Title: Depressive symptoms and the onset of menarche
1Depressive symptoms and the onset of menarche
2What is ALSPAC?
- Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children
- AKA Children of the Nineties
- Cohort study of 14,000 children and their
parents, based in south-west England - Eligibility criteria Mothers had to be resident
in Avon and have an expected date of delivery
between April 1st 1991 and December 31st 1992 - Population based prospective cohort study
3Wheres Avon to?
4What data does ALSPAC have?
- Self completion questionnaires
- Mothers, Partners, Children, Teachers
- Hands on assessments
- 10 sample tested regularly since birth
- Yearly clinics for all since age 7
- Data from external sources
- SATS from LEA, Child Health database
- Biological samples
- DNA / cell lines
5Data for current models - outcome
- Depressive symptoms
- Short form of Mood and Feelings Questionnaire
- Angold, A., Costello, E. J., Messer, S. C.,
Pickles, A., Winder, F., Silver, D. (1995).
Development of a short questionnaire for use in
epidemiological studies of depression in children
and adolescents. International Journal of Methods
in Psychiatric Research, 5, 237249. - Costello, E. J., Angold, A. (1988). Scales to
assess child and adolescent depression
Checklists, screens and nets. Journal of the
American Academy of Child and Adolescent
Psychiatry, 27, 726737. - Assessed in clinic self report
- 3 time points 10y7m, 12y10m, 13y10m
6Depressive symptoms Short MFQ
- I felt miserable or unhappy
(True/Sometimes/Not at all) - I didn't enjoy anything at all
- I felt so tired I just sat around and did nothing
- I was very restless
- I felt I was no good any more
- I cried a lot
- I found it hard to think properly or concentrate
- I hated myself
- I was a bad person
- I felt lonely
- I thought nobody really loved me
- I thought I could never been as good as other
kids - I did everything wrong
7Depressive symptoms Short MFQ
- I felt miserable or unhappy
(True/Sometimes/Not at all) - I didn't enjoy anything at all
- I felt so tired I just sat around and did nothing
- I was very restless
- I felt I was no good any more
- I cried a lot
- I found it hard to think properly or concentrate
- I hated myself
- I was a bad person
- I felt lonely
- I thought nobody really loved me
- I thought I could never been as good as other
kids - I did everything wrong
8Restless non-response more common
9Restless non-monotonic change
10Subscales odd / even
- Measured using short MFQ (13 items)
- I felt miserable or unhappy
- I didn't enjoy anything at all
- I felt so tired I just sat around and did nothing
- I was very restless
- I felt I was no good any more
- I cried a lot
- I found it hard to think properly or concentrate
- I hated myself
- I was a bad person
- I felt lonely
- I thought nobody really loved me
- I thought I could never been as good as other
kids - I did everything wrong
11Depression scales basic stats
12Depression scales basic stats
13Data for current models - exposure
- Age at onset of menarche
- Assessed repeatedly by questionnaire
- Respondent mother and/or daughter
- 3 groups
- Before 11½ (14.7)
- 11½ - 13½ (65.5)
- After 13½ (19.8)
14Study sample
- 2063 with complete data
- All are girls (obviously!)
