Current Events In ActivityBased Modeling - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Current Events In ActivityBased Modeling

Description:

Current Events In. Activity-Based Modeling. Ken Cervenka, P.E., AICP ... Current Agency Activities (Cont.) Models Under Development By Universities ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:69
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: chad198
Learn more at: https://www.ampo.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Current Events In ActivityBased Modeling


1
Current Events InActivity-Based Modeling
  • Ken Cervenka, P.E., AICP
  • North Central Texas Council Of Governments
  • For
  • AMPO Travel Modeling Work Group Meeting
  • Houston, Texas
  • March 20, 2006

2
Agenda
  • Current Agency Activities
  • Responses From Focus Groups
  • TRB Innovations In Modeling Conference
  • Strategies For Advancing The Model Profession

3
Current Agency Activities
  • Models In Place And In Operation
  • SFCTA (San Francisco County)
  • NYMTC (New York MPO)
  • MORPC (Columbus, Ohio MPO)
  • Models Under Development By Consultants
  • DRCOG (Denver MPO)
  • SACOG (Sacramento MPO)

4
Current Agency Activities (Cont.)
  • Models Under Development By Universities
  • FAMOS (Tampa Area Testing)
  • CEMDAP (Dallas-Fort Worth Area Testing)
  • Others
  • ARC (Atlanta MPO)
  • MTC (San Francisco/Oakland MPO)
  • TRANSIMS (Portland Case Study)

5
MPO CoalitionActivity Model Listserv
  • Mission Statement
  • MPO Coalition for the Examination and
    Advancement
  • of Activity-Based Models for Use in
    Transportation
  • Planning Applications
  • 27 MPOs (97 Million People) Are Represented
  • 34 Of Total U.S. Population (Census 2000)
  • 46 Of All MPO Population

6
(No Transcript)
7
Academic/Consultant E-MailFocus Group--Question 1
  • Do YOU think activity-based models (ABMs)
  • are the appropriate "wave of the future" for a
  • significant near-term (within five years)
  • advancement of the U.S. travel model practice?
  • 38 Responses

8
Focus Group--Question 2
  • Assume 2 million a year for the next five years
  • (10 million) of unexpected monies were made
  • available for advancing/improving land
  • use/travel demand modeling tools. How would
  • YOU suggest this money be spent?
  • 27 Responses

9
Focus Group--Question 3
  • What do YOU consider the right path for
  • MPOs to take, when it comes to implementation
  • of land use/demographic forecasting tools?
  • 17 Responses

10
Focus Group--Question 4
  • What should be the role of the federal
  • government (especially U.S. DOT) in
  • advancing the travel modeling profession?
  • 5 Responses

11
Focus Group--Question 5
  • How should one go about testing an existing
  • activity-based model, to determine its readiness
  • for real-world model applications use?
  • 4 Responses

12
Focus Group--Question 6
  • What are the questions we should expect
  • robust land use and transportation models to
  • help us resolve?

13
TRB Innovations In TravelDemand Modeling
Conference
  • 130 p.m. Sunday, May 21, 2006
  • To
  • 230 p.m. Tuesday, May 23, 2006
  • Austin, Texas (Hyatt Regency)

14
Preliminary Agenda
  • Sunday Workshops (130 to 500 p.m.)
  • Innovations In Practice
  • FTA Findings For Meaningful Forecasts
  • Data And Survey Issues

15
Preliminary Agenda
  • Monday Morning Plenary Sessions
  • Overview Of The Policy Issues
  • Moving Innovative Models Into Practice

16
Preliminary Agenda
  • Monday Afternoon Concurrent Sessions 1
  • Tour Based Models
  • Data And Synthetic Populations
  • Land Use Forecasting
  • Monday Afternoon Concurrent Sessions 2
  • Activity Based Models
  • Survey Methods
  • Assignment Advances

17
Preliminary Agenda
  • Tuesday Morning Concurrent Sessions 3
  • Education And Outreach
  • Emerging Modeling Considerations
  • Validation
  • Tuesday Morning Concurrent Sessions 4
  • Transitioning To A New Model Framework
  • Data And Future Travel Behavior

18
Tuesday Afternoon Closing PlenaryNext Steps
Institutional Issues
  • Round Table Discussion By Eight MPO Model
  • Practitioners
  • Larry Blain (Seattle) Salvador Gonzalez (El
    Paso)
  • Ron Milone (Washington, D.C.) Chuck Purvis
    (San Francisco)
  • Chris van Slyke (Houston) Aichong Sun
    (Tucson)
  • Dick Walker (Portland) and Kemit Wies
    (Chicago)

19
Strategies For Consideration (1)
  • We Need A Very Clear Picture Of Who Is Doing
  • What
  • The TRB Innovations In Modeling Conference
    Will
  • Set The Stage For Good Documentation
  • Both Successes And Failures Are Important
  • Rigorous Assessment Of Modeling Tools
  • Not Just Activity Models Should Be Tested
  • Both Implemented And Estimated Models
  • Guidelines For Dynamic Validation Tests

20
Strategies For Consideration (2)
  • More Basic Research To Better Understand
  • (And Calculate) Behavioral Responses
  • Some Original Explorations Still Needed
  • Some Directed Efforts May Also Be Needed
  • Applied Research Leading To Implementations
  • Individual Or Pooled Funding Efforts?
  • Rigorous Review Of All New Implementations
  • A Need For An Active, Up-to-Date Knowledge
    Base
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com