Title: GGF EGA Merger Framework
1GGF / EGA Merger Framework
2Agenda
- Objectives
- Design Implementation Principles
- Stakeholder Requirements
- Simplified Merger Framework
- Merger Framework
- Structure Governance
- Membership
- Intelectual Property
- Schedule Next Steps
- Timeline
- Key Milestones
3Design Implementation Principles
- Focus on what the new organization needs to be
successful as opposed to preserving either
existing organizations processes, biases, etc. - Merger of equals - creating a new, more effective
and efficient organization - Sensitive to existing constituencies no
disenfranchisement - Preserve the continuity of current work
throughout merger intent and transition phases - Integrated, worldwide organization presenting a
clear and differentiated mission statement
attractive to stakeholders - Transparent in our governance and processes and
open in our technical deliberations - Tangible and tiered benefits for organizational
and individual members - Well described processes which make it easy for
people to get work done - Encourage interoperability while enabling
industry innovation and value add. - Inclusive and broadly based - enable the best and
brightest to contribute - Promote and encourage grid adoption and the value
of the new organization
4Stakeholder Requirements
- Organizations
- Influence direction while ensuring a level
playing field - Tangible, timely and commercially - viable
standards and results - Focused interaction and advocacy in key sectors
(academic/research enterprise/ industry IT
vendors) - A vendor neutral voice on grid definitions,
education, directions, maturity and appropriate
use cases and value - A forum for the exchange of ideas and
acceleration of packaged grid-enabled
applications and solutions - Policies and practices that protect IP while
enabling participation and collaboration - Recognition as a leader within the industry
- Insight into grid technology directions and
maturity
- Individuals
- Technical meritocracy and quality
- An environment where I can make a difference
- Recognition for my contributions
- Inclusive participation and low barriers to
collaboration - Simple processes and tools that enable work
5Simplified Merger Framework
Membership
Structure Governance
IP
Individual
Organizational
Enable steering and oversight Top Down
Compelling entitlements for funding the
organization
Protect members IP and encourage collaboration
and adoption
Checks and Balances
Trust and Respect
Compelling reasons for participating in the
organization
Bottoms Up Enable participation and meritocracy
6Structure Governance - Overview
Regional Organizations Structure - TBD
Steering Committees (Event Steering Committee
Technical Steering Committee
Board of Directors Chair (1), Foundation (12),
At-large (3)
- Advisory Council
- Regional strategic advice
Nominating Committee Leadership nomination
processes
Chair
Community Vice Chair
Technical Vice Chair
Marketing Vice Chair
Events
AR/PR
Programs
Operations GGF Staff Global Inventures
Membership / Sponsorship
Document tools and processes
Web site
Event Mktg. Ops
Management tools processes
Finance, HR, Legal
Representatives from across the various
organizational functions as appropriate
7Structure Governance - Detail
8Structure Governance - Detail
9Structure Governance - Detail
10Structure Governance - Detail
11Structure Governance - Detail
12Membership Principles
Design objective maximize organizational funding
and individual participation
Compelling reasons for participating in the
organization
Compelling tiered entitlements for funding the
organization
Influence on directions and priorities
Recognition as a leader driving grid
adoption
Insight on grid standards best practices
13Membership Types Tiers
- Two types of members
- Organizational Sponsors
- For organizational members, their will be 3 tiers
with increasing level of entitlements - Elected BoD members will pay an adder for
accepting BoD seat - Individual contributors
- For individual members their will be a tier for
individuals whose organizations are not members
and special consideration for students - All members will sign an agreement that includes
an IP policy - Further design of member entitlements and fees
will be completed after the signing and
announcement of the LOI
14Membership - Transition
(during the merger transition before the new
organization is legally established)
- Members from both organizations should continue
to participate in their original organizations - Membership fees paid to one or both organizations
will be applied to new memberships level chosen
on a pro-rated basis once the new organization is
established - During the transition phase the activities of the
two organizations will be increasingly brought
together
15Intellectual Property
