ITAIDE Food Living Lab

1
ITAIDE Food Living Lab
Summary of Food LL meetings Detailed plan
2007 Food LL Workspace www.itaide.org/default.asp
?P432objp2171
2

• 6 July 2007
• Dear all,
• This document has the following purposes
• Summarize the discussions prior to and during the
  Food LL kick-off
• Provide the most up-to-date detailed plan for
  2007
• It includes to do lists expectations for the
  RD group as well as ARLA and SKAT
• I will approach you for a run-through asap,
  latest Friday 13 July 2007.
• Your feedback is most essential and welcome!!
• Many thanks and best regards,
• Eveline van Stijn
• Food LL coordinator

3
Content of this presentation

• Expressed visions the Food LL towards 2010
• What do we need to do in 2007? (1,2)
• RD group to do and expectations (1-4)
• Harmonized Action Research Approach
• RD group comprehensive capturing
• SKAT and ARLA to do and expectations
• Current planning (1, proposal)
• To conclude Food LL mission

4
Expressed visions the Food LL towards 2010

• The UN and WCO/ WTO want global harmonization
• The EU wants paperless and streamlined procedures
  for secure and competitive trade by implementing
  Authorized Economic Operator and Single Window
• ITAIDE wants to provide Wake-up calls and as much
  realization of Science-fictioning by piloting
  redesigned procedures with advanced ICT combined
  with recommendations for further adoption
• SKAT wants what the Belastingdienst has
  summarized in 4 slides 2 new slides of their
  own with improvements
• ARLA wants an AEO and ICT solutions that is local
  EU global to get streamlined gov exchanges and
  real business advantages
• ... and your Food LL coordinator likes a Creative
  Cuisine!

5
Repeat The Belastingdiensts slides

• WAKE-UP CALL to the EU DG Taxud active in
  reviewing and in the Advisory Board. Besides
  DG Taxud we found that DG Sanco, DG Agri and DG
  Tren need to be informed and contacted. DG
  Enterprise recent statement on 25
  administrative burden reduction. Inventorizating
  is done rule by rule We will give advise to look
  at the combination of regulations. We will
  adopt/evaluate the ISCM (International Standard
  Cost Method) that is used by the EU.
  modernising the audit concept in control and
  statistical sampling minimizing formalities
  mandate to skip them opening laws for the
  AEO-concept introduce in ALL laws the
  facilitation mechanism like the customs
  simplified procedures and different types of
  bonded warehouses, depending on the level of
  control. setting-up a process for judging new
  legislation on the necessity of the
  administrative burden. New Responsibility of DG
  Enterprise?
• PROVEN IN CONTROL Integrated and fulfill-able
  government requirements and optimal facilitation
  based on trustable control mechanisms
  Convenanten with Big Companies, Horizontal
  audit (cases SRA, Newspaper delivering
  companies, Taxi-project IVW, compliant, software
  developer - OESO document) Example of the
  Heineken case export declaration and coming
  ECS/AES. Pre-departure information not
  necessary for selection for physical check.
• COMBINE or DELETE information flows/processes
  Different regulations need the proof/enough
  evidence that the goods physically left the EU
  The Export declaration in the existing Export
  system and coming ECS (later on combined in AES)
  should be covering all the requirements in those
  regulations. Direct advice is given to delete
  from the functional specification of EMCS (Excise
  Movement Control System) the declaration of the
  export of excise goods.
• Standard core components Audit look-up in
  EPCIS only possible/acceptable with standard
  audit view presentation. That will need the use
  of or translation to core components.
• IT-Audit QUALITY ASPECTS Guarantees of the
  technology concept Students investigated the
  requirements. Besides specific data
  requirements in special regulations, a company is
  obliged to, but free in organizing and keeping
  his books and records. The electronic
  registration should be kept 7 years (may slightly
  differ in other countries). For the entire
  retention period it should be possible to examine
  and therefore produce the data within a
  reasonable period of time. Who is responsible
  for the data of the service provider (e.g.
  Safmarine and the EPCIS system)?
• Fred van Ipenburg Jan Felix, Dutch Tax
  Customs Administration

