Title: The History of Management Thought
1The History of Management Thought
- MGT 336
- Week 7 Notes
- Mike Bejtlich
2Part Three
3Chapter Thirteen
4Hawthorne Studies
- Hawthorne Plant of Western Electric
- Subsidiary of the American Telephone and
Telegraph Company - The Social Person was not invented by these
studies, but was brought to a wider recognition
by those who interpreted the results. - The studies have been widely publicized,
misinterpreted, praised, and criticized over the
many years since the event.
5Hawthorne Plant History Time Line
- 1905 Western Electric moved to Cicero, Illinois
- Founder Enos Barton
- The Biggest Little Railway in the World
- 1914 Absorbed operations from New York Chicago
- Main manufacturer for Bell Telephone Laboratories
- Hawthorne Works included over 100 buildings
- Hawthorne Works was Western Electrics only
manufacturing facility.
6Hawthorne Plant History Time Line
- 1924-1933 Hawthorne Studies
- 1932-1938 Harvard researchers continued research
- Human Element is critical
- 1940 Peak production with 42,000 workers
employed - 1958 Western Electric Statistical Quality
Control Handbook - Hawthorne Plant History Time Line
7Illumination Studies 1924-1927
- The original research issue was the effect of
workplace illumination on worker productivity.
Those who came initially to Hawthorne were
electrical engineers from MIT.
8Illumination Studies 1924-1927
- After establishing performance baselines in three
departments, the researchers varied the level of
illumination. - Their conclusion Illumination appeared to have
no influence on input.
9Illumination Studies 1924-1927
- Another attempt was made with a control group and
a variable group, placed in separate buildings. - Again In this case output went up in both groups.
10Illumination Studies 1924-1927
- The illumination research was abandoned in 1927.
- One of the researchers, Charles E. Snow of MIT,
concluded there were too many variables and the
psychology of the human individual could have
been the most important one.
Charles E. Snow
11The Relay Assembly Test Room 1927-1933
- The studies could have been trashed at this
point, but Homer Hibarger one of he researchers
from Hawthorne, and George Pennock, assistant
works manager of Hawthorne, pushed for further
study.
Homer Hibarger
12The Relay Assembly Test Room 1927-1933
- Pennock had an excellent insight Supervision was
a better explanation.
George Pennock
13The Relay Assembly Test Room 1927-1933
- The participants were volunteers, knew the
objectives of the study, and were observed for a
short period in their regular department prior to
going to a separate room with their observer. - After eight months into the experiment, two of
the original participants were replaced.The Relay
Assembly Test Room 1927-1933
14The Relay Assembly Test Room 1927-1933
- A number of changes were introduced
- The incentive payment plan was changed such that
the relay assembly group was rewarded on their
output rather than on the output of the larger
relay assembly department. - Participants were told they could make more money
under this arrangement. - Participants were allowed to talk to each other
during the work day.The Relay one variation
15The Relay Assembly Test Room 1927-1933
- Rest periods were introduced.
- After eight months, two operators quit and two
new ones were selected. - Work-day and work-week changed.
- Lunch and refreshments were provided by the
company.
16The Relay Assembly Test Room 1927-1933
- Over a year after the studies began, all of these
privileges, except the small group payment
plan, were removed. - While output varied, the overall trend was
increased output.
17Dr. Clair Turner, MIT Early Interpretation
- Dr. Clair Turner of MIT had an interpretation of
the test results - The small group resulted in more esprit de corps.
- Difference in the style of supervision relaxed
and friendly in the test room vs. he was
meanhe died I didnt even go to see him.
(Theresa Layman speaking of regular room
supervisor Frank Platenka)
18Dr. Clair Turner, MIT Early Interpretation
- Increased earnings average wage went from 16 to
28-50 per week while in the Test Room. - The novelty of the experiment.
- The attention given to the operators by others at
the plant.
19Second Relay Group
- A second relay group was formed by Turner in an
effort to test the pay for performance effects.
Average earnings per week had increased
significantly. - The second relay group was formed and taken from
the large group payment plan to the small group
one. Initially, output went up and then leveled
off. The study only lasted nine weeks. The group
was then returned to the original payment plan,
output dropped. That was the end of the second
group.Mica Splitting Tests 1928-1930
20Mica Splitting Tests 1928-1930
- Mica splitters had always been on individual pay
incentives and this group was studies for 14
months. - In this group, average hourly output went up
during this period. - Turner concluded that pay incentives were one
factor, but not the only one, although it was of
appreciable importance.Mica Splitting Tests
1928-1930
21The Interviewing Program 1929-1930
- Snow and Hibarger started asking the workers
directed questions about their feelings. - Elton Mayo (1880-1949) made a contribution by
changing the interviewing program to a
nondirective approach. He believed that
supervisors need to listen more.
