Title: THE SOURCES OF KNOWLEDGE
1THE SOURCES OF KNOWLEDGE
Three Main Questions
- 1. What are the sources of knowledge?
- 2. What is the nature of knowledge?
- 3. Is our knowledge valid?
2THE SOURCES OF KNOWLEDGE
Tradition and Common Sense
- 1. Idols of the mind
- a. the idols of the tribe
- b. the idols of the cave
- c. the idols of the marketplace
- d. the idols of the theater
3THE SOURCES OF KNOWLEDGE
Obstacles To Clear Thinking
- 2. Prejudice
- 3. Propaganda
- 4. Authoritarianism
4THE SOURCES OF KNOWLEDGE
Obstacles To Clear Thinking
- 5. Fallacies in thinking
- 1. Begging the question - one of the premises is
in the conclusion, usually in disguise - 2. Ad hominem (to the man) fallacy - move from
an issue to a personality in the middle of an
argument
5THE SOURCES OF KNOWLEDGE
Obstacles To Clear Thinking
- 3. Other informal fallacies
- Use of threat False cause
- Appeal to ignorance Appeal to the mob
- Hasty conclusion Guilt by
association - Slippery slope Straw man
6THE SOURCES OF KNOWLEDGE
Obstacles To Clear Thinking
- 6. Closed minds
- Can block advances in knowledge
- Can block various relationships
7THE SOURCES OF KNOWLEDGE
The Possible Sources Of Knowledge
- 1. Authority
- Can be helpful or dangerous
- Helpful when it can be questioned and trusted
- Dangerous when not examined and weighed in the
balance - 2. Empiricism - our senses are the source of our
knowledge
8THE SOURCES OF KNOWLEDGE
The Possible Sources Of Knowledge
- Problems with empiricism -
- Our experiences do not account for all of our
knowledge - Our senses are not always trustworthy -
- Vision
- Sound
- Smell and taste
- Mental experience
9THE SOURCES OF KNOWLEDGE
The Possible Sources Of Knowledge
- 3. Rationalism - reason is the center of our
knowledge - Mild rationalism - we can know with more than
senses - Strict rationalism - absolute truths solely
without senses
10THE SOURCES OF KNOWLEDGE
The Possible Sources Of Knowledge
- 4. Intuition -
- Intuition can be harmful in isolation
11THE SOURCES OF KNOWLEDGE
SUMMARY ON THE SOURCES OF KNOWLEDGE
- Sources of knowledge work together - worth more
together than as individual approaches - Different situations call for different forms of
knowledge - We need to adapt
12THE NATURE AND TESTSOF KNOWLEDGE
- Does what we know exist only in our minds?
- Can we gain knowledge from a real world outside
of us?
13THE NATURE AND TESTS OF KNOWLEDGE
- Subjectivism says what we sense is not real
- unless we are conscious of it.
- Subjectivism then says there is no reality
- outside of individual experience. But there is
- still a difference between primary and
- secondary qualities.
14THE NATURE AND TESTS OF KNOWLEDGE
- What if I am all there is to reality?
- Or you are all there is?
- Everything else is a figment of your or my
- imagination.
- Solipsism subjectivism at its most extreme.
- Not a serious position.
- Related to this is the egocentric predicament
if - everything comes from my own mind and
- experiences, then everything is an object we are
- always the subject.
15THE NATURE AND TESTS OF KNOWLEDGE
- Positives on subjectivism direct knowledge is
- comforting. We also do not have to continually
- justify what we know.
- Negatives -
- 1. almost always ends in solipsism
- 2. cannot explain how any belief can be wrong
- 3. experience in itself is an inadequate basis
for - Knowledge
16THE NATURE AND TESTS OF KNOWLEDGE - OBJECTIVISM
- I can have independent knowledge of an
- outside world.
- Reality exists apart from what I know.
- Arguments for objectivism
- 1. Subjectivism engages in non sequitur
- drawing a false conclusion from a true
- proposition
17THE NATURE AND TESTS OF KNOWLEDGE
- 2. Subjectivism wrongly uses idea both for
- the concept held by the knower AND the
- object known
- 3. Objectivism explains the world around us,
- the beyond
- 4. Objectivism accounts for causal
- Interactions
18THE NATURE OF KNOWLEDGE SUMMARIZED
- 1. Difference between knowing something
- directly and knowing about it.
- 2. Difference between knowing facts about
- something (knowing that) and knowing how
- to do something.
19SKEPTICISM AND THE TESTSOF KNOWLEDGE
- One form of skepticism says truth cannot be
- known or found. But to deny all knowledge is
- a statement that refutes itself.
- Skepticism is also the idea that we should
- question and examine statements to make sure
- they are true. This is helpful.
20THREE TESTS OF TRUTH
- The correspondence theory Most favored
- by realists. Something is true because it agrees
with - fact. Belief or disbelief do not change truth.
- 2. The coherence theory Favored by
idealism.Truth - is found in the consistency of judgments, which
are - true if they are consistent with other judgments
we - accept as true.
21THREE TESTS OF TRUTH
- 3. The pragmatic theory Truth is not simply
- correspondence between an idea and the focus
- of the idea, and coherence is overly rational.
- Something is true if it works.
- Something is true if it satisfies our desires
- Something is true if it can be experienced
- Something is true if it helps us in our
- physical struggle to live
22THE NATURE AND TESTS OF KNOWLEDGE - CONCLUSIONS
- Once again, a middle way is best.
- Where does truth lie? Beyond experience and
reason, - the truth tests have little value. Different
fields of - thought find different truths because their
- foundations are different.
- Where does truth lie? Beyond and above all
systems - of thought. How we approach truth is not the
bottom - line.