The History of Management Thought - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 37
About This Presentation
Title:

The History of Management Thought

Description:

'The Social Person' was not invented by these studies, but was ... Do not act officious or be socially distant. Group Behavior: Bank Wiring Test Room (1931-1932) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:560
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 38
Provided by: juliat2
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The History of Management Thought


1
The History of Management Thought
  • MGT 336
  • Week 7 Notes
  • Mike Bejtlich


2
Part Three
  • Social Person Era

3
Chapter Thirteen
  • The Hawthorne Studies

4
Hawthorne Studies
  • Hawthorne Plant of Western Electric
  • Subsidiary of the American Telephone and
    Telegraph Company
  • The Social Person was not invented by these
    studies, but was brought to a wider recognition
    by those who interpreted the results.
  • The studies have been widely publicized,
    misinterpreted, praised, and criticized over the
    many years since the event.

5
Hawthorne Plant History Time Line
  • 1905 Western Electric moved to Cicero, Illinois
  • Founder Enos Barton
  • The Biggest Little Railway in the World
  • 1914 Absorbed operations from New York Chicago
  • Main manufacturer for Bell Telephone Laboratories
  • Hawthorne Works included over 100 buildings
  • Hawthorne Works was Western Electrics only
    manufacturing facility.

6
Hawthorne Plant History Time Line
  • 1924-1933 Hawthorne Studies
  • 1932-1938 Harvard researchers continued research
  • Human Element is critical
  • 1940 Peak production with 42,000 workers
    employed
  • 1958 Western Electric Statistical Quality
    Control Handbook
  • Hawthorne Plant History Time Line

7
Illumination Studies 1924-1927
  • The original research issue was the effect of
    workplace illumination on worker productivity.
    Those who came initially to Hawthorne were
    electrical engineers from MIT.

8
Illumination Studies 1924-1927
  • After establishing performance baselines in three
    departments, the researchers varied the level of
    illumination.
  • Their conclusion Illumination appeared to have
    no influence on input.

9
Illumination Studies 1924-1927
  • Another attempt was made with a control group and
    a variable group, placed in separate buildings.
  • Again In this case output went up in both groups.

10
Illumination Studies 1924-1927
  • The illumination research was abandoned in 1927.
  • One of the researchers, Charles E. Snow of MIT,
    concluded there were too many variables and the
    psychology of the human individual could have
    been the most important one.

Charles E. Snow
11
The Relay Assembly Test Room 1927-1933
  • The studies could have been trashed at this
    point, but Homer Hibarger one of he researchers
    from Hawthorne, and George Pennock, assistant
    works manager of Hawthorne, pushed for further
    study.

Homer Hibarger
12
The Relay Assembly Test Room 1927-1933
  • Pennock had an excellent insight Supervision was
    a better explanation.

George Pennock
13
The Relay Assembly Test Room 1927-1933
  • The participants were volunteers, knew the
    objectives of the study, and were observed for a
    short period in their regular department prior to
    going to a separate room with their observer.
  • After eight months into the experiment, two of
    the original participants were replaced.The Relay
    Assembly Test Room 1927-1933

14
The Relay Assembly Test Room 1927-1933
  • A number of changes were introduced
  • The incentive payment plan was changed such that
    the relay assembly group was rewarded on their
    output rather than on the output of the larger
    relay assembly department.
  • Participants were told they could make more money
    under this arrangement.
  • Participants were allowed to talk to each other
    during the work day.The Relay one variation

15
The Relay Assembly Test Room 1927-1933
  • Rest periods were introduced.
  • After eight months, two operators quit and two
    new ones were selected.
  • Work-day and work-week changed.
  • Lunch and refreshments were provided by the
    company.

16
The Relay Assembly Test Room 1927-1933
  • Over a year after the studies began, all of these
    privileges, except the small group payment
    plan, were removed.
  • While output varied, the overall trend was
    increased output.

17
Dr. Clair Turner, MIT Early Interpretation
  • Dr. Clair Turner of MIT had an interpretation of
    the test results
  • The small group resulted in more esprit de corps.
  • Difference in the style of supervision relaxed
    and friendly in the test room vs. he was
    meanhe died I didnt even go to see him.
    (Theresa Layman speaking of regular room
    supervisor Frank Platenka)

18
Dr. Clair Turner, MIT Early Interpretation
  • Increased earnings average wage went from 16 to
    28-50 per week while in the Test Room.
  • The novelty of the experiment.
  • The attention given to the operators by others at
    the plant.

19
Second Relay Group
  • A second relay group was formed by Turner in an
    effort to test the pay for performance effects.
    Average earnings per week had increased
    significantly.
  • The second relay group was formed and taken from
    the large group payment plan to the small group
    one. Initially, output went up and then leveled
    off. The study only lasted nine weeks. The group
    was then returned to the original payment plan,
    output dropped. That was the end of the second
    group.Mica Splitting Tests 1928-1930

20
Mica Splitting Tests 1928-1930
  • Mica splitters had always been on individual pay
    incentives and this group was studies for 14
    months.
  • In this group, average hourly output went up
    during this period.
  • Turner concluded that pay incentives were one
    factor, but not the only one, although it was of
    appreciable importance.Mica Splitting Tests
    1928-1930

21
The Interviewing Program 1929-1930
  • Snow and Hibarger started asking the workers
    directed questions about their feelings.
  • Elton Mayo (1880-1949) made a contribution by
    changing the interviewing program to a
    nondirective approach. He believed that
    supervisors need to listen more.