22The Interviewing Program 1929-1930
- With the nondirective approach the length of the
interviews and the information gathered
increased. - There appeared to be a cathartic effect. After a
worker complained, follow-up interviews revealed
that the complaint was gone. The workers felt
better even though no change in conditions had
occurred. - Fact and sentiment had to be separated.
- Two levels of complaints
- Manifest what the employee said
- Latent the psychological content of the
complaint
23The Interviewing Program 1929-1930
- Complaints were symptoms to be explored.
- Pessimistic reveries (negative attitudes held
by employees that could interfere with their
performance according to Mayo) could be reduced
if supervisors were concerned and listened to
their employees. - Group Behavior Bank Wiring Test Room (1931-1932)
Elton Mayo
24Group Behavior Bank Wiring Test Room (1931-1932)
- Concerned observation, but not intervention, with
male workers assembling switches for central
office switchboards. - Restriction with output was a surprising finding
to Turner and W. Lloyd Warner even though
restriction of output had been described by
others.
25Group Behavior Bank Wiring Test Room (1931-1932)
- Workers had established an output norm that was
lower than managements standard or the bogey. - In the informal organization, there were two
cliques, each having norms about appropriate
in-group behavior, such as the practice of
binging.
26Group Behavior Bank Wiring Test Room (1931-1932)
- Researchers found that work groups
- Deliberately restricted output
- Smoothed out production
- Developed intragroup disciplinary methods
- Some workers were isolates, not in a clique,
because of various factors
27Group Behavior Bank Wiring Test Room (1931-1932)
- Rules for clique membership
- Do not work too fast. (Rate buster)
- Do not work too slowly. (Rate chiseler)
- Do not squeal on a member of your group.
- Do not act officious or be socially distant.
28Group Behavior Bank Wiring Test Room (1931-1932)
- Factory as a social organization work groups
served to protect the workers within their group,
and to protect the group from outsiders. - The workers
- Viewed technologists and managers as following a
logic of efficiency which interfered with group
activities. - Were apprehensive of authority and followed a
logic of sentiments which reflected their
feelings and attitudes toward outsiders.
29The Hawthorne Effect
- The Hawthorne Effect has been a part of human
relations folklore for years. - Allegedly, the findings were biased because the
experimenters became personally involved in the
social-work situation. - Theresa Layman, one of the participants, rebutted
this so did Don Chipman, one of the observer
experimenters. - The Hawthorne Effect is widely referenced, but is
a dubious explanation of the Hawthorne results.
30Human Relations
- Pessimistic reveries were one type of blockage
which arose out of personal, social, and
industrial problems and became manifest in
apprehension of authority, restriction of output,
etc. - Anomie, borrowed by Mayo from Emile Durkheim to
describe the break-up of traditional society,
leaving people without norms.
31What Happened to ATTs Bell System and Western
Electric?
- November 20, 1974 Antitrust suit charging
monopolization and conspiracy to monopolize. - 1984 ATT was ordered to divest its Bell System
and Western Electric divisions. - Lucent Technologies
- Bell Laboratories
32Current Use of Hawthorne Works
- 1983 Hawthorne Works converted into retail
space - Hawthorne Works Plaza
- Super K-Mart
- Dominicks Grocery Store
- The tower and a portion of the plant remains.
33Leadership
- In the view of Elton Mayo and Fritz
Roethlisberger, leadership needed strengthening
by social and human skills from the leader. - Influenced by Chester Barnard, Mayo concluded
that authority had to be based on social skills
in securing cooperation. - Management needed to focus more on building group
integrity and solidarity. - First line supervisors were particularly
important in good worker-manager relations.
34Motivation
- Motivation in the human relations literature
evolved and became more Mayo and Roethlisbergers
advocacy rather than based on what happened at
the Hawthorne Plant.
Fritz J. Roethlisberger
35Motivation
- Early reports, such as Clair Turners report and
Mark Putnams statement to Business Week, placed
money as important. - The test room participants stated they liked the
fact they were able to make more money.
36Motivation
- As time passed, the Mayo-Roethlisberger theme
shifted - Roethlisbergers memo that Mayo would be happy
because of some evidence that physiological, not
economic, factors were related to output. - More emphasis in later writings is placed on
social belonging needs, being accepted by the
group. - A later quote regarding discarding economic
man. (See Wren text for further discussion of
this point).
37Summary
- The Hawthorne Studies, began as an investigation
into the relationship between illumination and
worker productivity, evolved into a study of the
increased output unrelated to lighting. - Improved performance was due to
- Incentive payments
- Style of the supervisor.
- The human relations-oriented supervisor could
satisfy the social needs of humans and the
economic needs of the organization.