- Intention is to repeat models with boys using
alternative measures of pubertal onset
151 Simple cross-sectional models
161 Standardized results
- --------------------------------------------------
-------------- - Coef. SE t Pgtt
95 CI - -------------------------------------------------
-------------- - t1 (10y7m)
- Early menarche .042 .064 0.67 0.505
-.082 .167 - Late menarche .027 .057 0.47 0.637
-.084 .137 - --------------------------------------------------
-------------- - --------------------------------------------------
-------------- - t2 (12y10m)
- Early menarche .220 .063 3.48 0.001
.096 .344 - Late menarche .005 .056 0.08 0.936
-.106 .115 - --------------------------------------------------
-------------- - --------------------------------------------------
-------------- - t3 (13y10m)
- Early menarche .191 .063 3.02 0.003
.067 .315 - Late menarche -.170 .056 -3.03 0.002
-.281 -.060 - --------------------------------------------------
--------------
17However
- Scales are skewed
- Data is longitudinal
- Heterogeneity in patterns of change
- Scale properties may not be invariant across time
182 Measurement Invariance model
192 Measurement Invariance model - on items
Optional
Item-1
Item-12
Item-1
Item-12
Item-1
Item-12
F_t1
F_t2
F_t3
Menarche onset
202 Measurement Invariance model
Decent fit for fully invariant model
- CFI
0.952 - TLI
0.975 - Number of Free Parameters
57 - RMSEA (Root Mean Square Error Of Approximation)
0.043 - WRMR (Weighted Root Mean Square Residual)
1.892
212 Measurement Invariance results
- Meas Inv model
- Estimate (SE), P-Value
Estimate (SE), P-Value - F_t1 ON
- EARLYMEN 0.044 (0.071), p 0.534 0.042
(0.064), p 0.505 - LATEMEN 0.025 (0.064), p 0.700 0.027
(0.057), p 0.637 - F_t2 ON
- EARLYMEN 0.239 (0.073), p 0.001 0.220
(0.063), p 0.001 - LATEMEN 0.004 (0.065), p 0.956 0.005
(0.056), p 0.936 - F_t3 ON
- EARLYMEN 0.206 (0.073), p 0.005 0.191
(0.063), p 0.003 - LATEMEN -0.198 (0.065), p 0.002 -0.170
(0.056), p 0.002
22c.f. with equivalent simple C/S results
- Meas Inv model
Simple C/S - Estimate (SE), P-Value
Estimate (SE), P-Value - t1/F_t1 ON
- EARLYMEN 0.044 (0.071), p 0.534 0.042
(0.064), p 0.505 - LATEMEN 0.025 (0.064), p 0.700 0.027
(0.057), p 0.637 - t2/F_t2 ON
- EARLYMEN 0.239 (0.073), p 0.001 0.220
(0.063), p 0.001 - LATEMEN 0.004 (0.065), p 0.956 0.005
(0.056), p 0.936 - t3/F_t3 ON
- EARLYMEN 0.206 (0.073), p 0.005 0.191
(0.063), p 0.003 - LATEMEN -0.198 (0.065), p 0.002 -0.170
(0.056), p 0.002
23 1 C/S 2 Meas Invariant
24Considerable variability between subjects
253 2nd Order Growth Model
263 2nd Order Growth Model piecewise
Optional
t1_odd
t1_even
t2_odd
t2_even
t3_odd
t3_even
F_t1
F_t2
F_t3
F_i
F_s1
273 2nd Order Growth Model piecewise
t1_odd
t1_even
t2_odd
t2_even
t3_odd
t3_even
F_t1
F_t2
F_t3
Zero residual variance
F_i
F_s1
283 Growth model fit
- CFI
0.972 - TLI
0.970 - Number of Free Parameters
13 - Akaike (AIC)
46763.214 - Bayesian (BIC)
46836.429 - Sample-Size Adjusted BIC
46795.126 - RMSEA (Root Mean Square Error Of Approximation)
- Estimate
0.077 - 90 Percent C.I.
0.068 0.088 - Probability RMSEA lt .05
0.000 - SRMR (Standardized Root Mean Square Residual)
- Value 0.037
293 Growth model parameters
-
Two-Tailed - Estimate S.E.
Est./S.E. P-Value - Means
- INTCPT 2.370 0.045
52.119 0.000 - SLOPE1 0.112 0.021
5.435 0.000 - SLOPE2 0.686 0.050
13.660 0.000 - Variances
- INTCPT 3.382 0.144
23.462 0.000 - SLOPE1 0.653 0.029
22.313 0.000 - SLOPE2 4.053 0.170
23.864 0.000 - INTCPT WITH
- SLOPE1 0.985 0.052
19.072 0.000 - SLOPE2 -0.946 0.105
-9.003 0.000 - SLOPE1 WITH
- SLOPE2 -0.324 0.049
-6.678 0.000
303 Growth model - add menarche
- INTCPT ON
- EARLYMEN 0.061 (0.071), p 0.386
- LATEMEN 0.037 (0.063), p 0.559
- INTCPT ON
- EARLYMEN 0.237 (0.068), p 0.001
- LATEMEN -0.003 (0.061), p 0.959
- INTCPT ON
- EARLYMEN 0.210 (0.066), p 0.002
- LATEMEN -0.185 (0.059), p 0.002
- SLOPE1 ON
- EARLYMEN 0.189 (0.073), p 0.010
- LATEMEN -0.033 (0.065), p 0.606
- SLOPE2 ON
- EARLYMEN 0.029 (0.071), p 0.683
- LATEMEN -0.214 (0.063), p 0.001
313 Growth model - add menarche
- INTCPT ON
- EARLYMEN 0.061 (0.071), p 0.386
- LATEMEN 0.037 (0.063), p 0.559
- INTCPT ON
- EARLYMEN 0.237 (0.068), p 0.001
- LATEMEN -0.003 (0.061), p 0.959
- INTCPT ON
- EARLYMEN 0.210 (0.066), p 0.002
- LATEMEN -0.185 (0.059), p 0.002
- SLOPE1 ON
- EARLYMEN 0.189 (0.073), p 0.010
- LATEMEN -0.033 (0.065), p 0.606
- SLOPE2 ON
- EARLYMEN 0.029 (0.071), p 0.683
- LATEMEN -0.214 (0.063), p 0.001
32Compare models so far
33Measurement Invariance model - alternative
Item-1
Item-12
Item-1
Item-12
Item-1
Item-12
F_t1
F_t2
F_t3
Menarche onset
34Compare models so far
35Compare models so far
36Effect of censoring on 1st order factors
Uncensored
Censored
t1
??
