Title: Brown vs. The Board of Education
1Brown vs.The Board of Education
Return to ACA Return to Portfolio TOC (link will
only work if in view show mode
- Dave Baniszewski
- Mike Bryant
- Helen Reyes
- David Rutledge
- EDUC 845
- Liberty University
2The escalation of segregation in the South began
immediately after the Civil War.
3The Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments, along
with the two Civil Rights Acts of 1866 and 1875
and the various Enforcements Acts of the early
1870s, curtailed the ability of southern whites
to formally deprive blacks of their civil rights.
4(No Transcript)
5The decade of the 1880s was characterized by mob
lynchings and a vicious system of convict prison
farms and chain gains
6(No Transcript)
7In 1890 Louisiana passes the infamous Jim Crow
law mandating separate but equal accommodations
for blacks and whites
8By 1910, every state of the former Confederacy
had adopted laws that segregated all aspects of
life wherein blacks and whites might socially
mingle or come into contact.
9(No Transcript)
10Impoverished and often illiterate southern blacks
were in a weak position in the 1890s for
confronting the racist culture of Jim Crow.
11The Land mark Supreme Court's in 1896 Plessy v.
Ferguson
12By 1905, the issue of how to most effectively
deal with Jim Crow came to a head in the debate
between the followers of Booker T. Washington and
W.E.B. Du Bois.
In the 1930s, the NAACP, began to focus more of
its attention on a campaign to challenge
segregation
13(No Transcript)
14Segregation in Education
15After the Civil War, the southern states
scrambled to recover and keep the public school
system alive. Ultimately this effort created a
dual educational system based on race.
Schools were anything but equal
16Case Name Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537
(1896)Plaintiffs Homer Plessy Defendants
John H. Ferguson, judge of the criminal District
Court for the parish of Orleans Location New
Orleans, Louisiana Year Argued April 13, 1896
Decided May 18, 1896
Case Name State of Missouri ex rel. Gaines v.
Canada, 305 U.S. 337 (1938) Plaintiffs Lloyd
Gaines Defendants CANADA, REGISTRAR OF THE
UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI Location Missouri Year
Argued November 9, 1938 Decided December 12,
1938
Case Name Cumming v. Board of Education of
Richmond County, 175 U.S. 528 (1899) Plaintiffs
Cumming, Harper and Ladeveze Defendants The
Board of Education of Richmond County and Charles
S. Bohler, tax collector. Location Richmond
County Georgia Year Argued October 30, 1899
Decided December 18, 1899
Case Name Gong Lum v. Rice, 275 U.S. 78
(1927) Plaintiffs Gong Lum and Martha
Lum Defendants Superintendent of Education of
the State of Mississippi Location
Mississippi Year Argued October 12, 1927
Decided November 21, 1927 196
17Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas
- Argued Dec. 8, 1952
- Reargued Dec. 7, 1953
- Decided May 17, 1954
- Key Players
- Thurgood Marshall
- Rev. Oliver Brown
- Linda Brown
- Chief Justice Earl Warren
18Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas
- Several Cases Were Combined into One
- Delaware Belton v Gebhart
- Kansas Brown v Board of Education
- South Carolina Briggs v Elliot
- Virginia Davis v County School Board of Prince
- Edward County
- Washington, DC Bolling v Melvin Sharpe
-
19Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas
- Separate educational facilities are inherently
unequal.
20Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, KansasThe
Issue
- Schools approached equality in terms of
buildings, curricula, qualifications, and teacher
salaries. -
- Nevertheless, despite equality of objective
factors, intangible issues foster and maintain
inequality.
21Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas
- This case was not simply about children and
education. - This new law had far reaching social and
ideological implications that continue to be felt
throughout the nation and the world. - The struggle for Human Rights throughout the
world can trace its roots back to this case. - Reinforced the supremacy of the power of the
people in protecting natural rights from
arbitrary limitations imposed by governments.
22Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas
- The case did not abolish segregation in other
public areas, such as restaurants and restrooms,
nor did it place a time frame for implementation
of the law. - Other pioneers would take up the torch of freedom
and carry on the challenge.
23 1960s
24Greensboro Four
25Freedom Riders
26Segregation Forever
27Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.
28Bloody Sunday
29NOW Poll Tax Laws
30Justice Injustice
31Court Cases Legislation
- March Griggs v. Duke Power Company
- Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenberg Board of Education
- Palmer v. Thompson
- ERA
- Title IX Education Amendments
32Court Cases
- San Antonio Independent School District v.
Rodriguez - State Constitutional Challenges
- Public School Race Riots
- Education for All Handicapped Children Act
33Court Cases
- Affirmative Action
- Brown III
34Reagan Administration
- Emergency School Aid Act
- Los Angeles
- Segregation
- Desegregation
- Segregation Again
35Race Gender
361988
- Desegregations High Water Mark
37Board of Education v. Dowell 1991
38Reality vs. Assumptions
39Survey Says..
- Dont Do as I Do, Do As I Say
40Segregated? Not in My Neighborhood!
- Where Segregation Integration Occur
41School Segregation Current Trends Regular
Public School Enrollments by Race/Ethnicity and
Region, 2000 - 2001
Region Total Enrollment White Black Latino Asian Pacific Indian Alaskan
South 14,361,152 53.6 27.4 16.5 2.1 0.4
Border 3,478,610 71.0 20.6 3.3 1.9 3.3
Northeast 8,227,746 67.4 15.5 12.4 4.4 0.3
Midwest 9,837,237 76.3 14.4 6.0 2.3 0.9
West 10,785,326 50.5 6.6 33.0 7.8 2.1
Alaska 133,356 61.5 4.6 3.4 5.5 25.0
Hawaii 184,360 20.4 2.3 4.5 72.3 0.4
Bureau of Indian Affairs Schools 46,938 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0
U.S. Total 47,054,725 61.2 17.1 16.3 4.1 1.3
Reprinted with permission from the Civil Rights
Project, Harvard University
42The Affect of Shifting Demographics
43School Segregation Current Trends Racial
Composition of Schools Attended by the Average
Student of Each Race, 2001 - 2001
44Signs of Hope?
45Thirty Years and Counting.
46- Segregation is evil because it scars the soul of
both the segregated and the segregator. It gives
the segregated a false sense of inferiority and
it gives the segregator a false sense of
superiority. It does something to the soul.this
is why segregation is utterly evil and utterly
un-Christian. It substitutes an "I/It"
relationship for the "I/Thou" relationship.
Martin Luther King Jr.