6
What do we need to do in 2007? (1)
Creative Cuisine Structure and flexibility Scienti
fic and practical
M2 redesign
To Be analysis
M1 problem definition
As is analysis
Context analysis
X past, present, future
Pilot scoping
M3 Scope 2008-2010
Milestones X continuous, embedded As is W 34 ?
M1 W 36 To be W 37 ? M2 W 42 Scoping W 44 ?
M3 W 46 Consolidate W 47 ? M4, 5 W 50
Consolidation
M4 Final deliverables/ decisions M5 Plan 2008
7
What we need to do in 2007? (2)

• To get started
• Share insights and materials
• also in the ITAIDE workspace
• www.itaide.org/default.asp?P432objP2171
• Step 1 Logon at www.itaide.org
• Likely Step 1b click forgot password!
• Step 2 www.itaide.org/default.asp?P432objP2171
  
• Step 3 Upload and participate on the forum
• New functionality add your skype name in your
  contact information and be visible ?

8
RD group To do and expectations (1)

• See Description of Work Planning 18-30
• WP leaders are and remain responsible for
  coordinated organization of their RD activities
  in the Food LL.
• WPs run their 2007 research work centered around
  week 34, 38, 43, and 47
• All WPs are present/ represented during the
  weeks this can include being on phone stand-by

9
RD group to do and expectations (2)

• Problem statements to recap bottom-up
• 3 April 2007, pre kick-off meeting Copenhagen
• 31 May 2007, eco-system meeting Copenhagen
• 27 June 2007, kick-off meeting Helsingør
• 29 June 2007, Barriers/Drivers Workshop Helsingør
• Problems identified in the Beer LL and Food LL
• Inspired by reflection on the current trends
  desires for change.
• Proposal cataloguing and auctioning RD / eco

10
RD group to do and expectations (3)

• Compare with Beer and Paper LL
• Complement and contribute to earlier efforts and
  current state-of-the-art
• Include relevant eco-system partners
• e.g. Mærsk, DFFE, Standardization bodies, SKAT
  ministry
• Settle UMM methodology format integration of
  WPs
• Semi-structure interviews
• Prepare questionnaire incl. value assessment
• Harmonized Action Research Approach
• ? Use week 34 as (non) evidence finding rather
  than only re-discovering the same broken wheels.

11
RD group to do and expectations (4)

• Telecons
• Extra
• Thursday, 26 July 15-17 CET
• ? 3-5 page state-of-art per WP by 19 July
• Thursday, 9 August 15-17 CET
• ? Updates finalize preparations
• Otherwise
• every 1st Thursday of the month, 15-17 CET

12
Harmonized Action Research Approach (HARA)
Structure and flexibility Scientific and practical
Comprehensive capturing of the processes and
results of action reflection in the Food LL/
ITAIDE and share the findings within and beyond
the Food LL/ ITAIDE borders.
Share
Share
Reflect
Share
Share
Act
Act
Share
Share
Act
Share
How do we Combine and Complement?
Reflect
Act
Act
Reflect
Reflect
Realize opportunities Innovation Adoption
Act
Share
Share
Share
Reflect
Share
References 1) Per Mårtensson Allen Lee
(2004) Dialogical Action Research at Omega
Corporation MIS Quarterly Vol. 28, No. 3, pp.
507-563 2) Tyrone S. Pitsis, Stewart R. Clegg,
Marton Marosszeky, Thekla Rura-Polley (2003)
Constructing the Olympic Dream A Future Perfect
Strategy of Project Management Organization
Science, Vol. 14, No. 5, pp. 574590 3)
www.isworld.org
13
RD group comprehensive capturing

