Title: Integrated Management of Vegetable Diseases and Soil Health
1Integrated Management of Vegetable Diseases and
Soil Health
Frank J. Louws Professor and Extension Plant
Pathologist Department of Plant Pathology North
Carolina State University Raleigh
NC frank_louws_at_ncsu.edu
2(No Transcript)
3Soil Health
Chemical Physical Biological
4Ecosystem Services
- PRODUCTION FUNCTION
- - supply and retention of nutrients
- - disease and pest suppression
- RESISTANCE TO STRESS/CAPACITY TO CHANGE
- - resist and recover from disasters
- - flexibility to adapt to different land uses
- BUFFER AND REACTOR FUNCTION
- - decomposition, mineralization, C-cycling
- - attenuation (e.g. of harmful pollutants)
- - absorb, retain, release, transport water
- HABITAT FUNCTION
- - structural, genetic and functional biodiversity
5Less reliance on external inputs More reliance
on Biology Processes and Cycles Knowledge and
Information
6DISEASE CONTROL What is the core component of
your program?
PESTICIDES
MANAGEMENT
7(No Transcript)
8PRACTICE Crop Rotation practiced for
thousands of years Spatial, temporal, genetic
deployment of crops SCIENCE Understanding the
mechanisms - e.g. mechanisms associated with
fertility and decreased inoculum load The
Practice can direct the Science and the Science
can inform the Practice
9Science Common Sources of Inoculum
Soil Invader
Soil Inhabitant
Napoleon Know Your Enemy .Know Your
Friends
From G.N. Agrios. 2005. Plant Pathology. 5th
edition. Elsevier AP.
10Phytophthora capsici (crown and root rot)
11Crown and root rot management Water management
12Challenges with Managing Soilborne Diseases
- Microscopic difficult to sample and monitor
(scouting) - Patchy distribution
- Persistent and responsive inoculum (thresholds)
- Complex of pathogens that act together
- Generally requires prophylactic control not
reactive
13COMPLEXITY OF FARMING SYSTEMS
Disease suppression Plant health
Rotation
Ecosystem Services
Farming system
RESEARCH EXTENSION TEACHING PRODUCTION
Biodiversity
Crop Diversity Genetic diversity Microbial
community analysis
14(No Transcript)
15Plant 15 Sep 15 Oct
Prepare land and fumigate (15 Aug 15 Sep)
Manage Oct - Mar
Harvest Apr Jun And start over.
20,000 30,000 lb/A 22,000 - 32,000 kg/ha
16Plymouth Fernandez and Louws Experimental
Design Camarosa RCBD 4 replications Three-bed
plots Three year study (no rotation) Harvest
center row
Tactic Substitution
17Plymouth 2000-2002 Strawberry Yield Results
d
No Fumigant
cd
30000
cd
cd
cd
Telone II
bc
25000
MS drip
ab
a
20000
MB-C
Marketable Yield lb/A
MS shank
15000
Telone-C35
10000
InLine (1,3-D)
InLine
No Fumigant
Chloropicrin
Telone-C35
MS-shank
Telone-II
MS-drip
MB-C
5000
Chloropicrin
Fernandez Louws
0
18ON-FARM-TRIALS(usually replicated with 2-4
alternatives)Finding the holes making it work
19Bunn NC 2007
20(No Transcript)
21HortTechnology 18705713
22Tomatoes Economic Analysis of Alternatives
(Sydorovych et al. HortTechnology 2008)
Over 9 years of trials
Net return of MeBr 8,758/A 21,641/ha
23T-C35 to maintain yields in plasticulture
tomatoes
Ecosystem Services
Farming system
A B X
Biodiversity
Important short term
24(No Transcript)
25Tomatoes Tactic Diversification
Tube Grafting
26Tomatoes Tactic Diversification
- Ralstonia solanacearum
- Southern Bacterial Wilt
- Colonizes Vascular tissue
- Tropical Environments
- Soil Inhabitant
- Wide host range
272007 Organic Farm TrialBacterial Wilt Management
28(No Transcript)
29Vegetable and strawberry production systems are
inherently counter productive to soil health
management you have to start somewhere and
WHO better than YOU?... Soil Health is a
directional concept
30Practitioner Approach Can we implement a
compost-based production system and improve soil
health as an alternative to methyl bromide? JUST
DO IT!