t2
??
t3
??
374 Growth model with mixture
384 Growth model with mixture
- overall
- lt. . .gt
- c1 on earlymen latemen
- c1
- slope1
- slope1
- slope2
- slope2
- intcpt
- intcpt
- intcpt on earlymen latemen
- slope1 slope2 on earlymen latemen
- intcpt with slope1 slope2
- slope1 with slope2
c2 slope1_at_0 slope1_at_0 slope2_at_0
slope2_at_0 intcpt intcpt intcpt on
earlymen latemen intcpt with slope1_at_0
slope2_at_0 slope1 with slope2_at_0
394 Growth model with mixture
- overall
- lt. . .gt
- c1 on earlymen latemen
- c1
- slope1
- slope1
- slope2
- slope2
- intcpt
- intcpt
- intcpt on earlymen latemen
- slope1 slope2 on earlymen latemen
- intcpt with slope1 slope2
- slope1 with slope2
c2 slope1_at_0 slope1_at_0 slope2_at_0
slope2_at_0 intcpt intcpt intcpt on
earlymen latemen intcpt with slope1_at_0
slope2_at_0 slope1 with slope2_at_0
No change in symptoms
Change is permitted
404 Two class results
- LATENT CLASSES BASED ON THE ESTIMATED MODEL
- c1 1074.91 52.1
- c2 988.09 47.9
- BASED ON MODAL CLASS
- c1 1033 50.1
- c2 1030 49.9
Average Latent Class Probabilities for Modal
Class (Row) by Latent Class (Column)
1 2 1 0.958 0.042 2 0.083
0.917 Entropy 0.774
414 Two class results
424 Two class results
C1 ON EARLYMEN 1.363 1.016, 1.828, p
0.039 LATEMEN 0.863 0.619, 1.112, p
0.254
- Class 1
- INTCPT ON
- EARLYMEN -0.002 (0.092), p0.980
- LATEMEN 0.130 (0.091), p0.154
- SLOPE1 ON
- EARLYMEN 0.159 (0.095), p0.094
- LATEMEN -0.061 (0.081), p0.448
- SLOPE2 ON
- EARLYMEN 0.003 (0.096), p0.972
- LATEMEN -0.213 (0.075), p0.004
Class 2 INTCPT ON EARLYMEN 0.136 (0.160),
p0.396 LATEMEN -0.105 (0.119), p0.377
43Has that really helped with the skewness?
Manifest measures within class
44Has that really helped with the skewness?
1st level factors within class
45What next?
- Semi-continuous models
- Zero-inflated models
- ideal for instance where a score of zero is
substantively different to score of 1 - Split measures in binary (zero/non-zero) and cts
(e.g. log of non-zero scores) - Prevalence of non-zero is 60-70 so what does
such an onset mean - Limited scope for modelling of 3 binaries, i.e.
- i bin_fd_at_0 bin_ff_at_2.25 bin_fg_at_3.25
46Summary / conclusions
- We have 3 skewed measures of MFQ and wish to
assess the extend to which early menarche leads
to an earlier and/or greater onset in depressive
symptoms - The models considered thus far are in good
agreement and have not altered the conclusions
made on the initial figure - Inclined to favour the invariance model based on
items only model which appears to have
successful dealt with skewness - Thoughts gratefully received