• Minimum log of meetings
• Time, participants, key topics, decisions/to do
• INTERVIEWS by ITAIDE partners
• Tape-recordings are made
• Recordings are available for participants and
  shared by the RD organizer(s) in agreement with
  them
• ITAIDE general Food LL MEETINGS
• Switch to video-recordings
• ? Find appropriate way to share recordings (now
  available upon request)
• ? Further methodological briefing during telecons
  research workshop 20 August

14
...A reflective moment...
Conduct of Work
This is my drawing of the CoW. What I can tell
you about the CoW is The CoW wants to Grow.The
CoW needs Food. The CoW wants Friends. The CoW is
more than just Cs. The CoW likes to Learn. The
CoW is in favor of Eco- treatment. The CoW is
afraid of Carnivores. The CoW is seriously over
the top AND because I care for the CoW, the CoW
is happy to give milk to me...!!
15
SKAT and ARLA To do and expectations

• Contact identified people before 13 July
• Co-organize the ITAIDE tour to Fredericia, Århus
  Viby from 22 August Friday 24 August
• Including invitations to people you want/ need
  us to talk to
• Please keep sharing your ITAIDE ambitions with
  colleagues so they can tell their brilliant
  ideas and opinions
• and participate in the Food LL workspace
• www.itaide.org/default.asp?P432objp2171

16
Current Planning (1) Week 34 As is/ Wake-up call

• Monday 20 Aug Research workshop (org. WP 5.3)
• Key participants RD team
• Purpose RD harmonization
• Tuesday 21 Aug UMM workshop 1 (org. WP 1)
• Key participants IS standardization experts
  users
• Purpose Current processes/ data (Denmark-global)
• Wednesday 22 Aug Tour (org. ARLA, SKAT)
• to Friday 24 Aug
• Key participants RD team and locals
• Purpose understanding SKAT ARLA people _at_ work
• ? Problem cataloguing auctioning for the to be
  analysis

17
Current Planning (3) Week 38 To be/ SF-ing

• Monday 17 Sept Tech showcases (org. tech prov)
• Purpose understand state-of-the-art technology
  options
• Tuesday 18 Sept UMM workshop 2 (org. WP 1 3)
• Purpose understand ideal redesign ICT options
• Wednesday 19 Sept Future workshop 1 (org.
  SKAT/ARLA)
• Purpose wishes demands with SKAT ARLA taking
  the lead
• Thursday 20 Sept Future Syntegrity 2 (org. WP 4)
• Purpose wishes demands with WP 4 RDers taking
  the lead
• Friday 21 Sept Wrap-up day (org. WP 5.3)
• Purpose common understanding of the Food LL
  ambition
• ? The world of possibilities is 8 infinite!

18
Current planning (3)

• Week 43 22 October 26 October
• Purpose Decisions on the pilot scoping
• Week 47 19 November 23 November
• Purpose
• Consolidation Problem Analysis plans for 2008
• Location will be Geneva (Switzerland) around the
  IST event and ITAIDE progress meeting
• Please remind each other to block in your
  agendas!!

19
To conclude (1) summary

• www.itaide.org/default.asp?P432objP2171
• Forum for sharing insights
• Problem cataloguing and auctioning
• Provide your skype name
• State-of-the-art per WP due by 19 July
• Telecon Thursday, 26 July 15-17 CET
• Telecon Thursday, 9 August 15-17 CET
• Telecons further 1st Thursday each month, 15-17
  CET
• As is W 34 ? M1 W 36
• To be W 37 ? M2 W 42
• Scoping W 44 ? M3 W 46
• Consolidate W 47 ? M4, 5 W 50
• Your continuous FEEDBACK ENTHUSIASM is MUCH
  APPRECIATED!!

20
To conclude (2) the Food LL mission

• To be a
• Creative Cuisine

e
Customs
21
For info, questions, and comments
www.itaide.org/default.asp?P432objp2171 (logon
required)
Dr. Ir. Eveline van Stijn Food LL
coordinator Email evs.caict_at_cbs.dk Skype
evelinevanstijn Tel. [phone] Center of
Applied ICT Copenhagen Business School Howitzvej
60, 1. Sal 2000 Frederiksberg Denmark