GGF EGA Merger Framework - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 25
About This Presentation
Title:

GGF EGA Merger Framework

Description:

Technical meritocracy and quality. An environment where I can make a difference ... Enable participation and meritocracy. Enable steering and oversight. Top ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:114
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: markhenr
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: GGF EGA Merger Framework


1
GGF / EGA Merger Framework
2
Agenda
  • Objectives
  • Design Implementation Principles
  • Stakeholder Requirements
  • Simplified Merger Framework
  • Merger Framework
  • Structure Governance
  • Membership
  • Intelectual Property
  • Schedule Next Steps
  • Timeline
  • Key Milestones

3
Design Implementation Principles
  • Focus on what the new organization needs to be
    successful as opposed to preserving either
    existing organizations processes, biases, etc.
  • Merger of equals - creating a new, more effective
    and efficient organization
  • Sensitive to existing constituencies no
    disenfranchisement
  • Preserve the continuity of current work
    throughout merger intent and transition phases
  • Integrated, worldwide organization presenting a
    clear and differentiated mission statement
    attractive to stakeholders
  • Transparent in our governance and processes and
    open in our technical deliberations
  • Tangible and tiered benefits for organizational
    and individual members
  • Well described processes which make it easy for
    people to get work done
  • Encourage interoperability while enabling
    industry innovation and value add.
  • Inclusive and broadly based - enable the best and
    brightest to contribute
  • Promote and encourage grid adoption and the value
    of the new organization

4
Stakeholder Requirements
  • Organizations
  • Influence direction while ensuring a level
    playing field
  • Tangible, timely and commercially - viable
    standards and results
  • Focused interaction and advocacy in key sectors
    (academic/research enterprise/ industry IT
    vendors)
  • A vendor neutral voice on grid definitions,
    education, directions, maturity and appropriate
    use cases and value
  • A forum for the exchange of ideas and
    acceleration of packaged grid-enabled
    applications and solutions
  • Policies and practices that protect IP while
    enabling participation and collaboration
  • Recognition as a leader within the industry
  • Insight into grid technology directions and
    maturity
  • Individuals
  • Technical meritocracy and quality
  • An environment where I can make a difference
  • Recognition for my contributions
  • Inclusive participation and low barriers to
    collaboration
  • Simple processes and tools that enable work

5
Simplified Merger Framework
Membership
Structure Governance
IP
Individual
Organizational
Enable steering and oversight Top Down
Compelling entitlements for funding the
organization
Protect members IP and encourage collaboration
and adoption
Checks and Balances
Trust and Respect
Compelling reasons for participating in the
organization
Bottoms Up Enable participation and meritocracy
6
Structure Governance - Overview
Regional Organizations Structure - TBD
Steering Committees (Event Steering Committee
Technical Steering Committee
Board of Directors Chair (1), Foundation (12),
At-large (3)
  • Advisory Council
  • Regional strategic advice

Nominating Committee Leadership nomination
processes
Chair
Community Vice Chair
Technical Vice Chair
Marketing Vice Chair
Events
AR/PR
Programs
Operations GGF Staff Global Inventures
Membership / Sponsorship
Document tools and processes
Web site
Event Mktg. Ops
Management tools processes
Finance, HR, Legal
Representatives from across the various
organizational functions as appropriate
7
Structure Governance - Detail
8
Structure Governance - Detail
9
Structure Governance - Detail
10
Structure Governance - Detail
11
Structure Governance - Detail
12
Membership Principles
Design objective maximize organizational funding
and individual participation
Compelling reasons for participating in the
organization
Compelling tiered entitlements for funding the
organization
Influence on directions and priorities
Recognition as a leader driving grid
adoption
Insight on grid standards best practices
13
Membership Types Tiers
  • Two types of members
  • Organizational Sponsors
  • For organizational members, their will be 3 tiers
    with increasing level of entitlements
  • Elected BoD members will pay an adder for
    accepting BoD seat
  • Individual contributors
  • For individual members their will be a tier for
    individuals whose organizations are not members
    and special consideration for students
  • All members will sign an agreement that includes
    an IP policy
  • Further design of member entitlements and fees
    will be completed after the signing and
    announcement of the LOI

14
Membership - Transition
(during the merger transition before the new
organization is legally established)
  • Members from both organizations should continue
    to participate in their original organizations
  • Membership fees paid to one or both organizations
    will be applied to new memberships level chosen
    on a pro-rated basis once the new organization is
    established
  • During the transition phase the activities of the
    two organizations will be increasingly brought
    together

