Review of World Bank funded projects: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 29
About This Presentation
Title:

Review of World Bank funded projects:

Description:

Society for Elimination of Rural Poverty (S. E. R. P), an autonomous society ... PROMOTING PARTNERSHIP BETWEEN KEY LINE DEPARTMENTS AND INSTITUTIONS OF THE POOR. 200 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:90
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 30
Provided by: ope5
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Review of World Bank funded projects:


1
  • Review of World Bank funded projects
  • APDPIP and APRPRP

T. VIJAY KUMAR, I.A.S. C.E.O. Society for
Elimination of Rural Poverty Dept. of Rural
Development, Govt. of A.P 24-10-08
2
Rural poverty reduction projects
  • 1. Andhra Pradesh District Poverty Initiative
    Project (A.P.D.P.I.P) from the year 2000 to Dec
    2006 (completed)
  • 2. Andhra Pradesh Rural Poverty Reduction
    Programme (A.P.R.P.R.P) from the year 2002 to
    Sept 2009 (ongoing).
  • Implementing Agency
  • Society for Elimination of Rural Poverty (S. E.
    R. P), an autonomous society under the Rural
    Development Department
  • Indira Kranthi Patham
  • In the year 2005, the scope of the 2 projects
    was expanded to cover all mandals and all
    villages of the state and the comprehensive
    programme was named as Indira Kranthi Patham
    (IKP).

3
Indira Kranthi Patham Objectives
  • to enable the rural poor in the State,
    particularly the poorest of the poor, to improve
    their livelihoods and quality of life through
    building their own institutions

4
A.Ps Vision
  • each family in the state should be out of
    poverty and enjoy
  • Life with dignity
  • Equity within the family
  • Freedom from hunger
  • Decent Income gtRs.5000 per month, 3 - 4 sources
  • Planned household expenditure
  • Risk management - life, health, assets and
    incomes
  • Shelter, sanitation, drinking water, good health
  • EDUCATION

5
Poverty Eradication Core Beliefs
  • Poor have a strong desire and innate ability to
    come out of poverty
  • Poor have a strong sense of self-help and
    volunteerism
  • Poor can come out of poverty only through their
    own institutions
  • Social mobilization process not automatic,
    needs to be induced
  • Hence, need for sensitive support structure for
    poor S.E.R.P

6
Indira Kranthi Patham Conceptual Framework
GOALEmpowering Integrating Poor
Voice of the Poor
ltltltRipple EFFECTS Plannedgtgtgt
Economic Integration Markets/Institutions (E.g.
Banks, Dairy Fedn., etc.)
Mapping Needs vs. Actions3-5 Years
Social Safety Net
Livelihoods Menu
Pensions
Insurance
Gender
NREG
Jobs/Skills Imparting
Land
Dairy
Marketing
Basic Institution/Trust Building Platform
Trust Building2/3 Years
Microfinance
Community Investment Fund
Food Security
Key Success Metric Extent of reduction in the
number of people below economic, social,
institutional and economic poverty
Institutional Architecture
SHG
VO
Mandal/Block
District
State
Function Focus
Mapping Needs vs. Actions Implementation
Operational skill support Coordination
Monitoring Replicability Strategy
7
(No Transcript)
8
(No Transcript)
9
(No Transcript)
10
Role of S.E.R.P
  • Sensitive support organization for the poor
  • Autonomous society set up by Government in 2000
  • firm conviction in the capability of poor, and,
    in organizations of the poor
  • To induce social mobilization
  • To provide facilitation support to institutions
    of poor
  • To sensitize line departments to be inclusive of
    the needs of the poor

11
Implementation Arrangements
  • Society for Elimination of Rural Poverty (SERP)
    is an overall implementing agency.
  • At the State level, there is State Project
    Management Unit, consisting of C.E.O, assisted by
    functional specialists.
  • At the district level, there is District Project
    Management Unit, headed by a Project Director,
    assisted by functional specialists. The P.D,
    D.P.M.U is also the P.D, DRDA. Functional
    specialists drawn from open market or Govt.
  • There are Area Coordinators for 4-5 mandals, who
    are supporting the MSs in implementation of their
    programs

12
Implementation at grassroots
Self help groups (10 to 15 members 1 SHG
  • All SHGs, federate at village level into Village
    Organisaton (VO).
  • VO registered as cooperative under MACS
  • All VOs federate at mandal level into Mandal
    Samakhya (M.S.).
  • All MSs federated at dist. Level called Zilla
    Samakhya (ZS)
  • M.S.s and VOs implement key project components.
  • ZS is implementing complex programmes like
    insurance

Village organization (15-20 SHGs 1 VO) 150
250 members
Mandal Samakhya (20-40 VOs 1 MS) 6,000 10,000
members
Zilla Samakhya (All MSs in the district) 2-5 lakh
members
13
Implementation arrangements at grassroots
  • Mandal Samakhyas and the Village Organisations
    implement various project components
  • Each Mandal is divided into three Clusters of
    10-15 habitations. Each cluster is assisted by a
    development professional, called Community
    Coordinator (C.C) and a master bookkeeper
    (M.B.K). MS is also assisted by Community
    Facilitators, mostly drawn from the members, to
    support VOs in bookkeeping and strengthening
    SHGs. Each MS is having MS Accountant
  • MS and VOs implement various programs like food
    security, marketing, pension distribution etc.
  • Micro credit plans are evolved by the S.H.Gs.
    These are financed by banks and C.I.F. V.Os
    assisted by para professionals
  • Zilla Samakhyas implement larger programs like
    insurance and also monitor the performance of
    MSs. It is supported by its own staff recruited
    for the specific needs.

