Title: Baltic Tangent seminar
1Baltic Tangentseminar
- 20.-21.06.2005
- Erkki Jaakkola
- matrex oy
2matrex oy(Management Transportation Experts
Matrex Oy)
- STAN, The Modelling Software
- Frisbee (STAN application)
- And cases
3An overview of the services and resources of
Matrex Oy
- Matrex Oy specialises in transportation systems
and management consulting. The companys
operating principle is to work together with
clients and to enable them to carry out projects
independently. Matrex Oy provides
state-of-the-art know-how and support services. - Matrex Oy, established in 1993, has special
expertise in strategic transportation planning
and analyses at national, regional and city
levels. Matrex Oy has excellent competence in the
fields of transport demand models and pavement
management systems. - Matrex Oy is the distributor of the EMME/2 and
STAN software packages in Finland, and provides
training their use. These packages support an
integrated state-of-the-art approach to passenger
and freight transport planning and analysis.
4Personnel and Expertise
- Matrex Oy has always emphasised high quality
expertise, provided by the following persons - Mr. Tapani Särkkä (M Sc. in Civil Engineering,
the chairman of the board) is responsible for
Matrex Oy administration, transportation system
planning, distribution of EMME/2 and STAN
software and training - Mr. Erkki Jaakkola (M Sc. in Civil Engineering,
the financial director) is responsible for
freight transportation systems planning and STAN
applications. - Mr. Petri Blomqvist (M Sc. in Systems and
Operations Research, Project Manager) is
responsible for transport modelling, programming
and data base applications (e.g. Oracle) - Mr. Ville Koskinen (M Sc. in Systems and
Operations Research, Project Manager) specialises
in transport modelling, programming and data base
applications - Mr. Petja Partanen (M Sc. in Civil Engineering,
transport planner, specialises in public transit,
EMME/2 macro programming, and is responsible for
the companys publications)
5Markets and Clients
- The main markets are in the public sector, there
the big organizations - Ministry of Transport and Communication (MinTC)
- Finnish Road Administration (FinnRA)
- Finnish Civil Aviation Administration (FCAA)
- Finnish Railway Administration
- Cities and municipalities
- Helsinki Metropolitan Area Cooperation Council
(YTV) - Provinces
- Etc.
- Matrex acts often as a subcontractor for other
consultants - Foreign clients include the Portuguese Road
Administration (IEP), DGTREN/EU, COWI (DK), SIKA
(SE), SINTEF (NO), TIS (P) - Matrex has had cooperation with SAP Finland,
Accenture and BPS Finland among others
6The Modelling software (STAN)
- STAN Strategic Transportation ANalysisThe
objective of STAN is to assist the strategic
planning of multiproduct multimode transportation
systems. The aim is to correctly represent the
elements of the system, to capture their
interactions, and to obtain an overall estimation
of the movements of most (all) products, by
most (all) of the modes available, following
various assignment criteria and scenario
definitions.The modelling approach as well as
the initial version of STAN, were developed in
the late 80s at the Center for Research on
Transportation (C.R.T.) of the University of
Montréal. Since 1988, technical support and
development has been provided by INRO Consultants
(www.inro.ca)
7Model components (STAN)
8Model components (STAN)
Functions attempt to capture the criteria used to
determine how traffic is moved over the network,
and may include factors relative to travel costs
and time, congestion phenomena, environmental
preoccupations, energy prices, or any other
performance measure
9Network elements (STAN)hierarchy and attributes
!
10STANInput and output of a multiproduct multimode
assignment
The demand is assigned on the networks minimizing
the system costs (system optimum). During the
assignment the whole transport chain is
considered both the optimum route and optimum
modes will be found and used.
11STAN
- A typical use of the strategic freight model is
the comparison and evaluation of alternatives. - The contemplated alternatives usually represent
anticipated or predicted variations in the origin
to destination demands for the products
considered, major changes to the transportation
infrastructure or technology, or modifications to
the regulatory or economic (e.g. energy prices)
environment. - Usually, an existing situation is described by
one of the scenarios in the data bank (base
scenario). A simulation of the freight flows is
carried out. - Future situations are described by other
scenarios. The simulation of freight flows is
carried out on these scenarios as well. - Then flows, link costs and delays, inter modal
shipments and other performance indicators may be
compared with those of the base scenario in order
to carry out various analyses and comparison
evaluations.
