HEALTH POLICY AND POLITICS IN THE U.S.

1 / 29
About This Presentation
Title:

HEALTH POLICY AND POLITICS IN THE U.S.

Description:

Current Events. Redistribution and Social Justice. Medicare and Medicaid. Readings. Current Events. Short! Role of Government: Redistribution. Charitable (Welfare) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:49
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 30
Provided by: LHL

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: HEALTH POLICY AND POLITICS IN THE U.S.


1
HEALTH POLICY AND POLITICS IN THE U.S.
  • Medicare and Medicaid
  • Redistribution and Social Justice
  • Week 8
  • October 9, 2003

2
Outline
  • Current Events
  • Redistribution and Social Justice
  • Medicare and Medicaid
  • Readings

3
Current Events
  • Short!

4
Role of Government Redistribution
  • Charitable (Welfare)
  • Benefit from charity
  • Government provision reduces free rider problem
  • Who supports? Poor?
  • Why not provide cash support for poor?
  • Welfare aids poor and other providers

5
Role of Government Charity
  • Conditions of Charity
  • Cant benefit poor more than near poor
  • Industry that provides services demands this
    legislation.
  • Charity reflects the charitable desires of the
    middle-income and upper-income groups and the
    economic interests of the supplier of those
    services.
  • Also, beneficiaries usually deserving

6
Role of Government Redistribution
  • Universal
  • Different motivation for redistribution
  • Expanding eligibility increases costs
  • Must include beneficiary group to share benefit.
  • Median voter is typically middle class forms
    coalition with rich or poor.
  • Nature of visibility of tax aimed at rich versus
    poor.

7
Charitable Redistribution Example
  • Food Subsidies
  • 1946 National School Lunch Act
  • 1954 School Milk
  • 1965 Breakfast
  • Origin House Agriculture Committee
  • Benefit farmers, difficult to see costs
  • Justification to find markets and stabilize
    markets

8
Charitable Redistribution Example
  • Housing for the Poor
  • 1937 Wagner-Steagall Act
  • Create jobs and help the new poor
  • How to deal with problems of new housing
    depressing the market for existing housing
  • Post WWII Housing for poor relegated to inner
    cities, members changed to poor and political
    support ended
  •  

9
Charitable Redistribution Example
  • AFDC
  • Cash versus in kind services
  • Initial goal to support former middle class
    whites. Black constituency had less political
    support and program faltered. Index for inflation
  • Powerful producer groups stopped Nixon and Carter
    from changing welfare to cash system.
  • Opposition from the welfare bureaucracy

10
Universal Redistribution Examples
  • Higher Education
  • Medical Education
  • Farm Policy
  • Social Security

11
Universal Redistribution
  • Medical Education
  • Subsidy accrues to middle and upper income
    students.
  • Students become part of top quartile of income
    distribution
  • Charitable justification
  • Why not provide to low income students?

12
Medicare
  • Interest groups
  • Unions
  • Aged
  • American Medical Association
  • Other Providers

13
Medicare
  • Impacts
  • Aged utilization, life expectancy but not all
    benefited equally
  • Providers Substantial benefit
  • Working non-aged- paid directly via Social
    security and income taxes, also paid with higher
    prices. Not equitable distribution
  • Medically Indigent Price/premium increases

14
Medicaid
  • Interest groups
  • Unions
  • Aged
  • American Medical Association
  • Other Providers

15
Redistribution Readings
  • Daniels
  • Fair chances/Best Outcomes
  • Do we favor best outcomes?
  • Priorities
  • Sick/disabled versus less ill
  • Aggregation Problem
  • Small benefits to many vs. large benefit to few
  • Democracy Problem
  • Who makes the outcome decisions?

16
Redistribution Gruber and Levitt
  • Should be use tax credits to expand health
    insurance coverage?
  • Microsimulation of five policies
  • Refundable tax credit for nongroup insurance
  • Nonrefundable credit for nongroup insurance
  • Deduction for nongroup insurance expenditures
  • Refundable credit for nongroup insurance
    restricted
  • Refundable credit for any insurance expenditure

17
Redistribution Gruber and Levitt
  • Behavioral Consequences in Model
  • Those uninsured who would purchase insurance if
    it were subsidized
  • Those now holding nongroup insurance who would
    take up the subsidy
  • Firms who would drop/reduce group coverage if
    nongroup were subsidized
  • Those with group switching to nongroup insurance
  • Those dropping group insurance if employers
    raised contributions

18
Redistribution Gruber and Levitt
  • Base policy
  • 13.3B or 3,300/person in 1999 dollars
  • 18.4M would take up subsidy
  • 4.7 M previously uninsured
  • 8.6 M previously covered by nongroup insurance
  • 4.7 M previously covered by group insurance
  • 0.4 M previously covered by Medicaid

19
Redistribution Gruber and Levitt
  • Base policy Net effect
  • Net 4.0 M decline in previously uninsured
  • Net 9.8 M increase in nongroup insurance
  • Net 5.4 M decline in those with group insurance
  • 1.1 M in firms stopped offering group insurance
    and moved to nongroup
  • 0.1 M in firms stopped offering group and became
    uninsured
  • 3.6 M switched from group to nongroup insurance
  • 0.6 M uninsured because of premium increases

20
Redistribution Gruber and Levitt
  • 1 Base policy 3,300 per newly insured
  • More than cost of insurance
  • 2 Credit 3,827 per newly insured
  • Only 2 M previously uninsured
  • 3 Tax Deduct Total costs 0.8 M
  • 0.25 M previously uninsured
  • 4Limit Credit Total cost 6.2 B, 2,930 Per
  • 2.1 M previously uninsured
  • 5 Expand sub. Total cost 62.2 B, 5,000 Per
  • 12.4 M previously uninsured

21
Stuart Shea
  • Framing the debate Medicare Drug Benefits
  • Who has benefits?
  • How stable are those benefits?
  • What is the pattern of switching among benefit
    plans?
  • More dont have coverage for part of year than
    snapshot examination indicates

22
Stuart Shea
  • Fewer than half of Mediare have coverage for full
    two years
  • 50.6(30.5) had (no) coverage for year
  • 41.5(23.4) had (no) coverage two years
  • Demographics have small role
  • Gaps in coverage but stable
  • Implication need for Medicare Plan

23
Poisal Murray
  • Comparison of Medicare enrollees with and without
    Drug Coverage
  • 1997/1998 similar coverage
  • Utilization/spending pattern predictable
  • Gap widening 1997 to 1998
  • Gap bigger by health status, chronic conditions
    and poverty status

24
Frank
  • What is pattern of drug pricing and how does it
    vary by payer type?
  • Historical observation of price differences
  • Difficult to find true price (rebates)
  • Pattern observed with VA paying least

25
Frank
  • Price differences not caused by production/
    distribution costs Price discrimination
  • Market Power
  • Market Segmented
  • Arbitrage Potential

26
Frank
  • Economics of Prescription Drug Pricing
  • Impacts of growth of HMOs,
  • Impacts of development of PBMs
  • Impacts of use of formulary

27
Frank
  • Economics of Prescription Drug Pricing
  • What is the role of regulation and market
    structure?
  • PDMA in 1987
  • Distribution system chargebacks, rebates and
    discounts

28
Schoenman et al
  • Effect of BBA on physician decisions and access
    to care
  • Shift in relative payment from surgical
    procedures to E and M or surgeons to
    nonproceduralists
  • Level of awareness
  • Seriousness of access

29
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)