14
Universal Coverage of the Poor
15
Key impact financial support to poor
  • Seed capital support to Mandal samakhyas
  • Project facilitated financial intermediation by
    federations M.S V.O S.H.G member
  • Close to Rs.900.0 crores disbursed to 1097
    mandal samakhyas from 2001 2008
  • C.I.F (World bank project) and S.G.S.Y funds
    channelled to federations
  • Catalytic role of the fund
  • Enable poorest of poor to get a sizeable loan and
    build their credit record
  • Innovate and develop new financial products food
    security, marketing, health, education

16
Financing model
Village Organization
17
SHG Bank Linkages
18
SHG-Bank Linkage in AP (Rs.crs)
50 of All India 2007-08
11000
5883
3064
2001
1018
753
454
198
19
Performance in Key Areas outcome(Sep 2008)
  • Cumulative Bank Linkage from 2001-02 Rs
    16,605. Crores
  • No. of Households benefiting from Food Security
    21,77,641
  • Community Marketing turnover(cumulative) Rs
    695 crores
  • No. of acres under sustainable agriculture
    9.9 lakhs
  • No. of Rural Youth provided jobs in the current
    year till Sep 2008 ----- 27,979
  • No. of persons covered under life insurance -----
    80 lakhs

20
Key impact S.H.G-bank linkage
  • Bank loans to S.H.Gs Rs.5900 crs in 2007/08
  • Per member linkage - Rs.11000
  • Repayment rates gt 98.5
  • From savings linked lending to lending based on
    micro credit planning by S.H.Gs
  • Bank finance for debt swapping, social needs and
    income generation 3031 villages covered,
    balance 32000 villages in 4 years
  • From 2004 interest subsidy for on-time
    repayment - Pavala vaddi scheme Rs.250.0
    crores outlay for 2008/09

21
Prerequisites for a family to come out of poverty
  • strong and self sustaining institutions of the
    poor
  • 6 to 8 years of continuous nurturing and
    handholding by their S.H.Gs, V.Os and M.Ss
  • A minimum investment of Rs.100,000/- per family
    ( by way of numerous small and big loans) 6
    8 years
  • Repeat loans from the S.H.G and the bank to
    meet all priorities
  • S.E.R.P focuses on building self sustaining V.Os
    and M.Ss, and, facilitating credit access to
    S.H.Gs

22
A.P Roadmap for bank linkages
  • Universal financial inclusion, adequate
    financing for poor and a bank in every village
  • Mobilise Rs.100,000 crores, cumulatively, by
    2013/14
  • Total Financial inclusion in all villages by
    2011/12 6000, 8000, 12000, 6000

23
Monitoring and Evaluation S
  • Process Monitoring
  • Studies
  • Mid-term project evaluation
  • End- term evaluation

24
Making state work - convergence
  • Convergence with line departments on terms
    conducive to full participation by the
    institutions of the poor and ownership of the
    poor
  • Economic agenda
  • Rural development S.G.S.Y, NREGA, Watersheds
  • Human development
  • School education mid day meals programme
  • Health and family Welfare community managed
    health in 45 mandals
  • Rural water supply and sanitation dept
  • Women Child welfare Nutrition centres in 45
    mandals

25
Convergence
  • Revenue land purchase, land access, and
    resolution of legal disputes
  • Family counselling centres police and judiciary
  • Social protection payment of pensions to old
    aged
  • Housing department rural housing for the poor
  • PRIs better participation and voice of poor in
    Gram sabhas and Gram panchayats
  • Agriculture sustainable agriculture
  • Animal Husbandry A.P.D.D.C.F partnership
  • Forestry NTFP collection and marketing
  • L.I.C death and disability cover

26
Best Practices
  • Community based targeting
  • Focus on the poorest of the poor
  • U.S.P power of scale bringing all the poor in
    the state into social networks
  • Scaling up through community resource persons
  • Institutional design SHG V.O M.S
  • Large scale mobilization of bank finances for
    poor
  • Large scale livelihoods promotion
  • Community managed food security
  • Social issues as an agenda for collective action
  • Social risk management
  • Convergence with all line departments
  • S.E.R.Ps dynamic role

27
A.P. Freedom from Poverty Project (2009-10 to
2013-14) Next Phase
  • Project will build on the strong foundation of
    institutions of the poor
  • Specific strategies focusing on the poorest of
    poor
  • Interventions will focus on stabilising and
    deepening existing livelihoods and creating new
    livelihoods for the youth
  • Convergence with all line departments
  • Project addresses directly and significantly all
    the millennium development goals, from the
    demand side

28
PROJECT COST
29
A.P
free from poverty

  • Financial and managerial

  • self reliance of federations

  • Parity for ultra

  • poor in all initiatives

  • Younger generation skill upgradation, higher
    education, jobs
  • Deepening key livelihoods and development of
    livelihoods based institutions
  • Achieving millennium development goals by 2015
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com