12Freight Transport Model in the Baltic Sea and
Barents Regions (STAN application)
13FRISBEE
14FRISBEE Background
15FRISBEE Objectives and the scope
16FRISBEEContents
- Truck/Road
- Train/Rail
- Inland waterways
- Truck-Ferry (Ro-Ro)
- Car Truck Ferry
- Bulk (tramp traffic)
- LO-LO
- Rail-Ferry, RO-RO
- (Gas and oil pipe)
- (Air cargo)
Unit costs in the model denote all factors
affecting transport volumes and particularly the
route choice of freight transport, which can be
described as commensurable
17FRISBEE Supply Road Network (for truck mode)
18FRISBEE SupplyRoad Network in Poland
19FRISBEE SupplyNetwork
20FRISBEE Supply Rail network (for train mode)
21FRISBEE Supply Sea network (bulk, tramp traffic)
22FRISBEE Supply Sea network (truck ferry and
Lo-Lo shipping routes)
23FRISBEE Zones (215)The demand of freight has
its origins and destinations in zones, which are
connected to the transport networks.
24FRISBEE Demand Commodity groups from zone to
zone (area to area)export and import of
countriesThe products to be transported are
aggregated to 12 commodities, which have similar
characteristics.
(1.) A Food and live animals (2.) B Beverages
and tobacco (3.) C Crude materials, inedible,
except fuels (4.) D Mineral fuels, lubricants
(exl. gas) (5.) E Animal and vegetable oils,
fats and waxes (6.) F Chemicals and related
products, n.e.s. (7.) G Paper and paper
manufactures (8.) H Manufactured goods of
metals (9.) I Manufactured goods (exl. paper and
metal) (10.) J Machinery and transport equipment
(exl. electr. etc) (11.) K Miscellaneous
manufactured articles (exl. electr. etc) (12.) L
Office machines, apparatus and instruments
25FRISBEE Demand Commodity groups
(1) A Food and live animals Live animals Meat and
meat preparations Dairy products and birds
eggs Fish (not marine mammals) and preparations
thereof Cereals and cereal preparations Vegetables
and fruit Sugars, sugar preparations and
honey Coffee, tea, cocoa, spices, and
manufactures thereof Feeding stuff for animals
(not including unmilled cereals) Miscellaneous
edible products and preparations (2) B Beverages
and tobacco Beverages Tobacco and tobacco
manufactures (3) C Raw materials, inedible,
except fuels Hides, skins and fur skins,
raw Oil-seeds and oleaginous fruit Crude rubber
(including synthetic and reclaimed) Cork and
wood Pulp and waste paper Textile fibres and
their waste Crude fertilizers and crude
minerals Metalferous ore and metal scrap Crude
animal and vegetable materials (4) D Mineral
fuels, inedible, execpt fuels Coal, coke and
briquettes Petroleum, petroleum products and
related materials (5) E Animal and vegetable
oils, fats, waxes Animal oils and fats Fixed
vegetable oils and fats, refined or
fractionated Animal or vegetable oils and fats,
processed (6) F Chemicals and related
products Organic chemicals Inorganic
chemicals Dyeing, tanning and colouring
materials Medicinal and pharmaceutical
products Essential oils, resinoids and perfume
materials Fertilizers Plastics in primary
forms Plastics in non-primary forms Chemical
materials and product
(7) G Paper, paper board, paper pulp Paper and
paperboard and articles thereof (8) H Metal
products Iron and steel Non-ferrous
metals Manufactures of metals (9) I Manufactured
goods Leather, leather manufactures and dressed
fur skins Rubber manufactures Cork and wood
manufactures (excluding furniture) Textile yarn,
fabrics, made-up articles Non-metallic mineral
manufactures (10) J Machinery Power-generating
machinery and equipment Machinery specialized for
particular industries Metalworking
machinery General industrial machinery and
equipment Road vehicles Other transport
equipment (11) K Miscellaneous manufactured
items Prefabricated buildings sanitary,
plumbing, heating and lighting fixtures and
fittings Furniture and parts thereof Travel
goods, handbags and similar containers Articles
of apparel and clothing accessories Footwear Misce
llaneous manufactured articles (12) L Valuable
machinery, manufactured articles Office machines
and automatic data-processing machines Telecommuni
cations and sound-recording and reproducing
apparatus and equipment Electrical machinery,
apparatus and appliances Professional, scientific
and controlling instruments and
apparatus Photographic apparatus, equipment and
supplies and optical goods
26FRISBEE Demand Aggregated (Total) Frisbee
demand, 1000 t/a(Derived from Eurostat, year
1995)Russia data, year 2001/2003
27FRISBEE Demand(1000 t/a)
28FRISBEE Demand (1000 t/a)
29FRISBEE Demand (1000 t/a)
30FRISBEE Demand Exports from one zone in Finland
(excl. Russia)
31FRISBEE Demand Import from Russia to one zone
in Finland (y. 2000)
32FRISBEE Cost components in functions
- By mode, by commodity and by country, for links
and transfers (defined at market price) - for the transport phase (euros/ton-km) and for
the terminal phase (euros/ton) - Operation costs (Average)
-
- The level of service
- Risk of damage
- Reliability
- Value of goods
- Transport time (Average lead time)
- Frequency (sea transport)
Unit costs in the model denote all factors
affecting transport volumes and particularly the
route choice of freight transport, which can be
described as commensurable.
