UTA GEM DHCAL Simulation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

UTA GEM DHCAL Simulation

Description:

LC physics topics require excellent jet energy and angular ... Fits are Landau Gaussian. Nov. 13, 2003. Status of DHCAL Simulation, J. Yu. 16. Resolutions ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:59
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: andy279
Learn more at: http://www-hep.uta.edu
Category:
Tags: dhcal | gem | uta | landau | simulation

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: UTA GEM DHCAL Simulation


1
UTA GEM DHCAL Simulation
  • Jae Yu
  • UTA DoE Site Visit
  • Nov. 13, 2003
  • Introduction
  • GEM Geometry Implementation
  • Single Pion Study for GEM performances
  • GEM Analog Mode
  • GEM Digital Mode
  • Single Pion EFA Studies
  • Summary

(On behalf of the UTA team A. Brandt, K. De, S.
Habib, V. Kaushik, J. Li, M. Sosebee, A. White)
2
Introduction
  • LC physics topics require excellent jet energy
    and angular resolutions
  • Energy flow algorithm is one of the solutions
  • Large number of readout channel will drive up the
    cost for analogue style energy measurement ?
    Digital HCAL
  • Tracking calorimeter with high gain sensitive gap
  • GEM is one such detector technology
  • Simulation effort to understand detector
    progressed along with prototype development
  • Thanks to the support from LCRD and ADR

3
UTA GEM Simulation
  • LC Physics Events Pandora Phythia
  • Use Mokka as the primary tool
  • Kept the same detector dimensions as TESLA TDR
  • Replaced the HCAL scintillation counters with GEM
    (18mm SS 6.5mm GEM, 1cmx1cm cells)
  • Single Pions used for performance EFA studies
  • 5 100 GeV single pions
  • Analyzed them using ROOT

4
TESLA TDR Geometry
  • Ecal Electromagnetic Calorimeter Material
    W/G10/Si/G10 plates (in yellow)
  • 1mm W absorber plates
  • 0.5 mm thick Si, embeded 2 G10 plates of 0.8 mm
    each
  • Hcal Hadronic Calorimeter
  • Material
  • 18 mm of Fe
  • 6.5 mm of Polystyrene scintillator (in green)

5
UTA Double GEM Geometry
25.2sec/event for Simple GEM v/s 43.7 sec/event
for Detailed GEM
6
Energy Deposit for 10 GeV Pions (GEM)
fEMgt0.85
fHCgt0.85
Total
Remaining
7
GEM-Digital Elive vs of hits for p-
8
GEM Cell Occupancies
74 single hit
26 gt1 hit
Number of cells with higher number of hits
increase w/ E
9
Energy Deposit/Ncells vs Layers for 50 GeV Pions
10
Extraction of of dE/dN
11
EM-HAD Relative Weighting Factor
  • To compensate the response differences between
    ECAL and GEM HCAL responses a procedure to
    normalize them had to be introduced
  • ELiveSEEM W SgEHAD (gGEM Intrinsic gain)
  • Obtained the relative weight W using two Gaussian
    fits to EM only v/s HAD only events
  • Perform linear fit to Mean values as a function
    of incident pion energy
  • Extract ratio of the slopes ? Weight factor W
  • E C ELive

12
GEM Relative Weights
Analog
Digital
13
GEM-Digital Live Energy 50 GeV p-
14
GEM Normalized Response
Analog 2.4
Digital2.6
15
Converted energy 50 GeV p-
Analog
Digital
Fits are Landau Gaussian
16
Resolutions
17
EF Technique
Normal Calorimetric Method
C1
C2
C3
C4
C6
C5
Energy Flow Method
C7
p3
p2
p5
p7
18
Energy Flow Studies Using p-
  • Charged particle energy subtraction based on
    track-cluster association is important to EFA
  • The algorithm must work well with single particle
    case
  • Pions ?E p- ? 7.5 GeV chosen for study
  • Studied the energy distribution of pions in jet
    events
  • Find the centroid of the shower ( HCAL ) using
  • Energy weighted method
  • Hits weighted method
  • Density weighted method
  • Match the extrapolated centroid with TPC last
    layer hit to get ?? and ?f distribution

19
Calorimeter Centroid Determination
  • Energy Weighted Method
  • Hit Weighted Method
  • Density Weighted Method

20
Event Displays
6 jets
Single p
21
Number of charged and Neutral particles
ltNgt6
ltNgt12
Neutral particles
Charged e?, ??, K?
22
?R of all the particles relative to quark
23
Dh (E weighted vs Numerical Mean)
Ep 50 GeV 1cm x 1 cm cells
Analog seems to be better than digital but not by
significant factor
24
?? - 7.5 GeV p-
Energy Weighted
Hit Density Weighted
25
Summary
  • Made a marked progress thanks to the LCRD and ADR
    support
  • Completed single p GEM DHCAL performance studies
  • Initial study documented in Habibs MS thesis
  • More detailed and refined study being completed
    by Kaushik
  • Analog resolution seems to be worse compared to
    other detector technology due to large
    fluctuation in initial ionization electrons
  • Digital, however, performance is comparable to
    other analog technologies
  • Released our Pandora Phythia ASCII and other
    analysis packages to LC software group per their
    request

26
  • EFA studies in progress
  • Study track cluster association and energy
    subtraction using single pion ? Three methods
    being investigated
  • Study typical distance between charged particles
    within the jet
  • Determine necessary resolving power for realistic
    situation
  • Prepare for larger scale prototype, cosmic ray
    stack and TB simulation
  • Development of analysis software
  • Continued and increased support is critical to
    make the next quantum jump
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com