Community Connections:

1
(No Transcript)
2
(No Transcript)
3
(No Transcript)
4
Community Connections A Transportation Vision
For The Next 25 Years Adopted METROPLAN
ORLANDO September 2004
5
TOPICS

• 2025 Transportation Vision
• Our Communitys Opinions
• Financial Resources
• The Plan Highways, Transit, Bicycle and
  Pedestrian Facilities
• Strategies- Now and in the Future

6
The Year 2025 Plans Vision

• Integrated Regional System
• Balanced Multi-Modal System
• System Safety
• Efficient Cost Effective System
• Quality of Life/Community Compatibility
• Environmental Sensitivity
• Economic Vitality

7
Community Opinions
8
Community Opinions
9

• FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY
• - Should we rely on new revenue sources?
• - Should we scale back projects to balance
• the costs versus revenues?

10
Financial Resources

• Projected Revenues to 2025 from Existing Funding
  Sources
• 7.2 Billion
• (Includes revenues from Turnpike Enterprise
  and Orlando-Orange County Expressway Authority)

11
Financial Costs

• Updated Project Costs from Previous Year 2020
  Plan
• 7.76 Billion

12
Funding Gap

• 500 Million Deficit

13
POTENTIAL LOCAL FUNDING SOURCES

• Local Infrastructure Sales Tax
• Significant revenue source for capital
  expenditures only
• Charter County Transit Surtax
• Eligible to fund both capital and OM expenses
• Estimated 20 year yield of half-cent levy Orange
  County - 3.5 Billion, Seminole County - 750
  million, Osceola County - 420 million
• Local Option Gas Tax
• Estimated 50 million available annually (6 cents
  Orange County 5 cents Seminole and Osceola
  County)
• Local Option Rental Car Surcharge
• Estimated 55 million annually (2 per day)

14
Year 2025 Plan Cost FeasibleFederal/State
Highway Projects

• Interstate 4
• SR 408
• SR 417
• SR 528
• Floridas Turnpike
• SR 429
• US 17-92
• US 192
• SR 46
• SR 50
• SR 415
• SR 434

15
2030 Expressway Master Plan (Draft) March 8, 2006
Presentation to METROPLAN
16
Work Plan FY 2006 to FY 2010
17
Improvements to Existing System -2010 to 2030
18
(No Transcript)
19
FEDERAL and STATE PROJECTS (Million)

• I-4 Orange/Seminole Co. Line to north of SR 434
• Right of Way Acquisition thru FY 2010/11
  151M
• SR 417 Extension - I-4 to International Parkway
• New 4-Lane Expressway
• Design in FY 2006/07 and 2007/08
  1.2M
• Construction in FY 2010/11
  11.4M
• SR 434 Montgomery/Wekiva Springs Road to I-4
• Widen to 6 Lanes
• Right of Way in FY 2006/07
  7M
• Construction in FY 2008/09
  4M
• SR 434 I-4 to Rangeline Road
• Widen to 6 Lanes
• Right of Way in FY 2007/08
  15M
• Construction in FY 2009/10
  9M
• SR 434 Maitland Boulevard to SR 436
• Widen to 6 Lanes
• Construction in FY 2006/07
  14M

20
LOCAL PROJECTS (Million)

• Bunnell Road Eden Park Road to West Towne
  Parkway
• Reconstruct to 3 Lanes with Bike Lanes
  Sidewalks
• Right of Way in FY 2006/07 2.0 M
• Construction in FY 2007/08 10.8M
• Rock Springs Road Ponkan Road to Kelly Park
  Road
• Widen to 4 Lanes
• Construction in FY 2006/07 6.6M
• Sand Lake Road Hunt Club Boulevard to SR 434
• Reconstruct to 4 Lanes with Bike Lanes
  Sidewalks
• Right of Way in FY 2006/2007 8.5M
• Construction in FY 2009/10 7.5M

21
EXPRESSWAY AUTHORITY PROJECTS (Million)

• Maitland Boulevard Ext. (John Land Apopka
  Expressway) - New 6 Lane Expressway
• First Phase SR 429/Western Beltway to
• Hiawassee Road
• Design/Construction beginning in FY 2007/08
  146.4M
• Second Phase Hiawassee Road to US 441
• Design/Construction beginning in FY 2007/08
  69.3M
• Future Phase SR 429/Western Beltway to
  US441 West
• Currently Unfunded

22
Highway System

• Deficient Roadways Increase 61
• Average Speed Decreases 14
• Vehicle Miles Traveled Per Capita Increase 12
• Vehicle Hours Traveled Per Capita Increase 30

23
RISING CONSTRUCTION COSTS(Source FDOT)

• 2003
  2006
• Concrete 549.82
  1,113.79
• Asphalt 53.93
  105.54
• Reinforcing Steel 0.52
  0.99
• Earthwork 4.96
  13.23

24
TRANSIT

• Establish a Transit Vision for the Orlando
  Urbanized Area

25
Regional Transit System Concept Plan
26
CONCEPT PLAN CONCLUSIONS

• Light Rail in I-4 corridor is core of regional
  transit system, best suited to local needs
• Rather than a rank order staging of each transit
  system component of the Concept Plan, each
  component or transit system segment should be
  advanced on its own merit and schedule as funding
  becomes available

27
Central Florida Commuter Rail Transit
28

• Ultimate Project
• Poinciana Blvd. in Osceola County to DeLand 61
  miles
• Phase 1
• Orlando Amtrak to DeBary 31 miles
• Phase 2
• Poinciana Blvd. to Amtrak 23 miles
• Final Phase
• DeBary to DeLand -
• 7 miles

2
29
OTHER STRATEGIES AND THEIR IMPLEMENTATION

• Management and Operations
• Land Use

30
MANAGEMENT AND OPERATION STRATEGIES

• Management of the Transportation System
• Bus bypass ramps, frontage roads, freeway ramp
  metering, incident management, parking control
• Management of the Transportation Demand
• Variable pricing, work schedule changes, CBD
  travel restrictions, limiting driveway access,
  freeway lane restrictions
• Intelligent Transportation Systems
• Traffic signal coordination, emergency vehicle
  signal preemption, transit signal priority,
  variable speed limits, traveler information
  systems

31
IMPACTS OF REGIONAL MO DEPLOYMENT ON 2025
TRANSPORTATION NETWORK

• Evaluated benefits of full implementation of
  management and operation strategies
• Transit ridership could increase between 5 and
  25
• VMT (vehicle miles of travel) could be reduced
  between 2 and 6
• Delay could be reduced between 8 and 15

32
YEAR 2025 LAND USE

• Adopted Land Use Forecasts Continuation of
  Existing Development Patterns

33
(No Transcript)
34
(No Transcript)
35
(No Transcript)
36
IN SUMMARY Although five years of growth and
demands on the regions transportation system
have been added, no additional funding has been
identified and costs have risen. The regions
purchasing power, in terms of transportation,
has decreased over time and is less today than it
was in 2000 and the gap between what is needed
and what is affordable continues to widen. If
the region continues down this path, the
resulting impact on mobility and quality of life
could be less than encouraging. Breaking this
trend will take bold new thinking.
37
HAVE A GREAT DAY!
METROPLANORLANDO.COM