Operating costs are not the only factors
affecting the mode and route of transport in
long-distance freight flows!
33FRISBEE Cost components
The relative value of unit cost components for
every commodity in relation to the operation cost
of commodity H (1, metal products).
34FRISBEE Cost components
Operating costs in the Frisbee model for every
mode, cents per ton km (base year 2000). (The
unit cost depends on the commodity group)
35FRISBEE Possible Frisbee applications in
analysis
36FRISBEE Some development case studies
- Reduced fairway dues
- Road fees on TEN -road network
- Corridor 9A Freight Model (Corridor II)
- PolCorridor
- Klaipeda Port Study
- Swedish Transit Freight Matrices
- EUVELI-project
- Transport connections between the EU and Russia.
Current status and outlook for the future - SRLog (Work Package 2), (one case touch on Via
Baltic connection)
37FRISBEE Development case studies
- SRLog (Work Package 2)
- (one case touch on Via Baltic connection)
- The logistics and the location of the three
regions, EKES, Umeå and Wielkopolska, as a part
of the European logistical freight markets
infrastructure and freight flows using railway
transport regional needs and possibilities for
location oriented business and entrepreneurship,
taking advantage of good railway connections and
transport potentials
Very rough estimation!!
X EKES
X Berlin
X Wiel.
Freight flows between Berlin-EKES and
Wielkopolska-EKES. The unit costs were calculated
for the Baltic Sea route and for Via Baltica
(road and rail).
38FRISBEE case Via Baltic connection (SRLog
project)Improved connections and faster border
crossing
Very rough estimation!!
Assumptions on Via Baltic connection
- The border crossing formalities are assumed to
be at the same level as they generally are in
Europe (road and rail). - The speed of trains is assumed to be three times
faster than it is today. - The bogie is being changed in the border of
Kaliningrad and Poland (different rail gauge). - It is also assumed that there is train ferry
going between Helsinki and Tallinn.
39FRISBEE case Via Baltic connection (SRLog
project)
Unit price index of transport from Berlin and
Wielkopolska to EKES-region for food products
(group A). Transport by sea is 100. Road and rail
transports are through Tallinn.
Train transport through Kaliningrad and Tallinn
is still slightly more expensive alternative and
also pricier than road transport. Even if the
operating costs of train are less than for
trucks, the handling times at port and terminals
(ships, trains) are longer than in road
transport. The change of gauge takes time and
causes more costs of trains, too.
Very rough estimation!!
40FRISBEE case Via Baltic connection (SRLog
project)
Transport time index of transport from
Wielkopolska to EKES -region. Transport by sea is
100.
Via Baltica, after the improvements of service
level, will be speedier (but slightly more
expensive) than the sea route for the freight
between Wielkopolska and Finland
Very rough estimation!!
41FRISBEE case Via Baltic connection (SRLog
project)
Very rough estimation!!
Commodity group C (e.g. paper mass, metal scrap)
Commodity group A (daily goods)
The best routes from Southern Finland. Shadowed
areas Via Baltica will be used The Baltic Sea
and port of Gdansk will be used.
The best routes from Southern Finland. Shadowed
areas Via Baltica will be used The Baltic Sea
and port of Gdansk will be used
Via Baltica will provide a competitive
alternative for transports to Eastern Europe,
where transport speed is important. Sea transport
will remain competitive for transports between
Finland and Germany (Berlin).
42FRISBEE case SRLog What will happen if the
operating costs (market prices) in road transport
would rise 10, 15, 20 and 30 in Poland?
