Choice of thirdperson pronouns in discourse - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 9
About This Presentation
Title:

Choice of thirdperson pronouns in discourse

Description:

memory and attention states (Gundel et al. 1993) activation in ... 2) actant vs. possessive, singular vs. plural, nominative vs non-nominative (wrt distance) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:129
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 10
Provided by: Olga183
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Choice of thirdperson pronouns in discourse


1
Choice of third-person pronouns in discourse
  • Olga Krasavina
  • Moscow State University / Humboldt University of
    Berlin
  • krasavio_at_rz.hu-berlin.de

2
Introduction Factors of referential choice
  • Salience
  • familiarity (Prince 1981)
  • accessibility (Ariel 1990)
  • memory and attention states (Gundel et al. 1993)
  • activation in consciousness (Chafe 1994)
  • ...

3
Introduction Factors of referential choice
  • Salience
  • familiarity (Prince 1981)
  • accessibility (Ariel 1990)
  • memory and attention states (Gundel et al. 1993)
  • activation in consciousness (Chafe 1994)
  • ...
  • Impact of salience-based factors
  • grammatical role
  • distance
  • animacy
  • thematic importance

4
Subject and method
  • Referential expressions
  • pronouns vs. other forms
  • factors of referential choice?
  • differences in use between types of pronouns
  • Act vs. Poss
  • Sg vs Pl
  • Nom vs Non-Nom
  • is salience enough ? is one-factor-model
    sufficient?
  • Corpora annotated for coreference
  • PCC (default), Stede 2004
  • NEGRA (annotated animacy), Skut et al. 1997
  • RST Discourse Treebank (for comparison purposes),
    Carlson et al. 2003
  • Quantitative and qualitative analysis
  • Automatic pre- and post-processing

5
Set-up
  • antecedent (ante) properties
  • subjectivity
  • lexical form / lexical complexity
  • beginning or end of the clause
  • referent properties
  • protagonism
  • (local) topicality
  • (absolute) centrality
  • animacy/agentivity
  • antecedent-anaphor properties
  • parallelism
  • linear hiarachical distance
  • discourse features
  • topical persistence

6
Results
  • antecedent (ante) properties
  • subjectivity reduced forms compensates
    distance
  • lexical form ? no significant impact
  • lexical complexity ? compensates distance
  • beginning or end of the clause ?
    language-specific impact
  • referent properties
  • protagonism reduced forms compensates
    distance
  • (local) topicality reduced forms (vs.
    demonstrative pronouns) compensates distance
  • (absolute) centrality reduced forms no
    compensation
  • animacy/agentivity reduced forms distance
  • antecedent-anaphor properties
  • parallelism pronoun-SB ante-SB
  • defNP-DO ante-DO
  • linear hiarachical distance local and global
    structure
  • discourse features
  • topical persistence
  • pronouns are least dependent on
  • compensates growth of distance

7
Consequences
  • General
  • One factor is not enough
  • Rhetorical (hierarchical) recency linear
    recency
  • Recency criterion clause-position, animacy,
    topicality
  • Parallelism subject preference
  • Actant vs possessive pronouns
  • Language-specific
  • German
  • 1) pronoun end position of ante in a clause
  • 2) actant vs possessive pronouns (wrt distance)
  • English
  • 1) pronoun beginning of the clause if long
    distance
  • pronoun end of the clause if short distance
  • 2) actant vs. possessive, singular vs. plural,
    nominative vs non-nominative (wrt distance)

8
  • 1 For insurance agent Toni Johnsont, dealing
    with the earthquake has been more than just a
    work experience.
  • (2) Shet lives in Oakland, a community hit hard
    by the earthquake.
  • (3) The apartment Tonyt shares with hert
    sisters was rattled
  • (4) but nothing was severely damaged.
  • (5) Hert sister Cynthia said, Tonit should
    have a different job.
  • (6) "We worry about hert out there," shet
    added.
  • (Source RST Discourse Treebank)

9
  • 1 For insurance agent Toni Johnsont, dealing
    with the earthquake has been more than just a
    work experience.
  • (2) Shet lives in Oakland, a community hit hard
    by the earthquake.
  • (3) The apartment Tonyt shares with hert
    sisters was rattled
  • (3) The apartment her sisters shares with
    hert was rattled,
  • (4) but nothing was severely damaged.
  • (5) Hert sister Cynthias said, Tonit
    should have a different job.
  • (6) "We worry about hert out there," shet
    added.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com