- The new organization will develop an IP policy
that protects member IP and encourages
collaboration and adoption of standards - During transition,
- Activities that remain separate will operate
under each organizations existing IP policy - EGA and GGF members are encouraged to participate
in each organizations group activities but must
adhere to the existing IP policy of the group
they are participating in. - Any new joint technical activities between the
two organizations will operate under the GGF IP
policies until the new organization IP policy is
established
16Timeline
- Phase I. Merger Intent
- Framework development (PP presentation, document,
LOI) - Stakeholder validation and refinement
- LOI signed by both organizations
- Press/PR/Community Announcement of intent to
merge (1) - Phase 2. Merger Transition
- Develop merger plan including appropriate
documents, processes and procedures for
integration - Separate organizations but synergistic operation
- Phase 3. Merger Integration
- New organization legally structurally
established for integrated operation. (BoD and
leadership in place Bylaws, Member Agreement,
New IP Policy) - Integration of the new organization is complete
and all core processes operational
(1) TBD Date of Intent to Merge Announcement
17Phase 1 Merger Intent Detailed Schedule
Joint merger teams meet to review slide deck,
paper, and develop draft LoI
EGA BoD and GGF GFSG Review Paper And draft
LoI Form detailed feedback
Team releases Final LoI and proposal Paper
to Respective leadership
Release Paper and Draft LoI To respective leadersh
ip
Representatives Of both parties Meet
to Resolve Differences, Agree to final points
Both parties Have from 1/23 to 1/31/06 To review
and approve LoI and vote to merge
Team Prepares Final LoI and proposal paper
9 10 11 13 16-17-18 20 22
23 30 31
EGA BoD To review And approve LoI And vote to
merge
Regular EGA BoD meeting
18Key Milestones
- Phase 1 Merger Intent (11/05 2/06)
- Signed letter-of-intent (LOI)
- Announcement of intent to merge
- Merger implementation team established
- Merger transition guidelines communicated and
reviewed with organizational sponsors
19Key Milestones
- Phase 2 Merger Transition (2/06 6/06)
- Merger implementation plan is completed and
approved including new organization - Bylaws
- IP Policy
- Membership Agreement and Entitlements
- Area / Group transition plan
- Leadership transition plan (BoD, Officers,
Leaders)
20Key Milestones
- Phase 3 Merger Integration (6/06 9/06)
- New organization is a legal entity and activities
commence in the new organizational structure - Initial BoD and officers are appointed with
staggered tenure ( 50 1 year 50 - 2 year
terms) - Initial Vice Chairs and Area Directors are
appointed with staggered tenure (Note using
existing GGF cycle) - Vice Chairs and Area Directors are chosen from
existing leadership of GGF and EGA - EGA and GGF members have transitioned to new
organization membership agreements - New Web site is in place with logos, branding,
content, etc. - Core processes, procedures and policies are in
place and operational
21- The following slides are the notes from the GFSG
discussion regarding issues with the current
framework
22Issues
- BoD
- What is the TSC and name of the technical
function? - What is the name of the NEWORG
- Business case
- What is the voting procedure
- GFSG votes and board approves
- 2/3 of those voting
- What do we say to the community and when
- GFAC discussion (Friday, 20th)
- GFSG vote (Tuesday, 24th)
- GFSG final vote (Friday, 27th)
23BoD
- The GGF believes that the board should not have a
proactive approval but an exception veto on the
publication of documents. A document can be
published even with board veto, but it must be
marked. Veto is only by super majority - Want 2/3 1/3 instead of ¾ - ¼ on board
composition of foundation member versus at-large - Commitment level to retain vote
- Vice chairs should attend BoD meetings but no
vote - Nominations for at-large member through the
NOMCOM process. - Mechanism where collected membership can interact
with BoD
24TSC
- Vice Chair of Standards Technology (Standards
needs to be in the name) - Technical Strategy Committee to own the ongoing
Standards Roadmap development process and develop
the technical strategy and direction for the
organization - Participation from across the councils (Vice
Chair of ST, 3 appointed by VC, 3 appointed by
board) - Councils (Community, Standards, Marketing,
Operations) have formalized decision making
process. (i.e. vote within council)
25Organization name
- Business Case for name change or name
continuation (cost, brand) - Execute appropriate alternatives
- Keep the monogram, change the logo and meaning of
the letters - Change the monogram, keep the logo
- Change the monogram, change the logo