22
The Interviewing Program 1929-1930
  • With the nondirective approach the length of the
    interviews and the information gathered
    increased.
  • There appeared to be a cathartic effect. After a
    worker complained, follow-up interviews revealed
    that the complaint was gone. The workers felt
    better even though no change in conditions had
    occurred.
  • Fact and sentiment had to be separated.
  • Two levels of complaints
  • Manifest what the employee said
  • Latent the psychological content of the
    complaint

23
The Interviewing Program 1929-1930
  • Complaints were symptoms to be explored.
  • Pessimistic reveries (negative attitudes held
    by employees that could interfere with their
    performance according to Mayo) could be reduced
    if supervisors were concerned and listened to
    their employees.
  • Group Behavior Bank Wiring Test Room (1931-1932)

Elton Mayo
24
Group Behavior Bank Wiring Test Room (1931-1932)
  • Concerned observation, but not intervention, with
    male workers assembling switches for central
    office switchboards.
  • Restriction with output was a surprising finding
    to Turner and W. Lloyd Warner even though
    restriction of output had been described by
    others.

25
Group Behavior Bank Wiring Test Room (1931-1932)
  • Workers had established an output norm that was
    lower than managements standard or the bogey.
  • In the informal organization, there were two
    cliques, each having norms about appropriate
    in-group behavior, such as the practice of
    binging.

26
Group Behavior Bank Wiring Test Room (1931-1932)
  • Researchers found that work groups
  • Deliberately restricted output
  • Smoothed out production
  • Developed intragroup disciplinary methods
  • Some workers were isolates, not in a clique,
    because of various factors

27
Group Behavior Bank Wiring Test Room (1931-1932)
  • Rules for clique membership
  • Do not work too fast. (Rate buster)
  • Do not work too slowly. (Rate chiseler)
  • Do not squeal on a member of your group.
  • Do not act officious or be socially distant.

28
Group Behavior Bank Wiring Test Room (1931-1932)
  • Factory as a social organization work groups
    served to protect the workers within their group,
    and to protect the group from outsiders.
  • The workers
  • Viewed technologists and managers as following a
    logic of efficiency which interfered with group
    activities.
  • Were apprehensive of authority and followed a
    logic of sentiments which reflected their
    feelings and attitudes toward outsiders.

29
The Hawthorne Effect
  • The Hawthorne Effect has been a part of human
    relations folklore for years.
  • Allegedly, the findings were biased because the
    experimenters became personally involved in the
    social-work situation.
  • Theresa Layman, one of the participants, rebutted
    this so did Don Chipman, one of the observer
    experimenters.
  • The Hawthorne Effect is widely referenced, but is
    a dubious explanation of the Hawthorne results.

30
Human Relations
  • Pessimistic reveries were one type of blockage
    which arose out of personal, social, and
    industrial problems and became manifest in
    apprehension of authority, restriction of output,
    etc.
  • Anomie, borrowed by Mayo from Emile Durkheim to
    describe the break-up of traditional society,
    leaving people without norms.

31
What Happened to ATTs Bell System and Western
Electric?
  • November 20, 1974 Antitrust suit charging
    monopolization and conspiracy to monopolize.
  • 1984 ATT was ordered to divest its Bell System
    and Western Electric divisions.
  • Lucent Technologies
  • Bell Laboratories

32
Current Use of Hawthorne Works
  • 1983 Hawthorne Works converted into retail
    space
  • Hawthorne Works Plaza
  • Super K-Mart
  • Dominicks Grocery Store
  • The tower and a portion of the plant remains.

33
Leadership
  • In the view of Elton Mayo and Fritz
    Roethlisberger, leadership needed strengthening
    by social and human skills from the leader.
  • Influenced by Chester Barnard, Mayo concluded
    that authority had to be based on social skills
    in securing cooperation.
  • Management needed to focus more on building group
    integrity and solidarity.
  • First line supervisors were particularly
    important in good worker-manager relations.

34
Motivation
  • Motivation in the human relations literature
    evolved and became more Mayo and Roethlisbergers
    advocacy rather than based on what happened at
    the Hawthorne Plant.

Fritz J. Roethlisberger
35
Motivation
  • Early reports, such as Clair Turners report and
    Mark Putnams statement to Business Week, placed
    money as important.
  • The test room participants stated they liked the
    fact they were able to make more money.

36
Motivation
  • As time passed, the Mayo-Roethlisberger theme
    shifted
  • Roethlisbergers memo that Mayo would be happy
    because of some evidence that physiological, not
    economic, factors were related to output.
  • More emphasis in later writings is placed on
    social belonging needs, being accepted by the
    group.
  • A later quote regarding discarding economic
    man. (See Wren text for further discussion of
    this point).

37
Summary
  • The Hawthorne Studies, began as an investigation
    into the relationship between illumination and
    worker productivity, evolved into a study of the
    increased output unrelated to lighting.
  • Improved performance was due to
  • Incentive payments
  • Style of the supervisor.
  • The human relations-oriented supervisor could
    satisfy the social needs of humans and the
    economic needs of the organization.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com