4511_Lec4_30Jan08 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 12
About This Presentation
Title:

4511_Lec4_30Jan08

Description:

... is not Gaussian, but follows the 'Landau distribution. ... Simple Gaussian. Landau. Tail: hard scatters with energetic -ray e's. Thin samples big spread. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:33
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: ronpo
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: 4511_Lec4_30Jan08


1
  • Homework 3 is back.
  • Because of my travels I am late on everything
    this week. I made a formal request to myself to
    delay until March 5 the deadline for completing
    my Homework 4 solutions. I agreed (what a
    relief!), and you get the extension too.

2
  • Interactions of Charged Particles with Matter
  • Ionization dominant for heavy charged particles
  • Bremsstrahlung dominant for electrons at
    typical EPP energy
  • For hadrons, nuclear interactions also contribute
  • Interactions of Photons with Matter
  • Photoelectric effect
  • Compton scattering
  • Pair production dominant by 10 MeV

3
Interactions of Particles with Materials
Projectile charges E interacts with atom,
accelerating electron, perhaps ionizing it, with
minimal deviation in its own trajectory.
4
  • Observations

?Interactions with electrons are responsible for
most energy loss.
5
  • Stopping Power S(t) -dT/dx
  • Total energy transferred to the medium (electron
    density ne ?ZA0/A) is obtained by integrating
    the energy transfer to the electrons in a shell
    from b to b db over all values of b that could
    contribute
  • b cant go to zero, because model of the target
    as a fixed pointlike charge breaks down. Min.
    impact parameter is that for which ?p 2mv.
  • b cant go to ?, because model of the target as a
    free electron breaks down. Max. impact parameter
    has collision time comparable to orbital period.

Captures many of the true features of energy
loss, but a better job required
This gives
6
  • The better treatment incorporates the quantum
    nature of energy transfer, the wave nature of
    particles, and relativistic effects

Bethe-Bloch Equation
About 20 eV per electron-ion pair in Ar.
7
  • Observations about Bethe-Bloch (and its limits)
  • Scaling with ?? - minimal dependence on
    particle mass
  • 1/v-2 dependence at low speeds ? strong energy
    dependence.
  • Relativistic rise for high speeds ?2 under
    ln
  • Saturates for dense media charge screening
    suppresses long-range interactions
  • dT/dxmin 3.5Z/A g/cm2 at ??3 (minimum
    ionizing particle)
  • Min I occurs at higher momenta for more massive
    particles
  • (dT/dx)min 1.5 MeV per g/cm2 for steel
  • Weak dependence on medium (Z/A 0.5)
  • dT/dx allows particle ID at low speeds and (esp.
    for electrons) in the relativistic rise.

8
Relativistic Rise
9
Weak Medium Dependence
10
The Bigger Picture
Atomic effects dominate charge dependent
Everything weve talked about so far
Radiative Effects Bremsstrahlung
PDB p. 237
11
Bremsstrahlung
Acceleration of a charged particle (esp.
electron) in the Coulomb field of a nucleus ?
radiation.
  • Energy-loss rate by Brems is linearly
    proportional to energy, while ionization rises
    logarithmically
  • Critical energy Ec is where the rates are equal,
    20 MeV for electrons in Cu, several hundred GeV
    for muons in Cu.
  • New measure of amount of material Radiation
    Length

12
Range and Straggling
Simple calculation of when particle runs out of
gas leads to predicted range.
Actual process of energy loss is random, observed
as range straggling, and a distribution of
energy-loss increments in small samples that is
not Gaussian, but follows the Landau
distribution.
Thin samples? big spread.
Tail hard scatters with energetic ?-ray es.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com