Veto Wall Test - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Veto Wall Test

Description:

Purpose of veto wall : To exclude events which is from impurities of ... Since now : Examine the signals through the waveform taken by oscilloscope. 3. Contents ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:38
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: pasRoc
Category:
Tags: oscilloscope | test | veto | wall

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Veto Wall Test


1
Veto Wall Test
  • Hyupwoo Lee
  • MINERvA/Jupiter Group Meeting
  • June 20, 2007

2
Introduction
  • Purpose of veto wall To exclude events which is
    from impurities of neutrino beam.
  • How? Using a set of big scintillator panels
    with PMT forward and backward(?) of main
    detector.
  • My job Test panels and PMTs and figure out the
    characteristics of its signals.
  • Since now Examine the signals through the
    waveform taken by oscilloscope.

3
Contents
  • Position Test Examine the changing of signals
    with different hit position
  • Timing test Time characteristics of signal
    start position of signal in time domain
  • Cable length test observe the signals with
    different signal cable length

4
Position Test
  • Take data with only left hand side PMT
  • Sections row position - ½ of A and ½ of B,
    column position - 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14
  • Averaged signal waveform of 32 events
  • Use 2 small panels for trigger signal same for
    all the other test

5
Position Test result 1
  • Signal size decreases when the distance between
    PMT and hit position increases
  • Signal seems to be delayed with the distance

6
Position Test result 2
  • Signal size reaches over than 30pC

7
Timing Test
  • Sections C02, C08, C14
  • Single sample event
  • 2 different DAQ method
  • - Taking waveform from scope (25 samples for
    each section).
  • - Using math func. in scope (80 samples for
    each section)
  • 3 different way used for analysis
  • - 10 peak (signal volt) to 10 peak (trigger)
    same as scope math func.
  • - 10 of total charge (signal) to 10 peak
    (trigger)
  • - 200 fC (signal) to 10 peak (trigger)

8
Timing Test result 1
  • - Standard deviation of timing (signals falling
    edge to triggers falling edge) is 10ns
  • Signals are delayed by the length between hit
    position and PMT.
  • Scope cal. data for C14 is biased by data
    selection

9
Timing Test result 2
10
Cable Length Test
  • Sections C02, C08, C14
  • Averaged signal waveform of 256 events
  • Signal cable length for big panel varied with
    323cm (x1, x2, x3) using 3 same BNC cables.

11
Cable Length Test result 1
- As cable goes longer, signals are distorted a
little, but it seems OK. - As timing, shifting
the signal is roughly matched with cable delay
(5.5ns/m). - Roughly small signal (section C14
far from PMT) shows the same feature only but
amplitude.
12
Cable Length Test result 2
13
Plan for Future
  • FEB test for veto wall
  • Determine the setup of FEB for veto wall

14
Backup 1 (sample waveform)
Timing test C02 sample 3
15
Backup 2 (select event - scope cal.)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com