population structure ? language variety

4
Theres also an internal ecology
  • It lies in the language itself
  • Its more obvious at the communal than at the
    idiolectal level
  • It lies in the variants that compete for the same
    communicative or structural function
  • It lies in the interdependencies that obtain
    between particular structural features
  • It lies in the particular composition of the
    feature pool in which the variants compete

5
Language evolution is largely determined by how
the feature pool is affected by the external
ecol-ogy, especially the relevant population
structure
6
A communal language is a collective pro-duction
  • It is an emergent phenomenon
  • It is the outcome of the cooperative
    commu-nicative activities of speakers/signers
  • No particular speaker/signer has the monop-oly of
    determining how a language variety shapes up,
    though some are more produc-tive than others
  • Different speakers innovate different forms and
    structures
  • Competition arises at the level of copying

7
Various factors bear on the copying/spread-ing
processes
  • Chiefly, intelligibility
  • Ease of production and ease of perception
  • Need for precision, clarity, transparency,
    regularity, etc. ? scale of markedness
  • Identification with a particular group
  • loyalty, prestige, singularity
  • These and other ecological factors determine how
    competition is resolved (or how variation is
    reduced, if not eliminated)

8
Innovation vs copying/spreading
  • While language is social, the engine of its
    evolution lies in the activities of individual
    speakers in individual communicative acts
  • It also lies typically in the dyadic or triadic
    interactions of individual speakers and how they
    accommodate each other
  • Communal patterns emerge from repetitions of some
    accommodations, which produce convergent forms,
    structures, and meanings
  • This is where the invisible hand operates, in
    the selections that favor some variants over
    others

9
If uniformitarianism is a valid assumption
  • the same ecological factors that affect the
    diachrony of individual languages in human
    history (language evolution) must also have
    influenced the phylogeny of language in mankind
    (the evolution of language)

10
Ecology as scaffolding
  • Use of speech and gestures in ways that
    distinguish human from other animals was
    facilitated by bipedalism
  • Exaptation of bucco-pharyngeal structure and
    hands to produce language was facilitated by
    particular mental infrastructure, one that found
    an advantage in explicit/elaborate communication
    with members of ones group and an advantage in
    collaboration to solve problems
  • Language was not invented wholesale by one
    hominin its the outcome of collaborative
    productions by various speakers

11
Ecology as habitat and how it can help explain
linguistic diversity
12
Homo sapiens did not disperse from the same
village nor at the same time
  • Homo sapiens probably did not speak the same
    language
  • The languages of Homo sapiens may/must have also
    varied in complexity
  • We have no clue about the extent of normalization
    in the language varieties spoken by Homo sapiens
  • There must have been quite a few contacts of
    populations and of languages since the exodus of
    Homo sapiens out of East Africa they must have
    contributed to further specia-tion of languages

13
Language contact as an ecological factor
  • Then and now, contact must have generat-ed new
    feature pools, produced new patterns of
    competition and selection
  • It cannot be ignored in research on the origins
    of typological variation
  • In research on Phylogenetic evolution of
    language, ecology contributes complexity in
    causation

14
Thank you!
http//humanities.uchicago.edu/faculty/mufwene/
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com