Learning objectives - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 22
About This Presentation
Title:

Learning objectives

Description:

The transmission of information through the medium of numbers ... Ogive - Cumulative frequencies. Cum. Time Freq. Freq. 40-45 4 4. 45-50 13 17. 50-55 17 34 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:76
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: Jon121
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Learning objectives


1
Learning objectives
  • Be better able to present tables and graphs so
    that the information contained in them is
    immediately apparent to users
  • Be able to tackle the problem of analysing data
    systematically

2
Data Communication
  • The transmission of information through the
    medium of numbers
  • Usually in the form of tables, graphs or other
    pictorial methods
  • A manager usually encounters data in business
    reports, management information systems,
    accounting data, self-generated data
  • Objective is to ensure that main patterns and
    exceptions in the data are immediately evident

3
Rules For Data Presentation
  • Round the numbers to 2 effective figures
  • Reorder the numbers
  • Interchange rows and columns (when desirable)
  • Use summary measures (averages but not totals)
  • Minimise the use of space, and lines
  • Clear (but unobtrusive) labelling
  • Verbal summary (of main patterns)
  • (Rules1, 5, 6, 7 are applicable to accounting
    data)

4
Rule 1 Round the numbers to 2 effective figures
  • E.g. 34.8 ? 18.3 35 ? 18 ? 2
  • E.g. 1382 1400 721 720
    79.311 79 17.1 17
    4.2 4.2 2.32 2.3
  • E.g. 11242 11240 11327 11330 11231 11230

5
Rule 2 Reorder the numbers
  • Arrange in size order, so that patterns are
  • more easily seen
  • One of the columns or rows of the table
  • The averages of the columns or rows
  • Something external to the table, e.g.
    geographically
  • NOTE Alphabetic order may be useful for detail
  • information, but not for management information.

6
Rule 3 Interchange Rows and Columns
  • Important comparisons should be down
  • columns not along rows. This makes it easier
  • to compare numbers and detect trends.
  • Example 570 430 99 260 570 430
    99
  • 260

7
Rule 4 Use Summary Measures
  • Averages for rows and columns
  • This makes it easier to compare rows (columns)
    and to spot quickly figures within rows
    (columns), which are above or below average.
  • A total is not a summary measure, as it is of a
    different order of magnitude than the individual
    numbers.

8
Rule 5 Minimise the use of space and lines
  • Numbers should be close together for ease of
    comparison, gaps interfere with the ability to
    see trends.
  • Grid lines should just be used to separate one
    type of number from another, e.g. summary row
    from the rest.

9
Rule 6 Labelling should be clear but unobtrusive
  • E.g. Avoid abbreviations and obscure labels
    which may be unfamiliar to the reader.Rule 7
    Use a verbal summary
  • This helps direct attention to the main features
    of the data

10
Accounting Data - Presentation
  • They have a standard logical sequence
  • There is a convention and tradition
  • Apply Rules 1, 5, 6 7 only
  • Summarise as far as possible
  • The best solution is often to have 2 sets of
    accounts
  • Source material for legal requirements and
    financial experts
  • Communicating document to provide financial
    information to shareholders and non-accountants.

11
Data Presentation-Graphs
  • Graphs are good when
  • Attracting attention and adding variety to a long
    list of tables communicating very simple
    patterns
  • Graphs are not good when
  • Communicating even slightly complex patterns
    being used for reference purposes

12
Pie Charts
  • Sales by Dept and Year (m)
  • 1995 1996 1997
  • Clothing 1.7 1.4 1.4
  • Furniture 3.4 4.9 5.6
  • Electrical 0.2 0.4 0.5
  • Total 5.3 6.7 7.5
  • relative size
  • categorical data

13
Bar Chart
14
Histograms
  • For grouped frequency tables
  • The horizontal axis is a continuous scale
  • It is the area of the bars that is being compared
  • Time Frequency Time Frequency
  • 40-45 4 55-60 44
  • 45-50 13 60-65 59
  • 50-55 17 65-70 7

15
(No Transcript)
16
Ogive - Cumulative frequencies
  • Cum.
  • Time Freq. Freq.
  • 40-45 4 4
  • 45-50 13 17
  • 50-55 17 34
  • 55-60 44 78
  • 60-65 59 137
  • 65-70 7 144

17
Data Analysis
  • Finding out what real information, if any, a set
    of numbers contains
  • Management problems with data analysis
  • The statistical gap
  • Lack of confidence
  • Over-complication by the experts

18
Guidelines For Data Analysis
  • Reduce The Data Re-present The Data
  • Build A Model- Find a pattern that can be
    expressed simply, E.g.
  • Row averages are all equal, but with ? 10
    variation within each row
  • Column 1 (y) is related to column 2 (x) by the
    equation y 2.71x 3.34
  • Exceptions
  • Comparisons

19
Alcohol Consumption across U.S.A.
  • Objective of Analysis Measure the variation in
    consumption across the USA and detect any areas
    where there are distinct differences.
  • Stage 1 Reduce the data. E.g. Why population,
    total consumption and per capita figures?
  • Stage 2 Re-present the data
  • Rule 1. Reduce to 2 effective figures. Accuracy
    to 8 figures is spurious considering the way
    figures like these are collected.

20
  • Rule 2. Reorder states in decreasing population
    order, enabling consumption which is out of line
    with a states population to be easily spotted.
  • Rule 3. Interchange rows and columns. - not
    necessary here.
  • Rule 4. Use summary measures. With reduction of
    the data this is not necessary here either.
  • Rule 5. Minimise use of space and lines - divide
    into groups of 5.
  • Rule 6. Labelling clear but unobtrusive.
  • Rule 7. Verbal summary.

21
  • Stage 3. Build a model.E.g. Per capita
    consumption is about equal to the average for all
    licensed states (2.1 wine galls. per year) ?
    30. The pattern one year earlier is much the
    same, except that overall consumption has
    increased by about 0.6 during this time.
  • Stage 4. Exceptions
  • District of Columbia(6.5), Nevada (7.2), and
    Alaska (3.6).

22
  • Stage 5. Comparison
  • A comparison between 1975 and 1976 is provided.
    Other useful data would be
  • Earlier years e.g. 1965, 1970.
  • Breakdown into consumption by different types of
    beverage
  • Changes of population in the various states over
    the same time
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com