Talking Systems - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 40
About This Presentation
Title:

Talking Systems

Description:

To investigate the setting up of links between the VLE - Lotus Learning Space ... Liber Quarterly 11(4), pp. 372- 381. 31 Aug 2003. Useful links. Dr Ed's SCORM course ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:65
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 41
Provided by: jan8152
Category:
Tags: liber | systems | talking

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Talking Systems


1
Talking Systems
  • Janice Sim
  • Technical Services Manager
  • University of Wales College, Newport

2
Talking Systems
  • One of the JISC funded DiVLE projects
  • Linking Digital Libraries with VLEs
  • October 2002 July 2003

3
Talking Systems
  • To investigate the setting up of links between
    the VLE - Lotus Learning Space and the Sirsi
    Unicorn Library Management System

4
  • Dan Noyes - Project Manager
  • Centre for Learning Development
  • Project website
  • www.newport.ac.uk/talkingsystems

5
Partners
  • Sirsi UK
  • IBM Lotus Software
  • Percussion Software UK
  • Lancaster University, Library and Information
    Systems

6
Aims
  • To create SCORM learning objects and transfer
    metadata from these objects to a Bath Profile
    compliant Z39.50 server

7
Why?
  • To find content across multiple Virtual Learning
    Environments e.g. Lotus Learning Space,
    Blackboard, WebCT
  • To standardise search behaviour across disparate
    e-learning resource bases
  • To open access to learning content metadata
    beyond our institution

8
SCORM
  • Shareable Content Object Reference Model
  • Funded by the US Department of Defense.
  • Emerging specification combining a number of
    existing standards

9
SCORM
  • Specifies a standard way to describe sequenced
    content that is to be used by a single learner
  • The learner can identify a specific learning
    requirement and have a bespoke tutorial created
    from distributed content to answer this
    requirement

10
SCO
  • SCOs represent a collection of one or more
    shareable resources that include a specific
    launchable asset that uses the SCORM run-time
    environment to communicate with a learning
    management system.

11
SCORM learning objects
  • The SCORM had not previously been used at UWCN
  • Stored using a Windows 2000 development server
    running an IBM Lotus Domino platform.

12
SCORM learning objects
  • Data is stored in Domino in forms and a single
    form was created for SCO input to automate the
    production of metadata

13
SCO Form
  • Three sections
  • 1. The basic metadata provided by the content
    author
  • 2.The SCO content itself
  • 3. Automatically created metadata matched to MARC
    fields using the Dublin Core crosswalk on the
    Library of Congress website

14
Source data
  • A Lotus Domino database of 500 pieces of mainly
    HTML formatted text each of about 300 words
    making up a fledgling study skills database.
  • This was copied to the mini VLE on the
    development server

15
SCORM content
  • Next steps
  • Stringing the individual documents together to
    make SCOs and content structure
  • Macromedia Authorware used to aggregate and
    sequence the elements making up tutorials

16
Percussion Notrix
  • Originally planned to use ODBC scripting to push
    data to the Unicorn server but this was not
    supported.
  • The live Unicorn library system was used in this
    project, not a test server.

17
Unicorn Library System
  • Importing records
  • Linking to the VLE (s)
  • Searching

18
Unicorn Importing records
  • ODBC scripting not supported
  • Bibload
  • Perfectly successful and capable of being
    automated using FTP and reports
  • Definitely not new

19
Unicorn Linking to the VLE
  • Searching the catalogue to find items
  • Using the 856 field to link to objects in the VLE

20
Unicorn - Searching
  • Using the Webcat or a Z39.50 client
  • to find a MARC record with a URL pointing to a
    Domino document or an Authorware tutorial

21
(No Transcript)
22
(No Transcript)
23
(No Transcript)
24
(No Transcript)
25
What Is Z39.50
  • A search and retrieval protocol which enables
    clients and servers from different vendors to
    communicate with each other
  • Searches are mapped from Z39.50 to the local
    search protocol and can be run against more than
    one target at a time

26
Z39.50
  • Not the easiest feature of Unicorn to use
  • Not understood by network staff
  • - Frequently firewall issues
  • When access is achieved
  • - Often error messages

27
Z39.50 search
  • Should have 6 attributes each given a numerical
    value e.g.
  • Use - such as title, author or ISSN
  • Relation - equal, greater than, less than
  • Position - any position in field, first
  • Structure - word, word list or phrase
  • Truncation - right hand truncation or do not
    truncate
  • Completeness - complete field, incomplete subfield

28
Unicorn Bath Z Server Behaviour
  • FIND TITLE KEYWORD FISH
  • Attribute Value Name
  • use 4 title (keyword indexing policy)
  • relation 3 equal
  • position 3 any position in field
    (keyword)
  • structure 2 word
  • truncation 100 do not truncate
  • completeness 1 incomplete subfield

29
Where does it go wrong?
  • Most vendors do not document their Z39.50 servers
    capabilities
  • Some vendor documentation is inaccurate
  • Many exhibit default behaviour when they receive
    attribute combinations they dont support giving
    unreliable search results
  • All six attributes are not compulsory

30
Current State Of Z Implementations
31
Current State Of Z Implementations
32
Z Answers
  • A recent development in Sirsi is the delivery of
    preconfigured search name maps for each vendors
    server
  • U2003 clients can send all 6 attribute values for
    a Z search
  • Use the Bath profile to fully define searches and
    make Z39.50 work

33
Bath Profile
  • Bath profile defines which of the combinations of
    attributes a Bath compliant server should be able
    to handle and the nature of the response. A core
    set of requirements.
  • University of North Texas is able to test a
    Z39.50 server for compliance

34
Z39.50 and Talking Systems
  • To meet our aim of searching across disparate
    sources standardisation was needed.
  • For this reason it was decided that our server
    should be made Bath profile compliant.
  • A consultant was needed!

35
Our consultant
  • Slavko Manojlovich
  • Memorial University of Newfoundland
  • Sirsis Z39.50 guru!

36
Changes to Unicorn
  • A new format for Dublin Core records
  • A new Library policy (ELECTRONIC! A godsend for
    E-books, journals and databases and the best bit
    of the whole project)
  • New keyword indexes, name, title, subject and
    number for each format

37
Keyword Indexes
  • The changes to the keyword indexes for each MARC
    field took about 4 days work, following the
    specification from Texas.
  • The result was a Bath Profile compliant server,
    one of the first if not the first in the UK.

38
The end of the project
  • Work will continue to make links between the
    systems
  • The project showed that the SCORM approach is
    complex and difficult to apply across the
    institution
  • Bath profile provides a good basis for e-learning
    content discovery.

39
  • Slavko Manojlovich
  • Z39.50 clients and servers the current state of
    affairs. http//nofish.library.mun.ca/stlouisu2003
    .ppt
  • Peter Gethin
  • Why the Bath profile makes Z39.50 work
  • Liber Quarterly 11(4), pp. 372- 381

40
Useful links
  • Dr Eds SCORM course
  • www.jcasolutions.com/SC12/index.html
  • Paul Miller
  • Z39.50 for all
  • www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue21/z3950/intro.html
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com