Sensitivity of changes in the share of transport
work (ton km) of road and rail transports if the
operating cost increases on Polish roads (does
not apply to domestic transport)
A Food (daily goods) F Chemicals and related
products (dangerous goods) K Miscellaneous
manufactured articles (e.g. furniture)
43FRISBEE case Corridor 9A with corridor II
Russian export and import freight flows to, from
and through St. Petersburg and Leningrad Oblast
- Assuptions
- 1. Corridori II Moscow Berlin has
- A road connection of motorway class
- Direct unit train service Moscow Warsaw
Berlin - Border delays the same as at EU external borders
in general (2 hours). - 2. Corridor 9 A has similar infrastructure
(motorway and fast railway)
44FRISBEE case Corridor 9A with corridor II
Russian export and import freight flows to, from
and through St. Petersburg and Leningrad Oblast
Export on railway network / Corridor II
improved (Of the Russian export is included 66,6
milj. tonnes)
Export on railway network/ Corridor II not
improved (Of the Russian export is included 66,6
milj. tonnes)
45FRISBEE case Corridor 9A with corridor II
Comparison between current scenario and scenario
Corridor II improved
- Russian export (Of the Russian export is included
66,6 milj. tonnes) - Changes on railway network
- Increase Decline
Russian export (Of the Russian export is included
66,6 milj. tonnes) Changes of sea transport
Increase Decline
46FRISBEE case Corridor 9A with corridor II
How much Russian export must grow in order to
utilise fully the planned port expansions? (St.
Petersburg 60 -70 M tons, Ust Luga 35 M tons,
Vysotsk 10 M tons)
Export through the St. Petersburg Port (million
tons) under different transport system scenarios.
In Frisbee assignment the export (million tons)
of Russia was
66,6 66,6 66,6
100 133,2
166,5
Corridor II German prices
Corridor II Russian prices
47Freight Transport Tariffs
48FRISBEE case EUVELI Transport connections
between the EU and Russia. Current status and
outlook for the future
Russias main transport routes to the west
import, export and transit traffic in 2003,
million tonnes/year. Source Mahlin, 2004.
Scenario of Russias main transport route to the
west import, export and transit traffic in the
year 2030, million tonnes/year.
49FRISBEE case EUVELI (Transport connections
between the EU and Russia. Current status and
outlook for the future)
Russian export and import.
Decrease of transport volumes on other routes as
a result of a more efficient level of service on
the GermanyPoland-route (Corridor II). Unit
costs on the GermanyPoland-route between
Moscowthe Polish border A at the EU-level B at
the Russian level
50FRISBEE case EUVELI Transport connections
between the EU and Russia. Current status and
outlook for the future
index
Unit cost index of transport routes for three
different product groups between Central
GermanyMoscow. Unit cost of the Finnish route
(existing situation) is 100 for all product
groups. Unit costs on the GermanyPoland-route
between Moscowthe Polish border A at the
EU-level B at the Russian level
Transport time index of routes in freight
transport between Central Germany and
Moscow. Transport time for the Finnish route is
100.
51(No Transcript)
52How the Frisbee functions work?
- The unit cost (euros/ton) of a transport chain
for a possible transport route from Finland to
Germany. The freight model chooses the optimum
route and mode choice. The assumptions are - land transport 100 km both in Finland and
Germany - sea transport ca. 1 000 km
- two port operations
- Truck-ferry and Rail-ferry four times a week
- Bulk (tramp traffic) once in two weeks
- CarTruck-ferry once a day.
53FRISBEE Which areas are possible to reach from
a certain zone (here EKES) within xx hours (here
24 h) by one or more modes
The areas reached from EKES within 24 h by train.
(Average train speed 60 km/h in Finland)
The areas reached from EKES within 24 h by all
available modes (truck, train and all sea modes)
54FRISBEE caseReduced Fairway Dues
The fairway due, based on ship size and ice
class, was reduced by 50 in the Finnish
territorial waters in 2000/2001. Frisbee data
bank was tested with the same inputs.
Changes in railway network Increase
Decline
- Some results
- transito freight at the Russian border increased
by 2.5 4.0 million tons/year - this is in accordance with the real data
- truck freight increased by 0.5 million tons/year
- transport work increased inside Finland 400-600
million tonkms
Changes in seaway network Increase
Decline
55FRISBEE case Road fees on TEN-road network
- Higher road fees on TEN-road network, based on
the White Book of EU - Four values tested, min. 0.08 max. 0.36
EUR/vehiclekm
- Some results
- Total transport work of Export/Import in the
Frisbee area will increase 416 bill. ton km - Road transports in Finland will decrease 1535
- Rail transports in Finland will increase 1025
- Total transportation costs in the system will
increase 1.3 3.0 (12 bill. EUR/year) - Cost components related to level of service
(reliability, risk of damage, frequency) will
increase 917