ECONOMICS 3200M - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 16
About This Presentation
Title:

ECONOMICS 3200M

Description:

1. ECONOMICS 3200M. Winter 2006. Professor Lazar. 2. ECONOMICS 3200M. Lecture 1. January 6, 2006 ... Format: 3 questions of 6 short essays ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:40
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: laz95
Category:
Tags: 3200m | economics | lazar

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: ECONOMICS 3200M


1
ECONOMICS 3200M
  • Winter 2006
  • Professor Lazar

2
ECONOMICS 3200MLecture 1January 6, 2006
3
Course Requirements
  • Three tests
  • February 10 March 13 April
  • 30 30 40
  • Format 3 questions of 6 short essays
  • Open book No cell phones, no wireless
    communication devices
  • No excuses for missing first two tests see
    Course Outline

4
Other Ground Rules
  • No taping of lectures
  • No cell phones in class
  • Responsible for all chapters in text except
    chapter 18
  • Listen before you write Lecture notes for each
    week will be posted by the end of the week

5
Office Hours
  • Fridays 11-1
  • N205J, Schulich
  • Phone 736-5068
  • Email flazar_at_yorku.ca

6
Text
  • D.W. Carlton and J.M. Perloff, Modern Industrial
    Organization, 4th Edition, Addison-Wesley, 2005

7
Objectives
  • Focus of the course Examine real-world
    competitive behaviour, and highlight the
    theoretical limitations of traditional
    microeconomic theories
  • Study different market structures
  • Consider how these structures develop and evolve
    over time
  • Implications for competitive behaviour

8
Disclosure Personal Bias
  • Theoretical underpinnings of competition policy
    and competition law have not yet incorporated the
    work of Professor Michael Porter. Porters work,
    which builds upon that of Joseph Schumpeter, one
    of the great economists of the 20th century,
    emphasizes that companies strive to create a
    competitive advantage.
  • Those that succeed outperform their competitors
    and are most likely to dominate their markets.
  • The laggards eventually exit the industry.
  • Competition policy tends to inhibit companies
    from freely developing competitive advantages
    because the successful companies are likely to be
    constrained in their ability to exploit their
    advantages.
  • The long-run consequences of this are much more
    significant than the supposed loses in consumer
    welfare resulting from a reduction in the number
    of unsuccessful competitors.

9
Disclosure Personal Bias
  • According to Schumpeter, the competitive gales of
    creative destruction, the product of
    entrepreneurs, drive the capitalist system
    forward and produce the dramatic improvements in
    standards of living.
  • If one were to compare the top 25 companies on
    the Fortune 500 list in 1970 and the list in
    2005, one would find that there has been a
    dramatic turnover in the list.
  • And in 35 years time the list will be much
    different yet.
  • All of these changes have taken place and will
    take place without the intervention of
    competition policy.

10
Introduction
  • Theory If, then
  • If perfect competition, then PMC
  • If monopoly, then, PgtAC
  • If no entry barriers and zero exit costs, then
    markets contestable and PAC
  • If economies of scale to Q0 and diseconomies of
    scale beyond Q0 , then AC curve is U-shaped
  • If oligopoly, then ???
  • If heterogenous product, then Monopolistic
    competition
  • If economic profits, then entry occurs

11
Introduction
  • Problem Many paths to the if, thus many paths
    for then
  • Example Monopoly
  • How was monopoly created?
  • Government, natural monopoly, successful
    strategies, superior management, luck
  • Entry barriers created as part of process?
  • Depends on how monopoly created
  • Strategies to sustain monopoly?
  • Rent seeking public vs.private sector

12
Introduction
  • Problem Competition
  • Passive/active?
  • Rivalry the goal of competition is to kill
    your competitors
  • Compare to concept of competition in perfect
    competition model
  • Michael Porter Determinants of rivalry
  • Concentration and balance (Herfindahl-Hirschman
    index, concentration ratios) facilitate
    collusive behaviour, deter entry, dominant firm
  • Threat of entry, exit barriers
  • Product differentiation brand identity,
    switching costs, reputation
  • Informational complexity
  • Intermittent overcapacity airlines, steel
  • Bargaining power of buyers
  • Industry growth

13
Introduction
  • Problem Competition
  • Michael Porter Competitive strategy
  • Establish profitable and sustainable position
    factoring in bargaining power of suppliers and
    buyers, threat of entry, threat of substitutes,
    intensity of rivalry
  • Strategies for achieving competitive advantage
  • Cost leadership
  • Differentiation
  • Niche
  • Role of management and luck
  • Gamblers ruin and industry concentration

14
Introduction
  • Problem Competition
  • Sustainability of competitive advantage
  • Barriers to imitation not insurmountable, thus
    firm must create moving target by investing to
    continually improve position
  • Well executed offensive strategy best defense
    against attack by challenger
  • Role remains for defensive strategy increase
    structural barriers to entry, increase
    probability of retaliation retaliate when entry
    attempted

15
Introduction
  • Problem Market definition
  • Identification of buyers, sellers potential
    entrants, potential sources of supply
  • Geographic scope
  • Local, regional, national, international
  • Trade barriers, information
  • What constitutes a substitute product?
  • Cross-price elasticities measurement, critical
    values
  • MRgt0 elastic range of demand curve, thus high
    degree of substitutability with products that are
    not included in market

16
Introduction
  • Problem Market definition
  • Entry barriers ease, speed of entry
  • Entry by outsiders (who are they?) entry by
    insiders
  • Height, perception of entry barriers
    reputation,economies of scale/scope, learning
    curves, access to distribution networks,
    switching costs, firm specific capital (patents,
    trade secrets, management skills, location)
  • Strategic behaviour of incumbents entry
    accommodation or deterrence
  • Time period for defining markets time required
    for adjustments in buyer/seller behaviour in
    response to certain size price change
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com