15
Intellectual Property
  • The new organization will develop an IP policy
    that protects member IP and encourages
    collaboration and adoption of standards
  • During transition,
  • Activities that remain separate will operate
    under each organizations existing IP policy
  • EGA and GGF members are encouraged to participate
    in each organizations group activities but must
    adhere to the existing IP policy of the group
    they are participating in.
  • Any new joint technical activities between the
    two organizations will operate under the GGF IP
    policies until the new organization IP policy is
    established

16
Timeline
  • Phase I. Merger Intent
  • Framework development (PP presentation, document,
    LOI)
  • Stakeholder validation and refinement
  • LOI signed by both organizations
  • Press/PR/Community Announcement of intent to
    merge (1)
  • Phase 2. Merger Transition
  • Develop merger plan including appropriate
    documents, processes and procedures for
    integration
  • Separate organizations but synergistic operation
  • Phase 3. Merger Integration
  • New organization legally structurally
    established for integrated operation. (BoD and
    leadership in place Bylaws, Member Agreement,
    New IP Policy)
  • Integration of the new organization is complete
    and all core processes operational

(1) TBD Date of Intent to Merge Announcement
17
Phase 1 Merger Intent Detailed Schedule
Joint merger teams meet to review slide deck,
paper, and develop draft LoI
EGA BoD and GGF GFSG Review Paper And draft
LoI Form detailed feedback
Team releases Final LoI and proposal Paper
to Respective leadership
Release Paper and Draft LoI To respective leadersh
ip
Representatives Of both parties Meet
to Resolve Differences, Agree to final points
Both parties Have from 1/23 to 1/31/06 To review
and approve LoI and vote to merge
Team Prepares Final LoI and proposal paper
9 10 11 13 16-17-18 20 22
23 30 31
EGA BoD To review And approve LoI And vote to
merge
Regular EGA BoD meeting
18
Key Milestones
  • Phase 1 Merger Intent (11/05 2/06)
  • Signed letter-of-intent (LOI)
  • Announcement of intent to merge
  • Merger implementation team established
  • Merger transition guidelines communicated and
    reviewed with organizational sponsors

19
Key Milestones
  • Phase 2 Merger Transition (2/06 6/06)
  • Merger implementation plan is completed and
    approved including new organization
  • Bylaws
  • IP Policy
  • Membership Agreement and Entitlements
  • Area / Group transition plan
  • Leadership transition plan (BoD, Officers,
    Leaders)

20
Key Milestones
  • Phase 3 Merger Integration (6/06 9/06)
  • New organization is a legal entity and activities
    commence in the new organizational structure
  • Initial BoD and officers are appointed with
    staggered tenure ( 50 1 year 50 - 2 year
    terms)
  • Initial Vice Chairs and Area Directors are
    appointed with staggered tenure (Note using
    existing GGF cycle)
  • Vice Chairs and Area Directors are chosen from
    existing leadership of GGF and EGA
  • EGA and GGF members have transitioned to new
    organization membership agreements
  • New Web site is in place with logos, branding,
    content, etc.
  • Core processes, procedures and policies are in
    place and operational

21
  • The following slides are the notes from the GFSG
    discussion regarding issues with the current
    framework

22
Issues
  • BoD
  • What is the TSC and name of the technical
    function?
  • What is the name of the NEWORG
  • Business case
  • What is the voting procedure
  • GFSG votes and board approves
  • 2/3 of those voting
  • What do we say to the community and when
  • GFAC discussion (Friday, 20th)
  • GFSG vote (Tuesday, 24th)
  • GFSG final vote (Friday, 27th)

23
BoD
  • The GGF believes that the board should not have a
    proactive approval but an exception veto on the
    publication of documents. A document can be
    published even with board veto, but it must be
    marked. Veto is only by super majority
  • Want 2/3 1/3 instead of ¾ - ¼ on board
    composition of foundation member versus at-large
  • Commitment level to retain vote
  • Vice chairs should attend BoD meetings but no
    vote
  • Nominations for at-large member through the
    NOMCOM process.
  • Mechanism where collected membership can interact
    with BoD

24
TSC
  • Vice Chair of Standards Technology (Standards
    needs to be in the name)
  • Technical Strategy Committee to own the ongoing
    Standards Roadmap development process and develop
    the technical strategy and direction for the
    organization
  • Participation from across the councils (Vice
    Chair of ST, 3 appointed by VC, 3 appointed by
    board)
  • Councils (Community, Standards, Marketing,
    Operations) have formalized decision making
    process. (i.e. vote within council)

25
Organization name
  • Business Case for name change or name
    continuation (cost, brand)
  • Execute appropriate alternatives
  • Keep the monogram, change the logo and meaning of
    the letters
  • Change the monogram, keep the logo
  • Change the monogram, change the logo
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com