- John Vollmer
- on farm research
- organic transition
- Michelle Grabowski
- MS student
31Controlled Microbial Compost
- Management intensive system
- Compost pile monitored and adjusted daily for
temperature, moisture and CO2 content
Recipe 30 Dairy manure 30 Waste Hay 30
Waste Silage 5 Finished compost 5 Clay
soil
32Legume-Grass Cover Crop
Year 1 30 yd3/acre Year 2 20 yd3/acre Year 3
15-20 yd3/acre
33Rotary Spader
Raising of the Beds
Crop Establishment
34Marketable Yield
Indicates yield is significantly different than
MB
35Microbial Ecology
Strawberries - Tactic development
- Q Can we modulate microbial communities to
suppress disease and/or enhance strawberry
yields? - Leandro, L. F.S., L.M. Ferguson, F.J. Louws, and
G.E. Fernandez. 2007. Strawberry growth and
productivity in fumigated compared to
compost-amended production systems. HortScience
42 227-231. -
- Leandro, L.F.S., T. Guzman, L.M. Ferguson, G.E.
Fernandez, and F.J. Louws. 2007. Population
dynamics of Trichoderma in fumigated and
compost-amended soil and on strawberry roots.
Applied Soil Ecology 35237-246.
36- Disease suppression
- Plant growth promotion
- Good Yields
- Weed suppression
- Nutrient cycling
- Increased CEC
- Increased aggregate stability
A B X
37GOAL Design Suppressive Soils - Soils that
reduce or completely suppress the development of
soilborne plant diseases
Resource Availability
Competition Antibiosis
Root Pathogens
Beneficial Microbes
Hyper-parasitism
Nutrient cycling SAR ISR PGPR
Disease incidence severity
Plants
Microbially mediated mechanisms are critical
Abiotic causes may be important What drives the
structure of microbial communities?
38- Actinomycetes e.g Streptomyces spp
Linda Kinkel et. al. Green manures pathogen
suppression streptomyces antibiotic production
39Trichoderma
40SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM OF SYSTEMIC ACQUIRED RESISTANCE
(SAR) and INDUCED SYSTEMIC RESISTANCE (ISR)
III. When a pathogen lands on the (e.g.) leaf, it
cannot successfully establish a parasitic
relationship - infection is aborted.
II. A signal moves from the roots to the shoots
or other roots causing the distant tissue to
mount a defense response.
I. Beneficial bacteria colonize root inhabit
rhizosphere
May also get PGPR effects
41What drives the structure of microbial
communities? Soil typeCropping
HistorySeasonal/Yearly (Temporal)
impactsFarming Systems
42Cropping History Effect
Shuijin Hu et al. unpublished
High diversity soil
Low diversity soil
- Microbes dominated the disease suppression
- Potential importance of Microbial Diversity
(general suppression) - P Pythium ultimum STM steam sterilized
43Cropping History Effect Diverse Soils with
Organic History
High soil labile C correlated with high pathogen
density
Shuijin Hu et al. unpublished
44Seedling mortality negatively correlated with
microbial diversity
Hu et al. unpublished
45What Drives Microbial Communities Farming
System Impacts
46NRI Transitional Treatments asPercent of
Conventional Three Years
It begins with the soil.
47What Drives Microbial Communities? Seasonal and
Year Effects
8
7
6
5
LS Means (log MPN/g soil)
4
3
2
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
Julian Date
48Cropping history of the sampled soils with CT, NT
and SC at CEFS, North Carolina
49Disease incidence of seed rot and damping-off of
soybean in CT, NT and SC soils
Diseases indices
c
b
a
Different letters indicate values are
significantly different at P lt 0.05 level.
50The populations (CFU/ g dry soil) of Fusarium
spp. in CT, NT and SC soils
- Different letters indicate values are
significantly different at P lt 0.05 level. - Based on dilution plating.
51Similarity of Burkholderia community based on the
MPN/g soil and Denaturation Gradient Gel
Electrophoresis sequencing (DGGE) in CT, NT and
SC soils using CCA
Farming System impacted Burkholderia Diversity
(H) Richness (R) Evenness (E)
52Similarity of Fusarium community based on
dilution plating and DGGE in CT, NT and SC soils
using CCA
H Shannon indices R Richness E Evenness
53Ecological Function Damping-off of soybean
impacted by soil physical, chemical and
biological factors
54ADVANCING THE FRONTIER OF SUSTAINABLE AG
A B X
Input based Tactic substitution
Process based Tactic diversification